Centers For Combination And Detailed Security: Key Threat Agents And Trends In Threat Probability

Strategies for Combating Insider Threats

Question:

Discuss About The Centers For Combination Detailed Security?

The case is related to the European Union Agency for the Network and Information Security which includes the centres for the combination and the detailed security as well. The identification of the strategies with the combating of the insider threats help in determining all the important threats which are included in the brief discussion below (Payton et al., 2014).

As per the given case, the focus is on handling the networking tools of ENISA which needs to handle the information technology systems with the proper control of the information which is set with the cyber threats, data duplication and the security business analysis. The emerging kinds of the threat analysis is based on working over the cyber threats with the world-wide patterns that include the assigning of the central roles which are for the practical security incident and the event management. There are different organisation which work on the management of the software with the cyber security and the access is based on the organisational activities as well (Van Dijck, 2014). The forms and the standards match the limits related to the data that is based on the threat intelligence. The consistency is important for the collection and working on the aggregation and the data correlation. This will be important for the end user protection and reducing the threats which are mainly related to the information systems. The provisions of the security are mainly to match with the cases that relate to different organisations and how ENISA is able to handle the cyber security measures (Soria et al., 2016). The cases have been about making use of the threat information with involvement of the target assets to manage the security standards involving the targets. The management of the security factors with the creation of a better planning for removing any vulnerability is relevant with the controlled analysis which includes the application for the effective strategy measures and for cleaning the system. The case is related to the web based attacks and how the malware defiance need to work on the applications which are related to ENISA networking and security measures. The measures set for the security standards are also related to handle the requirements with the organisational forms and the services, which are mainly due to the application processes that could be understood with the use of SQL. The forms of the report and the testing is done in the web application vulnerability which tends to increase gradually (Payton et al., 2014).

Key Threat Agents

The security standards of ENISA is based on working over the current tools of IT and technology is based on the significant impact patterns which includes the organisation planning. The standards are set to protect and meet the different objectives that will overcome the threats related to the loss of data (Perera et al., 2015). The security standards are set to involve the different aspects of the business models which have a major impact on the business networking and the cyber security.

The IT systems and the software works on the probability forms where the threats are affecting the activities of the data. This also includes the higher level of security of information in the organisation. The management is based on matching with the different standards which combat the insider threat with the different strategies that could be for the funding and proper planning. There are different issues related to the top threats which are including the web based attacks based on the standards set for revealing the information to the competitors (Fabian et al., 2015). The web based attacks are covered with the allotted techniques that include the redirection of the web browser. This includes the infected web sites like the malware infections that take place which corrupt the whole system. The threat also tends to cover the wider networks in the website with the deployment of the other additional methods which includes the mobile devices and the different web applications (Soria-Comas & Damingo, 2016). The top threats are related to the efficiency with operating systems that covers the spacing of the computer. The malware is linked with the URL websites with the standards that are set for the automatic installation in the systems, with the designing spaces. The software tends to decline any of the available vulnerabilities with the exploitation in the systems. The major focus is on covering the world system and reducing the efficacy of the operating systems with attaching all the operating websites (Jerome, 2013). With this, around 145 million people have the unique which is recognized as malicious with the means over 40% of the URL which infects the malware (Pedrosa et al., 2014). The standards are set with the significant threats in the world, where the global issues that works on the infected files which is important for the business development. The web based attacks are set with the positions that are set in threat landscape of America and Europe. The major focus is on helping the organisation and working on determining the assets with defined risks for protecting the assets from insiders and outsiders. The training and monitoring is based on the insider security threat with the organisation working on the use of strategy that offers the training to staff with the policy and proper use of the technology to achieve the higher standards to avoid the errors (Michael & Michal, 2013). The situation is based on the threats and the technology which exists for the infractions.

Minimizing the Impact of Threat Agents on the System

Identify and discuss the key Threat Agents. What could be done to minimize their impact on the system? Based on the data provided, discuss the trends in threat probability. 

The threats are related to the functioning and handling the different security issues, where the cyber-attacks are considered to be of the higher probability measures. It includes the agents of threat who easily lead to the damage with the organisation working on the collection of important information (Pedrosa et al., 2014). The sharing of the information and working on the threat agents is important for the organisation so that all the information from the users is properly kept. The cyber criminals are efficient with the handling of malicious tools with the attacking methods as well. The threat agents are related to the functioning which includes how the biggest threat has a major impact on the management with the security standards set for the organisation and its development (Kasper, 2014).

The threat agents like the cyber criminals, working with the hired persons, cyber criminals work on the group of agents and the major objective is based on earning the profits with the illegal activities that work on the online means. The major focus is on the motivation with money and intelligence. The online cybercrime criminals works on the standards through the unethical means which includes the suitability standards to match with the large amount of the time and money. The focus is also on the hacktivists where the threat agents focus on the generation of the attention of media with the politically motivated activists. Here, the focus is on the activities which relate to handle the set groups and the structures that could be used for viewing the different time of the riots. The elections and the other major events are mainly to create the international attention (Beardsley et al., 2016). The cyber fighters are also the people with the motivation focusing on the power striking with the handling of the different results that include the boundaries that infect the people of the national and the international standards. With this, the focus is also on how the social hacking issues could be resolved where there are threats that could be mainly for controlling the use of the loggers, waste of the data or the social media patterns. The high techniques are for the handling of the social hackers to hack the social platforms which includes the creation of the threats to the organisation. The different kinds of groups work on the privacy standards with the major focus on the personalised data and the user document, cyber maltreatment. The usability forms are related to work with the social workers which play an important role in the website hacking process. The standards set for the operational activities is based on working over the different goals and standards, where the attack of the website, fraud or the cyber espionage. This includes the collection of the information which is set with the aggregation of data (Ramic et al, 2011). The focus is mainly on working over the end-user protection and then reducing the threats which are related to the security of the information and the other areas of working. It also includes the maintenance of the different provisions of security and then working on the improvement of the maturity with threat removal as well.

Trends in Threat Probability

The high amount of the data is based on the ETL processing with the handling of the performance with smoothing the processes. For this, the focus is on:

1. The loading processes where there are only rows that need to be changed. ETL focus on the collaboration with the contribution to improve the cyber security standards. It includes the focus on the supporting roles with the member states and the other private sectors that are for the proper handling of the information and the security measures. The agency focuses on the deals which are related to the security of the cyber environment with the production of certain recommendations, support with the policy development and the implementation (Maksimovic et al., 2015).
2. ETL works on the overviewing of the threats and then working over the assess for the threat exposure. The standards are set to measure the compilation with the focus on the different means and the application areas. This will help in improving the support for the security breach with the cross border functions. The standards are set to define the processes with the EU network for the large scale cyber incidents. The forms and the cooperation with the member states also require to focus on the different technological aspects.
3. The measures like cryptography, privacy enhancement of the technologies need to handle the readiness of the system with the proper policy law maker so that the community development with the easy guidance is provided to the different data controllers (Chakraborty et al., 2014). The emerging technologies like the big data and the mobile computing is set with the data protection of the agencies which are working over the protection to remain active in the area with the breach notifications.

ETL works on the improvement of the sophisticated threats with the law enforcement that includes the coordinated efforts. The standards are set based on the system functioning with the cybercrime that focus on the major impact of the system. ENISA focus on the highlights of the encryption libraries and the applications which are set in the different factors where the report is also about the leakage incidents that are classified by the security community. ETL also works on the malicious codes and then work on the threat trends that include the overall security infrastructure (Ramic et al., 2011). ETL works on the processes with the evaluation of the emerging strategy which works towards the individual and the organisations by adapting to the different counter measures. The standards are set for the developers with the security guides and the policy makers. It includes the different human resources with the threats that depend on the sources like the physical attacks, failure or the malfunctioning of the system. The unintentional damage, nefarious activities are considered to be illegal which need to be improved as well. (D'Acquisto et al., 2015)

