Analysis Of Four Pyramid Model Of Australian Sports

Discuss about the MMS711 Introduction to the Sport Industry.

Australian Sport Structure

Sports has been one of the most important factor in any country with the fact that it has developed in all the levels of the work in the period of time. The analysis of the sports in the various sects of the country can be targeted to the numerous talents that are there in the period of time. The Four pyramid model of the Australian sports is one of the basic models that help the country to have a detailed analysis of the present condition of the sports in the concerned amount of time. The following report is an analysis of both the present conditions of the sports as well as the future analysis of the sports in the required field of senses. The sport scene of Australia is segmented on the basis of the school and the ground level to the elite senses which is evident in the following report highlighted on the Australian sports. This research report particularly focuses on the Australian sports industry and its present impact on the activities and services.  The purpose of the report is to understand the application of 4 pyramids to Australian sports in the form of impact on the management activities, structure and organization of Australian sport. It has been identified that the role of government in the sport as well as recreation sector is quite similar across all ranges of governments. The role of national government in the sport sector tends to reflect the national intention for the success in the international sporting arena. The significant areas of the report is the application of 4 pyramids, effectiveness of 4 pyramids in terms of management activities, organization and structure of Australian sport and the emerging models of sport impacting the sector globally.

It has been identified that the focus of each pyramid is usually found at the apex, where large organizations and competitions could represents a fundamental sector of sport. However, Australian Sports Commission (ASC) plays a great role in leading Australian sport sector. It has also been found that each sport is supported by a national governing body which is further backed by a separate organizational setting which is responsible for performing the large corporate sport (Phillips and Newland 2014). A major characteristic of each pyramid is its increasing width at the lower range.  The most crucial fact of the pyramid is that in each pyramid has an increasing number of organizations due to which there is a long flow of communication and interaction between all the levels of the sport organizations as well as the mentions of each of the cases in the required span of time.

Pyramid 1: Traditional Sport System

When it comes to the impact of this 4 pyramids to the management activities and organization, it has been identified that pyramid 1 known as traditional sport system is its capability to cater for the masses authorizing recreational competitors to take part at a degree equal to their efficiency (Hodgetts and Duncan 2015). In other words, it can be mentioned that this pyramid enabled sports at all level which further helps to strengthen Australian sport sector such as leading it to a global level. Likewise, on the perspective of management, the key issue that might come out in this pyramid is the inverted nature of the management process. It is particularly identified that the lower level of this particular system include the authority of the management process. This model also helps to observe that existing management model is quite cumbersome and delegate system. There is a state of concern that how the national sporting agencies have relied on the state association leading and association. Taks et al. (2014) mentioned that consequently, several sports have failed to deal with the increasing series of issues appearing as the barriers to today’s management.

The essence of Pyramid 1 implies a most crucial change to the balance of power between NSO, state associations and club, which includes an employment of paid full-time managers (Bailey and Talbot 2015). Nonetheless, the principle of pyramid has facilitated to resolve the challenged between conventional honorary executive members as well as the paid managers.  In several ways, such resolution hold the responsibility for the initiative toward the corporate sport. Likewise, the pyramid 2 has a strong impact on the organizational bodies in sport industry as improvement of technology as well as commercial interests were responsible for the development of corporate sport. Pyramid 2 made it possible for Australian sport to be promoted as the core commercial product become was an obvious option (Joseph 2016).

On the other side, pyramid 3 revolves around government system and due to the principles of this pyramid, federal government has and increases its support for the sport that has gradually increased. Consequently, Australian sport has gained a tremendous positioning in the political ground. Furthermore, the last layer of the pyramid is about the overall development of sports in Australia. Due to the application of pyramid 4, the sport industry in Australia has been able to reinforce its position as this pyramid helps to lift up the sport that were lagging behind all in the earlier days (De Bosscher et al. 2015). Moreover, organizational bodies have developed separate goals of leading the sports and managing it in an international level. Australians find many opportunities to take part in variety of games when they intend. This opportunity finds more strength as even the older nationals of the nation found motivation to continue their involvement.

