On February 14, 2012 Brandon Tyler, Assistant Treasurer at Allied Digital (AD), sits in his office, talk to himself, “I must get this hedging memo done, and get out of here. Foreign exchange options? I had better get the story straight before someone in the Finance Committee starts asking questions. Let’s see, there are two ways in which I can envisage us using options now. One is to hedge a dividend due on September 15th from AD Germany. The other is to hedge our upcoming payment to Matsumerda for their spring RAM chip statement. With the yen at 78 and increasing I’m glad we haven’t covered the payment so far, but now I’m getting nervous and I would like to protect my posterior. An option to buy yen on June 10 might be just the thing.
Allied Digital is a $12 billion sales company engaged in, among other things, the development, manufacture, and marketing of microprocessor-based equipment. Although
Brandon Tyler in his office has been printing spot, forward and currency options and futures quotations from the company’s Bloomberg terminal.
The option prices are quoted in U.S. cents per euro. Yen are quoted in hundredths of a cent. Looking at these prices, Brandon realizes that he can work out how much the euro or yen would have to change to make the option worthwhile. Brandon makes a mental note that AD can typically borrow in the Eurocurrency market at LIBOR + 1% and lend at LIBID.
“I’ll attach these numbers to my memo,” mutters Brandon, but the truth is he has yet to come to grips with the real question, which is when, if ever, are currency options a better means of hedging exchange risk for an international firm than traditional forward exchange contracts or future’s contracts. Please assist Brandon in his analysis of currency hedging for his report to AD’s Finance Committee.
Show which hedging is better (forward, money market or option). Why? Detail calculation and explanation required.
Hints: