Wilmar was established in 1991 and it’s headquarter is in Singapore. It is the largest company listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange. The company is engaged in agribusiness activities including oilseed crushing, oil palm farming, oil filtering, sugar refining and biodiesel, specialty fats, oleo chemicals, composts, flour and rice milling. The company has more than 500 trade plants and wide dispersed network covering China, Indonesia, India and 50 more countries. It has labour force of 90,000 people. The company provides management services to more than 400 subsidiary companies. The agricultural products of Wilmar are the preferred choice of consumers and food industries. Initially the company started operations as palm oil trading company. Over the years, company expanded it’s operations into foreign countries (Anderson, et. al. 2015). It is also one of the biggest plantation owners in Malaysia and Indonesia. The company faced accusations against grabbing unresolved land in Africa. In this report Wilmar is taken to analyse external environment. For this, PESTEL analysis is done. Porters five force analysis is done to find the forces that affect the company’s market environment. The strategic recommendations are also given to avoid problems which are being faced by the company.
The PESTLE analysis is used by the companies to determine external forces that have impact on organisation. Macro environmental factors include forces which have impact on organisation but are out of control of organisation. PESTLE includes political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental factors. By using PESTLE analysis an organisation can maximise opportunities and minimise threats for an organisation.
In Porters five force analysis five industry forces are taken to describe the intensity of competition. It determines the long run predictions of profitability in the industry (Berg, et. al. 2015). The company can look beyond actions of competitors and can evaluate factors that can affect business environment.
Explanation of Porter’s 5 forces
Impact of Porter’s five forces on Wilmar
Competitive rivalry: Wilmar is comparatively young firm founded in 1991 against more established competitors. It is one of the largest companies in Singapore. Since 1991, the company has proved it’s unique integrated business model, grown in both earnings and revenue to beat competitors in size (Buono, 2015). The company faces competition from companies such as Golden agri-resources, First resources and firms like Cargill, Indofood Agri and Archer Daniels Midland Company.
Threat of new entrants: The threat of new entrants is very low as it needs to build a large network of farmers. Such operations require high capital and sufficient time to achieve balance in an economy, before this the company is mostly seen struggling. Many companies are already involved in the manufacturing process and can enter in the particular market where Wilmar is already in, that may determine low motion barriers. Such type of risk is moderated by the integrated business model of Wilmar, in such a way that the corporation has control over production (Albert & Beatty, 2014). It also has the flexibility to modify the use of raw material according to the conditions of market.
Threat of substitute products or services: The threat of substitute products and services is away from the basic products. The threat is reduced because of the company’s alternative range of products through decontaminating and handling wide range of other commodities like sunflower seed, canola, cotton seed, soybean, rapeseed, peanut edible oils and meal like rice, bran and wheat flour. Although man made alternatives create non eatable products which could create threat with new expansions which are economical.
Bargaining power of suppliers: Wilmar possesses and manages the production chain from upstream raw material obtaining to downstream purifying, to marketing and supply of products and services. Due to the company’s self-derived raw material, it has rare suppliers. So, the supplier influence will be low. The costs linked with the manufacturing are stable because of the independency of input costs on commodity prices. The company has also diverse business interests geographically in countries like Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia, China, India, Africa and Ukraine. It helps to spread potential cost risks (Nekvapil & Sherman, 2015).
Bargaining power of customers: The ultimate products of the company are traded through the wholesale distributors and retailers. As, the products are sold through large scale retailers and distributors, the consumers enjoy a definite degree of bargaining force as they could substitute products of company with another companies’ products are at low prices. The products of Wilmar are known for high quality and stability but most of the production of company is identical (Haddow, Bullock & Coppola, 2017). The presence of significant number of alternatives and lack of branding can result in customers can shift to other brands due to increased prices and lack of advertising.
