The financial modeling has been focused on brief observation over financial performance of business entities. It has developed brief measurement on different brands of Beer companies with the introduction of statistical financial modeling. The use of statistical tools, techniques and approach on the beer companies has been made. As per the statistical measurements, particular financial modeling, it has been included observation over the statistical financial assessment of Bia Hoi Beer company. In relation to evaluate different variables of financial attributes such as pricing, sales, growth rate and returns the statistical tools has been used for making more critical and depth analysis over the performance and positioning of the company (Nolan, 2014)
The data survey has been presented as per pricing, average pricing and shelf positioning of the 9 beer brands. The company that has been selected for the financial modeling analysis is been BIA Hoi Beer Company. Based on 30 years of sales, pricing and shelf information of BIA Hoi Beer Company, the statistical and financial modeling has been conducted tool regression analysis and linear regression analysis (Schwaitzberg, 2016). In the report, line chart tool has been used to observe the profitability and potentiality of the sales and marketing divisions of the company for making growth in the market. As per the assessment, the report also includes coefficient correlation, regression analysis, seasonal indexing for analysing trend and dummy variables (Shim et al. 2012).
Trend Analysis of BIA Hoi
|
|
Volume (in '000 litres) |
4 year moving avg |
2 year moving avg |
Index |
|
|
|
Time period |
Date |
Bia Hoi |
|
|
|
Deseasonalized |
Trends |
|
1 |
Jan-95 |
10.50093 |
|
|
150.3 |
0.06986646707 |
160.80093 |
Average price of a packet of peanut |
2 |
Feb-95 |
10.39675 |
|
|
150.9 |
0.068898277 |
171.6935 |
8.43 |
3 |
Mar-95 |
9.54165 |
|
|
151.4 |
0.06302278732 |
180.02495 |
8.75 |
4 |
Apr-95 |
10.42048 |
10.2149525 |
10.22304 |
151.9 |
0.06860092166 |
193.58192 |
8.25 |
5 |
May-95 |
10.56563 |
10.2311275 |
10.15376375 |
152.2 |
0.06941938239 |
205.02815 |
8.18 |
6 |
Jun-95 |
9.77784 |
10.0764 |
10.14293625 |
153.2 |
0.06382402089 |
211.86704 |
7.33 |
7 |
Jul-95 |
10.07394 |
10.2094725 |
10.15880625 |
153.7 |
0.06554287573 |
224.21758 |
8.34 |
8 |
Aug-95 |
10.01515 |
10.10814 |
10.02802625 |
153.6 |
0.06520279948 |
233.7212 |
8.64 |
9 |
Sep-95 |
9.92472 |
9.9479125 |
10.03885 |
153.5 |
0.06465615635 |
242.82248 |
7.05 |
10 |
Oct-95 |
10.50534 |
10.1297875 |
10.143845 |
153.5 |
0.06843869707 |
258.5534 |
8.62 |
11 |
Nov-95 |
10.1864 |
10.1579025 |
10.30436875 |
152.4 |
0.06683989501 |
264.4504 |
7.44 |
12 |
Dec-95 |
11.18688 |
10.450835 |
10.53377 |
152.4 |
0.07340472441 |
286.64256 |
9 |
13 |
Jan-96 |
10.5882 |
10.616705 |
10.594315 |
154.9 |
0.06835506779 |
292.5466 |
8.18 |
14 |
Feb-96 |
10.32622 |
10.571925 |
10.63187125 |
155.7 |
0.06632125883 |
300.26708 |
8.9 |
15 |
Mar-96 |
10.66597 |
10.6918175 |
10.61794125 |
156.3 |
0.06824037108 |
316.28955 |
7.42 |
16 |
Apr-96 |
10.59587 |
10.544065 |
10.537125 |
156.6 |
0.06766200511 |
326.13392 |
8.37 |
17 |
May-96 |
10.53268 |
10.530185 |
10.52397125 |
156.8 |
0.06717270408 |
335.85556 |
7.27 |
18 |
