Week 3: Discussion Board Instructions

Definition of Purity and Impurity in Judaism

Week 3: Discussion Board Instructions What are some ways that purity and impurity are defined in Judaism, and what might the implications of this be for nursing ethics and practice? In what ways might Jewish beliefs affect perspectives on end-of-life care and decisions? What are the implications of these perspectives for nursing ethics and practice? What three accommodations do Muslim patients prioritize? What are the implications of these modifications for nursing ethics and practice? Discussion Post Expectation One initial comprehensive post is due by Wednesday, with two peer responses due by Sunday this week. Please label your posts: initial, peer response 1, & peer response 2. Please review the discussion board rubric to ensure criteria for each post is met. Week 3: Discussion Board No unread replies.No replies. 305 Week 3: Discussion Board Instructions What are some ways that purity and impurity are defined in Judaism, and what might the implications of this be for nursing ethics and practice? In what ways might Jewish beliefs affect perspectives on end-of-life care and decisions? What are the implications of these perspectives for nursing ethics and practice? What three accommodations do Muslim patients prioritize? What are the implications of these modifications for nursing ethics and practice? Discussion Post Expectation One initial comprehensive post is due by Wednesday, with two peer responses due by Sunday this week. Please label your posts: initial, peer response 1, & peer response 2. Please review the discussion board rubric to ensure criteria for each post is met. Assignment Rubric Details to Week 3: Discussion Board close Rubric BSN Discussion Board (1) BSN Discussion Board (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehensive Initial Post 45.0 to >40.0 pts Exemplary All components of the discussion question/topic are addressed. Initial post successfully shows evidence of accurately interpreting topical knowledge, identifying relevant arguments, evaluating alternative points of view, justifying key results, and/or explaining assumptions. 40.0 to >35.0 pts Accomplished All questions/topics are answered. Minor improvements needed in explanation of one area of analysis. Majority of initial post demonstrates evidence of accurately interpreting topical knowledge, identifying relevant arguments, evaluating alternative points of view, justifying key results, and/or explaining assumptions. 35.0 to >25.0 pts Developing Answered all questions but more than one area is vague. Needs to analyze answer in more depth. Initial post shows some evidence of accurately interpreting topical knowledge and identifying relevant arguments. 25.0 to >15.0 pts Beginning Incomplete initial post that did not address all components of the discussion question/topic. Initial post shows little evidence of accurate interpretation of topical knowledge and relevant arguments. Lacked evaluation of alternative points of view and /or justification of key results. 15.0 to >0 pts Deficient No initial post or the initial post was severely off target in addressing the discussion question/topic. 45.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehensive Peer Responses 40.0 pts Exemplary Response to at least two peers and at least two responses show evidence of accurately interpreting topical knowledge, identifying relevant arguments, evaluating alternative points of view, justifying key results, and/or explaining assumptions. 30.0 pts Accomplished Response to at least two peers, but only one peer response demonstrates evidence of accurately interpreting topical knowledge, identifying relevant arguments, evaluating alternative points of view, justifying key results, and/or explaining assumptions. 20.0 pts Developing Response to at least two peers but responses demonstrate minimal effort to evaluate alternative points of view or justifying key results. 10.0 pts Beginning Response to one peer and response shows little evidence of accurate interpretation of topical knowledge and relevant arguments. Lacked evaluation of alternative points of view and/or justification of key results. 0.0 pts Deficient No peer responses OR one peer response that was severely off target in addressing the discussion question/topic. 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication & APA Formatting 5.0 pts Exemplary Posts are professionally written and include in the initial post an APA-formatted in-text citation and full reference. No grammar/spelling errors noted. 3.0 pts Accomplished One or more posts with 1-3 grammar/spelling errors. Initial post written with an incorrectly- formatted APA in-text citation and full reference. 2.0 pts Developing One or more posts with 4-6 grammar/spelling errors. 0.0 pts Deficient One or more posts with greater than six grammar/spelling errors. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Resources 5.0 pts Exemplary The initial post is supported by at least one scholarly finding (required readings and/or journal articles, textbooks, lectures, course materials, or evidence-based websites) which demonstrates an integration of evidence-based information to make a clear and supported argument. 3.0 pts Accomplished The initial post is supported by one or more non- scholarly sources or only one scholarly source. 0.0 pts Deficient The initial discussion post is not supported by any resource within the body of discussion and/or is opinion-based discussion. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation Guidelines 5.0 pts Exemplary Discussions posted on at least two separate days. The student MUST reply to the to the instructor, when applicable. This reply is not included in the two peer responses. 0.0 pts Deficient All discussions posted on the same day.