It is notable that the study used a subsample of the New Zealand attitudes and Values data set was used. Data cleaning was conducted by removing outlier values from the data set. This owes to the fact that the researcher noticed that some observations had -9999, which was deemed abnormal. Additionally, the researcher used SPSS and relied on the independent sample t-test to examine whether there is a significant difference between male and female study participants in all the factors under discussion.
An independent samples t-test was used to conclude whether there is a difference in extraversion scores in male and female study participants. The results reveal that female study participants have higher extraversion scores (M = 4.11, SD = 1.265) than male study participants (M = 3.97, SD = 1.226) (t (988) = 1.727, p > .05). The same test was used to examine for the presence of a difference in agreeableness between male and female study participants. The results reveal that that female study participants have higher agreeableness scores (M = 5.65, SD 0.937) than male study participants (M = 5.06, SD = 1.045) (t (988) = 9.375, p < .05). The test in question was also used to examine whether there is a difference in conscientiousness scores in male and female study participants. The outcome indicates that female study participants have higher conscientiousness scores (M = 5.20, SD 1.067) than male study participants (M = 5.01, SD = 1.018) (t (988) = 2.738, p < .05).
The independent samples t-test was still used to examine the presence of a difference in the neuroticism scores of male and female study participants. The results reveal that female study participants have higher neuroticism scores (M = 3.62, SD = 1.172) than male study participants (M = 3.38, SD = 1.157) (t (988) = 3.183, p < .05). Similarly, the same test was used to check for the presence of a significant difference in openness scores between male and female study participants. The results reveal that male study participants have higher openness scores (M = 5.03, SD 1.199) than female study participants (M = 5.02, SD 1.178) (t (988) = -0.68, p > .05).
The study human personality attracts attention from scholars and practitioners around the globe. Critical to the discussion is the fact that people believe in the differences between personality traits and gender to be so huge to the extent that it inhibits communication across gender. In fact, some authors argue that the differences in biological and social roles of different genders influence personality traits. It is notable that scholars have now reached some consensus on the study of human personality. This owes to the reality that scholars now concur of the existence of five personality types, which include, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism (emotionality), openness, and conscientiousness (Schwartz, Eichstaedt, Kern, Dziurzynski, Ramones, Agrawal, Shah, Kosinski, Stillwell, Seligman, and Unga, 2013). Consequently, authors such as Weisberg, DeYoung, and Hirsh (2012) examined the differences in the personality types between genders. The results in this section also examine differences in personality based on gender.
From the results obtained above it is evident that female study participants had mathematically higher extraversion scores than male study participants. Regardless, the results are not statistically significant because the p value obtained from the independent sample t-test was greater than 0.05. It follows that the test fails to reject the hypothesis implying that there is no statistically significant difference in extraversion scores between male and female study participants. It is notable that evidence from published studies indicates that extraversion appears to be evenly distributed across gender. As evidenced, Weiner (2017) argues that gender differences in extraversion scores may switch direction based on specific traits that are being measured. This owes to the reality that females tend to score higher on positive emotions, gregariousness, and warmth while men tend to score higher on excitement seeking and assertiveness than women (Lee, and Ashton, 2012). In short, the results obtained from the study are complemented by previous studies.
The results for agreeableness was higher in female (M = 5.65, SD 0.937) than in male study participants (M = 5.06, SD = 1.045) (t (988) = 9.375, p < .05). Evidently, the p value is less than 0.05, which rejects the hypothesis implying there is a statistically significant difference in agreeableness scores based on gender. Simply put, women score higher than men do on agreeableness. Critical to the discussion is the fact that Rahmani and Lavasani (2012) conducted a similar study. As a result, the authors concluded that there is a statistically significant difference score of agreeableness between male and female participants. Like the authors, the study also established a statistically significant difference in agreeableness scores between male and female study participants. In a different study, Vianello, Schnabel, Siram, and Nosek (2013) established that women score higher than men do on agreeableness scores. It follows that the finding from this study complements literature on the subject in question.
