Leadership Performance Appraisal Form: Summary, Evaluation, Comparison, and Recommendations

Total Possible Score: 8.00

Task:

Total Possible Score: 8.00
Provides a Summary and Overview of a Leadership Performance Appraisal Form
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides a thorough summary and overview of a leadership performance appraisal form.
Proficient - Provides a summary and overview of a leadership performance appraisal form. The summary is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Provides a limited summary and overview of a leadership performance appraisal form. The summary is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a summary and overview of a leadership performance appraisal form; however, the summary is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The summary and overview of a leadership performance appraisal form are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Evaluates the Gaps in the Knowledge and Skills Assessed
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly evaluates the gaps in the knowledge and skills assessed.
Proficient - Evaluates the gaps in the knowledge and skills assessed. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially evaluates the gaps in the knowledge and skills assessed. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the gaps in the knowledge and skills assessed; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The evaluation of the gaps in the knowledge and skills assessed are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Compares the Form to Other Techniques Used to Measure Leadership Effectiveness
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly compares the form to other techniques used to measure leadership effectiveness.
Proficient - Compares the form to other techniques used to measure leadership effectiveness. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially compares the form to other techniques used to measure leadership effectiveness. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to compare the form to other techniques used to measure leadership effectiveness; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The comparison of the form to other techniques used to measure leadership effectiveness is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Identifies and Recommends How the Organization Could Improve the Leadership Evaluation Process
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Identifies and thoroughly recommends how the organization could improve the leadership evaluation process.
Proficient - Identifies and recommends how the organization could improve the leadership evaluation process. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Identifies and partially recommends how the organization could improve the leadership evaluation process. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Identifies and attempts to recommend how the organization could improve the leadership evaluation process; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The identification and recommendation of how the organization could improve the leadership evaluation process are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Content Development
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Proficient - Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Basic - Uses appropriate and pertinent content but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.
Below Expectations - Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work and may distract the reader from its purpose.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient - Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.25
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.25
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.  
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.