Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment: Factors, Methods, And Framework

write the review of framework to assess an indoor environmental quality for office building.
 

Factors affecting Indoor Environment Quality Assessment

Indoor quality assessment is aligned with the improved operation development. The analysis of the building development and aligned with the formation of the effective design development for the organization (Andersen, Fabi and Corgnati 2016). The inclusion would also help for forming the analysis of the improved functional development. The formation of the operations had helped in forming the development of the successive deployment of the operations. The deployment of the activities would be helped for the deployment of the operations for forming the management of the successive development of the successive management of the operations. The deployment of the activities would also help the organization for forming the development of the successive performance approval of the activities. The alignment of the operations had helped the system development and formation of the improved functional analysis.

The Indoor Environment Quality Assessment is carried for forming the analysis of the factors affecting the quality of the air and environment of a building and formation of the successive deployment of the framework (Arif et al. 2016). The core idea behind the deployment of the study is the use of effective system exposure for the alignment of the operations. The analysis would be based on the deployment of the dynamic pollutant data analysis and the formation of the improved functional development.

The dynamic exposure of estimates would be done for calculating the productivity and performance of the data in Indoor Environment Quality Assessment. The temperature records would also be helpful for the formation of the final deliverable analysis of data records. The emission factors and units processes are also analysed by using the dynamic inventory analysis (Dickey et al. 2017). The dynamic impact assessment of the internal impacts would tend to form the analysis of the effect factors and intake functions suitable for the analysis of the data. The following diagram would help in explaining the relation between the elements of the assessment of Indoor Environment Quality Assessment,

The study had been made for the analysis of the elements depicted in the diagram and the formation of the successive deployment of the activities. According to Godish (2016), the dynamic occupancy data for the building of Indoor Environment Quality Assessment would tend to form the analysis of the data suitable for the analysis of the internal data within the system. The analysis would be based on the deployment of the dynamic pollutant data analysis and the formation of the improved functional development. The internal emissions and the outdoor concentrations must be analysed for collection of information related to the alignment of the successive development of operations. The dynamic exposure of estimates would be done for calculating the productivity and performance of the data in Indoor Environment Quality Assessment (Haverinen-Shaughnessy et al. 2015). The other data required for the analysis are airflows, temperature, humidity, lightning, acoustics, and outdoor climate. The rate of airflows in the building structure would be analysed for forming the development of the final analysis. The airflow pressure also plays a major role for the alignment of the final data analysis. The temperature records are stored on the daily basis and it would form the deployment of the successive influence among the system operations of the activities. The temperature records would also be helpful for the formation of the final deliverable analysis of data records. The humidity is the amount of water content in form of particles within the air and it would tend to form the major segment for the formation of the quality assessment in the organization. The lightning, acoustic and outdoor climate would tend to form the impact on the operations of the assessment of the factors supporting the indoor environment for the building. The implication of the e energy use would be analysed by considering the data from the reference source (Kolokotsa and Santamouris 2015). The emission factors and units processes are also analysed by using the dynamic inventory analysis. The empirical parametric relationships had been successful for the alignment of the crucial development of the activities. The dynamic impact assessment of the internal impacts would tend to form the analysis of the effect factors and intake functions suitable for the analysis of the data. The intake function is developed on the calculation of summing exposure and fate for the dynamic exposure estimates. The outcomes from the process flow are the internal and external health chemical impacts. The implication of the operations had tended the alignment of the information for processing the data for the alignment of the improved operation development. The formation of the operations would help in forming the development of the improved operations development for calculating the analysis and formation of the improved analysis. The deployment of the operations would be helpful for listing the inclusion of the water usage and development of the activities would also help in forming the modification of the operations and it would be aligned for the management of the operations (Langer et al. 2016). The core ideas would be developed for the assessment of the Indoor Environment Quality and it would be aligned with the development of the operations for analysis. The alignment of the operations would be aligned for the development of the Indoor Environment Quality assessment. 

