Settlements With Tainui: Business, Heritage, Culture And Sustainability

The Settlements Made by the Crown with Tainui

Discuss about the Business, Heritage, Culture and Sustainability.

The colonial government faces the pressure coming from the business investors as well as the inflow of the British people, to buy more and more of land available with Maori, in 1850 (Gardiner, 2003). The people residing in Maori understood that they had started losing the land, due to the increasing number of individuals coming from the Pakeha; therefore, there was a requirement to safeguard the existing land, and this was the main aim behind Tainui hiring sovereign, which was same like the Queen of Britain (Gardiner, 2003).

The Crown had approved the New Zealand settlement act along with the act of suppression of the rebellion, which also permits the rebels land, who deny to sell down their land to Crown (Gardiner, 2003). The Act of Native Land 1865, failed in accepting the ownership of land and over that they approved individual titles, as they were not able to afford the price of land surveys and in between they lost their land (Gardiner, 2003). The land ownership of an individual was also designed to formulate the ground alienation easier and faster (Gardiner, 2003).

The troops of Lieutenant General Duncan in the year, 1863, had tried to cross the River of Mangatawhiri, located in Waikato, and the same comes under the territory of Kingitanga, and there they took the Waikato river possession along with the nearby land of the river (Gray, 2011). Tawhiao, who was the second king of Maori, along with their supporters came to the Waikato second in the territory of Maniapoto, after the invasion of Waikato (Gray, 2011). They were enquired by Governor Grey to move towards the reserve area based on the land of confiscated, but at the same time, King of Maori was interested in returning to the confiscated land, which was not possible, as the land was given to British people (Gray, 2011). Many petitions were approved by King of Maori, who was Tainui in a case of land located in Raupatu (Gray, 2011). In the period of 1927, a commission was established. It was explored by the committee about the confiscation as immoral, and they gave compensation of the yearly amount of around $3000, to settle the claim of Tainui-Raupatu (Gray, 2011). This claim was later on disapproved by the king of Maori, as they think that land already taken should be given back (Gray, 2011). The settlement of money was also not approved in comparison to the lost land (Gray, 2011).

Impact of Settlement on Tainui

It was evident that after eighteen years, in 1946, the Princess Te Puea Herangi, who was the granddaughter of Tawhiao, made the negotiation to take the financial compensation, worth of £6000 each year for the coming 50 years and the amount of £5000 per years, will be made by Peter Fraser belonging to Labour party (Mahuta, 1995). The Tainui Maori Trust Board was set up, for the purpose of administering the amount taken from the government (Mahuta, 1995). The government viewed this settlement as the final, but again Tainui views the compensation as settlement part for the purpose of supporting economic times, and various pending land area (Mahuta, 1995).

Outline the four elements of these settlements made by the Crown with Tainui. Include a brief comment on the significance of these settlements on Tainui.

Social and economic development undertaken in the Tainui tribes was done under the Act of Maori Trust Board in the year 1955 (Meijl, 2013). According to the report came in 1982 about Tainui, Kenneth Egan as well as Robert Mahuta, presented their point about the underdevelopment of regions near Tainui, which acted as the driving force, going behind the resubmission of the longstanding claims of Raupatu (Meijl, 2013). In the year 1985, the law was changed, which gave the permission to the Waitangi Tribunal for the purpose of examining the grievance claims from the year 1840, when the agreement was made about the Treaty of Waitangi (Meijl, 2013).

Bypassing the TMTB in the case of the tribunal, negotiation permission from the government was attained (Meijl, 2013). It includes certain cases such as, historical account, which depicted that, in the year 1995, the claims made about the Waikato Raupatu Settlement became law (Meijl, 2013). It was noted that the Waitangi treaty helped the Tainui grievance about the land, in which act of crown clearly got unjustified through the Waikato and Kingitanga areas, and they finally did not succeed in fulfilling the criteria of Article 2 related to the treaty (Meijl, 2013). The people living in Maori, which tried to support the land from getting invaded by Pakeha clearly rebel and follow the threat coming from the sovereignty of crown (Meijl, 2013). It also includes the redressal of finances. The returning of the crown from around the 35000 acres of land got confiscated (Meijl, 2013). The restored land value was calculated to come around NZ$170 million, that came to around amount required for proceeding the leases and rents, and it was estimated to around NZ$7 (Meijl, 2013).

