Coursework Assignment: Clear Research Thesis Proposal Development

The learning outcomes that are assessed by this coursework are:

1. A systematic understanding of research methodology and practice.
2. The ability to interpret and critically appraise the research of others.
3. The ability to develop a research proposal with a clear aim, set of objectives and methodology
4. The ability to plan a meaningful and original research project.

This assignment is intended to support the development of a clear research thesis proposal through:

• An introduction to the research topic and problem context
• The presentation of a clear aim and set of objectives
• A concise literature survey highlighting the key themes for your proposed project in a critical manner
• A detailed explanation, with justification, of your chosen methodology for your planned research study
• A summary of any ethical issues that you anticipate and how these will be addressed.
• Consideration of any risks involved with the chosen methodology, and how these will be managed.
• A detailed work plan for the proposed study including Milestones and related tasks. The marking scheme for the assignment is the following:

Marking weight

Relevant introduction and context to chosen research topic 10%

Clear research aim and relevant research objectives presented 20%

Concise literature review clearly presenting research area and identifying research gap for proposed research 20%

Detailed methodology for proposed research activity, including relevant ethical consideration and risks involved with chosen methods 30%

Detailed work plan for research 10%

Style, structure and use of appropriate referencing style 10%

This assignment should not be more than 2,500 words excluding references.

Deliverables to be submitted for assessment:

How the work will be marked: Assessment will be based on the extent to which the learning outcomes listed above have been met.

Band Description

Excellent work which demonstrates that the “Distinction Level” student:

• Possesses an authoritative grasp of the conceptual context within which the work was undertaken
• Is able to display originality, insight and powers of indepth critical analysis in the solution offered and/or is able to sustain an argument displaying originality, insight into current debates and conceptual positions, in- depth critical analysis, and is capable of expressing this argument clearly, concisely and accurately
• Possesses a high degree of relevant technical competence

A clear grasp of an appropriate methodology suitably “Merit Level” focused on the topic/problem. A good level of understanding, organisation and relevant technical ability. An ability to synthesise material and to construct responses which reveal good skills of critical analysis and insight.

A coherent response to the task undertaken demonstrating “Pass level” a sound grasp of appropriate methodology. Work will be accurate and appropriately organised with clear evidence of skills of critical analysis.

The grasp of material and methodology is such as to “Marginal pass enable a basic response to the task undertaken. level” Work will generally be accurate and appropriately organised with some evidence of critical analysis.

The work demonstrates some understanding of the “Marginal fail” topic/problem but overall the achievement in terms of understanding, technical accuracy, organisation and critical analysis does not justify a pass mark.

Student’s performance is deficient in most respects, “Fail” revealing inadequate grasp of the material, poor organisational and technical ability and poorly developed communication skills. No evidence of critical analysis. A clear fail.