Indoor Environment Quality Assessment Methods

The Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment would align with the formation of the sensing system for analysing the development of the successive formation of the improved system development. The MCSI addition had been successful for the formation of the operations governing the formation of the successive alignment of the development model (Page et al. 2015). The inclusion of the operations would tend to realize the utilization of the process listing the allocation of the system components aligning the formation of the successive formation of the operations favourable for the development of the operations. The following diagram represents the sensing network required for the deployment of the activities and formation of the improved operational development,

The diagram had shown that the major building structure would comprise of MCSI addition, outdoor sample port, indoor sample port, OptiNet structured cable, and air data routers. These components would serve the purpose of the analysis of the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment (Altomonte et al. 2017). The MCSI addition had been successful for the formation of the operations governing the formation of the successive alignment of the development model. The new construction would be analysed for the quality assessment of the indoor environment. The air data router would tend to form the deployment of the connection between the various ports and networks in the building. The inclusion of the operations would tend to realize the utilization of the process listing the allocation of the system components aligning the formation of the successive formation of the operations favourable for the development of the operations. The indoor and outdoor sample ports would be helpful for the formation of the analysis and development of the successful integration of the operations favourable for the development of the assessment of the operations. The operational development would help in listing the modification for the formation of the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment (Mui et al. 2017). The additional analysis of the operations would serve the purpose of the deployment of the analysis methods. The implication of the operations would tend to form the alignment of the activities that are favourable for the alignment of the improved operation development. The alignment of the operations had also helped in forming the modification of the operations favouring the development of the improved operation development. 

The problem of the system is that the framework development for the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment would be irrespective of the implementation plan development for aligning with the implication of the improved functional development modification and alignment. The framework development would be supplied for the immediate implementation utilization of the factors for developing the alignment of the successive formation of the activities. The long term management of the framework would be inclined for the symbolic deployment of the activities. However, the maintenance of the quality assessment would be based on the utilization of the factors synchronizing the assessment. The study had been made for the study of the topic of Review of Framework to Assess an Indoor Environmental Quality for Office Building. The study had been made inclusive of the development factors for the management of the review of topic and generates outcomes from the study material and it would help in developing and forming a framework for supporting the inclusion of the effective tools and equipment analysis for forming the study of the existing technology for the involvement of the smart development activities (Santamouris et al. 2014). The study had covered the literature review and methodology for the deployment of the study of the topic. The analysis had also been helpful for forming the deployment of the improved activities that would also help in forming the final analysis of the product management and operations. The literature review had been made for considering the development of the activities that are capable of aligning with the successive development of the operations. The study had also been made for forming an analysis of the study methodology for the topic identified.

Indoor Environment Quality Assessment Framework

The following research is based for understanding the consideration of the factors for developing the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment framework. The following research objectives can be identified,

To understand the factors supporting the framework that is helpful for measuring the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment for a specific office building

To develop framework that is helpful for the assessing the quality of an indoor environment favourable for the implication of the activities

To improve the project scoring for developing the implication of the operations supplying the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment framework

According to Zhang et al. (2016), the indoor environmental quality assessment would help the organization in listing the modification of the operations and alignment of the operations of the alignment. The deployment of the operations of the life cycle assessment would also serve for the development. The deployment of the operations would be helpful for listing the inclusion of the water usage and development of the activities would also help in forming the modification of the operations and it would be aligned for the management of the operations. The core ideas would be developed for the assessment of the Indoor Environment Quality and it would be aligned with the development of the operations for analysis (Ai and Mak 2015). The alignment of the operations would be aligned for the development of the Indoor Environment Quality assessment. The development of the operations would align with the deployment of Life Cycle Assessment and it would be deployed for the operation development for the management of the activities. The architecture of the development and it would form the management of the activities, architecture, construction, and engineering operations (Tham, Wargocki and Tan 2015). The use of the Life Cycle Assessment would be aligned for the deployment of the activities would be helpful for the implication of the operations and alignment of the operations and formation of the effective alignment of the operations and listing the deployment of the improved decision making for the alignment of the improved operation development.