Jun-96 |
10.27651 |
10.5177575 |
10.4629125 |
156.9 |
0.06549719567 |
341.87718 |
7.98 |
19 |
Jul-96 |
10.22721 |
10.4080675 |
10.4112725 |
157.1 |
0.0651 |
351.41699 |
7.51 |
20 |
Aug-96 |
10.62151 |
10.4144775 |
10.3087925 |
157.2 |
0.06756685751 |
369.6302 |
8.11 |
21 |
Sep-96 |
9.6872 |
10.2031075 |
10.176695 |
157.25 |
0.06160381558 |
360.6812 |
7.71 |
22 |
Oct-96 |
10.06521 |
10.1502825 |
10.22527375 |
154.257 |
0.0652496159 |
375.69162 |
7.1 |
23 |
Nov-96 |
10.82714 |
10.300265 |
10.36343 |
157.5 |
0.06874374603 |
406.52422 |
8.91 |
24 |
Dec-96 |
11.12683 |
10.426595 |
10.49193875 |
157.65 |
0.07057932128 |
424.69392 |
7.04 |
25 |
Jan-97 |
10.20995 |
10.5572825 |
10.58265125 |
157.8 |
0.06470183777 |
413.04875 |
8.43 |
26 |
Feb-97 |
10.26816 |
10.60802 |
10.61395 |
157.9 |
0.06502951235 |
424.87216 |
8.15 |
27 |
Mar-97 |
10.87458 |
10.61988 |
10.50572125 |
158.1 |
0.0687829222 |
451.71366 |
8.56 |
28 |
Apr-97 |
10.21356 |
10.3915625 |
10.46991375 |
158.2 |
0.06456106195 |
444.17968 |
8.48 |
29 |
May-97 |
10.83676 |
10.548265 |
10.58216625 |
159 |
0.06815572327 |
473.26604 |
7.36 |
30 |
Jun-97 |
10.53937 |
10.6160675 |
10.46264875 |
159.311 |
0.06615594654 |
475.4921 |
7.16 |
31 |
Jul-97 |
9.64723 |
10.30923 |
10.31862875 |
160.1 |
0.06025752655 |
459.16413 |
8.47 |
32 |
Aug-97 |
10.28875 |
10.3280275 |
10.21143625 |
170.32 |
0.06040834899 |
499.56 |
7.93 |
33 |
Sep-97 |
9.90403 |
10.094845 |
9.97813375 |
170.6 |
0.05805410317 |
497.43299 |
8.65 |
34 |
Oct-97 |
9.60568 |
9.8614225 |
9.997555 |
171.233 |
0.05609713081 |
497.82612 |
8.23 |
35 |
Nov-97 |
10.73629 |
10.1336875 |
10.2231075 |
171.5 |
0.06260227405 |
547.27015 |
7.18 |
36 |
Dec-97 |
11.00411 |
10.3125275 |
10.39150125 |
171.6 |
0.06412651515 |
567.74796 |
8.59 |
37 |
Jan-98 |
10.53582 |
10.470475 |
10.53726125 |
172 |
0.06125476744 |
561.82534 |
8.71 |
38 |
Feb-98 |
10.13997 |
10.6040475 |
10.496085 |
172.3 |
0.05885066744 |
557.61886 |
8.92 |
39 |
Mar-98 |
9.87259 |
10.3881225 |
10.35258 |
172.6 |
0.05719924681 |
557.63101 |
7.37 |
40 |
Apr-98 |
10.71977 |
10.3170375 |
10.2339625 |
172.6 |
0.0621075898 |
601.3908 |
8.89 |
41 |
May-98 |
9.87122 |
10.1508875 |
10.1701975 |
172.9 |
0.05709207634 |
577.62002 |
7.87 |
42 |
Jun-98 |
10.29445 |
10.1895075 |
10.20647 |
172.99 |
0.05950893115 |
605.3569 |
8.52 |
43 |
Jul-98 |
10.00829 |
10.2234325 |
10.13165125 |
173 |
0.05785138728 |
603.35647 |
7.85 |
44 |
Aug-98 |
9.98552 |
10.03987 |
10.14196625 |
173.1 |
0.05768642403 |
612.46288 |
8.99 |
45 |
Sep-98 |
10.68799 |
10.2440625 |
10.25198125 |
173.2 |
0.06170894919 |
654.15955 |
8.82 |
46 |
Oct-98 |
10.3578 |
10.2599 |
10.2741925 |
173.3 |
0.05976803231 |
649.7588 |
8.79 |
47 |
Nov-98 |
10.12263 |
10.288485 |
10.52593 |
173.4 |
0.05837733564 |
649.16361 |
8.3 |
48 |
Dec-98 |
11.88508 |
10.763375 |
10.67081 |
173.6 |
0.0684624424 |
744.08384 |
7.73 |
49 |
Jan-99 |
9.94747 |
10.578245 |
10.61110375 |
174.3 |
0.05707096959 |
661.72603 |
7.38 |
50 |
Feb-99 |
10.62067 |
10.6439625 |
10.649825 |
175.25 |
0.06060296719 |
706.2835 |
7.67 |
51 |
Mar-99 |
10.16953 |
10.6556875 |
10.5344 |
175.6 |
0.057913041 |
694.24603 |
7.97 |
52 |
Apr-99 |
10.91478 |
10.4131125 |
10.52572 |
177.62 |
0.06145017453 |
745.18856 |
8.73 |
53 |
May-99 |
10.84833 |