Business Projects Undertaken by Tainui

It also includes the apology, in which crown apologized from Queen Elizabeth II, in the case of invasion of Waikato that had tried to claim for all the casualties (Orange, 1987). The raupatu of the land created the people of Tainui to work towards dislocating from land and failure to hold any identity (Spiller, Finn & Boast, 1995). It created the breakdown emotionally of tribes and even lead to loss of dignity, ability, and self-respect for controlling one’s life (Spiller, Finn & Boast, 1995).

It also includes redressal of culture (Durie, 1994). According to the act of Waikato Raupatu claims settlement in the year 2010, it impacted the Raupatu settlement of all the claims, which came to the Crown as well as Waikato-Tainui in the year 2009 (Spiller, Finn & Boast, 1995). It permitted the river management by both the authority of territory as well as Waikato-Tainui (Spiller, Finn & Boast, 1995). In the year 1995, the settlement of deed, taken between the Crown as well as Tainui, it provided Waikato-Tainui with the base to construct the business empire for the people that had lost their life in the year 1960, under the invasion of Waikato-Raupatu. The land came with the confiscation and money was included in the grievances, created by the crown (Spiller, Finn & Boast, 1995). The amount was viewed as the crime acknowledgment. In the year 1994, it was noted that the very first fiscal envelope was created by the government of New Zealand to settle every historical treaty Maori, with a view to claiming for the 1 billion dollars (Spiller, Finn & Boast, 1995). In the year 1995, the Waikato Raupatu act of settlement permitted the tribes of Waikato- Tainui for the purpose of claiming the 17% share from the comprehensive settlement with various other tribes, that increased the billion dollar amount, establish the settlement of tribe (Spiller, Finn & Boast, 1995).

What kinds of business projects has Tainui undertaken with the proceeds of the settlement? Give at least three examples. Identify the business model developed by Tainui to implement these projects.

The property assets and compensation attained in the year 1995, from the Crown as well as Tainui, had moved towards the creation of the commercial organization, and it’s known as Tainui Group Holdings (Walghan Partners, 1996). The key role of an organization is to attain the commercial gain from the property by management and property development, along with financial investment (Walghan Partners, 1996). The total asset managed through the company had enhanced with time (Renwick, 1991). The sound investment, strategic management, along with skills of real leadership had moved the assets of the company to billion dollars within 2014 (Walghan Partners, 1996). TGH had also tried to increase individual property assets by conducting financial investment; for instance, the Te Rapa Air Force Base transformation in the center of mega shopping is also known as the base (Walghan Partners, 1996). As per the yearly TGH report, came in 2014, it was mentioned that the total income coming from rent includes 47% of the total revenue, and around 37% was made through around three hotels, which were complete owned by the Tainui (Walghan Partners, 1996).

Tainui's Business Model

The group of TGH also tried to control the Hamilton Riverview Hotel that was entirely owned as well as operated through the Hotel of Novotel Tainui in the year 1998, along with IBIS hotel (Department of Health, 1992). The river trust, as well as Waikato Raupatu, came under the trustee of Te Kauhanganui, and all these trusts attained the land, and try to manage the settlement money and Waikato River through the crown (Department of Social Welfare, 1997). The main aim of the trust was mainly to oversee both the economic and social development of tribe according to the rules of appropriate trust (Department of Social Welfare, 1997).

Describe social and cultural benefits that have resulted from the Tainui settlements. Discuss also the aspirations and benefits yet to be achieved.

The Waikato- Tainui Te Kauhanganui, in which dividends were made available, were mainly used for the tribal expenditure, grants, scholarships, Kingitanga office, cultural events as well as sports (Base, 2015).

According to the yearly report of Waikato- Tainui, there will be the distribution of breakdown (Council, 2012). The Maraes clinics collaboration had come with the healthcare in the area of Maraes, instead of cities, in which the people are unlikely to move at Maraes, and are considered the lifeblood of Maori Society (Council, 2012). The facilities, as well as Marae Grants, is supporting the construction of the building and help in maintenance cost during the day time (Council, 2012).

