Physical health of mentally ill in community.

The Physical Health Needs of Persons with a Mental Illness in the Community

The physical health needs of persons with a mental illness in the community are often overlooked by health professionals. Critically discuss the veracity, importance and implications of this statement.

Word count for this discussion is 650 ± 10% words .Use at least 2 references and citation within your posts as per Harvard Referencing style. . Kindly refer to the discussion rubric Level 6 and 7 provided to you on Canvas in the IDEA Academy – Student Forms course that i have provided you in this description as a file

Discussion Rubric Levels 6 and 7

www.ideaeducation.com.mt

Criteria	Dimensions	10-8	7-5	4-2	1-0	Marks Max = 100
Quality of Post (40%)	Content Knowledge and Understanding (10%)	Post demonstrates an exceedingly high level of understanding content knowledge	Posts demonstrates a good level of understanding content knowledge	Post shows limited understanding of content knowledge	No post or a post which demonstrates a very limited understanding of content knowledge.	Max = 40
	Critical Approach: analysis, evaluation and reflection (10%)	Post contributes actively and demonstrates deep critical approach and reflection, exploring alternative views/issues and identifying solutions and limitations.	Post makes a relevant contribution and demonstrates sufficient critical analysis and reflection. There is some exploration of alternative views/issues which could have been developed further in identifying solutions and limitations	Post makes a limited contribution and there is a lack of critical analysis and reflection. There is a lack of exploration of alternative views/issues and solutions and limitations are not sufficiently provided.	Post demonstrates no or very weak critical approach. There is limited or no exploration of alternative views/issues and solutions are eithe lacking of inadequate.
	Development of discussion/argument and linking	Post demonstrates a high level of logical build up of	Post demonstrates a good level of logical build up of	Post shows limited logical build up of discussion/argument with limited	Post shows no or very limited logical build of discussion/argument with
	Presentation (10%): Shows respect for others: Demonstrates consideration and respect for others and responding professionally to criticism as well as compliments. Clarity and readability	Replies are always respectful and add insightful knowledge. Presentation is excellent making it easy for the reader to follow.	Replies are mostly respectful and add adequate knowledge. Presentation is good and is easy to follow.	Replies may lack respect and do not add sufficient knowledge. The presentation of the work makes it difficult to follow.	No responses or replies lack respect for others and do not add any knowledge. The presentation impedes understanding.
Relevance of Post (30%)	Post relevant to topic (10%)	Own post is completely relevant to the topic being discussed.	Own post is mostly relevant to the topic being discussed.	Own post contains information which is not always relevant to the topic being discussed.	Own post has very weak or no relevance to the topic being discussed.	Max = 30
	Replies/responses relevant to topic (10%)	Replies are completely relevant to the topic being discussed.	Replies are mostly relevant to the topic being discussed.	Replies are not always relevant to the topic being discussed.	Replies bear no or unclear relevance to the topic being discussed.
	Relevant examples (10%)	A good number of relevant examples are given.	Some relevant examples are given.	Few examples given which may not be completely relevant.	No or unclear examples given.
Contribution to the Learning Community (20%)	Own post stimulates discussion (10%)	Post shows an exceptional ability to stimulate and promote further discussion from other students.	Post shows a good ability to stimulate and promote further discussion from other students.	Post shows limited ability to stimulate and promote further discussion from other students.	No post or post is not developed and makes it difficult to promote further discussion from other students.	Max=20
Contribution to the Learning Community (20%)	Builds on peer responses, promoting further discussion, offering different interpretations /perspectives to the discussion (10%)	Replies are excellently linked to the original posts, stimulate further discussion and offer deeply insightful interpretations and perspectives relevant to the topic in discussion.	Replies are sufficiently linked to the original posts, stimulate further discussion and offer some insightful interpretations and perspectives relevant to the topic in discussion.	Replies are not well linked to origina posts, are limited in promoting further discussion and offer limited insightful interpretations and perspectives relevant to the topic in discussion.	No replies or replies bear no or little link to the original posts, do not promote further discussion and offe no or very few insightful interpretations and perspectives relevant to the topic in discussion.	Max=20
Referencing (10%)	Incorporation of source material and accuracy in documentation (10%)	Outstanding and scholarly incorporation of source material; documented accurately	Good incorporation of source material; mostly documented accurately	Sometimes inappropriate and unclear incorporation of source material; occasionally documented accurately	Weak and unclear incorporation or no incorporation of source material; documentation is inaccurate	Max=10