Strategies to Support the Mental Health of Employees During COVID-19

The main aim of this report is to propose alternative strategies to companies that would enable them to properly support the mental health of their employees in a time of crisis. It is found that Invest in training, modify policies and practices, and Measure is some strategies that support the mental health of their employees in a time of Covid. This report also evaluated that workers want additional beleaguered provision from their companies, tackle new challenges, Rethink flexibility and boundaries, Leadership extends beyond the company walls, Resist business, as usual, Sharpen the DEI priority are some strategies for promoting the mental wellbeing of employees. It is also found that are Encourage work/life harmony, address mental wellbeing at the office, provide complimentary assessment resources, sometimes speak about EAP opportunities, prioritize fitness, have on-the-job activities, and encourage staff initiatives to get treatment are some strategies for promoting the mental wellbeing of employers.

Development in the advancement of diversity, justice, and integration in the community and the market as a whole was sluggish well before the pandemic started. Historical problems for various populations have been compounded by the COVID-19 situation (Hallinger, 2018).

Here, we report on effects on the workers (And certain different communities can also experience the health consequences of COVID-19 more intensely). Females are especially high in industries that are projected to suffer from high joblessness in 2020, comprising hotels, diet & beverages, sales. As of September 2020, just 53% of U.S. young Black community are working, in comparison with 57% of the equivalent white population,2 and 39% of Black workers' employment became precarious as a consequence of the COVID-19 problem, comparison with 34% for white employees (Eva, et. al., 2019). Susceptible employees are either prone to pay freezes, knock, or made ineffective (for example, staff holding on a paycheck but not working) over times of high geographical barriers. In the same way, 65 percent of US Hispanics and Latinos serve in five markets which have seen biggest decline in GDP since pandemic, particularly recreation, tourism, and retail sales (Oc, 2018).

To those that are already operating, parents may be impacted overwhelmingly. For instance, U.S. mothers of small kids have cut their number of working hours at a pace that is four or five times greater than the dad in parenting, home education, and household duties. 3 U.S. moms are often 1.5 times additional probable than males devote an additional three or more hours a day on homework, care for children to 20 hours per week or half of full-time work (Crosby and Bryson, 2018). In India, females record a 30% rise in domestic duties. Our new Women in Place of work 2020 study reported , in the United States and Canada, pressure of  twofold change has caused one in four females in business environments to contemplate lowering their careers or quitting their workforce (Rudolph, Rauvola, and Zacher, 2018).

Strategies that support the Mental Health of their Employees in a Time of Covid

This report presents the strategies that support the mental health of their employees in a time of Covid. It also illustrates the Strategies to promote the mental well-being of both employees and employers.

Strategies that support the Mental Health of their Employees in a Time of Covid

Let the colleagues be informed of the behavioral wellbeing services available and urge them to utilize them. Approximately 46% of all the staff in our survey claimed that their employer would not share them constructively. If anyone exchanged it once, exchange this again.as well as, be mindful that embarrassment and disgrace discourage a lot of workers from accessing the mental health resources to pursue care, which equalize the usage of these programs. While management will be at the forefront of solving mental health challenges, it is still up to the most senior employees of the business to act decisively (Leithwood, Harris, and Hopkins, 2020).

In  2019 Mental Wellbeing at Work Study, published in collaboration with SAP and Qualtrics, the utmost widely sought-after mental health services at the work environment were more accessible and culture-accepting, clearer knowledge on when to go or how to get care, and learning (Cortellazzo, Bruni, and Zampieri, 2019).

Mental wellbeing concerns are as prevalent in the C-Suite as they are in private donors. Reporting their mental wellbeing issues and modeling positive behavior are two of the most crucial moves company may take. Here are a couple of other items that leaders should do to stabilize and promote mental wellbeing at work (Leithwood, Harris, and Hopkins, 2020).

Invest in training. Perhaps more than ever, the company can give priority to constructive and constructive mental wellbeing programming in the workplace for executives, administrators, and team members. Afore pandemic, corporations like Morrison & Foerster and Verizon Media had convened senior executives to address its position in building psychologically stable society. They were well prepared to handle the chaos that transpired. When more and more workers deal with mental wellbeing, it is vital to dispel traditional misconceptions, minimize shame, and develop the skills needed to engage in constructive discussions around mental health in the workplace. If the company doesn't have a fund to spend in preparation, mental health staff reserve groups are a poor place to raise visibility, create a network, and provide peer help (Cortellazzo, Bruni, and Zampieri, 2019).

