Intellectual Property, Plagiarism, and Assessment Task

You understand that the University will retain a copy of any assessments submitted electronically for evidence and quality assurance purposes; requests for the removal of assessments will only be considered if the work contains information that is either politically and/or commercially sensitive (as determined by the University) and where requests are made by the relevant module leader or dissertation supervisor.

By submitting this assessment, you declare that it is your own work and that the sources of information and material you have used (including the internet) have been fully identified and properly acknowledged as required[ University Academic Misconduct Regulations].  Additionally, the work presented has not been submitted for any other assessment.  You also understand that the Faculty reserves the right to investigate allegations of plagiarism or unfair practice which, if proven, could result in a fail in this assessment and may affect your progress.

A British company just signed a contract with an American company. The contract states that the American company will purchase 10,000 units of the British company’s product at the price of $2000 per unit, with payment due in one month. The current weighted average cost of capital of the British company is 8%.

Please compute value at risk of the account receivable using both Variance-Covariance and Historical Simulation method. Please interpret your results. Please refer to literature sources and critique each method.

Please form three hedging strategies using the following financial instruments/ markets and demonstrate the relationship between the payoff and profit of each hedging strategy and the future spot exchange rate in one month’s time on a chart.

Currency forwards

Money market

Currency options

Please discuss the costs and the benefits associated with each hedging strategy, including speculation (i.e., no hedge).

Which hedging strategy (including speculation) would you recommend? Please refer to literature sources and provide reasons for your recommendation.

Grading Criteria:

·Value at risk computation and interpretation (30%)

·Critique of value at risk methods (15%)

·Hedging strategy formation and outcome demonstration (20%)

·Discussion of the costs and the benefits associated with each hedging strategy, including speculation (10%)

·Hedging strategy recommendation (15%)

·Presentation and communication (10%)

·A reasonable attempt.  I could have developed some of the sections further.  

·A good attempt, displaying my understanding and learning, with  analysis in some parts.

·A very good attempt.  The work demonstrates my clear  understanding of the learning supported by relevant literature and scholarly work with good analysis and evaluation.

·An excellent attempt, with clear application of literature and scholarly work, demonstrating  significant analysis and evaluation.