Critical Evaluation of Jozaghi and Andresen's (2013) Study on InSite Supervised Injection Facility

Research Paradigms and Methodologies Used in Jozaghi and Andresen's (2013) Study

Objective: To critically evaluate a research paper with respect to research paradigms, related methodologies, and outcomes. Assigned Article: Jozaghi,E.and Andresen, MA. (2013). Should North America’s first and only supervised injection facility (InSite) be expanded in British Columbia, Canada? Harm Reduction Journal,10(1). Develop and construct a review paper in response to the above assigned article by incorporating the following requirements: 1.Discuss how the choice of research paradigm used in this research article contributes to the overall quality of this study by describing THREE ways in which the study design or findings were strengthened or enhanced by the choice of research paradigm. Your answer should include specific examples from the given research article. 2. Discuss FOUR themes associated with safe injection facilities that emerged from this study. Clearly explain these themes and include examples from the article to support your points. 3. Aside from opening more supervised injection facilities, provide TWO practical applications of this study’s findings and clearly identify the organization/s that may be responsible for implementing each application. 4.Briefly describe how this study’s findings have altered your knowledge of supervised injection facilities.