The listing of the activities has been successive for the management of the operations and taking care of the improved operation for the alignment of the successive development activities. According to Du et al. (2015), indoor environmental quality has included the thermal quality, indoor air quality, and acoustic and lighting quality. The spatial and ergonomic considerations had been helpful for the considerations of the successive building design and utilization of the activities. The analysis would consider the indoor air quality assessment and it would also in turn result in the development of the operations and alignment of the successive development. The alignment of the operations and the formation of the operations and it would in turn help in forming the modulation (Ghita and Catalina 2015). The alignment of the operations would help in the formation of the operations and it would help in forming the development of the activities. The alignment of the green building would allow the formation of the improved operations. The deployment of the operations would be helpful for listing the inclusion of the water usage and development of the activities would also help in forming the modification of the operations and it would be aligned for the management of the operations (Toyinbo et al. 2018). The use of the Life Cycle Assessment would be aligned for the deployment of the activities would be helpful for the implication.

The involvement had been helpful for the operations and alignment of the operations and formation of the effective alignment of the operations and listing the deployment of the improved decision making for the alignment of the improved operation development. The presence of the chemical pollutants and such as particulate matter and volatile organic compounds (VOC) along with the bacteria, viruses and fungi as biological pollutants had resulted in polluting the indoor environment quality. The study had helped in aligning the building operations for the alignment of the impacts for the building development parameters and performance outputs from the help of variance and reduced predictors for outcomes occupants. According to the research analysis of Bae et al. (2017), the life cycle assessment and indoor environmental quality are deployed for incorporating indoor chemical pollutant for the health toxicity life cycle impact assessment. The approaches are helpful for analysing the estimation of the emission rates of the indoor materials and processes. The analysis would allow the analysis of building level variables like occupancy rates and ventilation. The benefits of these approaches are helpful for the alignment of the activities and formation of the operations and it would be aligned for the deployment of the operations and it would be based for the formation of the whole building indoor environmental quality. The additional factors would help in indoor intake of outdoor pollution development and alignment of the operations. The indoor generation of the biological contaminants and non Indoor Air Quality related for the influences of the productivity and occupants health. The authors like Choi et al. (2014), have previously proposed a working definition as an approach for the Life Cycle Assessment and it is explicitly incorporating the dynamic process modelling for the environment and surrounding industrial systems in relation to the spatial and temporal variations.

As opined by Gobakis and Kolokotsa (2017), the indoor environmental quality is helpful for the management of the dynamic life cycle assessment as a framework for the developed operations. The distinction of the framework is aligned for the development of operations and it would be aligned for the formation of the internal and external analysis of the impacts building. The internal impacts building development would help in figuring out the formation of the operations and it would be integrated and alignment of the internal impacts. The dynamic approach would be helpful for the building operations and it would help in forming the accounting of the industrial and environmental (Tsushima, Tanabe and Utsumi 2015). The quantities of the materials and energy would result in forming the analysis of the building maintenance and operations. The input of the time series would align for the operation and it would form the energy and materials for maintenance and buildings for the alignment of the successive deployment of the operations for listing the deployment of the operations. According to recent research by Petras and Ing (2017), the benefit of the approaches would be helpful for forming the intoxication of the project lifecycle assessment. The analysis would help in deducing the analysis of the improved operation analysis so that the outdoor alignment of the operations would be aligned with the management of the activities and it would be aligned for the management of the operations and it would be helpful for the continuation of the operations and it would be helpful for the deployment of the operations and it would be aligned for the deployment of the improved operational development.

 The inclusion of the operations would also tend for the alignment of the activities and the formation of the successive improvement of the operations and it would also help in easing the modification of the operations that are favourable for the alignment of the improved operation development. The internal impacts to the human health and the environmental system or species are favourable for the deployment of the improved operations. As opined by Almeida and de Freitas (2014), the Indoor Environment Quality has been referred to as the environment quality for the building with the consideration of the impact on human health and safety. The well being of the humans in an enclosed location would serve the major purpose of the Indoor Environment Quality. The Indoor Environment Quality is defined by the factors such as damp conditions, air quality and lightning. These factors form the major impact for the development of the operations and it would be helpful for the implication of the activities. The implication of the activities would also help in easing the management of the operations and the alignment of the successive development model. The effective Indoor Environment Quality assessment would enable the deployment of the successive management of the activities (Ugranli et al. 2015). It would also help in forming the deployment of the successive building of the operation development. The dynamic approach would be helpful for the building operations and it would help in forming the accounting of the industrial and environmental. Toyinbo et al. (2016) have stated that the quantities of the materials and energy would result in forming the analysis of the building maintenance and operations. Moreover, the inclusion of the operations would also tend for the alignment of the activities and the formation of the successive improvement of the operations and it would also help in easing the modification of the operations that are favourable for the alignment of the improved operation development.