Pyramid 2: Development of Corporate Sport

The increasing involvement of Australian government has encouraged disable people who once were away from sports. Pyramid 4 has a strong contribution to the development of pathways for the diverse needs of population in the sector (Harman and Doherty 2014). For example, coach development program as well as talent identification were observed to be a significant to an effective sport development planning. In addition to this, the implementation of an in-depth view of this technique of sport development remains as the key managerial barrier from this pyramid 4.

The new sport structure derived from the pyramid model helps to incorporate a broader view of the method of sport development. The major principle found in the pyramid is all four pyramids are interconnected and they are not separate from each other; thereby, when applying this broader view of the sport development can be applied to all pyramids (O’Boyle and Shilbury 2016). Another significant point found in this structure is, even though four pyramid effectively illustrate the structure and function of Australia sport system it could incorporate a static system. The four pyramid structure of the country is to be analysed with the maintenance of the pyramid structure in the required span of time. The emerging new models of the sport structure as well as the organization in Australia is to be analysed to find out the level of the sport sector in the various stratus of the Australian sports industry.

The 4 pyramids of the sports have been useful for developing the Australian sports. This is because earlier there were many problems within the management of the Australian sports. There was a lack of proper communication and decision making problem. It is for this reason that the management decided to bring about some or then other kinds of changes within the management system. They realized that there is a need for bringing about the upward and the downward kind of communication system. There is also a need to bring out the change in the management system. However it was seen that when the people of the lower management levels started taking the important decisions there were actually many problems. With the advent of this model there has been much improvement within the system of the Australian sports. Ione of the most important change is the removal of the barriers from the sports system that barred the youngsters from taking part in the sports (Bailey and Talbo 2015). So, thus four pyramid models have really been very helpful.

Pyramid 3: Government System

The other utility is that it has allowed a new platform for the disabled people to take part in the Australian sports. So, this is one of the strongest point in favor this 4 pyramid model system. It is for this reason that the Australia sports have been highly benefitted by this model. The other important change that this model brought about is appointment of good and able managers for managing the overall management of the board of Australian teams. This is very essential as a step of improvement because this helped in improving the overall working of the sports. The idea of appointing the retired and the old sport athletes was also feasible. This is because the sports are one of the most important aspects of the modern day scenario (Rodríguez et al. 2015). So, it is for this reason that the new 4 pyramid model of sports has been very helpful for developing the condition of the sports (Piggin and Pollock 2016).

This is really very helpful and justified for the overall growth of the Australian sports. This is because they have brought about many important changes within the Australian sport industry. The 4 pyramid model has helped in changing the overall structure of the Australia sports. This has helped in making the Australian sports famous on a Global level. Earlier it was famous only in the local level but with the arrival of the 4 pyramid model the sports has become very famous and has been taken on an international level (Kelly, Bauman and Baur 2014). This has really been very helpful for the overall growth of the sports (Mann and Narula 2017). It has become famous on the Universal level and has also appointed the good and able managers who will be helping to carry on the proper management of the sports. There has been a healthy growth of communication and coordination within the sports industry. The players have been able to communicate with each other easily and have been able to spread the importance of the Australian sports all over the world.

Sport creation and delivery is one of the most important ways to develop the strategic arena of the sport arena of all the sections of the sport assembly. According to the views of Hajkowicz et al. (2013), the sport creation and delivery of Australia is dependent on a number of models and theories which help the organization to make sure that the complex infrastructure of the whole sports arena is maintained as well as the models of the sport creation are evaluated according to the needs of the country and the people.

Pyramid 4: Overall Development of Sports in Australia

The sport creation and delivery is one of the major segments which help to make sure that the sport scene of the specific country is on continuous evolvement from the native sports to the present day. According to the opinios stated by De Bosscher, Sotiriadou and Van Bottenburg (2013), there are a number of sports that are being created in the Australian zone which have an origin in Australia including Australian Rules football, International rules football, Trugo, Touch, Rogaining and others. With the increase in time and the amount of sport being played at the particular time and in a particular place, the future sport delivery of the time is becoming increasingly complex.

