Analyzing Starbucks' Strategies Essay.

1. Develop a critical awareness and understanding of strategy and its relevance and application to different contexts.    

2. Demonstrate a critical understanding of fundamental, contemporary strategic theories and concepts.

3. Critically evaluate and apply appropriate concepts of strategy to practice, across a range of organisational contexts

4. Assess alternative approaches to strategy and justify particular courses of action

5. Evaluate the implications of strategic decisions within different organisational and cultural contexts.

Ansoff Market Development Matrix

Starbucks Corporation is the successful retailer, and advertiser of privilege to fame coffee in the world. Starbucks additionally built up image for handling its workforces well. Their cafes are many a times meet point for the friends and office meetings. The Starbucks provide high quality product which attracts the customers the most. Moreover company also make customers special events special by organising parties for them.

Starbucks has a good position in the industry of beverages and coffee chains. As compared to the competitors, the company has shown an increase in the revenue by 2% in 2017 (CSI market, 2017). According to Geereddy (2013), the major competitors of the company are McDonalds, Costa Coffee, Dunkin brands and more. The main challenges for the brand include the low cost products by competitive brands, variety of food by the competitors, rising prices of coffee beans and more. The investors of the company are confident about the brand because of its good performance in the industry. Its earnings are better than the competitors and the boost in the stock price shows that the company still has the capability to perform even better.

The report initiates with the discussion of Ansoff matrix and then the other analytical tools are used to analyse the strategies of the company. These tools include SWOT analysis, PESTEL analysis, value chain of starbucks, Porters five forces model and Ansoff Matrix.

Market penetration –It is increasing revenues of current products in present markets. Starbucks started initially the writing names strategy of clients on the cups of coffee. The reason behind this strategy was to increase sale and value amongst market for Starbucks products (David, 2011).  They are continuallyrefining products and services serving new coffee essenceswhich gives consumer variety of selection at the time of ordering. Their USP, that serves the quality, develops the customerfaithfulnessover the brand to enhance. Moreover Starbucks has a continuousrequest from the customers to develop more products.

Product Development– It targets to growdeals by introducingnew and latest products into aprevailing market.  Some innovative products that Starbucks is providing are: breakfast and bakeryfoodstuffs. According to Darroch,(2014) Starbucks has establishedstores in all part of the world.

Market Development –The market development explainsrising sales by introduction ofpresent products into freshmarketplaces.  Starbucks is doing this by taking coffee shops all over the world.  These products are generally founded on the nation’s values and demand, which are originally vary form Starbuck’s present products. 

Diversification – It definesintroducing new items produced by any company in market which is not targeted till now. By being frequently endeavouring to enter new regions and providing items, is additionally a way through which Starbucks is extending its market operations (Haskova, 2015).

PESTEL Analysis

Political factor: The primary political issue evolves is around obtaining the raw resources. For this reason, the Starbucks needs to follow to community and ecological norms. It also gives significance to every country political environment before entering and moreover it adheres to fair practices of trade only (Yüksel, 2012). The political factors also effect the purchasing of raw material from other countries, as it needs to have information regarding laws and regulations of country.

Economic factor: The present economic slump is the main exterior financial driver for Starbucks. Moreover this convinced consumers to move to inexpensive substitutes. As customer did not stop purchase coffee, Starbucks must pursue chance here. The Starbucks also has a chance to contract with growing labour and operational expenses.

Social factor: Starbucks should offer a lesser amount of expensive items as it may need to amend the quality. This will grow customer segment to include the customerson the lower income levels as well.

Technological factor: Starbucks is having a upright position to take advantages of the emergingmobile tendency. The Starbucksallowed free Wi-Fi, in its cafes. According to Morais, et al., (2014) they will be able to surf the net while having the coffee. This is an additional incentive to the brand. It upgrades the general customerexperience.

Environmental factor: Abundant Starbucks business reviews about campaigners and universal gatherings. Indeed, even the buyers have communicated issues. For environmental concern, the organization should reflect holding consumers' faith (Tu, Wang & Chang, 2012). Some of the ecological variables Starbucks is stressed over are ecological standards and guidelines, ecological devastations in nations which deliver espresso beans and many more.