Most of the money is spend on the education from the early days by the help of granting scholarships (Durie, 1998). The main aim is actually to preserve the Te Rao, Maori, and finally to get affluent, and to enhance the skills and qualification level within the tribe (Durie, 1998). The College of Waikato-Tainui research and development had also tried to build a base on the set vision of Sir Robert Mahuta that had sought to negotiate the settlement of Waikato-Raupatu, with an aim to produce the coming future of Maori leaders, who can easily lead the tribe towards the coming century (Durie, 1998).

In the year 2007, the Te-Arataura, as well as Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui, actually come together for the purpose of the future blueprint of the tribe, and to attain the same by the year 2050, and it’s known as Whakatupuranga by the year 2050 (Durie, 1998). The aim of the strategic plan is to attain the cultural, social, as well as economic advancement of the Waikato-Tainui in the coming time (Durie, 1998).

The ideology plan apparently dwells over the Kingi Tawhiao vision, who believes for the purpose of growing and succession; constructing the stable base is essential for them for facing the future problems (Adds, 2012).

The key reason behind the plan of 2050 was mainly to make sure about the tribe longevity and to move from the legacy for the upcoming generation (McHugh, 1991). The requirements of Waikato-Tainui require keeping the leaders that can quickly create fluent in Maori and the one who can easily pass the values and cultural practices of Maori, mainly in the Kingitanga role in the coming future (Fleras & Maaka, 1998). The use of tobacco consumption on the health, social, economic and cultural well-being of the Maori fail to get align with the Whakatupuranga by the year 2050 (Fleras & Maaka, 1998). The requirement to ban the tobacco from both the New Zealand as well as Waikato through the WTTKI is mainly aimed towards attaining the 2050asprations in the blueprint of 2050 (McHugh, 1991). The advantages related with banning the tobacco is endless from the Maori and Tainui along with whole country (McHugh, 1991).

References

Adds, P. (2012). Te ?ti Awa of Taranaki-War and a kind of peace. Retrieved from Te Ara - the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Retrieved on 29 January 2017, from https://www.teara.govt.nz/en/te-ati-awa-of-taranaki/page-3

Base, T. (2015). History. Retrieved from The Base. Retrieved on 29 January 2017, from https://www.the-base.co.nz/info/history/

Council, W. R. (2012). CO-MANAGEment AGREEMENT For WAIKATO RIVER RELATED LANDS. Retrieved on 29 January 2017, from https://www.waikatoregion.govt.nz/PageFiles/15805/JMAs/2276497%20Tainui.pdf

Department of Health. (1992). Whaia Te Ora Mo Te Iwi: Strive for the Good Health of the People. Wellington.

Department of Social Welfare. (1997). Iwi Social Services Information Pack. Wellington.

Durie, M. (1994). Whaiora: M?ori Health Development. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

Durie, M. (1998). Te Mana, Te Kawanatanga: The Politics of M?ori Self-Determination. Oxford University Press

Fleras, A. & Maaka, R. (1998). "Rethinking Claims-Making as M?ori Affairs Policy" He Pukenga Korero, 3(2), 43-51.

Gardiner, J. (2003). Achieving enduring settlements. Retrieved on 29 January 2017, from PostTreatySettlements.org.nz: https://posttreatysettlements.org.nz/achieving-enduring-settlements/

Gray, J. (2011). Tainui plans for Ryman windfall. Retrieved on 29 January 2017, from https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10739347

Mahuta, R. (1995). Tainui , Kingitanga and Raupatu. In M. W. Yeatman, Justice and Identity (pp. 18-32). Wellignton: Antipodean Practices.

McHugh, P. (1991). The M?ori Magna Carta: New Zealand Law and the Treaty of Waitangi. Oxford University Press

Meijl, T. V. (2013). Ownership and distribution in settlement of M?ori grievances. In K. B. Fiona McCormack, Engaging with Capitalism: Cases from Oceania (pp. 39-43). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerauld Group.

Orange, C. (1987). The Treaty of Waitangi, Allen and Unwin, Wellington.

Renwick, W. (1991). Sovereignty and Indigenous Rights: The Treaty of Waitangi in International Contexts. Wellington: Victoria University Press

Spiller, P., Finn, J., & Boast, R. (1995). A New Zealand Legal History. Brookers, Wellington.

Walghan Partners. (1996). The Treaty of Waitangi and Social Policy Project. Brookers.