Developing Public Leaders

 

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Create a title slide and references section (as indicated in the format requirements).

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely created a title slide and references section.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

Partially created a title slide and references section.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Satisfactorily created a title slide and references section.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

Thoroughly created a title slide and references section.

Narrate each slide using a microphone, or provide talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely narrated each slide using a microphone, or provided talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

Partially narrated each slide using a microphone, or partially provided talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Points:

8.5 (8.50%)

Satisfactorily narrated each slide using a microphone, or satisfactorily provided talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Thoroughly narrated each slide using a microphone, or thoroughly provided talking points in the Notes area of the slides, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience.

Briefly summarize your idea of a public leader.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely summarized your idea of a public leader.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

Partially summarized your idea of a public leader.

Points:

8.5 (8.50%)

Satisfactorily summarized your idea of a public leader.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Thoroughly summarized your idea of a public leader.

Discuss the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely discussed the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Points:

11.25 (11.25%)

Partially discussed the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Points:

12.75 (12.75%)

Satisfactorily discussed the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Thoroughly discussed the specific leadership theories and styles that support your definition of a public leader.

Discuss gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely discussed gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Points:

11.25 (11.25%)

Partially discussed gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Points:

12.75 (12.75%)

Satisfactorily discussed gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Thoroughly discussed gender diversity in the workplace, including the increasing numbers of women in the workplace and leadership positions.

Predict three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely predicted three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Points:

11.25 (11.25%)

Partially predicted three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Points:

12.75 (12.75%)

Satisfactorily predicted three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Thoroughly predicted three public leadership trends that will be particularly significant within the next decade.

Summarize the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely summarized the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

Partially summarized the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Points:

8.5 (8.50%)

Satisfactorily summarized the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Thoroughly summarized the most important idea that you have learned in the course.

Include at least four peer-reviewed references (no more than 1 year old) from material outside the textbook.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Does not meet the required number of references. All references are too old.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

Meets the required number of references; some or all references are poor-quality choices. At least one reference is within the 1-year timeline.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Meets the required number of references; all references are good-quality choices. At least one reference is within the 1-year timeline.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

Exceeds the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices. At least one reference is within the 1-year timeline.

Writing mechanics, grammar, and formatting.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

Error-free or almost error-free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Appropriate use of SWS in-text citations and a reference section.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Lack of in-text citations, lack of a reference section, or lack of both.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in SWS style.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in SWS style.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and are consistently formatted correctly in SWS style.

Clarity and coherence of presentation.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

3.75 (3.75%)

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

4.25 (4.25%)

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

5 (5.00%)

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.