There have been many cases where the implication of the degraded Indoor Environment Quality would for the major impact on the health of workers and employees working in the building (Fabian et al. 2014). The employee’s health and safety is the primary concern related for the deployment of the effective assessment of the building’s indoor quality. The research conducted by many scholars has shown that the damped buildings and polluted buildings often result in causing the health issues among the workers. The lungs related issues and respiratory symptoms are the major illness caused due to the impact of the poor air quality in the indoor environment. The presence of the chemical pollutants and such as particulate matter and volatile organic compounds (VOC) along with the bacteria, viruses and fungi as biological pollutants had resulted in polluting the indoor environment quality (Ugranli et al. 2015). The intoxicating gases and particulates would tend to form the major issues in the implication of the activities and alignment of the operation development.

As per the study by Fabian et al. (2014), the NIOSH has conducted research for possible explanation of the impact of the pollutants in the organization and it would also show the inclusion of the percentage of the pollution in the environmental conditions. The analysis had tended to evaluate all the possible hazards related to health that may arise in the workplace. The various acts have resulted in forming the safety and security issues for the deployment of the operations that are favourable for the alignment of the operations. The integration of the safety acts and operations would also tend to form the improvement of the health and safety among the employees and workers of the building (Tisov, Siroky and Kolarik 2016). The implication of the activities would also be helpful for overcoming the yield and development of the successive deployment models. The study has considered the analysis of the building in terms of dampness, moisture, and air quality. The internal impacts to the Indoor Environment Quality is analysed by using the general approach to the LCIA as it would consist of including the multiple emission collection as the emission would tend to form the relation with the health impacts.

The emission would also tend to form the study of the exposure, fate, and effect modelling (Leung 2016). The approach is useful for the analysis of the successive development of the operations and it would tend to form the major alignment of the operations favourable for the deployment of the activities. According to Cabeza et al. (2014), the core ideas would be developed for the assessment of the Indoor Environment Quality and it would be aligned with the development of the operations for analysis. The alignment of the operations would be aligned for the development of the Indoor Environment Quality assessment. The use of the Life Cycle Assessment would be aligned for the deployment of the activities of indoor environmental quality that has included the thermal quality, indoor air quality, and acoustic and lighting quality. The use of the Life Cycle Assessment would be aligned for the deployment of the activities would be helpful for the implication of the study for the issues of incorporating indoor chemical pollutant for the health toxicity life cycle impact assessment. The benefits of Indoor Environment Quality assessment is align with the study that would be based for the formation of the whole building indoor environmental quality. The authors like Chau, Leung and Ng (2015), have previously proposed a working definition as an approach for the Life Cycle Assessment and it is explicitly incorporating the dynamic process modelling for the environment and surrounding industrial systems in relation to the spatial and temporal variations. The implication of the framework for assessment of the Indoor Environment Quality would help the evaluation of the factors for forming the major development of the activities.

Summary: The literature review has been provided for understanding the concept of forming the alignment of the improved operation development. The significant alignment of the indoor assessment for the quality of the office environment would be based on the use of the proper development factor. The Indoor Environment Quality is defined by the factors such as damp conditions, air quality and lightning. These factors form the major impact for the development of the operations and it would be helpful for the implication of the activities. The implication of the activities would also help in easing the management of the operations and the alignment of the successive development model. The effective Indoor Environment Quality assessment would enable the deployment of the successive management of the activities. The employee’s health and safety is the primary concern related for the deployment of the effective assessment of the building’s indoor quality. The research conducted by many scholars has shown that the damped buildings and polluted buildings often result in causing the health issues among the workers. The lungs related issues and respiratory symptoms are the major illness caused due to the impact of the poor air quality in the indoor environment. The analysis had tended to evaluate all the possible hazards related to health that may arise in the workplace. The various acts have resulted in forming the safety and security issues for the deployment of the operations that are favourable for the alignment of the operations. The integration of the safety acts and operations would also tend to form the improvement of the health and safety among the employees and workers of the building. The completion of the building procedure would be based on the alignment of the factors for developing. 

The methodology for the alignment of the outdoor development would be helpful for the formation of the improved functional analysis would tend to form the alignment of the successful development operations (Gong, Darling and You 2015). The analysis had tended for framework that would be helpful for the assessment of the indoor quality of the building. The framework includes the combination of Indoor Environment Quality and Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment together for the alignment of the final assessment of the Indoor quality for the building. The research methodology would be based on the simplification of the effective and improved data analysis. The framework would be developed using the analysis of the existing operations and functions. The positivism philosophy would be used for the execution of the project of developing the framework for the indoor environment quality and dynamic life cycle assessment. The deployment would be based on defining the simplification of the search process for the framework development.

The research process is developed using the simplified data collection using varied reliable resources. The following points would be considered when developing the research approach,

• The research would be carried on based on the simplification of the factors like realism, positivism, and interprevitism.
• The application of the logic would support the observation of the activities aligning with the utilization of the hidden facts and options.
• The inductive process of analysis would be taken forward for ensuring that even in the absence of data the analysis would yield sufficient amount of inference.
• The gaining of the access to the required data analysis would be based on the principles of explanation, description, and conclusion. 

The following image would show the combination of Indoor Environment Quality and Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment,

The complete framework of Indoor Environment Quality and Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment is divided into two parts namely external impacts and internal impacts. The analysis of the two impacts in details would help in easing the flow of the information and alignment of the successive deployment of the activities (Jovanovic et al. 2015). The alignment of the successive deployment of the activities would help in easing the progress of system development. The core ideas would be developed for the assessment of the Indoor Environment Quality and it would be aligned with the development of the operations for analysis. The alignment of the operations would be aligned for the development of the Indoor Environment Quality assessment. The development of the operations would align with the deployment of Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment and it would be deployed for the operation development for the management of the activities. The structure of internal impacts would involve the human health chemical, human health non-chemical and productivity and performance. The human health chemical would involve the analysis of the indoor environmental quality by evaluating the cancer toxicity, respiratory effects, and non cancer toxicity (Quinn and Davis 2015). The evaluation of the particulates would be based on same units and can be directly compared. The productivity and performance would result in forming the analysis of ventilation, thermal comfort, acoustics, day lighting, and lighting. The human health non chemical would result in studying the issues of allergens, pathogens, and stress mood disorders. The structure of the external impacts includes human health and other impacts. The human health examines the variable of cancer toxicity, respiratory effects, and non cancer toxicity. The other impacts would evaluate the acidification present in the air, global warming issue, ozone depletion, eutrophication, and photochemical ozone toxicity (Plevin, Delucchi and Creutzig 2014). The Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment and indoor environmental quality are deployed for incorporating indoor chemical pollutant for the health toxicity life cycle impact assessment. The approaches are helpful for analysing the estimation of the emission rates of the indoor materials and processes. The indoor generation of the biological contaminants and non Indoor Air Quality related for the influences of the productivity and occupants health. The distinction of the framework is aligned for the development of operations and it would be aligned for the formation of the internal and external analysis of the impacts building.