The research is based on working over the different parameters where ENISA need to focus on the levels of the current state and how the IT security need to work on the security measures. The focus should be mainly on the prioritization of the threats with the applications that are related to work on the different injection attacks. The injections attacks are namely the phishing, scareware, malicious codes etc. It is important to focus on the measures with ENISA not only working over the reduced effects but also on the threats that are considered to be proven best for the secured data patterns (Benndorf e al., 2017). The easy transfer of the data and the working without any major interference can be possible only with the improvement of the processes in ENISA. The process also include the extraction and working over how the rows are inserted and modified which leads to the change in the operations depending upon the standard processes. It works with the threats that are related to function on the areas of the embedded systems and how the hardware devices are able to solve the issues related to the components and the attacks. The threats are mainly related to the issues which include the breach of the data and so for that a strong password need to be used with the proper networks. It includes the data breaching measures which occurs when there is a vulnerability to the network, or there is any incorrect form of the user authentication. For this, the tampering and the insider threats are required to manage the issues which are then related to handle the information leakage processes. The introduction of the high security and the secured passwords with firewall settings will allow the system with the easy processing. The check is on the software defined data pattern and the network visualisation processes that include the centralised control over the networks. For this, there are forms of the management with the working that includes the flow of the data and the other attacks that relate to the network components as well as centralising the control functions.

Conclusion

Conclusion

As per the security standards ENISA focus mainly on providing the best support for the networking and improving the system of the cyber security. It includes the major influence and the working of the different processes that are for handling the operations based on the processing of the IT sector (Chibba et al., 2015). The reports have been mainly about the handling of different strategies and working over the combating of insider threats with the top threats. The case is also about the system functions and the analysis where the threats have a major impact on the operational security measures as well. Hence, the part includes the working, where the threat agents and the social hacking issues need to be handled in a proper manner.

References

Beardsley, S., Enriquez, L., Grijpink, F., Sandoval, S., Spittaels, S., & Strandell-Jansson, M. (2014). Building Trust: The Role of Regulation in Unlocking the Value of Big Data. The Global Information Technology Report 2014, 73.

Benndorf, V., & Normann, H. T. (2017). The willingness to sell personal data. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics.

Chakraborty, N., & Gonnade, S. (2014). Big data and big data mining: Study of approaches, issues and future scope. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)–Volume, 18.

Chibba, M., & Cavoukian, A. (2015, December). Privacy, consumer trust and big data: Privacy by design and the 3 C'S. In ITU Kaleidoscope: Trust in the Information Society (K-2015), 2015 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

D'Acquisto, G., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Kikiras, P., Torra, V., de Montjoye, Y. A., & Bourka, A. (2015). Privacy by design in big data: An overview of privacy enhancing technologies in the era of big data analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.06000.

Fabian, B., Ermakova, T., & Junghanns, P. (2015). Collaborative and secure sharing of healthcare data in multi-clouds. Information Systems, 48, 132-150.

Jerome, J. W. (2013). Buying and Selling Privacy: Big Data's Difference Burdens and Benefits. Stan. L. Rev. Online, 66, 47.

Kasper, A. (2014). Legal aspects of cybersecurity in emerging technologies: Smart grids and big data. In Regulating eTechnologies in the European Union(pp. 189-216). Springer International Publishing.

Maksimovi?, M., Vujovi?, V., & Omanovi?-Mikli? anin, E. (2015). Application of internet of things in food packaging and transportation. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 1(4), 333-350.

Michael, K., & Michael, M. G. (2013). No limits to watching?. Communications of the ACM, 56(11), 26-28.

Payton, T., & Claypoole, T. (2014). Privacy in the age of Big data: Recognizing threats, defending your rights, and protecting your family. Rowman & Littlefield.

Pedrosa, I., & Costa, C. J. (2014, May). New trends on CAATTs: what are the chartered accountants' new challenges?. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication (pp. 138-142). ACM.

Perera, C., Ranjan, R., & Wang, L. (2015). End-to-end privacy for open big data markets. IEEE Cloud Computing, 2(4), 44-53.

Ramic, E., Pranjic, N., Batic-Mujanovic, O., Karic, E., Alibasic, E., & Alic, A. (2011). The effect of loneliness on malnutrition in elderly population. Medical Archives, 65(2), 92.

Soria-Comas, J., & Domingo-Ferrer, J. (2016). Big data privacy: challenges to privacy principles and models. Data Science and Engineering, 1(1), 21-28.

Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197