Power Ledger Scandal: Ethical Implications Of Digital Marketing Essay.

Instructions and Learning Outcomes:

• Your introduction should be a short summary of the article and your plan for answering the questions.
• Your conclusion should be a concise statement that is consistent with your
2. The outline and summary should show that you understand issues raised from an ethical Perspective Outline/summary of arguments demonstrates clear understanding of relevance to ethics not just personal ethics and legal ramifications (if applicable)

3. Demonstrate own decision making/judgement processes in relation to the ethical issue demonstrating of how individual ethical judgements are made and how they may vary.

4. Provide an outline of relevant ethical moral philosophies demonstrates an understanding of the ethical moral philosophies discussed in class and can apply philosophy to actions/consequences.

5. Use of academic writing and referencing including attention to spelling, grammar and punctuation. Adherence to the Harvard style guide as listed in the Holmes academic course guide must be used.

Background of the Power Ledger scandal

Cryptocurrencies have always been under scrutiny from financial institutions and governments across the globe for their regulatory and security issues. Recently, an Australian crypto-currency startup Power ledger was in news for alleged payment to spruikers for promotion of its business. The issue which was highlighted in the Australian Financial review last month has criticized the Australian company for misleading consumers and using unethical promotional tactics. The article has put question mark on the credibility of the success of business as well as highlights the ethical concerns relating to the efforts put in by businesses for promotion of their products and services (Patrick 2018).

The present paper tries to understand the issue in the light of various ethical arguments and theories as well as the possible legal issues involved. The paper also analyses the response of the business on the issue and tries to examine the same in the light of ethical expectations from the business. The present paper analyses the ethical and legal issues involved in the bounty programs which are increasingly becoming popular in ICO and crypto currency businesses and examine the decision making process which are often employed by the marketers of such programs while launching such progress. The paper also highlights the need for transparency in the social media marketing as a part of corporate responsibility towards its stakeholders.

Power Ledger is an electricity trading platform which allows the users to make a choice of their source of electricity among various renewable sources (Powerledger 2019). The company also provides a cypto-currency trading platform and both the businesses are based on the revolutionary technology of blockchain. The recent scandal revolves around a community advocate program wherein the company has a system of selecting its advocates from amongst the community to popularize its products. Some of these advocates went on to make misleading remarks about the success of the company’s crypto-currency which is not only illegal but also unethical according to many scholars. The term which is often used for such promotion is spruiking, which is regulated by the ASIC (Putney 2019). The regulation prohibits the businesses engaged in business of crypto-currencies to encourage any misleading promotions of their products. Although the company has denied the allegation, the issue has raised serious questions of the ethics of modern businesses in the sense that how far they can go to promote their offerings.  

Bounty program is a common practice in digital startups, especially in those dealing with ICO or cryptocurrencies, wherein companies pay the participants to perform a series of tasks which result in building of social media community of the brand in question (katalyse.io 2018). These tasks may relate to bug finding, ethical hacking, promotion of products, social media marketing etc. In the case of Power Ledger, the company launched a bounty program to encourage users to promote its official social media posts in return of series of rewards on completion of the tasks assigned. The company has denied the allegations saying that the said bounty program does not exist anymore and the current community advocate program is run by the company just to stop the false information being spread in the community by rewarding these community advocates (Micky.com 2019). The company has also claimed to conduct the audit of the earlier bounty program to ensure that proper legal and ethical standards were followed.

Ethical and legal issues related to bounty programs

The company in question, Power Ledger has denied all the allegations of unethical conduct. However, the issue itself raises a lot of questions on the ethical implications of social media marketing in general and bounty programs in particular.

Bounty programs are often considered unethical as businesses often use these to manipulate the customers and increase their market share. It is also ethically wrong to give financial incentives or benefits to the bounty hunters to promote the products as it puts a question mark on the authenticity of the claim made by the company even if it is true.

As per deontological school of thought of ethics, ends cannot justify the wrong actions done to achieve them. For example, if the reward is given to achieve an end result, which is not morally justified, the practice of reward itself cannot be justified (Jones & Hall 2006). Also extrinsic rewards which are often associated with bounty programs might bring some change in consumer behavior in the initial stages, but it will not result in long term consumer loyalty or sustainable consumer base as the act is motivated by the reward or the promotion associated with it as against the genuine appreciation of the product itself.  

Even the principles of ethical justice are applicable in this case as it was the responsibility of the spruikers to disclose that they were receiving monetary incentives from the Power Ledger. Not doing so means that consumer actions were not based on the fair judgment based upon the true and right information.

Another issue relating to digital and social media marketing highlighted by the case is the need for increasing the social responsibility of the marketers to maintain the trust of the consumers. With the increasing use of social media and other digital marketing techniques, the element of trust has become more important in marketing. The consumer is already vulnerable to a lot of security and privacy issues while using such media. As a result, it is all the more important for the marketers to make all the efforts to retain the trust of the consumers. Anonymity provided by the social networks makes it easier for the users to pass on false information (Lipschultz 2014) and rumors about any business to the consumers and it is the social responsibility of the company to keep a check on such practices (Sharma & Baoku 2012). In current case, the response of Power Ledger that it was beyond its scope to keep a check on these false rumors being spread about the company does not indicate a responsible attitude on the part of the management.

Deontological and ethical justice perspectives on bounty programs

Bounty programs have been in trouble for their ethical concerns in the past as well. Recently Uber was put in question for unethical cover up of the data breach of the details of thousands of driver licenses of its users being compromised in a bug bounty program. The company instead of alerting the authorities resorted to paying the hacker and did not even inform the affected customers of the breach (Ellis 2018). Such incidents highlight the unethical behavior associated with the bounty programs which was originally designed to increase the safety of digital businesses. ASIC has also regulated bounty hunting or Spruiking in order to keep the customers safe as these spruikers were causing the false increase in the country’s real estate prices thereby leading to the losses of genuine consumers.

