In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:
You are a patrol officer on duty with your partner. At approximately 1:45 a.m., you observe a fast-moving vehicle run through a red stoplight. You attempt to stop the vehicle, which refuses to pull over but does turn on its hazard signal. Using light detection and ranging (lidar) technology, you determine the vehicle to be traveling in excess of the posted speed limit. After a brief two-mile traffic pursuit, the vehicle pulls into a hospital emergency room ambulance bay. The male driver exits the vehicle with his arms raised in the air and begins shouting at you and your partner. A female passenger then exits the vehicle, also with her arms raised. She yells that her water broke and that she is in active labor and needs to get into the hospital. What step do you take next? How do you address the situation?
Directions
You will be creating a written internal justification statement to submit to the chief of your department. You are a new patrol officer and are asked to provide information on how discretion could be used for this situation and other situations. Using the scenario, create a written statement (with all sections identified) that addresses all of the required elements:
What to Submit
To complete this project, you must submit the following:
Internal Justification Statement
Create a written statement justifying the discretionary decisions made in the scenario. This statement will be for internal use only and will be kept on file within your department. The statement should address the rubric criteria listed above: exercising discretion; integrity, authority, discretionary power, and morality in discretionary decision making; summary of actions; integrity, authority, discretionary power, and morality in the provided scenario; and decisions affecting other branches. Submit your statement as a 2- to 4-page Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Cite sources according to APA style.
sCriteria |
Exemplary (100%) |
Proficient (85%) |
Needs Improvement (55%) |
Not Evident (0%) |
Value |
Articulation of Response |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling |
Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling |
15 |
Exercising Discretion |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Explains what it means to exercise discretion in criminal justice |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include additional details or clarification explaining what it means to exercise discretion in criminal justice |
Does not attempt criterion |
10 |
Integrity, Authority, Discretionary Power, and Morality in Discretionary Decision Making |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Describes the role integrity, authority, discretionary power, and morality play in discretionary decision making |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include describing the relationship between integrity, authority, and discretionary power; describing the difference between ethics and morals; or describing how ethics and morals affect discretionary decision making |
Does not attempt criterion |
15 |
Summary of Actions |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Summarizes the actions taken in response to a discretionary dilemma |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include summarizing the discretionary decision made or providing rationale |
Does not attempt criterion |
20 |
Integrity, Authority, Discretionary Power, and Morality in Scenario |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Explains how integrity, authority, discretionary power, and morality affect decision made in response to scenario |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explaining the role integrity, authority, and discretionary power played in the decision made, or explaining how morals and ethics influenced the decision |
Does not attempt criterion |
15 |
Decisions Affecting Other Branches |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Explains how decisions in law enforcement affect discretionary decisions made in courts and corrections |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explaining how the court might react once the circumstances are known, explaining what discretionary decisions may be made in court, or explaining how the decisions in court could potentially affect corrections |
Does not attempt criterion |
20 |
Citations and Attributions |
Attributes sources where applicable using citation methods with very few minor errors |
Uses citation for ideas requiring attribution |
Attributes sources where applicable, but with major errors |
Does not attribute sources where applicable |
5 |