Get Instant Help From 5000+ Experts For
question

Writing Get your essay and assignment written from scratch by PhD expert

Rewriting: Paraphrase or rewrite your friend's essay with similar meaning at reduced cost

Editing:Proofread your work by experts and improve grade at Lowest cost

And Improve Your Grades
myassignmenthelp.com
loader
Phone no. Missing!

Enter phone no. to receive critical updates and urgent messages !

Add File

Error goes here

Files Missing!

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

Guaranteed Higher Grade!
Plagiarism checker
Verify originality of an essay
essay
Get ideas for your paper
Plagiarism checker
Cite sources with ease

How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay: Formula & Full Example

An-Illustration-On-How-To-Write-A-Critical-Analysis

Table of Contents

Why Most Students Struggle with Critical Analysis

When an instructor assigns a “critical analysis essay,” they are asking for more than a summary or a book report—they are asking for a structured, evidence-based argument about a text’s effectiveness. If you are exploring the foundational concepts of writing, our general essay writing guide is an excellent starting point.

The reason most students lose points is not that they failed to understand the book, but that they failed to structure their argument academically. They use too much summary and not enough true analysis.

In this definitive guide, we will provide you with the exact academic framework, the reusable thesis formula, and the full annotated example essay you need to master this assignment. This is the only method that guarantees a high grade by aligning your writing with university-level expectations.

What Is a Critical Analysis Essay? (Critical Analysis Definition & Meaning)

A critical analysis essay is a piece of academic writing that evaluates a work of art, literature, film, or theoretical concept by assessing its purpose, logic, and effectiveness. It provides a critical essay definition that moves beyond simple summation. It is not a summary. It is not a personal opinion. It is a systematic process of breaking down (analysis) a work into its components and making a judgment (critique) about how well those components achieve the author’s intended goal. This clarifies what is a critical analysis and distinguishes it from a simple review.

What Critical Analysis Is What Critical Analysis Is NOT
Interpretation: Interpreting the author’s meaning and purpose. Summary: Simply restating the plot or main ideas.
Evaluation: Assessing the work’s success or failure (its effectiveness). Personal Opinion: Stating whether you liked or disliked the work.
Evidence-Based: Using structured, cited textual evidence (quotes, details). Subjective Assessment: Relying on feelings or untested assumptions.

 

Critical Reading & Research Strategies (The Pre-Writing Work)

Before you can structure your essay, you must first critically engage with the original work to find your evidence and formulate your judgment. The purpose of this phase is to turn a simple reading into an analytical reading.

1. Contextualize the Work

  • Research the Background: Don’t read the text in a vacuum. Identify the author, date, and genre. Research the historical, social, or political background of the work’s creation. This helps you understand the author’s purpose.
  • Identify the Author’s Core Argument: Determine the central
  • (for non-fiction) or the primary theme/message (for fiction) the author intended to convey.

2. Analyze the How, Not Just the What

Focus your annotation and notes on the techniques the author uses to achieve their goal.

  • Identify Techniques: Look for the specific tools the author employs. These will become your Techniques A, B, and C in your Thesis Formula.
  • Locate Specific Evidence (E): Mark the exact quotes, data points, or scenes that exemplify the techniques you’ve identified. These are the pieces of text you will use as your Evidence in the P-E-A Model.

3. Formulate a Tentative Judgment

Ask yourself these critical questions to move towards your final critique: Did the author succeed in their purpose? Was the argument logical, or were there flaws?

How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay: The P-E-A Model

To beat the high-authority competition, you must use a rigorous academic framework. While some instructors use MEAL (Main Idea, Evidence, Analysis, Link), the P-E-A Model is simpler, clearer, and more direct for structuring a persuasive writing body paragraph. This is the most effective approach for how to write a critical analysis essay.

The P-E-A model is the secret to moving beyond summary and ensuring every paragraph directly supports your thesis statement.

P is for Point (The Topic Sentence)

This is the main idea of your paragraph, stating one specific claim that supports your overall thesis.

Example: Fitzgerald uses the symbolic setting of East Egg to instantly establish the moral corruption and inherited privilege of the old money elite.

E is for Evidence (The Support)

This is the textual proof—a direct quote, paraphrased detail, or descriptive fact—that validates your point. It must be properly cited (use a simple parenthetical citation).

  • Example: The text repeatedly describes the mansions there as sitting on “the less fashionable” side of the bay, suggesting an inherent moral decay (Fitzgerald 14).

A is for Analysis (The Interpretation)

This is the most crucial step, where you explain how and why your evidence supports your point, and how that point supports your overall thesis. Never let a quote speak for itself.

  • Example: This specific description establishes a contrast between physical wealth and ethical poverty, which is central to Fitzgerald’s critique of the American Dream. By linking the physical setting to the characters’ moral standing, the author successfully argues that inherited wealth inherently lacks spiritual vitality.

Your Next Critical Tool: The Thesis Statement Formula and Template (Analysis Essay Thesis)

The thesis statement is the single most important sentence in your essay. It must be specific, argumentative, and contain the “critical” element. Use this formula to guarantee you address the prompt correctly. For a more detailed guide on how to write a thesis statement, read our advice. This functions as an evaluation essay thesis template or an analysis paper thesis template.

The Standard Critical Analysis Thesis Formula (Thesis Statement for Critical Analysis)

You can copy and paste this structure directly into your essay and fill in the bracketed items.

Formula:

In [Name of Work] (Year), [Author/Artist] uses [Technique A], [Technique B], and [Technique C] to argue that [Author’s Core Message], which ultimately [Critique Verb: succeeds/fails] in [Achieving/Undermining X]..

Example Thesis (Affirming Critique):

In The Great Gatsby (1925), F. Scott Fitzgerald uses setting symbolism, unreliable narration, and color imagery to argue that the American Dream is corrupted by wealth, which ultimately succeeds in providing a timeless commentary on modern materialism. (Example of thesis statement for analytical essay)

Example Thesis (Challenging Critique):

In “The Ethics of AI” (2024), Professor Jones uses faulty statistical comparisons and straw man arguments to argue that AI development is inherently safer than biological evolution, which ultimately fails in convincing a discerning audience of his central conclusion.

3 Rules for Writing a Perfect Critical Thesis

  1. Be Specific, Not General: Avoid vague words like “shows” or “talks about.” Use precise critique verbs like argues, deconstructs, subverts, validates, or fails to prove.
    These principles closely mirror the structure required in argumentative essays; to enhance your academic writing with expert guidance, our Argumentative Essay Help service delivers personalized support designed to improve your argumentative structure and clarity.
  2. Identify 2-3 Techniques: Your thesis must name the tools the author uses (e.g., rhetorical questions, camera angles, historical allusion). These techniques become your body paragraphs.
  3. Contain a Judgment: The final clause is the critical part. You must conclude whether the author’s attempt was a success, a failure, or only partially effective.

Critical Analysis Essay Structure and Outline (Analysis Paper Outline)

A perfect critical analysis essay always has two distinct movements: Summary/Context and Critique/Analysis. Use this 5-paragraph structure as your roadmap. This serves as your critique essay outline and critical analysis paper outline.

I. Introduction: How to Start a Critical Analysis Essay

Step Action Focus
1. Hook Start with a relevant quote, statistic, or rhetorical question. Engage the reader immediately.
2. Context Introduce the author, title, publication date, and genre. Briefly state the work’s primary subject matter. Provide all necessary background information.
3. Thesis Statement Use the Thesis Formula above. State your specific argumentative claim (your judgment of the work’s effectiveness). State your essay’s central argument clearly and precisely.

 

II. The Summary Paragraph (1st Body Paragraph)

This is the only paragraph where you primarily summarize. Its purpose is to show your reader you understand the original work before you criticize it.

Step Action Focus
1. Topic Sentence State clearly: “This Work focuses on Core Topic.” Signal that this is a summary.
2. Overview Briefly summarize the author’s main argument, purpose, and key conclusions (if non-fiction) or the main plot points (if fiction). Use neutral, objective language. Keep it brief (max 20% of the essay).
3. Transition Conclude with a sentence that bridges to your critique. Example: While the author presents a compelling case, their use of logical fallacy ultimately weakens their central claim.

 

III. Body Paragraphs (2nd, 3rd, and 4th – The P-E-A Critique)

These paragraphs form the core of your analysis. You must use the P-E-A structure for each one. Each paragraph should focus on one of the techniques mentioned in your thesis (Technique A, B, and C).

Step Action Focus
P (Point) Topic Sentence: State how the first technique (e.g., Technique A: Color Imagery) contributes to your thesis. Claiming the first point of critique.
E (Evidence) Provide the specific quote, scene, or data from the text that proves your point. Showing the textual proof.
A (Analysis) The Critical Move: Explain how the technique (P) using the evidence (E) makes the argument effective or ineffective. (This is where the grade is earned.) Interpreting and judging the evidence.

 

IV. Conclusion: Critical Analysis Conclusion Example

The conclusion should synthesize your argument and leave the reader with a broader perspective on the topic. Remember that the conclusion is not the place to introduce fresh evidence, which helps you complete the essay strongly.

Step Action Focus
1. Restate Thesis Rephrase your original thesis statement using new language. Remind the reader of your main claim.
2. Summarize Main Points Briefly review the 2–3 main techniques (P-E-A paragraphs) you used to support your thesis. Synthesize the evidence presented in the body.
3. Final Insight End with a powerful closing statement that addresses the work’s larger significance or suggests future implications for the reader or the subject matter. Leave a lasting impression.

 

Academic Format and Citation Styles (Critical Analysis Format)

Understanding the critical analysis format involves more than just the content—it requires correct presentation. Your professor will specify a citation style, and adhering to it is mandatory. This section addresses analysis paper format and APA/MLA critical analysis format.

Key Formatting Requirements

Requirement MLA (Literature/Humanities) APA (Social Sciences/Articles) Chicago (History/Business)
Title Page No separate title page. Required (Title, Author, Institution). Required (Title, Author, Date).
Spacing Double-spaced throughout. Double-spaced throughout. Double-spaced throughout.
Headers Author’s Last Name and page number on every page. Running head (short title) and page number. Page number only, typically top right.
In-Text Citation (Author Page #) e.g., (Fitzgerald 14) (Author, Year) e.g., (Fitzgerald, 1925) Footnotes/Endnotes or (Author Year, Page #)
Works Cited/References Works Cited References Bibliography

 

The ability to correctly format an article analysis or critical review demonstrates mastery beyond the content itself. Ensure you check your assignment for the required style before submission.

Full Annotated Critical Analysis Essay Example

Essay Title (How to Title a Critical Analysis Essay): The Moral Dust: Fitzgerald’s Effective Critique of the Corrupted American Dream

Introduction

Paragraph Content Annotation (Why it works)
Hook: Before the Roaring Twenties had faded into memory, F. Scott Fitzgerald captured the era’s frantic search for meaning in the shadow of limitless wealth. Engages the reader by setting the cultural context immediately.
Context: Published in 1925, The Great Gatsby is a definitive American novel narrated by the observant and judgmental Nick Carraway, chronicling the rise and tragic fall of the mysterious millionaire Jay Gatsby. The novel explores themes of societal decay and the cost of ambition within the newly rich elite of Long Island. Provides the necessary author, title, date, and genre context.
Thesis Statement: In The Great Gatsby (1925), F. Scott Fitzgerald uses setting symbolism, unreliable narration, and color imagery to argue that the American Dream is corrupted by wealth, which ultimately succeeds in providing a timeless commentary on modern materialism. The thesis uses the formula: names the work, identifies three techniques (which become the body paragraphs), and provides a clear judgment (succeeds).

 

Body Paragraph 1: Summary (The Only Summary Allowed)

Paragraph Content Annotation (Why it works)
Summary Topic Sentence: The central narrative follows Nick’s observations of his neighbor, Jay Gatsby, a man obsessed with recapturing a past love through displays of extravagant, newly acquired wealth. The novel unfolds as a cautionary tale detailing Gatsby’s efforts to impress Daisy Buchanan, culminating in a tragic accident and the ultimate disintegration of the romanticized ideal of self-made success. This provides sufficient plot context but avoids excessive detail. It focuses on the themes relevant to the critique.
Transition: While the surface plot centers on a desperate romance, the true effectiveness of Fitzgerald’s novel lies in its complex literary apparatus used to deliver its core philosophical critique. This sentence pivots the essay from plot summary directly into the critical analysis.

 

Body Paragraph 2: Critique of Setting Symbolism (P-E-A)

P-E-A Component Paragraph Content Annotation (Why it works)
P (Point) Fitzgerald’s use of setting symbolism is immediately effective in establishing the novel’s core thematic conflict between old and new money, which represents the moral corruption inherent in both forms of wealth. Clearly states the paragraph’s claim, supporting the thesis.
E (Evidence) The contrast is visualized through the geography of the two opposing peninsulas, East Egg and West Egg. Nick describes East Egg as the “less fashionable of the two,” subtly revealing the established, inherited wealth of the residents like Tom and Daisy, suggesting an inherent decay, while West Egg, home to Gatsby and Nick, is merely “a foil” to the old aristocracy (Fitzgerald 14). Provides specific textual support (quote and detail) to ground the claim.
A (Analysis) This specific geographical juxtaposition is crucial because it physically manifests the class critique. By linking the physical setting to the characters’ moral standing—East Egg’s inherited wealth lacks spiritual vitality, and West Egg’s nouveau riche ambition is inherently vulgar—Fitzgerald successfully argues that no amount of material gain can truly fulfill the original, pure promise of the American Dream. This explains how the evidence (E) supports the point (P) and connects back to the thesis, earning the grade.

 

Body Paragraph 3: Critique of Unreliable Narration (P-E-A)

P-E-A Component Paragraph Content Annotation (Why it works)
P (Point) Furthermore, the critical success of the novel rests on Fitzgerald’s sophisticated use of unreliable narration through Nick Carraway, which forces the reader to constantly evaluate the events through a biased, privileged lens. The claim focuses on a literary technique and its function in the overall critique.
E (Evidence) Nick initially judges Gatsby severely, asserting that Gatsby “represented everything for which I have an unreserved contempt” (Fitzgerald 2). Yet, as the story progresses, Nick develops a profound admiration for Gatsby’s “colossal conceit” and romantic ambition, concluding that Gatsby is “worth the whole damn bunch put together” (Fitzgerald 154). The evidence shows the internal contradiction in the narrator’s perspective.
A (Analysis) This shift in the narrator’s moral compass is not merely character development; it is a critical strategy. By making the central observer initially contemptuous but ultimately forgiving, Fitzgerald emphasizes that Gatsby’s dream, however naive, possessed an imaginative nobility that the truly corrupt characters (like the Buchanans) wholly lacked, thus validating the claim that the promise of the Dream was once real, even if misguided in its pursuit. Explains the purpose of the technique and how it enhances the author’s message.

 

Body Paragraph 4: Critique of Color Imagery (P-E-A)

P-E-A Component Paragraph Content Annotation (Why it works)
P (Point) Finally, the novel’s tragic vision is reinforced through Fitzgerald’s consistent and evocative use of color imagery, especially the colors green and yellow, which symbolize the hollow nature of the pursuit of wealth. Focuses on the final technique named in the thesis.
E (Evidence) The color green, most famously embodied in the “green light” at the end of Daisy’s dock, is initially associated with hope and the future, the very core of Gatsby’s dream. However, this hopeful green is later countered by the prominent use of yellow, seen in Gatsby’s “lemon-colored” car and the “yellow cocktail music” at his parties, a color often associated with corruption and decay. Uses two contrasting pieces of evidence related to the single technique (color).
A (Analysis) This symbolic pairing is instrumental in Fitzgerald’s critique because it visually charts the decline of the American Dream. The green light of promise is overwhelmed by the cheap, false gold of Gatsby’s consumerism (yellow), demonstrating that the purity of hope inevitably becomes tarnished and fatal when pursued through corrupt, materialistic means. Final piece of analysis, linking the literary technique directly to the thesis’s core judgment.

 

Conclusion: Critical Analysis Conclusion Example

Paragraph Content Annotation (Why it works)
Restate Thesis: In conclusion, through a precise combination of symbolic settings, biased narration, and vivid color schemes, The Great Gatsby successfully delivers a timeless critique of American materialism, asserting that the country’s founding ideals have been irreparably polluted by the pursuit of extravagant wealth. Rephrases the thesis statement to confirm the essay’s central argument.
Summarize Main Points: The novel’s structural effectiveness relies on the dichotomy of the Eggs, the unreliable moralizing of Nick, and the pervasive shift from green hope to yellow decay, all of which reinforce the novel’s overarching theme of moral bankruptcy. Synthesizes the P-E-A paragraphs without introducing new evidence.
Final Insight: Ultimately, Fitzgerald’s technique and judgment succeed because the novel forces the reader to confront the enduring question of whether any dream can survive when its value is measured exclusively in dollars—a question that remains profoundly relevant nearly a century later. A powerful, forward-looking statement that broadens the essay’s significance.