Legal factor: Starbucks should guarantee that it does not disrupt any rules and principles in the operating market and nations. It has to be stay attentive about launching of caffeine manufacture and eating related rules and guidelines by fitness establishments.

The organization faces countless competition in various forms, in distinctive sizes, fortes and techniques (Gregory, 2015).Starbucks is facing competitive force from McDonald’s and Dunking Donuts and from other local coffee companies. The Starbucks is having strong force of competition because of low cost of switching, creating convenience for customers to switch easily to other competitive brands.

The substitution force examines that substitutes will surely affect Starbucks business. Starbucks customer without ample of effort can switch to substitutes as there are many substitutes, for instance refreshments from substitute cafes, drinks, products from supermarkets and many more. The cost of switching to alternatives is low on the fact that customers need not to pay for the switching procedure. Moreover, a large quantity of the substitutes cost will be lower than that of Starbucks.

Porter 5 Forces Model

The bargaining of purchasers is the importantpartaffecting Starbucks business. (Cheng, 2013). The bargaining power in hand of buyer is high as ample of products available in market at lesser cost than that of Starbucks. The power of buyer is affected by number of availability of products in the market.

This force describes that suppliers is not having much consequence on Starbucks business. Additionally, Starbucks has an arrangement for differentiating its production network (Magretta, 2011). This arrangement diminishes the impact of suppliers on the business in spite of the fact that allsuppliersare having a sufficient size contrasted with the Starbucks inventory network.

This force describesthe force of new participantswhich have effect on company. However this force doesnot have huge bearing on Starbucks business. Freshentrantswill go up against Starbucks in view of the lower expenses of working. But still, new participants finds hard to compete against brands like Starbucks.

The corporation comprises of individuals dedicated to assist their consumers, the world’s finest coffee and the supreme coffee experience. Initially the idea presented was rejected trusting that getting into the refreshment business would divert the organization from its essential core interest. However, Howard Schultz trusts that the idea Starbucks would offer and power his plan to initiate Starbucks as he envisioned.

Introduction phase: In this stage, Starbucks deals at the inferior level and in addition the level of benefits also low. According to Stark, (2015) introduction period is just operated as a phase of "presenting" additional variation like "non-beverage" Starbucks, specifically "non-coffee" beverages “Frappucinno”. The initiatives taken by Starbucks in introducing their products are very active and effective to create impression in minds of customers.

Growth phase:Starbucks is establishing itself in present as well as future market as well. It secures trustworthy customers trust and maintains market share as well. Starbucks is continuing to expand to other countries successfully as it is starting two cafes every day in new places (Guinee, et al., 2010). The growth of company also increases when summers are near, as Starbucks expects in hot days the demand of cool products which it serves will increase rapidly. The revenues also increase with effectiveness in promotion strategy adopted by Starbucks.

Maturity phase: Starbucks will attain maturity when the product it offers develops to cash cow. This will be accomplished when moving toward the finish of summer, early autumntime toward the start of the year. As the item is expended and is offered as a "springor summer drink" deals will steadily falloff and achieve maturity in accordance with the finish of summer. Starbucks predicts revenues of this taste variations year will influence the product to keep on being accessible for the individuals who are still fascinated in consuming it (Lior, 2010). This can be established by ways of Starbucks speed in adopting the customer’s behavior and routine.

Life Cycle of Starbucks

Decline phase: This stage is relied upon to come each year in pre-winter and mid-summer. Because of change in climate, weather and other factors affects the sale of Starbucks drinks. And in summer season customer prefer for summer cool drinks rather than hot drink which decline the sale of hot coffee in during summer.

Inbound logistics:The inbound activities of Starbucks characterize picking the finest idea of coffee beans from the various nations. Starbucks imports beans from the homesteads by the Starbucks buyers. After importing these are elatedto the destinations after which the beans are baked and delivered. These are then arranged to be delivering to the circulation division to organization and in addition other vital associations. The Starbucks does not outsource its import to ensure astonishing measures beginning from the purpose of accumulation of coffee beans.

Operations: Starbucks is possessing approximately 20,000 stores worldwide inclusive of Starbucks Coffee, Teavana, Seattle’s Coffee &development of renewed retail locations (Geereddy, 2013). According to its company report, it producedmajority of the whole revenue in previous year from its functionedprovisions while the provisions stores disclosed for lesser part of the total revenue.
Outbound logistics: There is very less no existence of middle people in product offering. The major part of revenue of product is sold in their own or functioned provisions. The organization keeps on launching new product as new organization does which pushed scope of single-starting point through which espressos is sold by retailers in the U.S market.

