As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit an Inter-Agency Working assignment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments.
After completing the module, you should be able to:
Undertake critical analysis and reach reasoned and evidenced decisions, contribute problem solving skills to find and innovate in solutions.
Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline and a word count; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in Arden University (AU) Harvard format. You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.
Please note that exceeding the word count by over 10% will result in a reduction in grade by the same percentage that the word count is exceeded. You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.
Please answer all the following questions.
Mr and Mrs Musa are a couple and are war victims originally from Sudan. They sought asylum in the United Kingdom because of a civil war in their country, which had a devastating effect on their family. They came to the United Kingdom and were supported by a caseworker, having been through an assessment process. The couple were found to be traumatised, largely due to the events of the war, which impacted on their mental wellbeing. The couple informed their caseworker about their faith and cultural needs, butthe leadership of the agency showed little or no interest in meeting their identified needs. As a direct consequence, the perceived lack of interest was seen as a cultural barrier, inpart due to the lack of care and support from the concerned Healthcare agency. This avoidable situation has made the couple unwilling to engage with support service providers in the community. Thus, the couple felt frustrated and reluctance to disclose their cultural needs to any support network in the community. As a result, the couple started to isolate themselves from support services that would have potentially supported them to meet their faith and cultural needs.
Using both examples from your own practice as well as the information from the above case study:
In care provision, service users and carers may have complex needs, which may require different types of help being provided by a range of agencies:
Analyse how lack of good leadership amongst healthcare agencies would impact negatively on the ethic of care as well as the multidisciplinary working initiative in healthcare.
1) In reference to the case study above, outline some of the leadership issues faced by the couple in terms of how healthcare agencies could have efficiently managed their needs.
2) What could you have done differently from a professional point of view to address the couple’s cultural need/s?
You must draw upon relevant theory, concepts, models and appropriate organisational examples. Also note that your work must be presented with research evidence as well as practical examples to showcase the breadth and depth of your understanding.
The white paper “Caring for People” was published in 1998 after the NHS and Community Care Act 1990. Both papers seem to have increased awareness of the need to develop both Inter-professional and inter-agency collaboration (IPIAC) in the last decades. Besides, the government issued several policy documents, which requires collaboration or partnership working arrangement to improve efficiency and effectiveness amongst healthcare services. While all of these initiatives were clearly declared in several papers, such as the 1998 white paper and, the Modernising Social Services white paper 1998, they all shared the views that “people do not fit into neat service categories, and that if partner agencies are not working together, it is the user who suffers” (DH, 1998 cited in Community Care, 2019)