 

How to Choose Critical Analysis Essay Topics?

Selecting a topic that requires evaluation—not just summary—is the first step toward a high grade. The best topics allow you to analyze the how and why behind the work’s effectiveness.
When looking for a good topic, you often want to pick a controversial argument to ensure there is enough material for a deep, critical discussion.

This list includes topics across various disciplines, addressing high-interest and complex texts for a wide range of assignments.

Literary Analysis & Film Critique

  • The significance of symbolism in Breakfast at Tiffany’s by Truman Capote.
  • Talk about the issues with perception and alienation in The Things They Carried.
  • Analysis of the rhetorical devices in Linda Hogan’s Dwellings.
  • Zen Buddhism’s Place in J.D. Salinger’s Nine Stories.
  • A critical examination of how Jane Austen subverts
  • Analyzing how the dichotomy of the city vs. the wilderness
  • Evaluating the extent to which the physical setting
  • Subversion of the traditional male hero in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.
  • Analysis of city vs. wilderness in Brave New World as a critique of scientific rationalism.
  • Setting (house/attic) as a metaphor for the protagonist’s mental state in The Yellow Wallpaper.
  • Examination of hybridity and cultural identity in novels by Chinua Achebe or Zadie Smith.
  • Analysis of The Handmaid’s Tale’s social problems in detail.
  • A critique of how the use of color and light informs the viewer’s perception of sanity in The Lighthouse (2019).
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of the unreliable narrator in Fight Club in commenting on consumerism.
  • Writing an effective critical book review template on Toni Morrison’s Beloved.
  • Critique of Wes Anderson’s style (symmetry, pastels) and its function in creating emotional distance.
  • Use of enjambment and vernacular in Langston Hughes’s poetry to articulate class experience
  • Analysis of the moral ambiguity of final actions in Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
  • Assessment of how the “frame story” in Frankenstein affects the perception of the monster’s humanity.
  • Analysis of how the deliberate pacing and scene duration in a horror film (e.g., Hereditary or Get Out) builds psychological tension.

Media, Ethics, and Social Issues

  • An examination of the impact of the media on political discourse and public opinion.
  • Celebrity culture’s effects on social values and conventions.
  • A critique of how marginalized groups are portrayed in the media.
  • An examination of how polarisation in politics affects democratic institutions.
  • A critical analysis of the use of deepfake technology in political campaigns and its ethical implications.
  • Evaluating the success of documentary filmmaking in achieving environmental policy change (e.g., Seaspiracy).
  • Critical analysis of the moral implications of deepfake technology in political campaigns.
  • Evaluating the ethical responsibility of social media influencers when endorsing health products.
  • A critique of algorithmic decision-making in criminal justice or loan applications and its social bias.
  • Analyzing the impact of clickbait headlines on public trust in digital news sources.
  • Critical evaluation of the ethical balance between national security and personal digital privacy.
  • A critique of the social effectiveness and fairness of “cancel culture” as a tool for accountability.
  •  Analyzing the moral implications of large-scale consumer data harvesting by tech giants.
  • Evaluating how mainstream media frames the issue of poverty and its effect on public policy support.
  • A critique of the originality and intellectual property rights when using generative AI for artistic creation.
  • Analyzing how social media algorithms reinforce political polarization and “echo chambers.
  • Critical assessment of the moral duty and consequences for whistleblowers in corporate or government settings.
  • Evaluating the effectiveness and sincerity of celebrity activism on complex social issues.
  • Analyzing how corporate ownership of news outlets affects editorial integrity and content diversity.
  • A critique of the strategies used by social media platforms to combat electoral misinformation.