The Indoor Environment Quality has been referred to as the environment quality for the building with the consideration of the impact on human health and safety (Tao et al. 2014). The well being of the humans in an enclosed location would serve the major purpose of the Indoor Environment Quality. The Indoor Environment Quality is defined by the factors such as damp conditions, air quality and lightning. The effective Indoor Environment Quality assessment would enable the deployment of the successive management of the activities. The presence of the chemical pollutants and such as particulate matter and volatile organic compounds (VOC) along with the bacteria, viruses and fungi as biological pollutants had resulted in polluting the indoor environment quality. The intoxicating gases and particulates would tend to form the major issues in the implication of the activities and alignment of the operation development. The various acts have resulted in forming the safety and security issues for the deployment of the operations that are favourable for the alignment of the operations (Pacheco-Torgal et al. 2014). The integration of the safety acts and operations would also tend to form the improvement of the health and safety among the employees and workers of the building. The study has considered the analysis of the building in terms of dampness, moisture, and air quality. The internal impacts to the Indoor Environment Quality is analysed by using the general approach to the Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment as it would consist of including the multiple emission collection as the emission would tend to form the relation with the health impacts. The alignment of the operations would be aligned for the development of the Indoor Environment Quality assessment (Souza, Teixeira and Ostermann 2015). The use of the Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment would be aligned for the deployment of the activities of indoor environmental quality that has included the thermal quality, indoor air quality, and acoustic and lighting quality. The use of the Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment would be aligned for the deployment of the activities would be helpful for the implication of the study for the issues of incorporating indoor chemical pollutant for the health toxicity life cycle impact assessment (Garnett 2014). The benefits of Indoor Environment Quality assessment is align with the study that would be based for the formation of the whole building indoor environmental quality.

Conclusion

The assignment had been made for the topic of Review of Framework to Assess an Indoor Environmental Quality for Office Building. The analysis of the various literatures and articles would help in forming the development of the improved functional development for the improved operation development. The study had focused on the alignment of the operations and the formation of the study that would help in forming the development of the smart analysis of the operations. The development of the operations had helped in forming the analysis for the formation of the improved analysis and development. The study had also considered the formation of the successive improvement operations. The success of the alignment of the activities would also form the development of the alignment of the operations favouring the alignment of the operations and forming the development of the continuation of the successive development model. The study was based on the development of the research of the topic of Indoor Environmental Quality for Office Building. The summative study was based for understanding the consideration of the factors for developing the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment framework for understanding the factors supporting the framework, developing the framework for Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment for a specific office building, and improving the project scoring framework. The research process had been based on the simplification of the factors like realism, positivism, and interprevitism, application of the logic, aligning with the utilization of the hidden facts and options, and inductive process of analysis  for ensuring that even in the absence of data the analysis would yield sufficient amount of inference. The research had been helpful for gaining the access to the required data analysis would be based on the principles of explanation, description, and conclusion. 

References

Ai, Z.T. and Mak, C.M., 2015. From street canyon microclimate to indoor environmental quality in naturally ventilated urban buildings: issues and possibilities for improvement. Building and Environment, 94, pp.489-503.

Almeida, R.M. and de Freitas, V.P., 2014. Indoor environmental quality of classrooms in Southern European climate. Energy and Buildings, 81, pp.127-140.

Altomonte, S., Schiavon, S., Kent, M.G. and Brager, G., 2017. Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings. Building Research & Information, pp.1-20.

Andersen, R.K., Fabi, V. and Corgnati, S.P., 2016. Predicted and actual indoor environmental quality: Verification of occupants’ behaviour models in residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 127, pp.105-115.

Arif, M., Katafygiotou, M., Mazroei, A., Kaushik, A. and Elsarrag, E., 2016. Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1), pp.1-11.

Bae, S., Asojo, A., Guerin, D. and Martin, C., 2017. A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Impact of Indoor Environmental Quality on Health and Well-Being in Office Buildings. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 17(6), pp.25-36.

Cabeza, L.F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G. and Castell, A., 2014. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 29, pp.394-416.

Celik, K., Meral, C., Gursel, A.P., Mehta, P.K., Horvath, A. and Monteiro, P.J., 2015. Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of self-consolidating concrete mixtures made with blended portland cements containing fly ash and limestone powder. Cement and Concrete Composites, 56, pp.59-72.

Chau, C.K., Leung, T.M. and Ng, W.Y., 2015. A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. Applied Energy, 143, pp.395-413.

Choi, S., Guerin, D.A., Kim, H.Y., Brigham, J.K. and Bauer, T., 2014. Indoor environmental quality of classrooms and student outcomes: A path analysis approach. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(2).

