Identify 3 Issues Which Currently Humans May Have Issue With, Or Face, In The Coming Years. In Your Opinion, With Some Educational Evidence, What Are Those Issues?
The increasing world population is reaching an overpopulation stage which will lead to the inability of the planet to hold this population. There has been a concern that the increasing world population will lead to depletion of resources which will create a lot of famine. Gerland, et al. (2014) suggest that the world population growth is unlikely to stabilize any time from now. This is based on the fact that as people continue to procreate, the demand for the resources keeps on increasing which makes it difficult to meet the needs of this growing population. In the current world, there is a shortage of resources with specific minerals being depleted due to overconsumption. This rising population has led to an increased demand for resources which will overpower the ability to the planet to manage the population (Lamble, 2018). State measures to deal with overpopulation have led to human rights abuse as states seek to control the ballooning population. For example, in the 1970s some countries like Mexico, Indonesia, Bolivia, Peru, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and India forced their citizens into sterilization which was a violation of human rights. This also led to the draconian in China policy where couples were required to have only one child. The need to protect the human population from the effects of overpopulation has been around for a long time thus leading to a situation where environmentalists in developed countries around the world have raised the red flag on what needs to be done to curb this problem.
Since the use of nuclear bombs on Japan in the Second World War, the regions that the bombs were used have never recovered up to today. The same is similar to Australian indigenous lands where testing nuclear bombs took place. The devastating nuclear effects in the two regions can still be seen today due to the effects on the environment and even the human population (Kristensen & Norris, 2014). This means that the use of nuclear weapons will make the world inhabitable due to nuclear effects. This is reported in radiation sickness, firestorms, nuclear winter and even electromagnetic pulses that can lead to the loss of modern technology. Robock, et al. (2017) suggests that although scholars have reported humans can survive the effects of nuclear radiation, other secondary effects can lead to human extinction. This has been termed as a nuclear holocaust which brings forth the idea of mutually assured destruction. As the threat of nuclear war becomes real in the 21st century, questions have been asked on how prepared the world is to deal with the consequences of nuclear war. In the Second World War, it was discovered that warfare technology had advanced more than medical technology which led to more casualties and deaths after the war. With the world having about 15,000 nuclear weapons around the world, states need to prepare people for any eventuality that can arise just in case nuclear weapons are used.
As the world technology develops, the need to modify the genetic composition of humans has driven the need for altering DNA to make it more advanced. There have been debates on the existence of “Crispr” which can edit human DNA making it easy to carve diseases like cancer which threaten the world’s population (Hough & Ajetunmobi, 2017). The concern has been the ethical concerns of the use of such technologies which can lead to human rights violations like selecting DNAs to produce babies that will have the best intelligence that the world needs. This means that those who will fail to meet the intelligence profile will be done away with which will be a great violation of human rights. This use of genetic modifications presents future challenges that the world will have to deal with. In this case, ethicists need to be prepared to deal with the issues that will arise from the use of these technologies in a way that protects vulnerable populations. The modification of DNA will also require proper reflection on what needs to be preserved in the case of a modification of DNA since this can create a different planet that is controlled by artificial intelligence rather than human brains. This means that human body seems will be changed to more superior beings that will make them different from what exists today (Raina et al., 2018). Further, what will happen in a case where some people have modified DNA and intelligence whole others do not? This will create an inequality environment where few will have the best-modified DNA which is similar to the materialistic world that we live in where people are measured according to the material resources that they have.
References
Gerland, P., Raftery, A. E., Ev Ikova, H., Li, N., Gu, D., Spoorenberg, T., . . . Wilmoth, J. (2014). World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science, 346(6206), 234–237.
Hough, S., & Ajetunmobi, A. (2017). The Future of CRISPR Applications in the Lab, the Clinic and Society. In Precision Medicine, CRISPR, and Genome Engineering: Moving from Association to Biology and Therapeutics (pp. 157-178).
Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2014). Slowing nuclear weapon reductions and endless nuclear weapon modernizations: A challenge to the NPT. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 70(4), 94–107.
Lamble, L. (2018, August ). With 250 babies born each minute, how many people can the Earth sustain? The Guardian.
Raina, M., Pandotra, P., Salgotra, R. K., & Ali, S. (2018). Genetic Engineering and Environmental Risk. In Modern Age Environmental Problems and their Remediation (pp. 69-82).
Robock, A., Oman, L., & Stenchikov, G. L. (2017). Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals: Still catastrophic consequences. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(14).