Essay: Seaport Management

Logistic functions and services

What Is The Importance Management Of Seaports In Australia?

The seaport of the Brisbane is one of the fastest form of growing and dynamic form of port in Australia. It is located approximately 20 kilometers to the east of Brisbane; the ports has managed and have well developed by the Port of Brisbane Pty Ltd (PBPL), under a 99-year lease from the Queensland Government.

On the contrary, the pot of Melbourne is situated on the coast or shore that contains one or more harbors where the ships can dock and transfer their people from one point to the other (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016). The port location is selected for the optimization of the access to the land and navigates the materials from one place to the other.

For the port of Brisbane, majority of the unpacked containers are imported containers for the port or one of the eleven suburbs of Brisbane that lies within 40 kms of the port (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016). Twenty-seven percent of the eight suburbs that are additional were distributed in Brisbane, are geographically concentrated in the three major areas (East Brisbane, South Brisbane and North Brisbane). Each of the areas has been directed to the arterial road network connection of the Port. In the recent years, Brisbane has become the twelve most significant (suburban) destinations for import containers each received more than 11,500 TEUs.

On the other hand, the total number of trade that are performed through the Sea Port of Melbourne has vehemently declined by the asking rate of 0.2% over the previous mentioned financial year to about 85.4 million revenue tonnes (35.0 million mass tonnes). The rate of import of the overseas imports have declined to 0.8% to 36.5 million revenue tonnes while overseas exports increased 3.1% to 26.5 million revenue tonnes. The coastal form of the imports have increased from 2.8% to 11.1 million revenue tonnes and the coastal form of exports declined from 2.7% to 11.3 million revenue tonnes. The trade of the container have been supported by the strong export performance where the total container have been throughput increased by 0.8% to 2.53 million TEU as the volume of the container have rebounded in the second half of the year. The rate of the full container exports have  increased to 1.8% in the years 2013-14 that included the records of the monthly throughput of a 65,000 full international TEUs in March (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016). The rate of the full container imports have been recorded as the modest decline of 0.2% while the empty container movements have increased to 1.4% to 521,000 TEU. There are  top ten form of the containerized commodity that exports the cereal grains, miscellaneous manufactures, paperboards and fiberboards, fruit and vegetables, dairy products, paper and newsprint, meat, beverages, pulp and wastepaper and stock feed. The top ten containerised commodity imports to the miscellaneous manufactures, furniture, electrical equipment, clothing, metal manufactures, machinery, paper and newsprint, fruit and vegetables, miscellaneous food preparations and vehicle parts (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016) .

Management of Port of Brisbane

There is a strong public interest that can be ensured in the ports of Queensland for the

There is a strong public interest for ensuring the ports of Queensland has to operate in an efficient manner when there is fair and competent administration is provided (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016). This is for the public interest that emerges from the major role that the ports play in logistics of the Queensland, as it acts as the gateways for the economic trade and the commerce (Chang, Xu and Song, 2016). With the globalization of the world economy, Queensland’s economic competitiveness is linked increasingly to its ability to manage the movement of both import and export commodities efficiently and effectively.

Under the role of CIRA, there are several numbers of the specific approaches that have been agreed for the facilitation of the competition of the objectives that are providing in the port that are related to the infrastructures of the services of the faculty (Chang, Xu and Song, 2016). Top have these approaches there are implications for these services there are needed to be included in the several other form of the implementation of the services. These may have included in the planning of the port that will eventually facilitate the entry of the various new suppliers of the port that are related to the services of the infrastructure that were accessed by the  several third party and that needs to be provided for a complete form of the neutral basis.

The planning covers the approval on the several issues that includes the environment, occupational health and safety, local planning and managing the interface with the broader community. The facilitation of the approval of the process of planning for the infrastructural investment have been expedited in few of the States that have provided a one-stop shop approach. In the Queensland, the developing a project on the strategic port land and having it declared as a ‘project of State significance have made the expedite for the process of approval.

