Effective Regulations Of Using Performance Enhancing Drugs At Rio Olympic 2016 And Its Impact On Government Business Relationship

Discussion

Discuss about the Government Business Relations for Business Organisation.

The relationship in between the government of a nation and business organisation is complex in inherent manner and this relationship should be understood by the society, as it is an essential relationship. According to Cavusgil et al. (2014), in a country, business organisation and the government are interdependent and interrelated on each other as in today’s competitive global business economy, the entrepreneurs and business experts have been proved as the basic driving forces of economy. The government of a country shapes and designs the business activities and functions for better economic condition within a particular country. In this essay, there will be detailed discussion on the effective regulations of using the performance enhancing drugs at Rio Olympic 2016 and its direct impact on the government business relationship. The government maintains an upward and steady economic growth for making and controlling the suitable business environment of an organisation. Events like Olympic is expected to follow the policies and legislations implemented by the government for using the performance enhancing drugs at Rio Olympic for the constant progression of the business environment (Bell & Hindmoor, 2014).

The business relationships are influenced by the incorporated regulations and laws by the government, even there are regulatory bodies and various government agencies, which deliberately control and handle critical situations encountered by the business organisation (Diale, 2012). Curran (2012) has mentioned that government of a country can be influenced by the business operations of an organisation. With lobbying and personal conducts an event, influence the activities of the government. The use of performance enhancing drugs is a controversial issue to discuss in this competitive sports world. However, there are strict regulations of using the drugs, which are capable of enhance the performance of the athletes can hamper the fairness, health of the athlete. As doping causes an economic damage of the nation in immense manner, therefore it can influence the government business relation. There are various sports organisations; which supports the performance enhancing drugs for the athletes without obeying the established regulations for it.  Even in Rio Olympic, there were cases like using drugs like steroids, blood doping for enhancing the performance in the biggest event of sports. There are committees of political action within the government and the large investment influence the government for investigating the use of this performance enhancing drugs and the impact of such regulations, which can prevent such practices as it has direct impact on the government business relationship of a nation. Jovarauskien? & Pilinkien? (2015) have contradicted that large sports organisations and sponsors usually intend to force the government for acting in a manner, which provides immense benefit for using the performance enhancing drugs in smooth way. However, it is a known fact that every sports person should follow a legitimate way to persuade the governmental policies, rules and regulations related to the use of performance enhancing drugs. Still, there are also instances of an athlete is going beyond its limit for enjoying a best position in Olympic, the biggest and famous event of sports without any concern of the government (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2014).

Impact of regulations on government business relationship

The political leaders, government officials and the corporate executives belong to the same social class and it helps to share a personal relationship in between both parties. However, the athletes’ forms group in a formal manner in order to present the critical issues to the government bodies for finding effective measures for using the performance enhancing drugs at Rio Olympic. There are several debates upon what could have happened if there were no strict regulations for using performance enhancing drugs at Rio Olympic. Diale (2012) has argued that if there was allowance of using performance increase g drugs then it possess the potentiality of making sports more honest and entertaining than now. Fisher (2012) has suggested that chamber of commerce and the trade unions are closely associated with the business companies with similar interest. Both the organisation and governmental agencies investigate to search common issues of the enterprises and then prepare reports. On the other hand, the political action committees (PACs) of Australia help to solicit money in order to share the decisions of the associated political candidates. There are also instances of donating money by the business executives to the political parties of a nation, whose views are similar to them for violating the regulations of using performance-enhancing drugs by the sports person. As opined by Charlesworth & Macdonald (2014), there is an attempt by the government for designing and shaping the sports events like Rio Olympics through implementing effective regulation, rules, policies and legislations both in indirect and direct manner. The athletes of modern era of technology used to receive drugs like steroids as it can be detected only with high range of detection machines, which are hardly available in all sports events. However, in sports events like Rio Olympics, there were instances of doping and several athletes from Australia, US and Russia had tested positive in the dope detection taste, which banned them for the entire Olympics and it damages the government business relationship of a nation.