The results also indicate that female study participants have higher conscientiousness scores (M = 5.20, SD 1.067) than male study participants (M = 5.01, SD = 1.018) (t (988) = 2.738, p < .05). It is evident that the p value was lower than 0.05, which rejects the hypothesis. Simply put, the study established that there is a statistically significant difference on conscientiousness scores between male and female study participants. Specifically, female study participants record higher conscientiousness scores than male study participants. Imperative to the debate is the reality that previous studies have established similar results. As evidenced, Lydon, O’Connor, McVeigh, Offiah, and Byrne (2015) reveal that females scored significantly higher than males on conscientiousness (p < .001). In a different study, Weisberg, DeYoung, and Hirsh, (2012) did not establish a significant difference in conscientiousness scores between men and women. However, the same result was established when the authors controlled for age with the same variables.
The results from the study are recorded as female (M = 3.62, SD = 1.172) and male study participants (M = 3.38, SD = 1.157) (t (988) = 3.183, p < .05). From the results, the p value is less than 0.05, which rejects the hypothesis. It follows that there is a statistically significant difference in neuroticism scores between male and female study participants. It is notable that the study is consistent with other publications that examined the same topic. Specifically, Vianello, Schnabel, Siram, and Nosek (2013) examined for the presence of a statistically significant difference in neuroticism scores between men and women. Consequently, the researchers concluded that women score higher than men do on neuroticism. Critical to the discussion is the reality that Weisberg, DeYoung, and Hirsh (2012) established similar results from their study. It follows that the outcome of the study complements those of previous authors.
The results reveal that male study participants have higher openness scores (M = 5.03, SD 1.199) than female study participants (M = 5.02, SD 1.178) (t (988) = -0.68, p > .05). Vital to the debate is the truth that the difference is mathematically significant but statistically insignificant. This owes to the fact that the p value from the results is greater than 0.05, which fails to reject the hypothesis. Authors such Weisberg, DeYoung, and Hirsh (2012) as have conducted similar studies and concluded that there is no significant differences in openness/intellect scores based on gender in terms of the big five domain. However, the authors found that women scored statistically significant higher than men did in openness. Analogously the same study reveals that men recorded statistically higher scores than women did on intellect. It follows that the results complement with previous literature.
Apparently, the study has established that there is a statistically significant difference of scores in agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism based on gender. The same study also indicates the absence of statistically significant scores in openness and extraversion based on gender. Critical to the discussion is the fact that the study is limited because it did examine individual factors that influence and individual’s personality. For instance, the study could examine how questions such as; Q1. Like order; Q2. Make a mess of things; Q3. Get chores done right away; and Q4r. Often forget to put things back in their proper place differ based on gender. As Weisberg, DeYoung, and Hirsh (2012) argue, age could act as an intervening variable and when conducting the study in question. In fact, the authors examined the subject while conducting for the effect of age on the outcomes. It follows that this study should also have controlled for age on the personalities of the study participants.
Bridges, R. K., and Harnish, J. R. (2015). Gender Differences in Formal Thinking: Their Impact
on Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Religious Fundamentalism. Psychology, 6, 1676-1684. Retrieved from https://file.scirp.org/pdf/PSYCH_2015101913493088.pdf
Lee, K., and Ashton, M. C. (2012). Getting mad and getting even: Agreeableness and Honesty-
Humility as predictors of revenge intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52: 596-600. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f133/1ef0c52d7062cc1e892e28d6250cdc45b0da.pdf
Lydon, S., O’Connor, P., McVeigh, T., Offiah, G., and Byrne, D. (2015) Medical Specialty
Choices: Does Personality Matter? Irish Medical Journal, 108(3), 75-77. Retrieved from
https://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/bitstream/handle/10379/5139/personality_aran.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Manson, JH. (2015). Life History Strategy and the HEXACO Personality Dimensions.
Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 48 - 66. Retrieved from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qp935pj
Rahmani, S., and Lavasani, G. M. (2012). Gender Differences in Five-Factor Model of
Personality and Sensation Seeking. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46: 2906 – 2911. Retrieved from doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.587
Rey, L., and Extremera, N. (2014). Positive Psychological Characteristics and Interpersonal
Forgiveness: Identifying the Unique Contribution of Emotional Intelligence Abilities, Big Five Traits, Gratitude, and Optimism. Personality and Individual Differences 68, 199-204. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.030
Schwartz, A. H., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, L. M., Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, M., Agrawal, M.,
Shah, A., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Seligman, E. P. M., Unga, U. H. (2013). Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach. PLOSone, 8(9): 1-16. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073791&type=printable
Vianello, M., Schnabel, K., Siram, N., and Nosek, B. (2013). Gender Differences in Implicit and
Explicit Personality Traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 55 (2013) 994–999. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.008
Weiner, I. B. (2017). Handbook of personality assessment. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Weisberg, J. Y., DeYoung, G. C., and Hirsh, B. J. (2012). Gender Differences in Personality
Across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(178): 1-11. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149680/pdf/fpsyg-02-00178.pdf
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2018). Gender Difference: Personality Traits. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/gender-difference-personality-traits.
"Gender Difference: Personality Traits." My Assignment Help, 2018, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/gender-difference-personality-traits.
My Assignment Help (2018) Gender Difference: Personality Traits [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/gender-difference-personality-traits
[Accessed 24 January 2021].
My Assignment Help. 'Gender Difference: Personality Traits' (My Assignment Help, 2018) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/gender-difference-personality-traits> accessed 24 January 2021.
My Assignment Help. Gender Difference: Personality Traits [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2018 [cited 24 January 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/gender-difference-personality-traits.
Getting nightmare regarding pending chemistry assignment? Then it is high time you consider hiring chemistry assignment help service of MyAssigemnthelp.com. We at MyAssignmenthelp.com deliver quality subject specific assistance on more than 100+ subjects. For us, students' need is foremost, and we work round the clock to offer science, humanities and commerce assignment help. Among Commerce wing, our one of the most popular services is capital budgeting assignment help. In science segment, we have gained popularity with biology assignment help.
Answer Annotated Bibliography Article 1 Citation Lu, T. H., Lin, H. C., Chen, R. R., & Chen, Y. L. (2013). Motion-Sensing Based Management System for Smart Context-Awareness Rehabilitation Healthcare. Advances in Internet of Things, 3(02), 1. Summary This paper is completely based on the motion sensing based management process and in which the author explained different balance exercis...
Read MoreAnswer Reflective journal The paper will evaluate different facts regarding why the communication skills is consideredas being one of the difficult processes especially for people from different cultures. As I belong to a different country which means a different culture, language, and a different living style therefore,I have facedcommunication problems during the first year of my college in Dublin. Due to this problem, I was unable to make ...
Read MoreAnswer: Importance of the project Business management is a set of doable that must be performed before initiating the project for achieving better results. This report will discuss about issues and problems that Coca Cola faces while performing business management. This report will also discuss about the opportunities Coca Cola will enjoy during their expansion. SMART objectives of Coca Cola is also discussed in this report. SMA...
Read MoreAnswer: Introduction 3D printing refers to the process of creating 3D solid objects from digital files. The development of a 3D printed object is usually obtained by use of the additive process. In this process an object is developed by laying down successive layers of material until the object is created. All this layers can be seen as individual thinly sliced horizontal cross-section of the eventual object. How 3D printer works The proces...
Read MoreAnswer: This Assessment Booklet provides you with information and your assessment tasks for this unit. A requirement of your qualification, from which the unit of competence is taken, is the application of the concepts you have been learning.The assessment activities are an important part of your course as they provide an opportunity to apply what you have been learning and they give both you and your trainer feedback on your progress. ...
Read MoreJust share requirement and get customized Solution.
Orders
Overall Rating
Experts
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat. If you are unable to calculate word count online, ask our customer executives.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
I was very satisfied with the expert\'s work. I would recommend this site for anyone having trouble with an assignment or trouble meeting a deadline.
Australia
Will use again, sometimes I have issues getting the creative part of writing going and love being able to reach out to help with drafts
Australia
The best way to paraphrase is to change every few words in the sentence or paragraph I want to use in my assignment.
Australia
good and excellent I am satisfied with your work. All the work done on time. Experts are good.
Australia