Understanding Marking Criteria in Academic Assignments

Lack of Evidence and Understanding

Marking Criteria

1. Lack of enough evidence in relevant area of knowledge – understanding and comprehension of concepts/theories. Error in identifying question requirements and/or theoretical concepts.

2. Limited and/or superficial knowledge of relevant concepts/theories. Inadequate ability to conceptualize and/or to apply appropriate theoretical concepts.

3. Knowledge and comprehension are adequate but somewhat limited - narrow and/or superficial. In the most part, descriptive instead of critical logical reasoning. Reasonably clear understanding of the key issues, but insufficient evidence for a critical analysis.

4. Knowledge and comprehension are above average and relevant. Good ability to apply theory, concepts, ideas and their inter-relationship. Clear articulation and evidence of reasonably holistic and critical analysis and discussion.

5. Knowledge and comprehension of relevant concepts and theories is current and appropriate. Good ability to relate and apply theory, concepts, ideas and their inter-relationship. Good articulation and evidence of holistic and critical analysis and discussion.

6. Besides, satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight. Ability to research, analyze and apply relevant skills, concepts and theories. Exceptional ability to synthesize, integrate and evaluate knowledgeProvide holistic and critical evaluation and discussion of the identified issues/opportunities.