10.6383275 |
10.64260125 |
177.92 |
0.06097307779 |
752.88149 |
8.08 |
54 |
Jun-99 |
10.65486 |
10.646875 |
10.621815 |
178.1 |
0.05982515441 |
753.46244 |
8.73 |
55 |
Jul-99 |
9.96905 |
10.596755 |
10.53134 |
178.2 |
0.05594304153 |
726.49775 |
8.56 |
56 |
Aug-99 |
10.39146 |
10.465925 |
10.4267725 |
178.35 |
0.05826442389 |
760.27176 |
8.55 |
57 |
Sep-99 |
10.53511 |
10.38762 |
10.36035125 |
178.5 |
0.05902022409 |
779.00127 |
7.26 |
58 |
Oct-99 |
10.43671 |
10.3330825 |
10.3692125 |
178.6 |
0.0584362262 |
783.92918 |
7.51 |
59 |
Nov-99 |
10.25809 |
10.4053425 |
10.5605475 |
178.8 |
0.05737186801 |
784.02731 |
7.11 |
60 |
Dec-99 |
11.6331 |
10.7157525 |
10.73707375 |
179 |
0.06498938547 |
876.986 |
7.09 |
61 |
Jan-00 |
10.70568 |
10.758395 |
10.77886125 |
179.2 |
0.05974151786 |
832.24648 |
8.2 |
62 |
Feb-00 |
10.60044 |
10.7993275 |
10.90197125 |
179.3 |
0.0591212493 |
836.52728 |
8.08 |
63 |
Mar-00 |
11.07924 |
11.004615 |
10.86774375 |
179.4 |
0.06175719064 |
877.39212 |
7.54 |
64 |
Apr-00 |
10.53813 |
10.7308725 |
10.6998825 |
180 |
0.05854516667 |
854.44032 |
8.34 |
65 |
May-00 |
10.45776 |
10.6688925 |
10.67955125 |
181.2 |
0.05771390728 |
860.9544 |
7.73 |
66 |
Jun-00 |
10.68571 |
10.69021 |
10.62050875 |
182 |
0.05871269231 |
887.25686 |
8.26 |
67 |
Jul-00 |
10.52163 |
10.5508075 |
10.54736375 |
182.1 |
0.05777940692 |
887.04921 |
8.61 |
68 |
Aug-00 |
10.51058 |
10.54392 |
10.6072875 |
182.3 |
0.05765540318 |
897.01944 |
8.63 |
69 |
Sep-00 |
10.9647 |
10.670655 |
10.57218375 |
182.5 |
0.06008054795 |
939.0643 |
7.28 |
70 |
Oct-00 |
9.89794 |
10.4737125 |
10.43835375 |
182.6 |
0.05420558598 |
875.4558 |
8.9 |
71 |
Nov-00 |
10.23876 |
10.402995 |
10.491985 |
182.7 |
0.05604137931 |
909.65196 |
8.44 |
Table 1: calculation of trends and Index price
(Source: Created by Author)
SUMMARY OUTPUT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regression Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple R |
0.7490463781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Square |
0.5610704766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted R Square |
0.5593147585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Error |
0.493727656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observations |
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANOVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
df |
SS |
MS |
F |
Significance F |
|
|
|
Regression |
1 |
77.90001504 |
77.90001504 |
319.5675198 |
0 |
|
|
|
Residual |
250 |
60.94174957 |
0.2437669983 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
251 |
138.8417646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficients |
Standard Error |
t Stat |
P-value |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95% |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95% |
Intercept |
10.21156172 |
0.06005310596 |
170.042191 |
0 |
10.09328722 |
10.32983621 |
10.09328722 |
10.32983621 |
Trends |
0.0006347898175 |
0.00003550983348 |
17.87645154 |
0 |
0.0005648532595 |
0.0007047263755 |
0.0005648532595 |
0.0007047263755 |
Table 2: calculation of Regression Analysis
(Source: As created by Author)
Figure 1: Line Chart
(Source: As created by the Author)