The model of the sport creation as well as the delivery of the Australian sports arena can be seen in the different types of theories and models that are there in the zone of the Australian sports. The value creation logic of the sports organization is measured to analyse the creation of value in the system of the organization and also to make sure that the strategies of the organization that are unsuitable for the changes are measured in the same manner. The business model depicts the structure as well as the transaction that is there in the business opportunities of the given time along with the exploration of the given opportunities of the business organization (Joseph 2016). The sports model that involves the revenue generation through the system of delivery into the Australian zone of analysis is also known as the value creation of the sports model.

The sport creation of the Australian sport zone is nothing but the sports that are being originated in the Australian land and is being addressed now in the global sphere all in the terms of the sport federation as well as the sport organizations that are being there. According to Joseph (2016), the sport creation system is one of the basic systems in the sport federation of the country which make sure to have the different types and genres of sports in the whole business. Being a country of a number of sport enthusiast, there are a number of ways in which the whole of the system of the sport models can be seen.

Sport delivery is the system in which the different sports of the country are being delivered or executed by the sportsperson from all levels of competition right from the school level which is from the physical education level to the level of the elite competition that is there for the global competitions and Australia being an active member of that part of the organization. According to the opinions of O’Boyle and Shilbury (2016), the sport delivery system is there for the delivery of the whole system in the part that it measures for the same in all the parts of the arena and also to the fact that sport delivery is surely required to make sure that the country has the required amount of sport personality in the manner of the self.

Utility of Four Pyramid Model

The concepts of the sport creation as well as the sport delivery has a lot of significance in the parts which is one of the major instances of the case. The sport delivery system is there for the number of the sports so that the enthusiasts in sports can get hold of the system and bring their passion and future of sports to their own grip (Harman and Doherty 2014).

Sports development have been central to the development schemes of Australia since 1970s. The Australian Government have made high end financial contribution as well as developed new infrastructure which are key to the Sports development according to this model. The Sports Management authority in Australia, have come up with regulatory bodies who would be basically performing he role of advising the government to invest in various sports welfare programs faceted towards making Australia flourish not only in Cricket or Football but also in the Olympics as well. Hence another criteria of the model that is injecting of most viable resources for the development of sports in the country have been made possible.

The factors like awareness about sports, participation in all versatile format of sports, enjoyment of various sports by the government and achieving excellence at the level of the game are all the factors that the activities of sports development in Australia should be faceted towards.

The advisory body of the Sports development committee in Australia can be considered as the performance decision standpoint by Australian standards.

In Australia there is actually a conflict between two opposed strategies from the two ends. The government on one and is trying to establish the country in all forms of sports and that is why the government is attempting that from the grass root level, the athletes are enticed towards creating interrelationships among various sports. Again, as Sarkar, Fletcher and Brown (2015), opines, the Australia communities like schools, sports clubs and other entities are rather concerned about the games that contribute to high level of financial contribution.

Moreover, it can be also opined that the grounded theory is actually aligning the differences that have to patch in order to ensure the development of sports in future in Australia. The government level intervention is highly required for the case of development of sports in future in Australia. Various research models and frameworks have been implemented by the sports regulatory bodies and as an impact, the commercial publicity of sports in Australia have also been hindered. Lastly, the limitations of the model should also be highlighted. The Australian sports federation can improvise and apply its policies to the context of those organisations which are enlisted and the primary NSOs that fall under the regulatory disposition of the Australian sports council. However there are 61% of unregistered clubs out in the middle (Singh et al. 2016). For them, there is no specified regulatory policy framework that can help those clubs and academies to achieve the excellence that is required for the wholesome development of Australian sports.

Sport Creation and Delivery

The following paragraphs highlight the future evolution of the different stratus of the sports council of the Australian sport organization in terms of the management, organization as well as the delivery system.

Physical Education and Sport development at pre-school, primary as well as secondary level, should be aimed at development of a vision for ensuring active participation. The structural as well as historical constrains that have impeded the performance of physical education as well as sports education in school have to be eradicated and more young people have to be enticed to join sports development curriculum and campaigns faced towards the future. The standard of sports education in the Australian school level have started to improve since 1994. However, Beck et al. (2017), opines that the sports management groups working towards the development of sports in Australian schools have to become more pro-active for ensuring the sustainable quality if sports education.

