World War II Essay: A Decisive Moment For America.

The Second World War is often viewed as a seminal event in United States History, a watershed that clearly marks America as differing after the war. For this essay, based on the readings we have done for class, you will take one of the case studies below and
argue for why or why not it should be considered a watershed moment. Outlined below are three statements that give the basic argument for the war being a watershed moment. Select one of them and argue for either in support or against the proposition.
Provide at least three reasons or examples to support your position.

Case Studies:
During World War II women’s work, often symbolized by Rosie the Riveter, set the stage for the second wave feminism of the late 1950s and 1960s. Although the 1950s is often seen as a conservative age, it was, in fact, a reaction to the radical and rapid changes in women’s roles that took place during the war. World War II marked a substantial acceleration of the Great Migration as black (and many whites) left the South for northern industrial jobs. It also meant that many Americans were exposed to racial attitudes beyond those they were accustomed to.

For African-Americans it meant serving in places without segregation. For white Americans, it meant confronting fascist racism. As a result, racial tensions flared in the United States, but the ground work was laid for the Civil Rights Movement. Following the First World War, the United States retreated into isolationism rejecting the Treaty of Versailles and electing Warren G. Harding president in 1920 who pledged to put “America First.” However, events during World War II convinced a sizeable number of Americans that they should abandon isolationism in favor of creating a new world order.

Neutralism after the Second World War

Following the First World War, the United States retreated into isolationism rejecting the Treaty of Versailles and electing Warren G. Harding president in 1920 who pledged to put “America First.”  However, events during World War II convinced a sizeable number of Americans that they should abandon isolationism in favour of creating a new world order.

The first world war taught the United States numerous lessons. It is said that wise people do not repeat their own mistakes. After world war 1, the United States of America decided to isolate itself from international wars (Hook and Spanier, 2018). They concluded that it was best to leave the Europeans fight their own battles without involving the United States. Most citizens agreed with this position and did not want the country to support any war as it had done in the first world war (Lyons, 2016). To make sure that this was ensured, the congress made the neutralism law which made the United Sates a neutral party in international wars. Both the political class and the citizens were convinced neutralism was the best position to take as a country.

Things do not always turn out exactly as we may want them too. Sometimes, certain things might happen and lead us to change our stands. This is what happened to the United States. Although they had made a decision to be neutral and not to be involved in any international way, they could not keep quiet any more after Japan attacked the pearl harbour killing thousand of United States’ military personnel (Russett, 2018). After this attack, the congress met and unanimously agreed to declare war on Japan. The second world war is therefore a seminal event in the United States history (Tanaka, 2017). This war played a great role in influencing the policies that the US had concerning foreign war. This paper is going to focus on the second world war and why it was a seminal event in the history of the United States.

After the first world war, most Americans concluded that participation of the US in the first world war had been one of the greatest mistakes that the US had ever made. They decided that the best way to establish worthwhile and long-lasting peace was to isolate themselves from international war. Throughout the 1920s, the United States employed a policy of neutralism where they decided to distant themselves from any international wars (Tsurumi, 2015). As a result, the US established a very good relationship with Latin America. Latin America was under Hoover, who was an antiimperialist. Therefore, Roosevelt, the then president of America, developed what was called the good neighbour policy with Latin America. The policy stated that the America region would altogether not be involved in any international war. To show his commitment towards this endeavour, Roosevelt withdrew all the American forces from the Caribbean. This led to establishment of a very good relationship between the United States and Latin America.

At around the same time, the state of the Europe countries especially Britain and France became tenser. Even with this, the United States continued to hold on to its isolationist policy. Most of the American population believed that it was best for America to stay neutral. Many of the polls conducted on the issue revealed that American citizens would not digest the idea of their country being involved in an international war again. To ensure that the US fully adopted the neutralism policy, a series of laws were enacted towards the same. With laws in place, it was evident that the US was determined to remain neutral. The issue of isolation was so important in the US that it played a significant role in shaping the elections of 1940. Roosevelt was elected president. His opponent in the election was trying to convince the voters not to vote for him claiming that he had started supporting American involvement with international war. In retaliation, Roosevelt assured the citizens that he would not send any military personnel to international war.

Giving Up the Isolationist Policy

The events of December 7 1941 played a great role in change of policy in the United States (Gruhl, 2017). On the said date, Japan made a surprise attack to the United States. A Japanese aircraft carrying ammunition was used to bomb the pearl of harbour. At this harbour, there were 18 ships belonging to America’s navy. All the ships and 347 planes were destroyed (Jackson, 2018). 1178 persons were also wounded. On the following day, the congress had a sitting. All the members of the senate apart from one voted for a war against Japan. Just 72 hours later, Germany and Italy declared war on the United States (Lewenstein, 2016). It is obvious that the isolationist policies could not work at that pint in time. It is worth noting that the isolationism died at the pearl of harbour. The United States found itself unprepared for a war of such magnitude. Therefore, president Roosevelt moved quickly to ensure that they had a prepared army, personnel and armoury. Due to the neutralism policy, the United States was not well prepared to go for war. Due to this, Roosevelt dedicated himself to ensure that neutralism was eradicated. In 1945, a total of 26 countries including the United States came together and formed the United Nations (Geiger, 2017). This meant that all these would support fight against Germany, Italy and Japan. On April the same year, Roosevelt died. He was succeeded Truman. The United States dropped two atomic bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Feis, 2015). The attack was too much for Japan. They surrendered and this marked the end of the second world war. This time however, the United States of America did not adopt the neutralism policies. They continued doing more research on better ammunition and better ways of fighting. This kind of preparedness is very important. To the current day, the US has one of the best prepared armies in the world. It has also employed modern and sophisticated methods of war. It is clear from the above discussion that the World war II was a decisive moment for America. She learnt lessons that have helped her to date.

Conclusion:

The United States made a very important decision after the world war 1. This was that they would not be involved again in an international war. Their participation in the first world war had taught them that participating/facilitating war had more disadvantages than advantages. For this reason, some legislation was made to ensure that the US remained neutral. As a result of this neutral approach, a good relationship was established between the US and Latin America. This decision was made in 1920s when Roosevelt was the president of the United States. Most American citizens were happy with the neutralism approach.

In life, some events may hit us in a way that we never expected. This is what happened to the United States. A japan aircraft attacked the pearl harbour destroying ships, people and planes. This came as a bad surprise to the United states as they had not expected that something of the sort would happen. Due to the event, the senate met the following day and declared war on Japan. Three days German and Italy declared war on the United States. There was one main event that led to the end of the war, that is the bombing of Hiroshima ns Nagasaki. After the end of the war, America was careful to ensure that future decisions ensure mechanisms.

References:

Feis, H. (2015). The atomic bomb and the end of World War II. Princeton University Press.

Geiger, R. L. (2017). Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. Routledge.

Gruhl, W. (2017). Imperial Japan's World War Two: 1931-1945. Routledge.

Hook, S. W., & Spanier, J. (2018). American foreign policy since World War II. Cq Press.

Jackson, R. (2018). Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter-terrorism. Routledge.

Lewenstein, B. V. (2016). The meaning of public understanding of science ‘in the United States after World War II. Public Understanding of science.

Lyons, M. J. (2016). Total War and the Home Fronts: World War II (pp. 240-255). Routledge.

Russett, B. M. (2018). No clear and present danger: a sceptical view of the United States entry into World War II. Routledge.

Tanaka, Y. (2017). Hidden horrors: Japanese war crimes in World War II. Rowman & Littlefield.

Tsurumi, K. (2015). Social change and the individual: Japan before and after defeat in World War II. Princeton University Press.