Dickey, P., Chai, S., Weaver, M., Song, L., Allen, C., Takaro, T.K. and Krieger, J., 2017. The Seattle–King County Healthy Homes Project: Implementation of a comprehensive approach to improving indoor environmental quality for low-income children with asthma. In Community Research in Environmental Health (pp. 63-92). Routledge.

Du, L., Prasauskas, T., Leivo, V., Turunen, M., Pekkonen, M., Kiviste, M., Aaltonen, A., Martuzevicius, D. and Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., 2015. Assessment of indoor environmental quality in existing multi-family buildings in North–East Europe. Environment international, 79, pp.74-84.

Fabian, M.P., Adamkiewicz, G., Stout, N.K., Sandel, M. and Levy, J.I., 2014. A simulation model of building intervention impacts on indoor environmental quality, pediatric asthma, and costs. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 133(1), pp.77-84.

Fabian, M.P., Adamkiewicz, G., Stout, N.K., Sandel, M. and Levy, J.I., 2014. A simulation model of building intervention impacts on indoor environmental quality, pediatric asthma, and costs. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 133(1), pp.77-84.

Fisk, W.J., 2015. Review of some effects of climate change on indoor environmental quality and health and associated no-regrets mitigation measures. Building and Environment, 86, pp.70-80.

Garnett, T., 2014. Three perspectives on sustainable food security: efficiency, demand restraint, food system transformation. What role for life cycle assessment?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73, pp.10-18.

Ghita, S.A. and Catalina, T., 2015. Energy efficiency versus indoor environmental quality in different Romanian countryside schools. Energy and Buildings, 92, pp.140-154.

Gobakis, K. and Kolokotsa, D., 2017. Coupling building energy simulation software with microclimatic simulation for the evaluation of the impact of urban outdoor conditions on the energy consumption and indoor environmental quality. Energy and Buildings, 157, pp.101-115.

Godish, T., 2016. Indoor environmental quality. CRC press.

Gong, J., Darling, S.B. and You, F., 2015. Perovskite photovoltaics: life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental impacts. Energy & Environmental Science, 8(7), pp.1953-1968.

Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., Shaughnessy, R.J., Cole, E.C., Toyinbo, O. and Moschandreas, D.J., 2015. An assessment of indoor environmental quality in schools and its association with health and performance. Building and Environment, 93, pp.35-40.

Jovanovic, M., Rooney, M.S., Mertins, P., Przybylski, D., Chevrier, N., Satija, R., Rodriguez, E.H., Fields, A.P., Schwartz, S., Raychowdhury, R. and Mumbach, M.R., 2015. Dynamic profiling of the protein life cycle in response to pathogens. Science, 347(6226), p.1259038.

Kolokotsa, D. and Santamouris, M., 2015. Review of the indoor environmental quality and energy consumption studies for low income households in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 536, pp.316-330.

Kralisch, D., Ott, D. and Gericke, D., 2015. Rules and benefits of Life Cycle Assessment in green chemical process and synthesis design: a tutorial review. Green Chemistry, 17(1), pp.123-145.

Langer, S., Ramalho, O., Derbez, M., Ribéron, J., Kirchner, S. and Mandin, C., 2016. Indoor environmental quality in French dwellings and building characteristics. Atmospheric Environment, 128, pp.82-91.

Leung, C.W., 2016. Indoor Environmental Quality in Construction Site Office (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University).

McManus, M.C. and Taylor, C.M., 2015. The changing nature of life cycle assessment. Biomass and bioenergy, 82, pp.13-26.

Meneses, M., Concepción, H., Vrecko, D. and Vilanova, R., 2015. Life cycle assessment as an environmental evaluation tool for control strategies in wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, pp.653-661.

Mui, K.W., Wong, L.T., Cheung, C.T. and Yu, H.C., 2017. Improving cooling energy efficiency in Hong Kong offices using demand-controlled ventilation (DCV) and adaptive comfort temperature (ACT) systems to provide indoor environmental quality (IEQ) acceptance. HKIE Transactions, 24(2), pp.78-87.