Marketing and sales:Starbucks placescapitals into prevalent quality items and high level of client administrations than hostile advertising (Bose, 2012). Starbucks is completing marketing and sales activity effectively for the company through various medium of promotion.

Service: Starbucks goal is to buildcustomercommitment through the consistent performance and customer benefit at its stores. The retail goal of Starbucks is to be the main retailer and brand of coffee in each of our target markets by offering the premiumclassof coffee and other products and by giving every client a superior Starbucks Experience.

This incorporates all divisions like administration, building, legal, and many more which are required to stay with the stores (Fearne, Garcia & Dent, 2012). Starbucks stores are complemented with customers which is the result of the dedicatedteam of workers.

The Starbucks workforce is observed as a characteristic in thriving and improvement consistently. Starbucks employees are motivated through points of interest and helpers. The association is identified for managing its staffalso a reason behind low turnover of its employees, which shows unimaginable human resource organization.

Technology development: Starbucks is remarkablyoutstanding for application of innovation not only for coffee procedures but to maintain consistency in flavour and ingredients to connect continuously with its clients (Hollensen, 2015). Many buyersuses Starbucks provisionsas office or meeting place due to the availability of boundless Wi-Fi.

Procurement:  This comprisesobtaining the material for the products it is providing to the customers. The organization operators go to various countries for the procurement of highquality material to express the superiorcoffee. The company develops connection and partnership with supplier after surveillance of the Starbucks measures.

Strong Brand: Starbucks is a famous brand all over the world and identifiable brand in the café industry. The Starbucks logo is straightforwardly recognizable, and appeals together fresh and old customers (Ayub, et al., 2013). Their offerings are of brilliant quality, apparently ecological friendly, and generally available in all areas. Thus, they can afford to charge clients high costs, which the vast majority is paying.

Efficient employees - The Starbucks is famous for its workersmanagement in an industry in which relationship abilities and aptitudes affectsthe progress and failures. Starbucks has an optimistic and working environment for its workforce, which converts into pleasedassociates serving clients and promising perfect advantages for the organization.

High Prices- The organization does pricing of its products at the superior rate in the centre levels of the market which places its productsexteriorto the financial of numerous people who prefer visiting other coffee outlets for their coffee rather than Starbucks.

Huge expenditure on CSR- Starbucks spends a substantialquantity of its budget in the market promotion and social responsibility causing inadvertently increasing the prices of products

Huge market to explore- The organization has an immense open door for it to the degree its wander into the creating markets is concerned. According to Roby, (2011) with a billion buyers at risk to join the pool of the people who require minute coffee and breakfast in China and India, the Starbucks can put into these countries and other creating markets, which have a lucrative open entryway for the organization.

Expanding product offering- Starbucks items would be invited in stores over the world, something which has just started. Offering their own produces items in super market rather than only in own stores will eventual be an extraordinary approach to boost the estimation of their huge notoriety (Lemus, et al., 2015).

Increased competition- There is immense competition in the market for Starbucks like Dunkin Brands, McDonalds, Costa Coffee and numerous other coffee stores which knowinglydisturb the effectiveness of it.

Starbucks' successwillpartiallycredit to the goodwill of coffee, and advantageous in the present society. Customers if through some means manages to move out from coffee  it would leave Starbucks struggling in market to survive.

The above report of Starbucks analysed about various strategic strategies it has adopted in order to achieve success and growth in market. The Ansoff matrix defined the Starbucks market development, market penetration, product development and diversification. In report the factors affecting external environment of Starbucks is analysed like political, social, technological, environmental, economic and legal is also discussed. The analysis used describing various factors affecting the performance of Starbucks such as rivalry, substitutes, bargaining power of supplier and buyer is Porter 5 force model. To access the effectiveness and efficiency of Starbucks since its inception Life cycle model is discussed. Moreover to evaluate its various internal factors like supply, operations, technological, HR and many more is analysed by using value chain analysis.

