Guaranteed Higher Grade!
Free Quote
Memo to CIO on Success Criteria for Enterprise System Implementation and Enterprise Architecture
This assignment gives you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to research, evaluate, and explain enterprise systems, and to communicate effectively at the executive level. This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcomes:
Your instructor has assigned each group one of several types of enterprise systems (SCM) to research and prepare a paper and an executive-level informational presentation. In Project 1, you prepared a 2-3 page paper summarizing the case studies, evaluating the success of the implementations, and identifying lessons learned. For this assignment, you are to work independently and write a 1-2 page memo (not including references page) to the CIO that identifies more than seven success criteria for implementation of enterprise systems, for the category of enterprise systems assigned to you (SCM). (NOTE: More than seven success criteria are required to receive all possible points; see Grading Rubric below.)
Important: Often students write this memo from the perspective of what it looks like to have a successful implementation of ES/EA. Instead, the focus should be on the criteria that will help you be successful! There is a difference here. For example, cost savings is the result but not necessarily the success criteria leading up to it. Now you could contribute cost savings to the fact that you had executive buy-in with sustained sponsorship (this could be an example) or other criteria that includes re-engineering of business processes as contributors. Please orient this memo such that you look at success criteria as the "drivers" for a good implementation. Also, please remember to put this into a memo format that looks professional. Please remember that the CIO has limited time and you should get to the key points quickly. Please refer to the grading rubric and carefully follow the assignment instructions!
You are to use a Microsoft Word memo template. The use of at least three external scholarly resources (in addition to your case studies and other class materials) is required. (NOTE: More than three external resources are required to receive all possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) You should use scholarly journals (rather than Wikipedia and authorless website postings). If you need assistance with determining what a scholarly journal is, the UMUC library is a very good source of information.
Remember to correctly cite and reference all sources. Since you are writing a memo, you should use in-text citations and list the references on a separate page at the end.
Note: The filename of your paper should include your last name. An example would be: Smith_Memo.doc.
Your work will be graded according to the rubric below.
|
Criteria |
90-100% Far Above Standards |
80-89% Above Standards |
70-79% Meets Standards |
60-69% Below Standards |
< 60% Well Below Standards |
Possible Points |
|
Introduction |
5 Points There is an effective introduction to the memo, stating the purpose, using sophisticated writing. |
4 Points There is a clearly written introduction to the memo, stating the purpose, using effective writing. |
3.5 Points The introduction adequately sets the stage for the memo. |
3 Points The introduction does not adequately set the stage for the memo. |
0-2 Points No introduction is provided or little effort is shown. |
5 |
|
Criteria |
18-20 Points More than 7 criteria for successful implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) are identified. Each of the criteria is thoroughly explained and each is very clearly applicable to enterprise system implementation success. Includes a thoughtful explanation on how the success criteria relates to enterprise architecture. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of course concepts, analysis, critical thinking and synthesis. |
16-17 Points More than 7 criteria for successful implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) are identified. Each of the criteria is clearly explained and each is applicable to enterprise system implementation success. Includes a good explanation on how the success criteria relates to enterprise architecture. Demonstrates a good understanding of course concepts, analysis, critical thinking and synthesis. |
At least 7 criteria for successful implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) are identified, explained, and are applicable to enterprise system implementation success, and may demonstrate an adequate understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Some discussion on how the success criteria relates to enterprise architecture. |
12-13 Points Fewer than 7 criteria for successful implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) are identified. Some of the criteria may not be clearly explained, and/or may not be applicable to enterprise system implementation success, and/or may not demonstrate an adequate understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Little to no mention of how this success criteria relates to enterprise architecture. |
0-11 Points Few or no success criteria applicable to enterprise system and enterprise architecture implementa-tion are identified and explained, or are not relevant. |
20 |
|
Application of Criteria |
45-50 Points The application in a successful implementation of enterprise systems is fully and clearly described for more than 7 criteria. Each of the criteria is appropriately related to implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) and to satisfying the enterprise architecture; and demonstrates sophisticated incorporation of course concepts and research, analysis, critical thinking and synthesis. |
40-44 Points The application in a successful implementation of enterprise systems is clearly described for more than 7 criteria. Each of the criteria is appropriately related to implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) and to satisfying the enterprise architecture; and demonstrates effective incorporation of course concepts and research, analysis, critical thinking and synthesis. |
35-39 Points The application in a successful implementation of enterprise systems is described for at least 7 criteria. The explanations relate the criteria to implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) and satisfying the enterprise architecture, and demonstrate adequate incorporation of course concepts and research, analysis, and critical thinking. |
30-34 Points The application in a successful implementation of enterprise systems may be only partially described and/or fewer than 7 criteria may be discussed. The criteria may not be appropriately related to implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) and satisfying the enterprise architecture, and/or may not demonstrate adequate incorporation of course concepts and research, analysis, and critical thinking. |
0-29 Points The explanations for application of the criteria do not relate to successful implementa-tion of enterprise systems, or are missing; or too few criteria are included. |
50 |
|
External Research |
14-15 Points More than three scholarly sources other than the class resources are incorporated and used effectively, contextualized, appropriately researched and supported, and synthesized with original arguments. Sources used are credible, relevant, and timely. Proper APA style is used for citations and references. |
12-13 Points More than three scholarly sources other than the class resources are incorporated and used effectively, appropriately researched and supported, and support original arguments. Sources used are credible, relevant, and timely. Proper APA style is used for citations and references. |
11 Points Three scholarly sources other than the class resources are properly incorporated and used. Uses APA format for references and citations. |
10 Points Three or fewer sources other than the class resources may be used; may not be scholarly sources; may not be properly incorporated or used to support arguments; may rely too heavily on the reporting of external sources, and/or are not effective or appropriate; and/or are not credible, relevant, or timely. May not use APA format. |
0-9 Points No external research is incorporated or reference listed is not cited within text. |
15 |
|
Memo Format |
9-10 Points Memo reflects effective organization and sophisticated writing; correct structure, grammar, and spelling; presented in a professional format using Word memo template. |
8 Points Memo reflects effective organization; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; presented in a professional format using Word memo template. |
7 Points Memo has some organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling; is in Word memo template. |
6 Points Memo is not well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not in Word memo template. |
0-5 Points Memo is extremely poorly written and does not convey the information. |
10 |
|
TOTAL Points Possible |
100 |
NTU Grading System in Singapore: A Complete Guide for Students
NTU in Singapore is considered to be one of the most popular educational institutions across the gl
Top 9 Private Universities in Singapore: Your Guide to Higher Education
If there is one thing Asian countries never compromise on, it is education. Particularly, Singapore
How to Format an Essay: MLA, APA, Chicago Styles
Many of you know how to write an essay. However, you guys struggle when it comes to formatting the
Extemporaneous Speech – Examples & Writing Guide
“According to most studies, people’s number one fear is public speaking. Number two is death. D
