The Essay On Execution Of Light Rail Framework.

Discuss about the Execution of Light Rail Framework.

Light Rail framework is mainly designed for improving the efficiency of the transport system and reducing traffic on the streets of this city that is Adelaide which is well known of Australia (Clarke, 2012). The design of this light rail framework is such a way that it relates to the framework is properly checked which is essential for the development (Dennis, Wixom & Tegarden, 2015). LRT is evaluated with the certain areas that needed for the support and deployment of this project in Adelaide (Cunha, Garis & Riesco, 2015). LRT is mainly essential for the evaluation during the preparation of this given report. During the evaluation of the framework many problems are faced (Hawkins et al., 2013). During development of lifecycle model which is required for upgradation of LTR is mainly discussed and evaluated in this particular report.

The preliminary design is mainly established for the upgradation of the framework which is mainly discussed in this report (Soni & Khaliq, 2015). Description of design and its methodology is mainly focused for the upgradation of the system (Moore, 2016). In the final stage the light rail transit framework mainly focuses on testing errors which can be generated at the time of its deployed of the given framework (Sachdeva, & Sunita, 2015). SLDC model is mainly used for the upgradation of the system and a schedule of project management is mainly created for managing the module and keeping a track on the progress of the given and mainly aims in increasing the efficiency which is mainly required for the development of this project.

Light rail framework design mainly consists of overhead lines of electricity, tracking of layout and mainly covering the essential region of the city and the particular model mainly focuses on framework of rail transits (Valacich, George & Hoffer, 2015). The tracks of the framework of LRT mainly focuses to design a such a way the passengers will feel a safe and comfortable journey with reduced vibration and jerk. The motor which is mainly used for running the engine of this LRT mainly requires to be powerful with various steps and cliffs (Smith, 2015). Implementation of light rail transport in Adelaide can be successful if it satisfies the proper needs of the city and which will ultimately bring benefit to the given city (Moore, 2016). Tracks which are used for LRT mainly needs to be combined with the metro which will ultimately reduce the development cost. Speed of this light rail track is mainly required to be checked for various routes (Rosen et al., 2012). GPS tracking system must be installed in this light rail which will provide real time update of present position and also calculates the distance that is covered by this LRT (Sun & Chao, 2013). 

Detailed design and development

The tracks are designed in such way that various road ways can be used for keeping the track and sharing it with different vehicle that is running on the road (Hanumantharaju, Ravishankar & Rameshbabu, 2013). The quality of transportation can be improved by using of proper insulation and maintaining silence in the cabin. The capacity of carrying passenger mainly requires to be improved with various changes in the present design (Dennis, Wixom & Tegarden, 2015). Usage of SDLC model can be beneficial for the upgradation of framework with minimizing the faults which is mainly generated during the implementation of the project (Hawkins et al., 2013). A proper analysis is needed to be done for collecting all the problems which is related during the implementation of the network (Huda, Arya & Khan, 2015). System that is designed mainly focuses on various feature and techniques which are essential for making the project successful (Soni & Khaliq, 2015). For reaching the following step on the complementation of previous stage and the various errors must be checked (Valacich, George & Hoffer, 2015). Now if an error is detected in the any phase then it is duty of developer to come back to the earlier step for the correction of any error and continuing with left portion of the projects.

The development of light rail framework in Adelaide and various aims of the project of is required to be checked. Various things like infrastructure of the building like platform and bridges are required to be analyzed for the deployment of this LRT (Smith, 2015). The present areas of the city traffic and various areas are needed to be checked (Valacich, George & Hoffer, 2015). The available scope of upgradation and infrastructure that can be used for reducing the cost of the network which ultimately aims in reducing the total cost and can also be proved for improving efficiency of the given network. The methodology that is chosen for the development of LRT mainly requires confirmation which works with the development of LRT (Rosen et al., 2012). For the proper development of the framework the basic or preliminary design needs to be evaluated and cost of life cycle also needs to be considered. The forthcoming design stage and the price is analyzed which is needed to be done and the life cycle of the project needs to be checked (Clarke, 2012). Various tools which are used for project management is mainly required for scheduling project and development of lifecycle which is stated in development stage for the upgradation of framework (Vir & Mann, 2013).

Project needs to be created as per the structure of work breakdown. It is the duty of the project manager to check different resources of activity which can be easily checked in the various phase of development of project (Messersmith & McIntosh, 2015). The total cost of the project can be easily calculated from the schedule and total coverage area needs to be checked with proper budget (Cunha, Garis & Riesco, 2015). In pre design phase various things like length of track and area of coverage needs to be checked (Smith, 2015). Now in the post design a proper analysis is required and all the information mainly requires to be checked and various details of the network is checked for calculation which ultimately increases the cost of the project (Huda, Arya & Khan, 2015). The cost of maintenance is also required to be checked in the post design analysis with repayment cost of current structure and replacing the framework which is inclusive of cost of maintenance (Sachdeva, & Sunita, 2015). The system outline is mainly designed in such that it can cover the predesign stage and post design stage which is mainly required for the detailed design for the development of LRT.

Development of this project mainly depends the workers that are available and help from the local community of this Australian city that is Adelaide (Messersmith & McIntosh, 2015). A proper analysis is made on the present network of the LRT of the city and upgradation that can be easily made after the usage of the new design which is provided to them (Sun & Chao, 2013). The project needs to be divided into various categories is checked for the proper evaluation of the system and structure is designed properly for satisfying the basic needs of the project.

