Pinch Table Review of Literature: Prophylactic Use of Colony Stimulating Factors in Neutropenia

Discussion Board Question

There is a Pinch table attachment where all the information needs to be put. The Discussion board question was on prophylactic use of Colony Stimulating Factors in Neutropenia. A Review of Literature is conducted to generate an understanding of what is known and not known about a topic of interest. You have identified a topic/problem in Module 1

Research Problem and found four related study articles in Module 4. In this assignment, you will create a Pinch Table of study articles as part of a Review of Literature following the guidelines in Gray, Grove, and Sutherland (2017) and use a Pinch Table to share your review Review of Literature, Pinch Table Review of Literature, Pinch Table Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem 10.0 to >8.0 pts Accomplished Clinical problem is discussed with citations. Gap in the research literature is identified and described. 8.0 to >3.0 pts Competent Significance of problem vague. Gap in the research literature is not well described. No citation given. 3.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Problem or gap is not discussed. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle # 1 Appraisal If the study does not meet the design criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 10 points will be deducted. 20.0 to >16.0 pts Accomplished Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article. 16.0 to >6.0 pts Competent Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article. 6.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Study does not met the criteria for the assignment. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked.

Appraisal If the study does not meet the design criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 10 points will be deducted. 20.0 to >16.0 pts Accomplished Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article. 16.0 to >6.0 pts Competent Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article. 6.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Study does not met the criteria for the assignment. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle # 3 Appraisal If the study does not meet design criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 10 points will be deducted. 20.0 to >16.0 pts Accomplished Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article. 16.0 to >6.0 pts Competent Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article. 6.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Study does not met the criteria for the assignment. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle # 4 Appraisal If the study does not meet design criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 10 points will be deducted. 20.0 to >16.0 pts Accomplished Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included.

Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article. 16.0 to >6.0 pts Competent Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article. 6.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Study does not met the criteria for the assignment. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Style 10.0 to >8.0 pts Accomplished PinchTable used for assignment. Pinch Table organized and readable. Spelling counts. See instructions. Reference page included with no citation errors. 8.0 to >3.0 pts Competent Pinch Table disorganized with errors. -1 point off for each error on formatting and basic readability. 3.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement More than 7 errors 10.0 pts Module Four Identifying Quantitative Nursing Research Articles ( USE THESE ARTICLES FOR THE PINCH TABLE) Reference: Fiona Lim, M. Y., Maria Choy, Y. P., Tong, M., Elaine Yim, P. Y., Tracy Lui, S. Y., Lam, Y. T., . . . Ashley Cheng, C. K. (2018). A cohort study on protocol-based nurse-led out-patient management of post-chemotherapy low-risk febrile neutropenia. Supportive Care in Cancer, 26(9), 3039-3045.

doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uta.edu/10.1007/s00520-018-4157

Prevalence of Neutropenia among Patients with Solid Tumors undergoing Chemotherapy at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya. International Journal of Life Sciences, 6(3), 91-95. Mak, W. C., & Ching, S. S. Y. (2015). Effect of an education program on knowledge, self-care behavior and handwashing competence on prevention of febrile neutropenia among breast cancer patients receiving Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Chemotherapy Day Centre. Asia- Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2(4), 276. ?ahin, Z. A., & Ergüney, S. (2016). Effect on symptom management education receiving patients of chemotherapy.Journal of Cancer Education, 31(1), 101-107. doi:10.1007/s13187-015-0801-8

Research Problem (identify a gap in the literature); detailed and citation included: