Get Instant Help From 5000+ Experts For
question

Writing: Get your essay and assignment written from scratch by PhD expert

Rewriting: Paraphrase or rewrite your friend's essay with similar meaning at reduced cost

Editing:Proofread your work by experts and improve grade at Lowest cost

And Improve Your Grades
myassignmenthelp.com
loader
Phone no. Missing!

Enter phone no. to receive critical updates and urgent messages !

Attach file

Error goes here

Files Missing!

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

Guaranteed Higher Grade!
Free Quote
wave
Critique of Qualitative Research Article on Hand Washing and Hospital-Acquired Infections
Answered

Critique of Qualitative Design (60 points/12 points each)

Select a qualitative research article related to this PICOT) question. (Does hand washing among healthcare workers reduce hospital acquired infections?)

1. Was the research tradition for the qualitative study identified? If none was identified, can one be inferred?


2. Is the research question congruent with a qualitative approach and with the specific research tradition? Are the data sources and research methods congruent with the research tradition?


3. How well was the research design described? Are design decisions explained and justified? Does it appear that the design emerged during data collection, allowing researchers to capitalize on early information?


4. Did the design lend itself to a thorough, in-depth examination of the focal phenomenon? Was there evidence of reflexivity? What design elements might have strengthened the study (e.g., a longitudinal perspective rather than a cross-sectional one)?


5. Was the study undertaken with an ideological perspective? If so, is there evidence that ideological goals were achieved? (e.g., Was there full collaboration between researchers and participants? Did the research have the power to be transformative?)

1. Was the setting appropriate for addressing the research question, and was it adequately described?


2. What type of sampling strategy was used?


3. Were the eligibility criteria for the study specified? How were participants recruited into the study?


4. Given the information needs of the study—and, if applicable, its qualitative tradition—was the sampling approach effective?


5. Was the sample size adequate and appropriate? Did the researcher indicate that saturation had been achieved? Do the findings suggest a richly textured and comprehensive set of data without any apparent “holes” or thin areas?


6. Were key characteristics of the sample described (e.g., age, gender)? Was a rich description of participants and context provided, allowing for an assessment of the transferability of the findings?

support
close