Part 1: Initial Analysis (35%)
Using the standard methodology described in the ME7724 Tutorials sessions on external flow analysis as a guide, import the supplied model into Ansys Workbench, School of Engineering and the Environment. Coursework Assessment Brief. Page 3 of 6School of Engineering and the Environment.Â
set up the CFD model, solve it using ANSYS CFX and examine the characteristics of the flow. For the initial analysis, the model should be set up identically to the model investigated during the tutorial sessions except that the choice of the flow domain dimensions and inflation layers are for you to decide. In carrying out the modelling you should:
  Investigate the effect of domain size on your numerical results for lift and drag by varying the domain dimensions in a systematic way.
On completion of the analysis you should summarise your findings, and illustrate the general flow field around the bodyshell highlighting   any problem areas or interesting flow features using combinations of appropriate Contour, Streamline and Isosurface plots.
These plots should be produced IN Colour. No more than ten images should be provided and each one should be annotated and discussed to indicate the features you found to be of interest. Provide a clear statement of the results of your investigations into the effect of flow domain size and select suitable flow domain dimensions for part 2.
Carry out some literature research into ways of improving the aerodynamics of commercial vehicles. Based on your research, choose two features you believe will improve the aerodynamic performance of the box van and describe why you believe that they will be effective.
Modify the given solid model to incorporate the features you have selected and re-do the CFD simulations and analysis of PART1 for your modified model. In carrying out this additional analysis, there is no need to conduct further investigations into the effect of flow domain size. However, so that you can make direct comparisons between the results of Parts 1&2 and quantify the benefits achieved by your modifications, you should ensure that you use flow domain dimensions which you already used in Part 1. Report the percentage reduction in the drag force achieved using your modified model. There is no specific target for the drag force but you need will to discuss any reduction or increase in the drag force on your modified model.
As before, illustrate the flow field around the modified model using combinations of appropriate Contour, Streamline and Isosurface plots. All plots School of Engineering and the Environment.Â
Should be produced In colour. No more than ten images should be provided and again, each one should be annotated to indicate the features you found to be of interest and to highlight any flow improvements you observe.
Provide a 3000-word report describing the results of your work.
The report should include all the plots you obtained in carrying out the work for Parts 1 & 2, together with a clear table summarizingand comparing the numerical results for the drag and lift forces. The report should provide brief details of your modelling methodology together with a clear statement of all the flow domain dimensions and inflation layer you used. It should also describe the aerodynamic design elements you have incorporated in your improved box van model together with their engineering basis. By referring to the plots you obtained, link the aerodynamic design elements you incorporated to the flow features evident in the plots.
Provide a critical appraisal of the cfd modelling methodology you used for the assignment and discuss how it could be improved upon. Your discussion should include comments on the appropriateness of the turbulence model used and on the quality of the boundary layer modelling achieved.
Note: In assessing your work, credit will be given for well thought out practical solutions showing technical engineering insight and understanding and for clarity of thought in both interpreting and presenting your results. Your report should be
entirely in your own words. There should be no need for you to download large tracts of material from websites. No credit will be given for such material.
End of the assessment
Assessment Criteria
Assessment of your submission will be based on the following weighted assessment criteria as given below which relate to the specified module and PSRB learning outcomes. Assessment criteria are reproduced in Canvas in a rubric.
Specific Criteria (marking scheme).
Marks available
PART 1: Initial analysis 35%
Part 2: Aerodynamic modification 30%
Part 3: Report and discussion (35%)
Total = 100%
Academic skills support
For help and advice on this assessment please contact the assessment setter/s or the module leader. For advice on academic writing and referencing please contact the Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computing (SEC) Academic Success Centre (ASCS). Trained staff and students will give you guidance and feedback on assessments.