Recommendation: From the above analysis it is analysed that Starbucks should limit its store opening through licensing. This will help Starbucks to enhance its goodwill amongst customer as well as superior value for its products(Lee, et al., 2013). Frequently opening up of stores affects the value of products in customers mind and market as well. This will help in improving their strategy for attracting customers with lesser marketing practices. This will also have risk of reducing customer base in geographic area where it can earn profit. The will affect stakeholder and competitors as well in the regions where Starbucks is not having presence.

References:

Ayub, A., Adeel, R., Muhammad, S.A. and Hanan, I., 2013. A conceptual framework on evaluating SWOT analysis as the mediator in strategic marketing planning through marketing intelligence. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), pp.91-98.

Bose, T.K., 2012. Market segmentation and customer focus strategies and their contribution towards effective value chain management. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(3), p.113.

Bull, J.W., Jobstvogt, N., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Mascarenhas, A., Sitas, N., Baulcomb, C., Lambini, C.K., Rawlins, M., Baral, H., Zähringer, J. and Carter-Silk, E., 2016. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework. Ecosystem services, 17, pp.99-111.

Cheng, D.S., 2013. Analyze the hotel industry in porter five competitive forces. Journal of Global Business Management, 9(3), p.52.

CSI market, 2017. SBUX Sales vs. its Competitors Q2 2017, Retrieved from https://csimarket.com/stocks/compet_glance.php?code=SBUX.

Darroch, J., 2014. Ansoff’s Growth Matrix—In Detail. In Why Marketing to Women Doesn’t Work (pp. 131-147). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

David, F.R., 2011. Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Peaeson/Prentice Hall.

Fearne, A., Garcia Martinez, M. and Dent, B., 2012. Dimensions of sustainable value chains: implications for value chain analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(6), pp.575-581.

Geereddy, N., 2013. Strategic analysis of Starbucks corporation. Harward [??????????? ??????].–????? ???????: https://scholar. harvard. edu/files/nithingeereddy/files/starbucks_ case_analysis. pdf.

Gregory, L., 2015. Starbucks Coffee’s Vision Statement & Mission Statement. Retviered from https://panmore. com/starbucks-coffee-vision-statement-missionstatement.

Guinee, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T. and Rydberg, T., 2010. Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future.

Haskova, K., 2015. Starbucks Marketing Analysis. CRIS-Bulletin of the Centre for Research and Interdisciplinary Study, 2015(1), pp.11-29.

Hollensen, S., 2015. Marketing management: A relationship approach. Pearson Education.

Lee, H., Choi, K., Yoo, D., Suh, Y., He, G. and Lee, S., 2013. The More the Worse? Mining Valuable Ideas with Sentiment Analysis for Idea Recommendation. In PACIS., p. 30.

Lemus, E., von Feigenblatt, O.F., Orta, M. and Rivero, O., 2015. Starbucks Corporation: Leading Innovation in the 21st Century.

Lior, N., 2010. Sustainable energy development: the present (2009) situation and possible paths to the future. Energy, 35(10), pp.3976-3994.

Magretta, J., 2011. Understanding Michael Porter: The essential guide to competition and strategy. Harvard business press.

Morais, U.P., Pena, J., Shacket, K., Sintilus, L., Ruiz, R., Rivera, Y. and Mujtaba, B.G., 2014. Managing diverse employees at Starbucks: Focusing on ethics and inclusion. International Journal of Learning and Development, 4(3), pp.35-50.

Roby, L.R., 2011. An Analysis of Starbucks as a Company and an International Business.

Savino, M.M., Manzini, R. and Mazza, A., 2015. Environmental and economic assessment of fresh fruit supply chain through value chain analysis. A case study in chestnuts industry. Production Planning & Control, 26(1), pp.1-18.

Stark, J., 2015. Product lifecycle management. In Product Lifecycle Management. (1), pp. 1-29. Springer International Publishing.

Tu, Y.T., Wang, C.M. and Chang, H.C., 2012. Corporate brand image and customer satisfaction on loyalty: An empirical study of Starbucks coffee in Taiwan. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 3(1), pp.24-32.

Yin, N., 2016. Application of AHP-Ansoff Matrix Analysis in Business Diversification: The case of Evergrande Group. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 44). EDP Sciences.

Yüksel, ?., 2012. Developing a multi-criteria decision making model for PESTEL analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), p.52.