Science, Technology, and Philosophy

  • An investigation into the morality of enhancing cognitive and intellectual capacity in humans through technology.
  • A critical evaluation of the moral implications of genetic engineering.
  • Analyzing the rhetorical structure of a major scientific paper.
  • Critically assessing the arguments for Universal Basic Income (UBI) in a world dominated by automation.
  • A critical analysis of a research paper on climate change policy.
  • Evaluating the effectiveness and inherent bias of the scientific peer review process in ensuring quality research.
  • Analysis of the replication crisis in psychology or social science and its impact on public trust in data.
  • A critique of how private or government funding sources influence the direction and reporting of scientific research.
  • Philosophical critique of the feasibility of achieving true scientific objectivity given human interpretation.
  • Examination of the ethical duty of institutions in managing cases of scientific misconduct and data falsification.
  • Evaluating the moral justification of using placebo control groups in clinical trials for life-threatening diseases.
  • Analysis of the benefits and methodological challenges of “citizen science” projects for research validity.
  • Philosophical analysis of the demarcation criteria used to distinguish between science and pseudoscience.
  • Critique of the ethical guidelines for conducting research on vulnerable populations (e.g., children, incarcerated individuals).
  • Philosophical assessment of the Turing Test and the criteria necessary to attribute consciousness or sentience to AI.
  • Analyzing the ethical and philosophical implications of mind uploading or “digital immortality.”
  • Critique of the moral justification for using technology to enhance human cognitive or physical capacity.
  • Evaluation of the philosophical arguments concerning existential risk (X-risk) posed by superintelligence.
  • Critical assessment of the arguments for Universal Basic Income (UBI) in response to job displacement by automation.

Comprehensive FAQ: Addressing Critical Analysis Pain Points

Q.1. What is the difference between a critical analysis, a critical review, and a critical appraisal?

All three require evaluation, but their targets differ:

  1. Critical Analysis (Essay): Evaluates a text’s rhetorical or literary techniques and effectiveness (e.g., How does the author use metaphor to argue X?).
  2. Critical Review: Evaluates a primary source (often an article or book) for its suitability and contribution to a field (e.g., Is this textbook useful for college-level instruction?).
  3. Critical Appraisal: A formal, standardized process used primarily in medicine and social science to judge the validity, reliability, and applicability of a research study (e.g., Did the randomized control trial use a large enough sample size?).

Q.2. How do I choose an effective title for my critical analysis essay?

should be descriptive and compelling (addressing how to title a critical analysis essay). Use a two-part format:

  • Part 1 (Creative Hook): A relevant phrase or image from the text (e.g., “The Moral Dust”).
  • Part 2 (Descriptive Argument): A colon followed by your main critique (e.g., “: Fitzgerald’s Effective Critique of the Corrupted American Dream”).

Q.3. How do I start a critical analysis essay?

The introduction must be highly focused (addressing how to start a critical analysis essay). Start with a compelling Hook, immediately provide the work’s Context (Author, Title, Date), and present your argumentative Thesis (your judgment). Do not start with definitions or broad generalities.

Q.4. How can I ensure my analysis paper is not just a summary?

Use the P-E-A Model for every body paragraph. Your A (Analysis) section must be twice as long as your E (Evidence) section. If you spend more time describing the quote than explaining how it proves your thesis, you are summarizing.

Q.5. What type of language should be used in a critical analysis essay?

Use formal, academic language (addressing critical writing essay). Avoid contractions, slang, and first-person pronouns (“I,” “my”). Focus on objective phrasing like: “The author argues…” or “The text suggests…”

Q.6. Where can I find a good critical book review template?

A strong critical book review template follows the same Introduction/Body/Conclusion structure as the general essay, but the body often breaks down into two main sections: 1) Author’s Thesis and Structure and 2) Critique of Methodology/Effectiveness. Focus on the author’s credentials and the book’s contribution to its field.

Hi, I am Mark, a Literature writer by profession. Fueled by a lifelong passion for Literature, story, and creative expression, I went on to get a PhD in creative writing. Over all these years, my passion has helped me manage a publication of my write ups in prominent websites and e-magazines. I have also been working part-time as a writing expert for myassignmenthelp.com for 5+ years now. It’s fun to guide students on academic write ups and bag those top grades like a pro. Apart from my professional life, I am a big-time foodie and travel enthusiast in my personal life. So, when I am not working, I am probably travelling places to try regional delicacies and sharing my experiences with people through my blog. 

Related Post

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.

Order Now
Plagiarism checker
Verify originality of an essay
essay
Get ideas for your paper
Plagiarism checker
Cite sources with ease
WhatsApp Order/Chat on whatsapp
support
close