Critical Analysis and Reflection on a Clinical Case

 The topic is outlined with a polished and succinct orientation to the case and clinical context. Introduction is comprehensively and skillfully structured and very clearly contextualised  The topic is very clearly introduced with a clear orientation to the clinical case and context. Introduction is well structured, relevant and very well contextualised  Credit The topic is clearly identified and explained with relevant orientation to the case and clinical context. Introduction is relevant and well contextualised  The topic is identified with some explanation of the case and clinical context, but this requires development. Introduction is mostly relevant and provides some context to the reflection.  The topic is not or only vaguely identified. The introduction lacks relevance and does not clarify context to the reflection.  2. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Describe the framework used to examine the chosen the topic event, case or decision. Discuss the outcomes, reflects on the topic event, case or decision, and provides recommendations. Clearly articulate evidenced based literature and aligns the legal and ethical codes relevant to the case. Demonstrate a a high level of critical analysis and synthesis and evaluation of relevant literature. Relevant legal and ethical codes are identified and integrated seamlessly with an extensive range of literature to support the discussion. Demonstrates a good level of critical analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of relevant literature. Relevant legal and ethical codes are well-integrated with the reference to a good range of literature to support the discussion. Credit Synthesises is sound and is soundly informed by some relevant literature. Some evidence of critical analysis, although this could be developed. Relevant legal and ethical codes are included and discussed at a good level to support the discussion. Satisfactory discussion informed by basic literature. Satisfactory/basic synthesis and integration of relevant legal and ethical codes Very limited or inappropriate discussion and with no critical analysis of the literature. Minimal or poor integration of relevant legal and ethical codes   3. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application and synthesis Uses evidenced based literature and a systematic ethical framework to describe the topic event, case or decision. and analyse the ethical decision-making process. Evaluates and Identifies gaps and /or what went well in the topic event, case or decision.  HD Demonstrates a a high level of critical analysis and synthesis and evaluation of relevant literature. Relevant legal and ethical codes are identified and integrated seamlessly with an extensive range of literature to support the discussion.  A highly developed clear discussion highlighting the systematic ethical framework used to illustrate and analyse the ethical decision process and outcomes. High quality, contemporary literature used to support the discussion and decisions. Credit Presents a credible description of the systematic ethical framework used to describe and analyse the ethical decision process and outcomes. Satisfactory literature used to support discussion and decisions.Satisfactory description of the systematic ethical framework used to describe the ethical decision process. Some analysis evident and outcomes are reasonably described. Minimal or poor use of relevant literature to support discussion and decisions.  Unsatisfactory Description of the systematic ethical framework used to describe and analyse the ethical decision process and outcomes is minimal or absent. Minimal or no evidence/literature to support findings.  words 4. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reflection Reflects on the topic event, case or decision using a structured model of reflection. Describes the management and outcomes of the case and provides recommendations for future practice.  HD A sophisticated and structured reflection on the case and contributing factors. Outstanding use of evidence and relevant recommendations that show excellent insight within the professional, ethical and legal frameworks of practice applied.  A thorough, clear reflection on the case and contributing factors. Well supported with credible evidence supporting the discussion. Effective recommendations that show good insight of the professional, ethical and legal frameworks of practice applied.  An insightful reflection on the case and the contributing factors. Reinforced with some suitable recommendations. Shows satisfactory insight with the professional, ethical and legal frameworks of practice applied.  Reflection on the case and contributing factors is limited. Basic discussion surrounding recommendations and supporting evidence. Shows some insight with the professional, ethical and legal frameworks applied, however, this could be extended.  Unsatisfactory Inadequate or no reflection on the contributing factors.