A 20 years line chart has been developed on BIA Hoi Beer Company. This line chart helps company to analyse sales volume and price of the product. A line chart represented by numerical and quantitative data. Bia Hoi Beer company’s 20 years line chart ease to understanding large statistical and quantitative data. With the implication of line graph, the sales and pricing fluctuations over 20 years has been analysed. Managers of the company analyse the data from the line chart and take the business decisions.
According to Treasure et al. (2014) a line chart of a company has been developed between the two or more variables. Independent variables are drawn on horizontal axis and dependent variable on vertical axis. Two variables of BIA Hoi Beers Company are Sales volume and the price. This two variables are directly correlated two each other’s. As, if sales volume of a product goes up then the price of the product also increase (Pignataro, 2013). Similarly, sales volume of a product decreases than price of the product also decreased. In January 1996, Bia Hoi Beer Company’s sales volume has been evaluated 10.39 (in 000 liter) and price per unit has been analysed 2.96. In February 1996, the sales volume of Bia Hoi has been decreased from 10.39 to 9.54 (in 000 liter). This has reduced the price of per unit beer cost that has affected market price of the beer. Thus, the price margin of beer has declined to increase its demand and push its sales volume. In the statistical observation, it has been stated that the company decrease in sales has dictated the increase in its expenses and cost of production. Thus, the beer company can develop more strategic approaches to make development and improvement in the financial field.
Estimating a model of volume of sales using trend analysis
Four years moving average is an indicator of current trends. Once determine the result it is plotted into a chart. Trend analysis has helped the company to identify the strengths and the weaknesses of the company. When the trend of a particulars month is, lower that indicates that company is not performing well. On the other hand, a positive and high trend indicates that the company is making goods sales (Woo and Kim, 2014, p.780). The trends analysis of a company also depends on the market index number. Therefore, if the index number of a particular period is in a high position then the company’s price per unit also increases. In this study, the production on March 1995 was 9.54 (000 liters).
It was increased to 10.42 (000 liters) to April, because of the higher index price in April 1995. This indicates that there is a correlation between the sales volume, index price and the price of a product. The entire variables are statistically significant as they are positively correlated (Marszałek and Burczynski, 2014, p.78). In July 2005 to Jun 2007, a rapid growth of sales volume has been measured and identified by the company. A regression analysis has been developed between sales volume and trend of BIA Hoi. The coefficient interception of trends is 10.21. This indicates that there is a positive relationship between sales and trends. Multiple R indicates that this regression is statistically fit. P value of this regression is less than 0.05. Therefore, null hypothesis will be rejected.