With incorporating such strict legislations, the government of every country forces the athletes not to dope anymore in order to retain the perfect image of the country. Many critics have criticised that as the rules and regulations of Brazil is strict enough for using the performance enhancing drugs for the athletes, therefore, it may create a negative impact upon the government business relationship. Walker et al. (2012) have argued that often the government of a country perceive an indirect method or approach for shaping the entire sports activities of a nation. Australian government often intends to transform the sports organisational policies by employing the effective drug using policies and procedures. Even the government can provide tax incentives for those sports complex and sponsors, which perform according to the appropriate use of performance developing drugs, such as steroids for offering a safe and environment friendly society, which is corruption free.  According to Mukheibir et al. (2013), the use of steroids also damages the brand image of elite and famous athletes, whose sports performance possess the capability to influence the behaviour of the spectator. There are several common ways, which suggests the act and view of the sports business solely depended upon the fundamental relationship with the government of a country. Australian government can favour the sports practice of the entire nation and the process of incentivise the basic business performances with proper investment policies and rules. Government is expected to support every growing business with applicable tax credits, subsidies and grants as it can be considered as major sources of the societal economy, innovation, scope of job opportunities and the economic well being of the entire business organisation and the use of performance enhancing drugs in Rio Olympic. Fish (2013) has mentioned that the relationship in between the government and the sports organisation reveals the partnership in order to address the crucial societal matters, like excessive use of drugs, which can affect the health, fitness and figure of the athletes. Dunning (2014) has referred that the governmental policies should be updated with the constant changing policies of the sports organisation otherwise it cannot mitigate the encountered societal challenges instead of the ideological responses related to the appropriate governmental roles and responsibilities in a completely free economic condition within the market. The governmental policies are suitable for sustainable business of the sports companies, as it tends to concentrate o the elementary responsibilities to the societal and environmental impact for recognising and analysing programs and policies of the government. Even the governmental legislations and laws help to curb the corruptions within the Rio Olympics to operate sports events in ethical manner. There are more than 1600 enterprises in Brazil during the Rio Olympics, which employ private investigators in order to examine whether the policies of drugs are being used by the athletes or not.

Government and sports organization relationship

Conclusion

Government business relations involve the impact of the political economy, which revolves around the fundamental idea of capitalism. Even the governmental policies and procedures help to mitigate issues regarding open communication, actions proposed by socialism in order to enable the standard quality of the economic conditions. However, from this essay, it has revealed that the laws and legislations of government are strict enough to manage the use of performance enhancing drug by the athletes at Rio Olympics and its impact upon the government business relationship. Various studies have revealed the fact that the government of Brazil has taken effective actions during Rio Olympics with its potential and suitable regulations of using performance-enhancing drugs in order to maintain a perfect government business relationship. Even the governmental policies and legislations help Rio Olympics to continue the entire events in smooth manner. With the constant changes in the contemporary business world, the governmental policies of Brazil have been changed in gradual manner for offering more flexible place s for the athletes, sports organisations and sponsors. This essay truly reveals the importance of effective regulations of using performance enhancing drugs at Rio Olympics and its actual impact upon government business relationship.

References

Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2014). The structural power of business and the power of ideas: The strange case of the Australian mining tax. New Political Economy, 19(3), 470-486.

Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2014). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education.

Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., Riesenberger, J. R., Rammal, H. G., & Rose, E. L. (2014). International business. Pearson Australia.

Charlesworth, S., & Macdonald, F. (2014). Women, work and industrial relations in Australia in 2013. Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(3), 381-396.

Curran, G. (2012). Contested energy futures: shaping renewable energy narratives in Australia. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 236-244.

Diale, A. J. (2012, January). The relevance or irrelevance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) to enhance government-business relations in South Africa: A theoretical exposition. In Global Conference on Business & Finance Proceedings (Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 759). Institute for Business & Finance Research.

Dunning, J. H. (2014). The Globalization of Business (Routledge Revivals): The Challenge of the 1990s. Routledge.

Fish, A. (2013). Reshaping the undergraduate business curriculum and scholarship experiences in Australia to support whole-person outcomes.Asian Education and Development Studies, 2(1), 53-69.

Fisher, R. C. (Ed.). (2012). Intergovernmental fiscal relations (Vol. 56). Springer Science & Business Media.

Jovarauskien?, D., & Pilinkien?, V. (2015). E-Business or E-technology?.Engineering Economics, 61(1).

Mukheibir, P., Kuruppu, N., Gero, A., & Herriman, J. (2013). Overcoming cross-scale challenges to climate change adaptation for local government: a focus on Australia. Climatic change, 121(2), 271-283.

Walker, B. W., Porter, D. J., & Marsh, I. (2012). Fixing the hole in Australia's heartland: how government needs to work in remote Australia.