There is an extent of the approximate amount of existing form of competition, the standard assessments of the market power often initiates by looking at the several factors that essentially includes the shares of the market. The previously mentioned step obviously logically follows the definition of the market exercise. Generally there is a port that are more likely to be have been found  at the powerful position in the market if they have the persistent form of has a high market shares than if it does not. A number of factors hold importance for the consideration that whether the ports that are located in the power of the market power includes the extent of the existing form of competition and the threat of potential competition, and the proper degree of the buyer power. The evolution of the different shares of the market is also a very relevant. However with proper and necessary given time that is required for the alteration of the various functionality of  the infrastructure, the market shares are very much unlikely to have the proper  changes that are very much significantly in the short term, except for the unusual circumstances. The level of competition is not the only factors that are necessary for determining the power of the market. The potential level of competition has also an impactful effect. The threat of the entry of the new ports can also help to constrain the varied behavior of existing ports. Barriers to entry can be substantial, especially for ports that are integrated into networks and multi-layered supply chains. The entry-level barriers are always substantial that holds its importance on the networks that holds the multi layered form of the chains of supply. 

Management of Port of Melbourne

The constraint on the power of the port market power from the potential competition is actually very low, that are primarily owing to the significant form of economic barriers that are limited to the entry relating to the scales of economy.

Apart from the minimal entry of the barriers, the major other factors that could have been mitigated the power of the market is the power of the buyer. The competition law are often in the flow to permit the defense that are against the findings of the market power if it can be shown.

In addition there are various hinterlands in the traffic, that the ports may be compete for the transshipment traffic, whereby the larger forms of the vessels are used a port and transfer their cargo to the smaller feeder vessels. These type of feeder vessels are then transported to the cargo on to ports that serves the required hinterland. The major distinction between the hinterland and the transshipment traffic is that the two ports that do not serve the same form of hinterland may operate in same form of the geographic market with respect to the relevant goods if they compete for the same transshipment traffic.

However, when it is seen that the competition have always concerns have risen, there has been several remedies that are possible. However, there has been introduction to the competition and the competition laws that are addressing the major concerns of the pricing. For instance, it is a port where there is a relevant form of market where there are no scope for the level of the dominance. There are ample scope for the divisibility that can be useful for competing the ports from the entity that are owned on the stake of each of them and there are no options for reducing the dominance of the each port (Cahoon, Pateman and Chen, 2013). There are various –port that separate terminals that are useful for opening some of the separate form of ownership for the terminals. This phenomenon requires the separated form of terminals for placing some of the degree of the constraints that are competitive for each other, so they need to be very much able to handle the same types of customers and commodities. For addressing some concerns that are regarding the proper refusal to the supply, there are regulators that could have forced a port for granting their access to the customers who are downstream customers (Cahoon, Pateman and Chen, 2013).

In past few years, it has been seen that the shippers have been choosing those ports, which are highly inspired by the arrangement of the supply change (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016).  There are general form of cargos that are have the recent benefits such as the reduction in the handling of the cargos, the reduction in the possibility of the loss of damage for providing the better form of protection and can essentially break the bulk of the cargo that have remained essential for the future use.

The Port of the Newcastle is the most important trade that is economic for the residents of New South Wales, which are particular for Hunter Valle, which will further situated to the north and northwest part of the State; the port has the authority to the Newcastle Port Corporation (NPC) (Singh, Chhetri and Padhaye, 2016) . It is one of the largest ports that is involved in the export and import business that determines the total output of 90% coal (Singh, Chhetri and Padhaye, 2016). In this port, there are a large amount of the diversification that can be dedicated towards the bulk commodities such as the grains, aluminum, machinery, heavy equipments, mining materials and other projects of the industry. It has the largest number of the gas turbines that have the excess amount of tones of containers that have arrived in the port (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016).

The current GDP per capita observes that Australia is a very economical and powerful form of country (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016). The cost of living in Australia is much lower than the other developed countries in the world (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016). From the different hindrance, there has been a high amount of crisis in the economic structures that are observed in the recent years have been contributed to the negotiation of the large amount of free trade treaties, particularly in the countries of Asia. For exporting goods from US to Australia there should be thus given priority to the people who wish to diversify  with their different forms of business in a consolidated form of market that have continuously grown (Bichou, 2014).

