Holistic And Sustainable Health Improvement Essay In Aotearoa New Zealand.

Discuss About The Holistic And Sustainable Health Improvement.

Ottawa Charter

Health promotion among different communities in Aotearoa New Zealand has become an important approach addressing the health inequalities in different communities. Health promotion entails the empowerment of individuals to manage their lives in methods that are adaptive, dependable, fulfilling, as well as rewarding. Maori (the indigenous populace) have the poorest health outcomes, as well as the shortest life expectancy of all ethnicities in New Zealand.  The promotion of health in Aotearoa New Zealand recognizes the rights along with the wants of Maori. Pacific people have an exceptional association with the state where this exceptional affiliation results in an ethical responsibility on the component of the state to progress the welfare and needs of Pacific peoples (Cumming, Mays & Gribben, 2008). Specifically, the government addresses their socio-economic requirements plus the requirement to uphold their own cultures. This means that the Pacific peoples’ perspectives, as well as needs, must be reflected in each aspect of health promotion practice. The paper will argue that the accomplishment of healthy communities plus healthy lifestyles via health promotion is an attainable objective in Aotearoa New Zealand.  

The historical importance of the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion starts with the primary meeting. The Ottawa Charter simplifies the organization that it is designed to characterize; however, it does demonstrate that all-inclusive health promotion in the community should undertake more than personal risk factors. Thus, the charter advocates for more dynamic contribution from the users along with the stakeholders. This kind of contribution is important towards the planning along with the implementation stages of health promotion research. According to Dooris 2009), the charter has been greatly significant in influencing the “new” public health. The charter focuses on helpful settings, pioneered in the Sundsvall Statement, established on stress in the “old” public health on guaranteeing clean, as well as secure settings (Dooris, 2009).

The health promotion crusade, as mirrored in the charter adequately acknowledges the significance of ecosystems along with sustainable resources towards improving the health of the communities. The charter was significant in encouraging a shift towards a further holistic strategy to wellbeing, using entire systems thinking, as well as stressing the incorporation of an assurance to wellbeing into the structure of culture, social structures, procedures, plus custom life in human societies, especially among the Maori in New Zealand. The model is consistent of socio-ecological approach that concentrates more on social, organizational, as well as cultural elements of the environment. The Ottawa Charter acknowledges the fact that the human health is a multifaceted due to a complex along with an active set of interactions amid social, people plus economic conditions, culture, as well as the natural setting (Poland, Dooris & Haluza-Delay, 2011).

TePaeMahutonga Model

The charter offered much of the impetus for the change towards the use of a socio-ecological strategy for health promotion along with health education in Aotearoa New Zealand. The Ottawa Charter acknowledged that primary health attainments were connected not to so much to developments in medical know-how as to increases in wages along with the living standards and to public health programs initiated by policy changes at community and government levels. The Ottawa Charter recognizes nine extensive prerequisites for promoting health among the population. These prerequisites include education, peace, stable ecosystem, income, sustainable resources, food, shelter, equity, and social justice. The Ottawa Charter champions a socio-ecological strategy towards enhancing wellbeing where people besides their environments are considered to be inextricably connected.  In line with health promotion, the Ottawa Charter ascertained that five key approaches were required to improve health in New Zealand towards attaining healthy communities. The five key strategies are: the creation of supportive environments; reinforcing of community accomplishment, reorientation of health and wellbeing services; improvement of personal skills; and building healthy public policies (Durie, 2011).

To assemble the aspects of contemporary health promotion in a unified way, it is important to investigate TePaeMahutonga (constellation of starts popularly called the Southern Cross). The constellation contains four primary stars that are used in New Zealand to represent four primary activities of health promotion, as well as can be named to reflect the four objectives of health promotion. These primary activities include Mauriora, Toiora, Waiora, and Te Oranga (Haluza-DeLay, 2008).

The Mauriora (secure cultural identity) is anchored on the principle on that good health relies on numerous factors; however, amongst the indigenous individuals globally. Thus, cultural identity is taken as a significant requirement in health promotion. The objective of health promotion based on this star is to advance the security of identity that needs the promotion of Maori entrance into Maori society. The Waiora (environmental protection) is connected to the outside world plus the spiritual aspects, which links person’s health with space, terrestrial, as well as water settings. This implies that it is difficult to attain good health with environmental pollution. The promotion of health should take into consideration nature along with the superiority of the contact amid individuals and the environment. On the other hand, Toiora (healthy lifestyles) underscores the fact that many threats to health emanate from the dangers, which threaten health along with the security in addition to having the ability to deform human knowledge. The star emphasizes that the majority of Maori people are ensnared in risk-laden ways of life and consequently will not realize their full potential in life. Therefore, the shift from destructive lifestyles to healthy lifestyles needs activities at many levels that underscore the importance of health promotion (Papaarangi & Bridget, 2006). The Te Oranga that entails the involvement in society stresses that promotion of health will not be detached from the socioeconomic situations among the Maori and Pacific peoples. Thus, health is not only regarding the safe cultural identity or a whole environment, or the evasion of risks. The Te Oranga stresses the need to promote the involvement in the community in the economy, schooling, occupation, knowledge society, in addition to decision-making (Ministry of Health, 2005).