Wilmar implements strategies such as Porter’s generics strategy to avoid problems, gain competitive advantage and to acquire position in market. The strategy has certain aspects such as:
Conclusion
From this report it has been concluded that Wilmar is a leading agribusiness group with a market capitalization of 17.1 billion SGD. The company is also engaged in the oil palm cultivation, sugar milling and refining specialty fats. The company has achieved growth through mergers and acquisitions mainly in Malaysia and Indonesia. It has also expanded operations in into foreign countries through multiple collaborations and joint ventures. Now the company operates over 500 manufacturing plants and has widespread distribution network in many countries. The company has established an extensive distribution channel for it’s products. The company has been successful to save costs through business model as it strategically places processing units to consumer markets by lower shipping cost. Wilmar has been successful to achieve growth through acquisitions and joint ventures. The company’s joint venture in Myanmar has reduced costs and saved time. The acquisitions of company helped to generate revenues from various regions and have diversified the risk. The company has solved it’s ethical matters of deforestation and illegitimate sourcing by undertaking considerable efforts. It has also attained the recognition award at Singapore apex corporate social responsibility awards 2015. The supply chain of company is also de linked with from forest destruction and human right abuses. The company’s agriculture business model allows scaling up value chain which results in operational efficiency. As recommended above, the company can expand it’s function by launching new products and services such as clothing and foot wear.
References
Albert, M., & Beatty, B. J. (2014). Flipping the classroom applications to curriculum redesign for an introduction to management course: Impact on grades. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), pp.419-424.
Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J. (2015). An introduction to management science: quantitative approaches to decision making. Cengage learning.
Beigel, R., Siegel, R. J., & Rader, F. (2015). Cardiac Hypertrophy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Introduction and Management. In Pathophysiology and Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease (pp. 291-324). Springer International Publishing.
Berg, D., Mani, H. S., Marinakis, Y. G., Tierney, R., & Walsh, S. (2015). An introduction to Management of Technology pedagogy (andragogy).
Buono, A. F. (2015). An Introduction to Management Consultancy. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(1), pp.144-147.
Chance, D. M., & Brooks, R. (2015). Introduction to derivatives and risk management. Cengage Learning.
Christopher, E., Laasch, O., & Roberts, J. (2016). New approaches to introduction to management courses. Journal of Management Education, 40(3), 359-361.
Combe, C. (2014). Introduction to management. Oxford University Press.
Haddow, G., Bullock, J., & Coppola, D. P. (2017). Introduction to emergency management. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Hillier, J. (2015). Fritz J. Roethlisberger Memorial Award Goes to “Let’s Burn Them All: Reflections on the Learning-Inhibitory Nature of Introduction to Management and Introduction to Organization Behavior Textbooks”. Journal of Management Education, 39(6), pp.681-683.
Martin-Albarracin, V. L., Nuñez, M. A., & Amico, G. C. (2015). Replacement of native by non-native animal communities assisted by human introduction and management on Isla Victoria, Nahuel Huapi National Park. PeerJ, 3, e1328.
McKenna, C. (2017). Introduction from management consultant to psychological counsel.
Nekvapil, J., & Sherman, T. (2015). An introduction: Language management theory in language policy and planning. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2015(232), pp.1-12.
Snyder, R. A. (2014). Let’s burn them all: Reflections on the learning-inhibitory nature of Introduction to Management and Introduction to Organizational Behavior textbooks. Journal of Management Education, 38(5), pp.733-758.
Soederberg, S. (2016). Introduction–Risk Management in Global Capitalism. In Risking Capitalism (pp. 1-20). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Stewart, P. M. (2014). Section Introduction: Emergent Management of Adrenal Disorders. In Endocrine and Metabolic Medical Emergencies: A Clinician's Guide (pp. 155-158). The Endocrine Society.
Stimson, C. J. (2016). Hospital Risk Management and the US Legal System: An Introduction to US Medical Malpractice Tort Law. In Risk Management in Medicine (pp. 69-76). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Wilkinson, A., Wood, G., & Demirbag, M. (2014). Guest editors’ introduction: People management and emerging market multinationals. Human Resource Management, 53(6), pp.835-849.
Ying, M., & Hongcui, W. (2015). Optimization for Framework Design of New Product Introduction Management System.