Modify policies and practices. To relieve the burden on everybody, be a supportive as well as versatile as necessary in reviewing strategies and procedures in response to pandemic and social disorder. For instance, people might yield a proper appearance at the issues and guidelines about elastic working hours, paid off days, email as well as other correspondence, paid and unpaid leave. Want to redefine presentation assessments tools for compassionate input as well as improvement instead of assessing them contrary to specific goals (Hughes, et. al., 2018). In mid-March, Katherine Maher, CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation has mailed emails to the institute detailing reforms to reduce tension comprising: "If a company chooses to cut down [work hours], it’s all right." It has dedicated itself to hiring consultants and hourly workers on the terms of the regular hours of service, irrespective of their willingness to work. Once they implement improvements, make it clear that they do so to help the emotional welfare of the staff, if this is indeed the aim (Hoch, et. al., 2018).

Strategies to promote the mental well-being of both employees and employers

Measure. Safeguarding transparency does not seem to be complex; this could be achieved routinely with quick pulsate study to know in what way people perform now and over period. BlackRock, a multinational wealth management company, is the companies which performed pulse studies after pandemic to identify fundamental stressors and desires of workers. The straight feedback from staff aided form innovative policies, together with distant administration skills development for administrators, improved wellness and well-being programs for workers, and expanded job accessibility and time off (Ospina, et. al., 2020).

While rapid and successful approaches to sudden shifts to working remotely might mitigated negative consequences, workers—mainly minority workers and parents working already learning to deal with the broad range of pandemic problems that go beyond distance learning. And there are also major differences. For example, the proportion of businesses contributing to mental wellbeing issues falls below the proportion of staff identifying this as a continuing issue, with different demographics experiencing the most acute difference (Lemoine, Hartnell, and Leroy, 2019).

There has been no alternative to the magic-bullet. Considering the dynamic nature of what causes behavioural wellbeing issues (e.g., burnout, out-of-work agitation, confusion regarding the future), employers will need to engage in several places at once, involving strategies relating to elevated workloads and workers' feeling of connection (Gumus, et. al., 2018).

The problem for companies would be much greater when they try to satisfy the diverse demands of different classes of employees. For example, females are much more supportive of the behavioural wellbeing/care counselling and individual well-being services provided by their organizations than men, maybe since they are much further willing to experience mental health problems. Thirty-five percent of females rate counselling amongst the other top three most valuable services that the companies might have throughout the COVID-19 crisis, marginally higher than 29 percent of men (Rudolph, Murphy, and Zacher, 2020).

Around the same time, wellness reviews and insurance benefits are the most valued employer-provided advantage for LBGTQ+ workers (against the third-most valued of straight and cisgender workers). LGBTQ+ workers often much more prone to appreciate extended days off (both compensated and unpaid) versus the regular counterparts. Maybe since the reservations regarding career growth, this still value further work training/rehabilitation (32 percent, in contrast with 25 percent of straight and cisgender employees) (Schoemaker, Heaton, and Teece, 2018).

Sharpen the DEI priority. Placing DEI initiative and guaranteeing that the campaign is run by a motivated manager is a beginning, whereas companies requisite to devote means—for instance, budget and staff—as necessary. Setting and monitoring consistent objectives (with just 50% of the firms surveyed do) can often support to measure success particularly though overlapping interests are on the table. They need to find solutions to resolve some of the problems found in our studies, like mismatch of monetary resources and the absence of transparency of senior executives (Andriani, Kesumawati, and Kristiawan, 2018).

Resist business as usual. Via our interactions with business owners, we described 33 key impact-driven approaches, 10 of which are especially important in the context of COVID-19 (Exhibit 7). Businesses ought to be careful through this list, concentrating on a few particular interventions that are important to their situation at this time, and only ultimately moving the progress in their company with controlled implementation (Walton, Murray, and Christian, 2020).

Tackle new challenges. There is a clear need for mental wellbeing among all categories of workers, but especially for females and LGBTQ+ workers. Businesses ought to reflect about consequences of the workers and part it should better perform in supporting their staff. It might take several ways, spanning from the availability of healthcare resources and funding for therapy to preparation for managers. Step managers may also play a part in addressing other issues, such as workload changes or workplace access (Blake, et. al., 2020).

Rethink flexibility and boundaries. LGBTQ+ staff, and POC in specific, cited complaints about increased workloads, and more employers anticipate this to be a problem in the next six months. Addressing this can enable employers to reconsider their standards of worker engagement and success, extend incentives such as compensated time off, and encourage workers to set limits among work and personal life (Santarone, McKenney, and Elkbuli, 2020).