Nitschelm, L., Aubin, J., Corson, M.S., Viaud, V. and Walter, C., 2016. Spatial differentiation in Life Cycle Assessment LCA applied to an agricultural territory: current practices and method development. Journal of cleaner production, 112, pp.2472-2484.

Nuss, P. and Eckelman, M.J., 2014. Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis. PLoS One, 9(7), p.e101298.

Pacheco-Torgal, F., Cabeza, L.F., Labrincha, J. and De Magalhaes, A.G., 2014. Eco-efficient construction and building materials: life cycle assessment (LCA), eco-labelling and case studies. woodhead Publishing.

Page, E., Burr, G., Zwack, C.L. and Kawamoto, M., 2015. Evaluation of Indoor Environmental Quality and Health Concerns in a Public Elementary School.

Petráš, D. and Ing, P.E., 2017. Energy Consumption and Indoor Environmental Quality of a Residential Building Before and After Refurbishment. Energy, 4.

Plevin, R.J., Delucchi, M.A. and Creutzig, F., 2014. Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate?change mitigation benefits misleads policy makers. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18(1), pp.73-83.

Quinn, J.C. and Davis, R., 2015. The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: a review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling. Bioresource technology, 184, pp.444-452.

Santamouris, M., Alevizos, S.M., Aslanoglou, L., Mantzios, D., Milonas, P., Sarelli, I., Karatasou, S., Cartalis, K. and Paravantis, J.A., 2014. Freezing the poor—Indoor environmental quality in low and very low income households during the winter period in Athens. Energy and Buildings, 70, pp.61-70.

Souza, D.M., Teixeira, R.F. and Ostermann, O.P., 2015. Assessing biodiversity loss due to land use with Life Cycle Assessment: are we there yet?. Global change biology, 21(1), pp.32-47.

Tao, F., Zuo, Y., Da Xu, L., Lv, L. and Zhang, L., 2014. Internet of things and BOM-based life cycle assessment of energy-saving and emission-reduction of products. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), pp.1252-1261.

Tham, K.W., Wargocki, P. and Tan, Y.F., 2015. Indoor environmental quality, occupant perception, prevalence of sick building syndrome symptoms, and sick leave in a Green Mark Platinum-rated versus a non-Green Mark-rated building: a case study. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 21(1), pp.35-44.

Tisov, A., Siroky, J. and Kolarik, J., 2016. Key figures for joint assessment of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and energy consumption in modern buildings–a literature review. In 12th REHVA World Congress CLIMA 2016REHVA World Congress.

Toyinbo, O., Obi, C., Shaughnessy, R. and Haverinen-Shaughness, U., 2018. PI–3–7 Evaluating school buildings and indoor environmental quality in nigerian elementary schools.

Toyinbo, O., Shaughnessy, R., Turunen, M., Putus, T., Metsämuuronen, J., Kurnitski, J. and Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., 2016. Building characteristics, indoor environmental quality, and mathematics achievement in Finnish elementary schools. Building and Environment, 104, pp.114-121.

Tsushima, S., Tanabe, S.I. and Utsumi, K., 2015. Workers' awareness and indoor environmental quality in electricity-saving offices. Building and Environment, 88, pp.10-19.

Turunen, M., Toyinbo, O., Putus, T., Nevalainen, A., Shaughnessy, R. and Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., 2014. Indoor environmental quality in school buildings, and the health and wellbeing of students. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 217(7), pp.733-739.

Ugranli, T., Toprak, M., Gursoy, G., Cimrin, A.H. and Sofuoglu, S.C., 2015. Indoor environmental quality in chemistry and chemical engineering laboratories at Izmir Institute of Technology. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 6(1), pp.147-153.

Ugranli, T., Toprak, M., Gursoy, G., Cimrin, A.H. and Sofuoglu, S.C., 2015. Indoor environmental quality in chemistry and chemical engineering laboratories at Izmir Institute of Technology. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 6(1), pp.147-153.

Zhang, Y., Barrett, P., Davies, F. and Barrett, L., 2016. A field survey on the indoor environmental quality of the UK primary school classroom. British Journal of School Nursing, 11(10), pp.492-496.