Task 2 and 3 for MyInspire Course

Prepare a video presentation for Task 1 with a duration of FIVE (5) MINUTES. Record a video presentation of yourself with the slide presentation and upload it upon the submission. You are required to upload this assignment in the form of a file in mp4 format (not exceeding 400MB). Please submit in a separate file.

Tips:

Draft Your Content: Know What to Present.
Consistent Format: Avoid Confusion.
Less Text: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words.
Make sure you have a good conclusion. It helps to repeat your main points and summarise your findings.
The presentation is relatively short, try to make two or three very good points and you need to make sure that you only use the information that you need to support and clarify those points.

[TOTAL: 10 marks]

Discuss the topic below in MyInspire forum, screenshot your discussion feedback and paste it into your report together with Task 1.

Choose a specific field as your reference.

Your e-tutor will create a folder in the assignment discussion. Please leave your opinion under that folder. Do not create another discussion folder to avoid confusion.

Do the following:

Select the best FIVE (5) postings from the forum discussion set up by your etutor.

Do screenshots of the postings and include them as images in your assignment.

The screenshots should be in an image file (either in JPG or PNG format). Refer to the sample of Screen Grab below.

The screenshots should contain: Name, Title of the discussion, Day, Date and Time. No marks will be given if there is no evidence of attachment.

Your response to each task will be graded separately based on the checklist attached. For maximum credit, be sure that your response addresses each of the tasks in the question.

QN	CLO	Criteria	Weight	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	Unsatisfactory	Max Marks
QN	CLO	Criteria	Weight	4	3	2	1	0	Max Marks
		TASK 1-DOCUMENTATION- CLO 2
1	CLO 2	Introduction	1.5	Excellent explanation about the project case (project title, organisation, location, duration, management) Excellent relevant illustration is provided to support the explanation.	Good explanation about the project case (project title, organisation, location, duration, management) Good relevant illustration is provided to support the explanation.	Fair explanation about the project case (project title, organisation, location, duration, management) Some relevant illustration is provided to support the explanation.	Poor explanation about the project case (project title, organisation, location, duration, management) Less or no relevant illustration is provided to support the explanation.	No introduction provided	6
	CLO 2	Explanation on the THREE critical challenges faced.	3.0	Excellent explanation on the stages/ activities that need proper quality improvement. Explanations are given with strong support of relevant illustration and reason of choosing the stage/ activity.	Good explanation on the stages/ activities that need proper quality improvement. Explanations are given with some support of illustration and reason of choosing the stage/ activity.	Fair explanation on the stages/ activities that need proper quality improvement. Explanations are given with a few support of illustration and reason of choosing the stage/ activity.	Poor explanation on the stages/ activities that need proper quality improvement. Very few or no support of relevant illustration and reason of choosing the stage/ activity.	No explanation on the stages/ activities that need proper quality improvement.	12
	CLO 2	Propose the recommended actions	2.0	Excellent proposal on the quality improvement for that particular challenges. Explanations are given with strong support of relevant illustration, literature and demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.	Good proposal on the quality improvement for that particular challenges. Explanations are given with some support of relevant illustration, literature and demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.	Fair proposal on the quality improvement for that particular challenges. Explanations are given with a few support of relevant illustration, literature and demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.	Poor proposal on the quality improvement for that particular challenges. Very few or no support of relevant illustration, literature and demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.	No explanation about the quality improvement for that particular challenges.	8
	CLO 2	A clear and attractive chart to show a process how to implement the quality improvement.	1.5	The chart includes all of the major process. The chart is brightly colored. The chart radiates from the centre of the page and the ideas branch out from other ideas in a logical and organised manner. The illustration make the chart memorable. The chart is very neat, orderly, and clearly readable.	The chart misses some major process. The chart colors are drab. The chart radiates from a central point and some ideas branch out from other ideas. The chart is somewhat neat, orderly, and clearly readable.	The chart misses most major process. The chart is not completely colored. The chart radiates from a central point and few ideas branch out from other ideas. The chart is not very neat and orderly but readable.	The chart presents no major points. The mind map is not colored. The chart does not radiate from a central point, no ideas branch out of other ideas. The chart is not readable.	No chart provided	6
	CLO 2	Conclusion	0.5	Excellent conclusion that goes beyond the summary with insightful and sound discussion. Excellent recommendations for further deliberations.	Good conclusion with adequate recommendations but limited for further deliberations.	Fair conclusion but limited recommendations and further deliberations.	Poor conclusion and no recommendations and further deliberations.	No conclusion provided.	2
		Mechanics of writing and references	1.5	Excellent writing skills and organised format. All references are cited appropriately by using APA referencing. Very few or no spelling and grammatical errors	Good writing skills and organised format. Almost all of the references are cited appropriately by using APA referencing. A few spelling and grammatical errors.	Simple writing skills and organised format. Missing some citations by using APA referencing. Some spelling and grammatical errors.	Poor writing skills and not organised accordingly. Only a few of the references are cited. A lot of grammatical and spelling errors.	No formatting and no citation.	6
		TOTAL	10.0						40
		TASK 2- PRESENTATION- CLO 3
2	CLO 3	Presentation Design and Ideas	1.0	Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.	Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.	Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow.	Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow.	Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.	4
	CLO 3	Slides	0.5	Slides are clear, succinct and demonstrate professional quality.	Slides are generally clear, succinct and demonstrate adequate quality.	Slides are consistent in clarity and quality.	Slides are inconsistent and poorly designed and confused.	Slides are unclear and not appropriate.	2
	CLO 3	Delivery	0.75	Presenter has professional appearance and well prepared without depending too much on notes. Volume, pacing and gestures contribute maximally to the presentation.	Presenter has professional appearance and prepared. Appropriate voice volume, tone and pacing. Gestures supported the overall presentation.	Presenter has good appearance. Strong dependence on notes and hesitation. Good voice volume, tone and pacing. Some appropriate gestures that supported the presentation.	Presenter has poor appearance and poorly prepared. Poor voice volume, tone and pacing. Inappropriate gestures which detracted from the presentation.	Presenter is unprepared.	3
	CLO 3	Duration	0.25	Presented in 5 minutes.	Presented in 6 minutes.	Presented in 4 minutes	Presented more than 6 minutes	Presented less than 4 minutes	1
		TOTAL	2.5						10

TASK 3 (ONLINE PARTICIPATION)- CLO 3
3	CLO 3	Discussion on MyInspire forum. “The Benefits of Doing Project Quality Audits”	2.5	Excellent opinion posted in MyInspire regarding the topic given. Received many comments. Engaged and performed very good discussion with other commenters (at least 5 comments posted). Evidences of the posting are attached in the assignment.	Good opinion posted in MyInspire regarding the topic given. Received a fair amounts of comments. Engaged and performed good discussion with other commenters (4 comments posted). Evidences of the posting are attached in the assignment.	Fair opinion posted in MyInspire regarding the topic given. Received some comments. Engaged and performed discussion with other commenters (3 comments posted). Evidences of the posting are attached in the assignment.	Brief opinion posted in MyInspire regarding the topic given. Received less or no comment. Less or not engaged and performed discussion with other commenters (2 comments posted). Evidences of the posting are attached in the assignment.	No opinion posted in MyInspire.	10
		TOTAL	2.5							10
OVERALL TOTAL										60