Get Instant Help From 5000+ Experts For
question

Writing: Get your essay and assignment written from scratch by PhD expert

Rewriting: Paraphrase or rewrite your friend's essay with similar meaning at reduced cost

Editing:Proofread your work by experts and improve grade at Lowest cost

And Improve Your Grades
myassignmenthelp.com
loader
Phone no. Missing!

Enter phone no. to receive critical updates and urgent messages !

Attach file

Error goes here

Files Missing!

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

Guaranteed Higher Grade!
Free Quote
wave
Developing Public Leaders
Answered

Task

Condense information from the other three assignments and additional criteria in order to develop a creative and appealing PowerPoint presentation.

Create a 10–12 slide presentation in which you:

Create a title slide and references section (as indicated in the format requirements below).

Narrate each slide, using a microphone, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience. Note: If you do not have access to a microphone, then you should provide detailed speaker notes with your presentation.

Briefly summarize your idea of a public leader. Cite experiences and research to support your assertions.

Discuss the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader. Provide a rationale to support your answer.

Discuss gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions. What are the main barriers to women's political participation and expression? What is the role of government and political parties to address this gap?

Predict three public leadership trends that you believe will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Summarize the most important idea that you have learned in the course. How can you apply what you have learned? What will you do with whom, where, when, and, most important, why?

Include at least four peer-reviewed references (no more than 1 year old) from material outside the textbook. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and government websites. Wikipedia, other wikis, and websites ending in anything other than ".gov" do not qualify as academic resources.

1. This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

2. Include a title slide containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The title slide is not included in the required slide length.

3. Include a reference slide containing the sources that were consulted while completing research on the selected topic, listed in SWS format. The reference slide is not included in the required slide length.

4. Format the PowerPoint presentation with headings on each slide, two to three colors, two to three fonts, and two to three relevant graphics (photographs, graphs, clip art, et cetera), ensuring that the presentation is visually appealing and readable from 18 feet away. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

5. Slides should abbreviate the information in no more than five or six bullet points per slide.

6. Slide titles should be based on the criteria being summarized (e.g., "Three Public Leadership Trends").

 

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Create a title slide and references section (as indicated in the format requirements).

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely created a title slide and references section.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

Partially created a title slide and references section.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Satisfactorily created a title slide and references section.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

Thoroughly created a title slide and references section.

Narrate each slide using a microphone, or provide talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely narrated each slide using a microphone, or provided talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

Partially narrated each slide using a microphone, or partially provided talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Points:

8.5 (8.50%)

Satisfactorily narrated each slide using a microphone, or satisfactorily provided talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Thoroughly narrated each slide using a microphone, or thoroughly provided talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Briefly summarize your idea of a public leader.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely summarized your idea of a public leader.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

Partially summarized your idea of a public leader.

Points:

8.5 (8.50%)

Satisfactorily summarized your idea of a public leader.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Thoroughly summarized your idea of a public leader.

Discuss the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely discussed the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Points:

11.25 (11.25%)

Partially discussed the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Points:

12.75 (12.75%)

Satisfactorily discussed the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Thoroughly discussed the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Discuss gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely discussed gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Points:

11.25 (11.25%)

Partially discussed gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Points:

12.75 (12.75%)

Satisfactorily discussed gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Thoroughly discussed gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Predict three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely predicted three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Points:

11.25 (11.25%)

Partially predicted three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Points:

12.75 (12.75%)

Satisfactorily predicted three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Thoroughly predicted three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Summarize the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely summarized the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

Partially summarized the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Points:

8.5 (8.50%)

Satisfactorily summarized the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Thoroughly summarized the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Include at least four peer-reviewed references (no more than 1 year old) from material outside the textbook.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Does not meet the required number of references. All references are too old.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

Meets the required number of references; some or all references are poor-quality choices. At least one reference is within the 1-year timeline.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Meets the required number of references; all references are good-quality choices. At least one reference is within the 1-year timeline.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

Exceeds the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices. At least one reference is within the 1-year timeline.

Writing mechanics, grammar, and formatting.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

Error-free or almost error-free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Appropriate use of SWS in-text citations and a reference section.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Lack of in-text citations, lack of a reference section, or lack of both.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in SWS style.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in SWS style.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and are consistently formatted correctly in SWS style.

Clarity and coherence of presentation.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

support
Whatsapp
callback
sales
sales chat
Whatsapp
callback
sales chat
close