Get Instant Help From 5000+ Experts For
question

Writing: Get your essay and assignment written from scratch by PhD expert

Rewriting: Paraphrase or rewrite your friend's essay with similar meaning at reduced cost

Editing:Proofread your work by experts and improve grade at Lowest cost

And Improve Your Grades
myassignmenthelp.com
loader
Phone no. Missing!

Enter phone no. to receive critical updates and urgent messages !

Attach file

Error goes here

Files Missing!

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

Guaranteed Higher Grade!
Free Quote
wave
How to Handle Suspicious Payments in a FTSE 100 Audit
Answered

To be successful in Assurance, you need to be curious. It’s important to understand exactly what your client does and how they have accounted for business activities, as this may affect the work performed and the conclusions reached.

Please imagine you’re working on the audit of a FTSE 100 client. You’re responsible for checking that payments to the company’s suppliers have been correctly accounted for. You’re having problems verifying that three of their suppliers exist. You’ve asked your main contact at the client to provide you with more information, but they haven’t heard of these suppliers. They’re very busy and advise you that, because the amounts are relatively small, they’re not worth looking into any further. However, you think the payments look suspicious and need to be investigated. You decide to raise the issue with your manager.

Further information to help you prepare

An important ABC value is to always act with integrity and do the right thing. There’s a risk management procedure for what to do if you suspect any inappropriate client activity. This emphasizes the importance of escalating concerns around unacceptable ethics and behaviours to a senior manager or above.

Last month’s ABC “Audit Update” email which is sent to the Assurance practice included an article about supplier fraud.

A ABC audit team had uncovered a significant fraud, where one of the senior executives had defrauded an engineering company of £1.5million over the course of 10 years. They found that the individual had set up payments to herself, disguising them as legitimate payments to a supplier.

Last year’s audit file include working papers that appear to indicate that tests were carried out on transactions with the suppliers in question and nothing unusual was identified, although it’s not clear exactly which tests were carried out.

The client’s processes state that payments to suppliers of up to £5,000 can be authorized by two signatories, who must be manager level or above. Payments over £5,000 need to be authorized by senior managers or above.

The payments that you’re querying are listed below:

This year

Company

£

Previous Year

Company

£

6 January

Granch Consulting

4,993

13 January

Granch Consulting

2,444

13 February

Generate Phoenix

4,739

2 February

Mauve Data Services

3,116

3 March

Mauve Data Services

3,456

10 March

Generate Phoenix

4,679

15 May

Generate Phoenix

4,421

29 March

Mauve Data Services

2,732

2 June

Granch Consulting

2,466

22 April

Generate Phoenix

4,985

10 July

Generate Phoenix

4,123

19 June

Granch Consulting

2,398

1 September

Mauve Data Services

4,992

14 September

Mauve Data Services

3,216

9 Oct

Generate Phoenix

4,986

23 Oct

Granch Consulting

4,500

3 December

Mauve Data Services

4,855

12 November

Granch Consulting

2,916

Your 5-minute presentation should include:

  • What you’ve discovered
  • The information you need to find out next
  • Recommendations to your manager on how to approach the situation.

support
close