In a recent case of spruiking, Australian court fined a real estate company, We Buy Houses for $18 million on the allegations of false claims. The company was allegedly claiming that customers could buy houses for as low as $1 and thereby misleading them (Propertyupdate.com 2018).

It is very important for the social media promotion campaigns to be transparent as it is very difficult for the consumers to make out authentic from fake promotions. Majority of the advertising codes insist upon the marketers to clearly indicate that the promotions are paid to help the consumers (Teffer 2013).

The case of Power Ledger also highlights the issues in the corporate leadership and governance in case of ethical dilemmas. When businesses are faced with ethical dilemmas, it falls upon the leadership of the organization to take and ethical decision. An ethical decision is not just taken by considering the applicable law of land, but it is also a moral decision which results in the greater good of the organization at large (Selart & Johansen 2011). In such cases, it is the responsibility of the organizational leader to consider the magnitude of the ethical harm involved and take the decision best suited in the interest of all the stakeholders.

As far as corporate governance is concerned, there is no clear demarcation of its efficiency in the given case. The company followed the law while launching a bounty programs and it conducted an audit on its completion to check whether the program followed all the required legal and ethical guidelines or not. However, while launching the community advocate program, the company did not keep a close watch on the information being shared within the community and did not take any actions on the false rumors of Tesla being interested in the company products. This is in consistence with the teleological ethical school which believes that it is ethical to achieve the desired end result (Svensson & Wood 2011). This news resulted in the increase in the sales of the company which was its ultimate objective. However, while doing so, company ended up in ethical and legal trouble as it did not exercise control over the actions taken by the participants of the program.

Transparency in social media marketing

The company broke the most important code of advertising ethics which prohibits marketers from making false claims (Munjal 2016). The company chose and egoist decision making process; wherein it took decision which suited its interests and not that those of consumers and other ICO businesses. Company had set aside millions of dollars worth of tokens for the bounty hunters and community advocates and ii is still engaged in the practice of awarding such tokens. This means that the company has not realized the consequences of its earlier faulty practice and does not consider anything wrong with the same.

Startups like power ledger have the capacity to add sustainability to the environment with their revolutionary business ideas like blockchain. However, the same businesses push the interests of the stakeholders, especially consumers out of the window while using unethical practices like bounty hunter programs. These programs take advantage of lack of transparency in existing social media marketing landscape in order to serve the interests of the consumers to give them more consumers for the bounty received from the companies behind them.

Such bounty programs and spruiking activities raise serious ethical questions on the marketers and their intentions and as such are regulated by majority of the countries. It is important that the businesses should pay attention towards the legal and ethical compliance while launching the marketing programs and make all the efforts to restore the trust of the customers in place.

References

Ellis, C 2018, Bug Bounty Ethics In The Aftermath Of The Uber Breach, accessed on 26 January` 2019, available at  <https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/01/11/bug-bounty-ethics-in-the-aftermath-of-the-uber-breach/#6d2c2e595a86>.

Jones, SC & Hall, DV 2006, 'Ethical issues in social marketing', Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences - Papers.

katalyse.io 2018, What are Bounty Programs in ICO campaigns?, Accessed on 26 January 2019, Available at <https://hackernoon.com/what-are-bounty-programs-in-ico-campaigns-6aefbc9c56e6>.

Lipschultz, JH 2014, Social media communication: Concepts, practices, data, law and ethics. Routledge, 1st edn, Taylor & Francis, New York.

Micky.com 2019, Power Ledger responds to intense scrutiny, Accessed on 26 January 2019, Available at  <https://micky.com.au/power-ledger-comes-under-intense-scrutiny/>.

Munjal, N 2016, 'A STUDY ON ETHICAL ISSUES IN ADVERTISING AND ANALYZING DIFFERENT UNETHICAL ADVERTISEMENTS WITH RESULTS OF ASCI DECISIONS: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE', Ecoforum, vol 5(2), pp. 237-242.

Patrick, A 2018, Blockchain start-up Power Ledger criticised for paying spruikers, Accessed on 26 January 2019, Available at <https://www.afr.com/technology/apps/blockchain-startup-power-ledger-criticised-for-paying-spruikers-20181218-h199iv>.

Powerledger 2019, Our core, accessed on 26 January 2019, available at <https://www.powerledger.io/about>.

Propertyupdate.com 2018, Record $18 million spruiking fine proves regulation urgently needed, accessed on 26 January 2019, available at <https://propertyupdate.com.au/record-18-million-spruiking-fine-proves-regulation-urgently-needed/>.

Putney, D 2019, Australia Blockchain Energy Startup Power Ledger Lambasted For Paying ‘Spruikers’, accessed on 26 January 2019, available at <https://www.ethnews.com/australia-blockchain-energy-startup-power-ledger-lambasted-for-paying-spruikers>.

Selart, M & Johansen, ST 2011, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: The Role of Leadership Stress', Journal of Business Ethics, vol 99(2),pp. 129-143.

Sharma, G & Baoku, L 2012, 'E-Marketing on Online Social Networks and Ethical Issues', International Journal of Online Marketing, vol. 2(4), pp. 1-14.

Svensson, G & Wood, G 2011, 'Teleological business ethics: formative, rationalist and transformative', ESIC Market, vol 138, pp. 35-61.

Teffer, P 2013, Paid-for tweets and posts raise ethical issues for advertising industry, viewed 26 January 2019, <https://www.dw.com/en/paid-for-tweets-and-posts-raise-ethical-issues-for-advertising-industry/a-16781522>.