For getting out from the load of the full container is the best form of exporters that have been i9n the volume of the shipping in at least six major forms of the standard pallets that are half of the containers whose volumes are 20 foot and 40 foot in the will allow the transporters for the twelve form of standardized pallets (Mangan and Lalwani, 2016). This method can produce the best form of the exports and imports in the goods that cannot come in the contact with those of the others.

The commercial form of port in Melbourne has been without any doubt to be the most essential maritime hub of Australia. It apparently handles about 2.5 million containers yearly that contribute to be about 36 percent of the commercial form of traffic for the country. With the query that are over miles over the 34 form of berths that are roughly 10,000 vehicles that are loaded and unloaded every day along with the different goods the various fo0rms of services. In the last ten years, this port has alone received a million of dollars for the investments and the infrastructures (Bichou, 2014).

The port of Brisbane is the third busiest ports of Australia that are growing faster day-by-day for the containers of the port of the country. It has mainly managed to develop the Port of the Brisbane Pvt. Ltd (PBPL). This port has 29 berths that are currently operating on the three very deep berths of water bulk water along with 17 water bulks and general forms of cargo berths (Bichou, 2014). The yearly turnover of the port is the about 28 million tonnes of cargo and 2600 ships are going for the transportation processes. It also features the cruise ships for the wharves of the port of Brisbane.

Conclusion

From the above discussion, it can be concluded that there are immense competition between the two ports and both the ports are equally essential for the trading of the containers of Australia. The two ports are the key factor of the increasing economy of the country.

References

Bandara, Y.M. and Nguyen, H.O., 2016. Influential factors in port infrastructure tariff formulation, implementation and revision. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, pp.220-232.

Bichou, K., 2014. Port operations, planning and logistics. CRC Press.

Cahoon, S., Pateman, H. and Chen, S.L., 2013. Regional port authorities: leading players in innovation networks?. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, pp.66-75.

Chang, C.H., Xu, J. and Song, D.P., 2016. Impact of different factors on the risk perceptions of employees in container shipping companies: a case study of Taiwan. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 8(4), pp.361-388.

Chang, C.H., Xu, J. and Song, D.P., 2016. Impact of different factors on the risk perceptions of employees in container shipping companies: a case study of Taiwan. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 8(4), pp.361-388.

Chen, P.S.L., Pateman, H. and Sakalayen, Q., 2017. The latest trend in Australian port privatisation: Drivers, processes and impacts. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 22, pp.201-213.

Demirbas, D., Flint, H. and Bennett, D., 2014. Supply chain interfaces between a port utilizing organisation and port operator. Supply Chain Management: an international journal, 19(1), pp.79-97.

Enright, M.J. and Petty, R., 2016. Australia's competitiveness: from lucky country to competitive country. John Wiley & Sons.

Hales, D., Lee Lam, J.S. and Chang, Y.T., 2016. The balanced theory of port competitiveness. Transportation Journal, 55(2), pp.168-189.

Kee, G., Wu, Y., Shen, J. and Jin, T., 2016. Replacement Or Dual Hub Port?: A Study on the Port Relationship in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions. Shanghai-Hong Kong Development Institute.

Mangan, J. and Lalwani, C., 2016. Global logistics and supply chain management. John Wiley & Sons.

Martínez Moya, J. and Feo Valero, M., 2017. Port choice in container market: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), pp.300-321.

O'Connor, K., Derudder, B. and Witlox, F., 2016. Logistics services: Global functions and global cities. Growth and Change, 47(4), pp.481-496.

Singh, A., Chhetri, P. and Padhaye, R., 2016. Understanding the Port-Centric Logistics Clusters: Concepts, Characteristics. Innovative Solutions for Implementing Global Supply Chains in Emerging Markets, p.257.

Singh, A., Chhetri, P. and Padhaye, R., 2016. Understanding the Port-Centric Logistics Clusters: Concepts, Characteristics. Innovative Solutions for Implementing Global Supply Chains in Emerging Markets, p.257.

Suárez-Alemán, A., Campos, J. and Jiménez, J.L., 2015. The economic competitiveness of short sea shipping: an empirical assessment for Spanish ports. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7(1), pp.42-67.

Xu, J., Song, D. and Chang, C., 2016. Impact of different factors on the risk perceptions of employees in container shipping companies: a case study of Taiwan.