Leadership extends beyond company walls. Our survey finds that workers throughout nations want companies to provide an outside voice on DEI from participating in culture and philanthropy to involvement with vendors. This means that businesses can profit from more analytical focus such as how to activate these external triggers. Businesses should investigate their own goals, and how better to match their internal objectives with a greater position in the advancement of DEI (Torous, et.al., 2020).

Applauding people work long and come back early, or waiting for many of them to operate from home after work, damages the business in long run. Deprived of a good work-life equilibrium, morale is expected to decrease and workers are more probable to flame out. Maintain staff on taking daily breaks where they can unscrew from the workplace. Don't ask anyone to respond to an email across the time. Encourage all to grow a rich, complete existence outside the workplace. Persons who indulge in hobbies, enjoy period with friends, family and find time to create successful employers of themselves (Hamouche, 2020).

Increased Sales

Big companies are increasingly going public about their environmental plans. When deciding which supplier to award a contract to, companies including IBM, Walmart, and Kaiser Permanente look at their suppliers' sustainability commitments. The company would have an advantage over vendors that have failed to adopt a sustainability plan if the enterprise can demonstrate its contribution (Buick, Blackman, and Johnson, 2018).

Attract Investors

Many buyers, like customers, choose to invest in an environmentally friendly business. Their motivations aren't entirely altruistic. Investors continue to make money. A business that faces a big government fine or a large clean-up operation is unlikely to be successful. Investors may therefore view a business that is environmentally friendly as being more creative and therefore more sustainable (Tollman, et. al., 2021).

References 

Alqatawenh, A.S., 2018. Transformational leadership style and its relationship with change management. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, 19(1), pp.17-24.

Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N. and Kristiawan, M., 2018. The influence of transformational leadership and work motivation on teacher's performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), pp.19-29.

Attah, E., Obera, V.A. and Isaac, S., 2017. Effective leadership and change management for sustainable development in Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research, 4(2), pp.37-42.

Becerril, L., Heinrich, V., Böhmer, A., Schweigert, S. and Lindemann, U., 2017, January. Engineering Change Management Within Agile Product Development—A Case Study. In International Conference on Research into Design (pp. 643-652). Springer, Singapore.

Blake, H., Bermingham, F., Johnson, G. and Tabner, A., 2020. Mitigating the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a digital learning package. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(9), p.2997.

Bögel, P., Pereverza, K., Upham, P. and Kordas, O., 2019. Linking socio-technical transition studies and organizational change management: Steps towards an integrative, multi-scale heuristic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, pp.359-368.

Buick, F., Blackman, D. and Johnson, S., 2018. Enabling middle managers as change agents: Why organizational support needs to change. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(2), pp.222-235.

Cameron, E. and Green, M., 2019. Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools, and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page Publishers.

Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E. and Zampieri, R., 2019. The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, p.1938.

Crosby, B.C. and Bryson, J.M., 2018. Why leadership of public leadership research matters: and what to do about it. Public Management Review, 20(9), pp.1265-1286.

Dhawan, S., 2020. Online learning: A panacea in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), pp.5-22.

Doppelt, B., 2017. Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government, and civil society. Routledge.

Dzwigol, H., Shcherbak, S., Semikina, M., Vinichenko, O. and Vasiuta, V., 2019. Formation of Strategic Change Management System at an Enterprise. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp.1-8.

Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D. and Liden, R.C., 2019. Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The leadership quarterly, 30(1), pp.111-132.

Foster, K., Cuzzillo, C. and Furness, T., 2018. Strengthening mental health nurses' resilience through a workplace resilience program: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 25(5-6), pp.338-348.

Galli, B.J., 2018. Change management models: A comparative analysis and concerns. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(3), pp.124-132.

Gumus, S., Bellibas, M.S., Esen, M. and Gumus, E., 2018. A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), pp.25-48.

Hallinger, P., 2018. Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational management administration & leadership, 46(1), pp.5-24.

Hamouche, S., 2020. COVID-19 and employees’ mental health: stressors, moderators and agenda for organizational actions. Emerald Open Research, 2.

Hayes, J., 2018. The theory and practice of change management. Palgrave.

Hoch, J.E., Bommer, W.H., Dulebohn, J.H. and Wu, D., 2018. Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), pp.501-529.

Hughes, D.J., Lee, A., Tian, A.W., Newman, A., and Legood, A., 2018. Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), pp.549-569.

Indriastuti, D. and Fachrunnisa, O., 2019. Triple psycho-organizational supports for change management process. International Journal of Economics, Business, and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 3(04).

Jayatilleke, S. and Lai, R., 2018. A systematic review of requirements changes management. Information and Software Technology, 93, pp.163-185.