Another regression analysis has been calculated among the sales, trend and seasonal index. The dependent variable of this regression was sales. On the other hand, trend and seasonal index were two independent variables. Coefficient intercept at 12.87, which indicates a positive relationship among three variables. This multiple regression is statistically fit, as multiple R is higher value.
It is important to identify the risk involved in the business. The risk in a business was mainly two type, systematic risk and the unsystematic risk. Systematic risk involvement is identified with beta calculation. Coefficient of the regression indicates that this two variables is positively correlated to each others. The Multiple R of this regression is 0.50 (Bielecki and Rutkowski, 2013, p.97). That means it is higher than the 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis will be rejected in this regression. R square value of the regression indicates that the regression is statistically fit.
As per the financial modeling of BIA Hoi, it can be seen that a disease namely “killer yeast strain” affected the beer brewing method and it had a severe effect. The virus of this disease is known as “Gastroenteritis”. Hence, the fear of the virus has been quickly spread throughout the world due to avoidance of the consumption of beer as well as yeast, which is related to the beer products. As a result, it can be concluded that there is an overall effect of the harmful diseases among the two periods (Charnes, 2012). Bia Hoi sales were affected due to virus. Therefore, two dummy variables have been added to the beer production. Coefficient of first dummy (D1) was 3.07 and for (D2) it was 0.05. First dummy has a positive impact on the sales of the company, as their coefficient is positive. On the other hand, the impact of second dummy is very negative as the coefficient was 0.
Competitors pricing strategy
The pricing strategy of a company depends on the competitors pricing policy. If the competitor's allow the customers to buy a product with low price then the cost of the goods of the company needs to be lower. On the other hand, a regression analysis has been developed between the BIA Hoi cost pricing and competitors pricing. Regression analysis has shows that San Migual, Angkor, Tiger, Chang companies intercepts at 13.00. This indicates a positive correlation. On the other hand, a negative impact has been identified among BeerLao, Klang, Bintang, Bia Saigon. All the correlation value is in negative.
Complementary goods
According to Girault and Valk (2013) the sales of a particulars product may get hamper for complementary goods. Customers may opt for new product with their existing price range. There are 8 more premium competitors available in Malaysian market. People of Malaysia will compare the pricing strategy and then decide to choose a particulars brand. Therefore, it is important for Bia Hoi to introduce complementary foods in order to stay in the market.Peanut is a complementary goods of beers. A regression analysis has been developed on a dependent variable and the independent variable. A strong relationship has been developed in this regression.
Merits of shelf position:
According to Finnerty (2013), in case of lower pricing, each of the time, the products are available in lower pricing rate. This leads to the benefit of the clarity. However, it does not give to the retailers along with higher and new advertising policy. Therefore, the shoppers predict to get the products at a lower pricing rate. On the contrary, in case of the promotional sales techniques, a retailer may have ongoing facilities to acquire shoppers’ concentration into the shops. Moreover, Benth and Benth (2013) mentioned that sales products can be stimulating the advertising with the help of the communication.
On the other hand, lower or the shelf position technique has a tendency to fix the low costs as the overall strategy and technique is able to construct and develop the infrastructure and the effectiveness of the supply chain. Moreover, advertising is assumed less costly with the help of the lower rate of pricing strategy. The reason can be discussed, as it is not needed to the retailers to promote and sale each of the items.
In the points of Huang and Chen (2014), lower pricing approach is simple for the customers to understand. As a result, this marketing policy will easy to be appealed to the clients to save money in case of appropriate purpose. Nevertheless, Jalil et al. (2013) stated that middle shelf positioning is a kind of practices of to set a price, which is greater than the marketable price. In this context, the anticipation of the consumers is seemed to the higher quality. In addition, the quality of the products, however, the seller has been ventured highly in the marketplace, which is required to provide the impression in terms of greater quality.
