Learning Journal Entries on Sustainable Future

Depth of Engagement, Insight, Critical Thinking, and Justification (75 marks total)

Mark

 

Quality of Justification and Discussion of Weekly Topic

 

NOTE: Each criteria apply to the three learning journal entries

Little or no

explanatio

n /

discussion of Weekly topic. 

Some attempt to explain / discuss weekly topic Discussion shows limited knowledge with significant

lapses, inadequacies

misunderstandings

. 

 

Learning journal entry provides basic insight,

understanding , and reflective thinking about the weekly topic and include limited engagement

with inquiry questions.

Learning journal entry provides good insight,

understanding , and reflective thinking about the weekly topic and include some engagement

with inquiry questions.

Learning journal entry provides comprehens

ive insight, understandi ng, and

critically reflective thinking about the weekly topic and includes substantial engagement

with inquiry questions.

 

 

 

 

0-6

7-12

13–15

16–19

20–25

 

 

Entry One

What might a sustainable future look like?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0-6

7-12

13–15

16–19

20–25

 

 

Entry Two

How do innovations and developments contribute to a sustainable future?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0-6

7-12

13–15

16–19

20–25

 

 

Entry

Three

What does a sustainable future mean for me personally and professionally?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall Engagement with Literature (15 marks)

 

 

 

0-3

4-7

8-10

11-12

13-15

 

 

Quality of

Engagemen

t with Literature 

Little or no literature use

Only a few appropriate examples of literature use.

 

Supports some key

points through engagement with some literature.

Supports each key point in some depth through engagement with literature.

Effectively supports each key point through excellent

engagement with literature. 

 

 

Scholarly Presentation and Academic Literacy (10 marks)

 

 

0-2

3-4

5-6

7-8

9-10

 

Quality of writing

 

Spelling, grammar, referencing

Writing is incoherent, illegible or unintelligible.

Extensive Incorrect grammar/ spelling throughout the writing 

 

Citations and APA

referencing are not used or are unintelligible

Quality of writing is difficult to

understand with structure that is not coherent Incorrect grammar/ spelling throughout the

writing 

 

Citations and APA referencing are incorrect.

Writing is of a basic quality overall. Some structure which lacks clarity.

Reasonable grammar/spellin g with a small number of errors.

Reasonable citations / APA referencing with a number of errors. 

Writing is of good quality overall with good flow, style, and structure. Presents ideas clearly and in a logical manner.

Good grammar/

spelling with only a few errors.

Good citations / APA referencing with only a few errors.

 

Writing is of the highest quality overall with excellent flow, style, and structure. A persuasive and coherent argument is highly developed.  Correct grammar/spelling throughout with no errors. 

Citations / referencing style correct (APA) with no errors.  

 

 

Total Marks (100%)

 

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRADE: 

E (0-39) 

D  (40-49)

C-  (50-54)

C  (55-59)

C+ (60-64) 

B- (65-69)

B  (70-74)

B+ (75-79

A  (80-84)

A   (85-89)

A+ (90-100)