Question 1(a)Let ð‘ð‘ andð‘žð‘ž be statements. Employ a truth table to verify that the proposition q)(~∧∨pp is a tautology. b)Use the rules of inference to show the validity of the following argument form. ð‘ð‘⟶(~ð‘žð‘ž)(premise)ð‘Ÿð‘ŸâŸ¶ð‘žð‘ž(premise)ð‘Ÿð‘Ÿ(premise)∴~ð‘ð‘(conclusion)Do not use truth tables in this part of the question and give a reason for each step.Question 2(a)Consider the following argument:All student must take a writing course. Carol is a student. Therefore, Carol must take a writing course.Let S(x) and W(x) be the predicates “x is a student” and “x takes a writing course”, respectively.(i) Rewrite the above argument using the predicates S(x) and W(x) together with the universal and/or existential quantifier. (ii)State whether the argument is valid or invalid and give the name to justify your choice.b)Consider the following statement P : For all real numbers x and y, if 22yx=thenyx=. (i) Write statement P using universal and/or existential quantifier, together with any necessary logical connectives.(ii)Also write the negation of statement P using universal and/or existential quantifier