In order to establish the relationship among different shelf positioning and sales, Crepey (2013) cited that there is a negative relationship among the sales and the lower pricing approach. Therefore, it can conclude that lower the pricing techniques, higher will be the sale. On the other hand, higher the pricing approach, lower will be the sale. As per the financial modeling of beer company, the researcher has been discussed a relevant model in the following:
As per the statement of this model, it can be stated that in case of the transaction of the single asset, a combination of the equity from the borrowed money, can be framed in such a way that the cash flow of the assets are assumed as the collateral. According to Chuang and Brockett (2014), the cost of the debt has lower rate of the cost of capital. On the other hand, return from the equity is raised with the rise for money. Hence, debt effectively provides as a lever to raise the returns on the investment. In the words of Chen and Hall (2013), the leveraged buyout model can employ when the financial sponsor obtains a company. On the contrary, most of the corporate transactions can be partially funded in terms of the banking fund.
As a result, it is assumed that the representation of leveraged buyout model is very efficient. Benth and Benth (2013) mentioned that LBO is mostly observed in the private organisations. On the other hand, with the rise in the financial sponsors, it is expected that there is a greater return from the leverage. More precisely, it can be stated as the greater ratio of debt to the shares of equity. As a result, it can conclude that the financial sponsors have incentive to recruit the suitable amount of debt to finance the acquisition. Barndorff-Nielse et al. (2012) opined that LBO model has followed some important characteristics such as the stability of the cash inflows, the quantity of the supply of equity by the financial sponsor and the total economic atmosphere.
The leveraged buyout model allows the companies to make the purchase easier. Burgin, M. and Meissner (2012) cited that as asset combining with the equity as well as the debt capital has a significance of debt in case of the overall capital. The ranges of the total capital have been lies 70% to 80% of the total share of the capital. This is the reason why leveraged buyout model is able to leverages itself with the help of the borrowed funds. In addition, the main objective of leveraged buyout model may be differentiated as it has a dependency on the purpose of purchasing an organization. In this occasion, Brauchart et al. (2015) stated that if an organization require to increasing the present operations or can raise the scale of the business. As a result, this type of strategic leveraged buyout can be achieved by the way of the mergers as well as the acquisitions.
Bohn (2015) stated that the major risk of the LBO model could be discussed in terms of the financial distress. In case of the private equity organization with the higher debt, always want to enhance their amount of returns. In addition, the general value creation of the LBO model is subject to increase the flow of cash. In most of the situation, these outcomes derive from the reduction has a greater impact sometimes. On the other hand, Baaquie (2013, p.1666) supported that LBO model is against the willingness to the target. More critically, it can be argued that most of the organisation will exit by taking of the cash out of the organisation.
A regression analysis has been developed to identify the dependent and the independent variable. It gives the company to know the relationship between the trends, sales volume, pricing and dummy variable. It is recommended for the company to decrease the cost structure and operating expenses. On the other hand, a ranking has been developed in this financial modeling to identify the current market situation.
As recommendation, it can be said the company can develop market analysis and assessment, to acknowledge the competitive environment. Property to the analysis, the management of the van includes strategic approaches to boost its sales volume. On the other hand, the diversification technique can also used. With the diversification, the beer company can make investment in other business fields to generate more revenue from the market.
Books
Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E., Mikosch, T. and Resnick, S.I. eds., (2012). Lévy processes: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
Benth, F.E. and Benth, J.S., (2013). Modeling and pricing in financial markets for weather derivatives (Vol. 17). World Scientific.
Benth, F.E. and Benth, J.S., (2013). Modeling and pricing in financial markets for weather derivatives (Vol. 17). World Scientific.
Bielecki, T.R. and Rutkowski, M., (2013). Credit risk: modeling, valuation and hedging. Springer Science & Business Media.
Bingham, N.H. and Kiesel, R., (2013). Risk-neutral valuation: Pricing and hedging of financial derivatives. Springer Science & Business Media.
Charnes, J., (2012). Financial modeling with crystal ball and excel. John Wiley & Sons.
D'Ecclesia, R.L. and Zenios, S.A. eds., (2012). Operations Research Models in Quantitative Finance: Proceedings of the XIII Meeting EURO Working Group for Financial Modeling University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. Springer Science & Business Media.