Health Inequity/Disparity

Considerable inequalities exist amongst diverse groups in New Zealand. For Instance, the Maori, Pacific peoples as well as people from all over lower socioeconomic groups have poorer health, as well as die young as compared to other people in New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand suffers inequities or disparities in health outcomes by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The health promotion approaches have targeted the Maori in an effort to address the health inequalities that have continued to exist to create healthy communities. Responsiveness to reflect Maori reflects the governments’ perspective that health research carried in New Zealand must contribute to improving the health of Maori and eliminating health inequities. Therefore, researchers should consider how their processes may better reflect Maori health priorities along with needs. Hence, responsiveness to Maori acknowledges the government’s obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi that flow on to research organizations getting the government financing. The Crown anticipates these obligations to be made transparent and they are explicit in administration contracts between the research funders along with providers (Cumming & Mays, 2011).  The Treaty of Waitangi has been designed to improve the health outcomes of the Maori by promoting their voice. The Treaty guarantees that the Crown will act in a manner that Maori will not be disadvantaged, and if disadvantaged is demonstrated, the Crown will undertake measures to correct this inequity in the health. The Maori populace is around 16% of the total New Zealand populace, and few researchers believe about the effect of a numerical minority voice on policy along with programs that are produced from research, particularly effect on further inequity along with marginalization (Hancock, 2007).

The socio-ecological promotion of health model that was developed by McLeroy and equals is founded on environmental systems theory. This underscores the fact that human advance is influenced by different systems. The framework identifies different, interdependent influence or evaluative points of policy, society, organizational, interpersonal along with intrapersonal levels that have become an important instrument for design, assessment and implementation of health improvement approaches (Dustin, Bricker & Schwab, 2010). The socio-ecological model inspires both whole-system approaches, like enhanced by environments strategy towards the promotion of health, and too the unambiguous knowledge of how more focused approaches can rely on elements at other levels for their efficiency, suitability or sustainability to be attained. This approach has been fundamental in improving the wellbeing of the Maori and Pacific peoples in New Zealand. Thus, schools have been acknowledged as health promotion environments since the charter was ratified. The health promoting schools operate at several socio-ecological levels through improving the wellbeing of the personnel, household, communities, as well as students with them (Buzzelli & Veenstra, 2007).

There are social determinants of health that has influenced the health promotion strategies in New Zealand. Social determinants have caused inequities in New Zealand resulting in health disparities that need to be addressed. The inequities in the distribution of in addition to access to material resources that include education, income, employment besides housing are the main cause of inequities. In New Zealand, the impact of socioeconomic status on wellbeing is mediated by different material behavioural and psychosocial factors that can offer efficient intervention points (Ratima, 2010). The housing policies plus community development programs can assist lower the exposure of small socioeconomic groups to unfavourable living situations. Furthermore, place of work strategies and health along with protection regulations might assist decrease exposure to unfavourable physical, as well as psychosocial working conditions in an effort towards health promotion of the Maori people. The threat of hospitalization for chronic illnesses in New Zealand is borne excessively by Maori in addition to Pacific individuals and by those who are underprivileged. The Maori are a well-researched case of the native individuals with higher risks plus shoddier wellbeing outcomes that the general populace. For example, the Maori have greater rates of cigarette smoking plus poverty, as well as the worse educational achievement than the general populace. Based on health, the Maori have superior unfulfilled needs in primary care, inferior excellence secondary care, as well as poor outcomes for a wide array of illnesses; standard life expectancy is less than 8 years as compared to other populace (Golden & Earp, 2012).