Jokinen, L., Vainio, V. and Pulkkinen, A., 2017. Engineering Change Management Data Analysis from the Perspective of Information Quality. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, pp.1626-1633.

Kuckertz, A., Brändle, L., Gaudig, A., Hinderer, S., Reyes, C.A.M., Prochotta, A., Steinbrink, K.M. and Berger, E.S., 2020. Startups in times of crisis–A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, p.e00169.

Lacerenza, C.N., Reyes, D.L., Marlow, S.L., Joseph, D.L. and Salas, E., 2017. Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), p.1686.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A. and Hopkins, D., 2020. Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School leadership & management, 40(1), pp.5-22.

Lemoine, G.J., Hartnell, C.A. and Leroy, H., 2019. Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), pp.148-187.

Levy, M., 2021. Change management serving knowledge management and organizational development: Reflections and review. In Research Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work (pp. 990-1004). IGI Global.

Marques-Quinteiro, P., Vargas, R., Eifler, N. and Curral, L., 2019. Employee adaptive performance and job satisfaction during an organizational crisis: the role of self-leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), pp.85-100.

Matthews, J., Love, P.E., Mewburn, J., Stobaus, C., and Ramanayaka, C., 2018. Building information modeling in construction: insights from collaboration and change management perspectives. Production Planning & Control, 29(3), pp.202-216.

Mckinsey & Company. 2020. Diverse employees are struggling the most during COVID-19—here’s how companies can respond. [Online]. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diverse-employees-are-struggling-the-most-during-covid-19-heres-how-companies-can-respond (Accessed: 06 March 2020).

Mckinsey & Company. 2020. Reenergizing an exhausted organization: A conversation with Admiral John Richardson. [Online]. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reenergizing-an-exhausted-organization-a-conversation-with-admiral-john-richardson (Accessed: 06 March 2020).

Muluneh, G.S. and Gedifew, M.T., 2018. Leading changes through adaptive design: Change management practice in one of the universities in a developing nation. Journal of Organizational Change Management.

Noori, B. and Latifi, M., 2018. Development of Six Sigma methodology to improve grinding processes: a change management approach. International journal of lean six sigma.

Oc, B., 2018. Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), pp.218-235.

Ospina, S.M., Foldy, E.G., Fairhurst, G.T. and Jackson, B., 2020. Collective dimensions of leadership: Connecting theory and method. Human Relations, 73(4), pp.441-463.

Rudolph, C.W., Murphy, L.D. and Zacher, H., 2020. A systematic review and critique of research on “healthy leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), p.101335.

Rudolph, C.W., Rauvola, R.S. and Zacher, H., 2018. Leadership and generations at work: A critical review. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), pp.44-57.

Santarone, K., McKenney, M., and Elkbuli, A., 2020. Preserving mental health and resilience in frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. The American journal of emergency medicine, 38(7), pp.1530-1531.

Schoemaker, P.J., Heaton, S. and Teece, D., 2018. Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), pp.15-42.

Shafiq, M., Zhang, Q., Akbar, M.A., Khan, A.A., Hussain, S., Amin, F.E., Khan, A. and Soofi, A.A., 2018. Effect of project management in requirements engineering and requirements change management processes for global software development. IEEE Access, 6, pp.25747-25763.

Sidwell, A.J., 2019. Psychological Hardiness and Self-Leadership: Leading Yourself to Effective Stress Coping. International Journal of Existential Positive Psychology, 8(1), p.12.

Stewart, G.L., Courtright, S.H. and Manz, C.C., 2019. Self-leadership: A paradoxical core of organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, pp.47-67.

Teo, W.L., Lee, M. and Lim, W.S., 2017. The relational activation of resilience model: How leadership activates resilience in an organizational crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(3), pp.136-147.

Thakur, V. and Mangla, S.K., 2019. Change management for sustainability: Evaluating the role of human, operational, and technological factors in leading Indian firms in the home appliances sector. Journal of cleaner production, 213, pp.847-862.

Tollman, P., Keenan, P., Mingardon, S., Dosik, D., Rizvi, S. and Hurder, S., 2021. Getting Smart About Change Management. In Mastering the Science of Organizational Change (pp. 79-100). De Gruyter.

Torous, J., Myrick, K.J., Rauseo-Ricupero, N. and Firth, J., 2020. Digital mental health and COVID-19: using technology today to accelerate the curve on access and quality tomorrow. JMIR mental health, 7(3), p.e18848.

Walton, M., Murray, E., and Christian, M.D., 2020. Mental health care for medical staff and affiliated healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, 9(3), pp.241-247.