Finnerty, J.D., (2013). Project financing: Asset-based financial engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
Girault, C. and Valk, R., (2013). Petri nets for systems engineering: a guide to modeling, verification, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
Pignataro, P., (2013). Financial modeling and valuation: A practical guide to investment banking and private equity. John Wiley & Sons.
Schultz, G.M., (2016). Investing in Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities,+ Website: Financial Modeling with R and Open Source Analytics. John Wiley & Sons.
Varian, H.R. ed., (2013). Economic and financial modeling with Mathematica®. Springer.
Journals
Baaquie, B.E., (2013). Financial modeling and quantum mathematics.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 65(10), pp.1665-1673.
Bohn, J., (2015). Financial Modeling, Actuarial Valuation and Solvency in Insurance. Quantitative Finance, 15(5), pp.735-740.
Brauchart, J.S., Dick, J. and Fang, L., (2015). Spatial low-discrepancy sequences, spherical cone discrepancy, and applications in financial modeling. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 286, pp.28-53.
Burgin, M. and Meissner, G., (2012). Negative probabilities in financial modeling. Wilmott, (2012)(58), pp.60-65.
Chen, F. and Hall, P., (2013). Inference for a nonstationary self-exciting point process with an application in ultra-high frequency financial data modeling.Journal of Applied Probability, 50(4), pp.1006-1024.
Chuang, S.L. and Brockett, P.L., (2014). Modeling and pricing longevity derivatives using stochastic mortality rates and the esscher transform. North American Actuarial Journal, 18(1), pp.22-37.
Crépey, S., (2013). Financial modeling. Springer Finance, DOI, 10, pp.978-3.
Huang, W. and Chen, Z., (2014). Modeling regional linkage of financial markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 99, pp.18-31.
Jalil, M.A., Razak, D.A. and Azam, S.F., (2013). Exploring factors influencing financial planning after retirement: structural equation modeling approach.American Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3), p.270.
Marszałek, A. and Burczyński, T., (2014). Modeling and forecasting financial time series with ordered fuzzy candlesticks. Information Sciences, 273, pp.144-155.
Nolan, J.P., (2014). Financial modeling with heavyâ€tailed stable distributions.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 6(1), pp.45-55.
Schwaitzberg, S.D., (2016). Financial modeling of current surgical robotic system in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how should we think about the expense?. Surgical endoscopy, 30(5), pp.2082-2085.
Shim, J.K., Siegel, J.G. and Shim, A.I., (2012). Financial Modeling: Tools for Budgeting and Profit Planning. Budgeting Basics and Beyond, Fourth Edition, pp.315-328.
Treasure, T., Gonzalez, R., Jameel, H., Phillips, R.B., Park, S. and Kelley, S., (2014). Integrated conversion, financial, and risk modeling of cellulosic ethanol from woody and nonâ€woody biomass via dilute acid preâ€treatment.Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 8(6), pp.755-769.
Woo, T.H. and Kim, Y.I., (2014). The Financial Modeling of Nanotechnology (NT) for the Energy Industry Using Systems Thinking Decision Making.Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(2), pp.165-173.
Zafirakis, D., Chalvatzis, K.J., Baiocchi, G. and Daskalakis, G., (2013). Modeling of financial incentives for investments in energy storage systems that promote the large-scale integration of wind energy. Applied Energy, 105, pp.138-154.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2017). Financial Modelling And Performance Of Business Entities: A Case Study. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-modelling-performance-of-business-entities.
"Financial Modelling And Performance Of Business Entities: A Case Study." My Assignment Help, 2017, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-modelling-performance-of-business-entities.
My Assignment Help (2017) Financial Modelling And Performance Of Business Entities: A Case Study [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-modelling-performance-of-business-entities
[Accessed 22 November 2024].
My Assignment Help. 'Financial Modelling And Performance Of Business Entities: A Case Study' (My Assignment Help, 2017) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-modelling-performance-of-business-entities> accessed 22 November 2024.
My Assignment Help. Financial Modelling And Performance Of Business Entities: A Case Study [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2017 [cited 22 November 2024]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-modelling-performance-of-business-entities.