A proper testing of system needs to done on the present framework of LRT and an approach is required to be made on the various methodology of testing which is required for the infrastructure (Rosen et al., 2012). Planning mainly involves building up of proper design for the given frame work and also test the various capabilities which are mainly required for LRT system (Sun & Chao, 2013). For providing the needs of the project the best performance of the project needs to be checked. The starting point of the project needs to be checked as per the approach of system engineering (Dennis, Wixom & Tegarden, 2015). A proper update is made on the model which is required for calculating the estimation of the test after deployment and increasing the outcome or efficiency of the system (Hanumantharaju, Ravishankar & Rameshbabu, 2013). Various models are available for the implementation of this light rail framework (Messersmith & McIntosh, 2015). Various difficulties are faced by the proper model and is checked and compared with the given model for deployment and making the project a huge success (Sharon & Dori, 2015).

Validation of the given project is mainly required to be checked after analyzing the given project with other different successful projects (Sachdeva, & Sunita, 2015). Various risk that are associated with implementation of the system needs to be checked as per the framework (Soni & Khaliq, 2015). The mode of failure and its effect on analysis mainly requires to checked or managed for proper analysis during the upgradation of this project (Cunha, Garis & Riesco, 2015). Various logic can be easily applied and data containing vital information needs to be collected (Hawkins et al., 2013). Brainstorming methodology and analysis of qualitative and quantitative must be required for the upgradation of the current framework of the given organization (Moore, 2016). Various risk that are involved in the input and output of the system needs to be controlled with various strategy of testing (Clarke, 2012). The various parts that are used for the implementation of the framework and usage of various service for checking the purpose and the framework of the given LRT project in Adelaide by using system development life cycle model (Huda, Arya & Khan, 2015).

Conclusion

From the above discussion it can be easily stated that the application of SDLC model is important for the development of LRT in Adelaide. A proper design is made for the provide the project and after that documentation of the project is made. Detail design is mainly composed of various function that are mainly required to be added and a proper methodology which is mainly essential for keeping a track of progress of this project in Adelaide. Validation of the project is mainly required to be selected for keeping a track on the progress of the given project that is LRT. The project must satisfy the needs of the project which is essential for the success of the project. It is the duty of project manager make use of different available project management tools which are essential for checking the proper budget and routine of the given project and as per the requirement it mainly monitors the progress of the project as per the requirement. The system mainly needs to be tested as per the schedule and proper cost of the project needs to be evaluated for the proper upgradation of the given project. The preliminary design is mainly established for the upgradation of the framework which is mainly discussed in this report (Soni & Khaliq, 2015). Description of design and its methodology is mainly focused for the upgradation of the system (Moore, 2016). In the final stage the light rail transit framework mainly focuses on testing errors which can be generated at the time of its deployed of the given framework (Sachdeva, & Sunita, 2015).

References

Clarke, S. (2012). Information systems strategic management: An integrated approach. Routledge.

Cunha, A., Garis, A., & Riesco, D. (2015). Translating between Alloy specifications and UML class diagrams annotated with OCL. Software & Systems Modeling, 14(1), 5-25.

Dennis, A., Wixom, B. H., & Tegarden, D. (2015). Systems analysis and design: An object-oriented approach with UML. John Wiley & Sons.

Hanumantharaju, M. C., Ravishankar, M., & Rameshbabu, D. R. (2013). Design of Novel Algorithm and Architecture for Gaussian Based Color Image Enhancement System for Real Time Applications. In Advances in Computing, Communication, and Control (pp. 595-608). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau?Bettez, G., & Strømman, A. H. (2013). Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(1), 53-64.

Huda, M., Arya, Y. D. S., & Khan, M. H. (2015). Quantifying Reusability of Object Oriented Design: A Testability Perspective. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 8(4), 175.

Messersmith, C., & McIntosh, B. (2015). Capturing Bad Design Practices in Object-Oriented Code.

Moore, F. (2016). Peo Life Cycle Cost Accountability: Viability Of Foreign Suppliers For Weapon System Development. Air War College Maxwell Air Force Base.

Rosen, M., Lublinsky, B., Smith, K. T., & Balcer, M. J. (2012). Applied SOA: service-oriented architecture and design strategies. John Wiley & Sons.

Sachdeva, A., & Sunita, M. (2015). An Empirical and Analytical View of New Inheritance Metric for Object-Oriented Design.

Sharon, A., & Dori, D. (2015). A Project–Product Model–Based Approach to Planning Work Breakdown Structures of Complex System Projects. IEEE Systems Journal, 9(2), 366-376.

Smith, B. (2015). Object-Oriented Design… A Revisit. In Advanced ActionScript 3 (pp. 357-371). Apress.

Soni, N., & Khaliq, M. (2015). Maintainability estimation of object-oriented software: Design phase perspective. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng, 4(3), 538-542.

Sun, S. P., & Chao, W. S. (2013). An Architecture-Oriented Design Method For Gaming Business Administration Systems. In C], Asia Pacific Conference on Gambling & Commercial Gaming Research (APCG2013), Taiwan.

Valacich, J. S., George, J. F., & Hoffer, J. A. (2015). Essentials of systems analysis and design. Pearson Education.

Vir, R., & Mann, P. S. (2013). A hybrid approach for the prediction of fault proneness in object oriented design using fuzzy logic. journal of academia and industrial research, 661-666.