• The growing number of older people in New Zealand has strained health resources that are needed to keep younger citizens healthy. Elderly individuals are more probable to have the disability as well as to over one health state.
• New Zealanders live for long and annually, more people over than 65 years, which is good for persons plus their households. Nonetheless, this means that social plus health services would have to adjust and this challenges the healthcare organization to seek for means to provide these services (Ratima, 2010).
• Some of the citizens in New Zealand does not benefit from health along with the disability system. For instance, whilst New Zealanders generally are living for more years, the Maori, as well as Pacific individuals, still have inferior life expectancies than the populace as an entire. Furthermore, children and disabled individuals face inferior health that the rest of the populace as compared to the rest of the population (Smith, 2009).
• Obesity is becoming a huge challenge in New Zealand and has long-term health, as well as social effects. Amongst New Zealand kids as an entire, about 10 % are less obese; nevertheless, the rate is around 30 percent in Pacific kids.

• By concentrating on preventing diseases, with by undertaking healthy choices simple, the country may help individuals either avoid developing long-standing healthiness situations or to slow down the growth of chronic conditions.
• In New Zealand, there is a growing and powerful knowledge base, fashioned from research, regarding what donates to high-quality health that is from beginning to maturity. The understanding would be a continuing resource, which will carry on guiding policies that assist kids to start out on avenues for healthy growth along with development (Samdal, Viig & Wold, 2010).
• The healthcare sector in New Zealand has benefited from advancements in technology plus connected infrastructure, like broadband. Thus, when everyday tasks are computerized, expert personnel may concentrate on what to perform most excellent (Matheson, Dew & Cumming, 2009).

Conclusions

New Zealand has experienced tremendous growth in improving the health of the citizens through different models that have been implemented. However, there are still many challenges in the healthcare sector that should be addressed to actually universal healthcare that will promote the health of the citizens. The Maori and Pacific peoples have historically faced the worst health in New Zealand. Nonetheless, the current health promotion strategies and models have proved effective in improving the health of this population. This has been an important milestone in promoting health among the New Zealanders and the use of the models and strategies will continue to advance the health of the Maori and Pacific peoples. The discussion confirms that the thesis of the paper that the attainment of healthy communities as well as healthy lifestyles through the promotion of health is an attainable objective in Aotearoa New Zealand.  

References 

Buzzelli M. & Veenstra G. (2007). New approaches to researching environmental justice: combining critical theory, population health and geographic information sciences. (GIS), Health and Place. 13, 1-2.

Cumming J, & Mays N. (2011). New Zealand's Primary Health Care Strategy: early effects of the new financing and payment system for general practice and future challenges. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 6:1–21.

Cumming J, Mays N, & Gribben B. (2008). Reforming primary health care: is New Zealand’s primary health care strategy achieving its early goals? Australia and New Zealand Health Policy. 5:24.

Dooris M. (2009). Holistic and sustainable health improvement: the contribution of the settings- based approach to health promotion. Perspectives in Public Health , 129, 29-36.

Durie, M. (2011). A Decade Two Framework For Considering the Practice of Health Promotion Nga Ara Tohungatanga o te Hauora Defining Professional Pathways in Health Promotion. Health Promotion Forum Symposium, Auckland, New Zealand.

Dustin D. L.,  Bricker K. S. & Schwab K. A. (2010). People and nature: toward an ecological model of health promotion. Leisure Sciences. 32, 3-14.

Golden, SD. & Earp, J.A.L. (2012). Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts. Twenty years of health education and behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav. 39(3):364–72.

Haluza-DeLay R. B. (2008). A theory of practice for social movements: environmentalism and ecological habitus. Mobilization. 13, 205-218.

Hancock T. (2007). Creating environments for health – 20 years on. Promotion and Education. S2, 7-8.

Matheson A., Dew K.,  &  Cumming J. (2009). Complexity, evaluation and the effectiveness of community-based interventions to reduce health inequalities. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20, 221-226.

Ministry of Health. (2005). Developing a monitoring framework and strategic research agenda for He Korowai Oranga. Summary of submissions. Ministry of Health: Wellington.

Papaarangi R. & Bridget R. (2006). State of the Maori Nation: Twenty-first Century Issues in Aotearoa. Chapter 1 The state of Maori Health. Raupo Publishing (NZ) Ltd.

Poland, B., Dooris, M & Haluza-Delay, R. (2011). Securing ‘supportive environments’ for health in the face of ecosystem collapse: meeting the triple threat with a sociology of creative transformation. Health Promotion International. 26 (2), 202-215.

Ratima, M. M. (2010). M?ori health promotion – a comprehensive definition and strategic considerations. Health Promotion Forum.

Samdal, O, Viig, NG, & Wold, B. (2010). Health promotion integrated into school policy and practice: experiences from the implementation of the Norwegian network of health promoting schools. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2:43–72.

Smith J. (2009). Critical analysis of the primary health care strategy and framing of issues for the next phase. Wellington: Ministry of Health.