The calibre testing methodology based on respective zones, a model implemented by the Health and Physical skills development authority in Australia is a significant approach at would help in the delivery of sports personnel in the future in a much more organised level. The HPELA focuses on the health statures of the school level athletes in various zones (Brymer and MacKenzie 2015). For evidence, the sports academies and the schools that are working towards sports development in the Western Australia have been probing at focusing at Cricket and Football.

The schools as well as the academies, under the sports development scheme, would develop student based plan and in course of the plan, they would ensure that every individual student acquire specified sports knowledge, develop the necessary attitude for the respective sports that they have been playing and also promote their health condition so that they are at their best condition of health in the best sporting age. Hence, alongside, endorsing the value of sporting activities, the schools have to develop specific campaign for health development.

Sport offerings are nowadays typically optional for the students. The students are complimentarily asked to participate in the school based general activities like drilling and swimming. Again, as Carson et al. (2016), opines, the regulation of having a school based team at the competitive level regional competitions is not liable to be stringently followed by the schools of Australia. However, it is necessary for every school to create a talent pool. In order to achieve that, every schools should participate in inter level district competitions. The zonal governments have to make arrangement in the future so that more media houses cover school sports in Australia. Currently, only the print media covers most of school level sports competitions. This scenario is to be changed in the future. Moreover, as per Delaney et al. (2018), it is also required that the cash awards of the school level competition be increased by at least 20 to 25%.

However there are lack of equity in the PE level in the Australian regulatory framework. Many schools’ teams are not sponsored by the sporting associations of the regional level. Rarely are the school level sports compulsory.

The district level in Australia have many clubs that invest high volume of money for the welfare and development of sports in the country. In high end metropolitan cities like Melbourne, Sydney, Perth and Adelaide, many clubs are there that are several sports clubs of national importance and that are also endorsed by the government of Australia. However, one main factor where future change is required in this context is that most of the potential clubs in Australia are concentrating on a particular set of sports like Rugby Football, Cricket and so on (Desbrow et al., 2014). As an impact, sports like Gymnastics, freestyle track sports, basketball, and so on are completely ignored. Most of the clubs have infrastructure that is suitable for a handful of sports only.

It is essential that famous clubs like the Richmond club of Australia incorporate infrastructure of the small grossing sports like Track events, swimming and so on. Table sports like Chess and others such are almost not played in Australian clubs at a professional level (Ekegren, Gabbe and Finch, 2015). In fact there are only a handful of clubs which professes in these sports.

Hence, it can be opined that, this is very necessary that national sports council like the Sports Development and Research authority of Australia and county boards like the Melbourne club should take up initiative to endorse other sports forms. The major factor why the clubs have hindered the progress of alternative sports form is that sports like Rugby, Football and Cricket are highly revenue earning (Espinosa, Lee and James, 2015). On the contrary, the other sports forms do not attract potential audience and the revenue generation rate of such sports events are 38% to 40% lower than these competitive sports forms.

The clubs are also not instructed from the ends of the government to develop the quality of alternative sports. Rather the government of Australia gives lot of allowances and incentives alongside including the potential clubs in social welfare schemes. In this scenario, it is impossible to endorse the small sports.

At the regional level, it is necessary to endorse the activities of the Department for the development of Sports as well as Recreation. The strategic plan since the year 2016, is stringently aimed at increasing the participation rate in sports and also developing the quality of performance of the sports personnel. The primary future faceted motive of the strategic plan is to gain active participation from the Western Australian sports committees.

The culture of Sports management and sports development in Western Australia is much heightened. As an impact, active settings are being endorsed in Australia. In order to develop the sports communities and encourage them to come out and play, it is essential that by 2022, the Australian Government develop at least 5 to 6 multi-facility stadiums in the western and south Western Australia. The government is also aiming to ask the sports merchandise corporate companies to accumulate money which they send as a part of their CSR activities and invest the same towards the development of the sports infrastructure in Australia (Farrow et al. 2016).

The government is also nourishing the policy of undertaking the business policies to develop certain zones which would be specifically important as heritage tourism sites for their reflection towards his sports culture.

The culture of active recreation is also strategically important. Australia should be developed as a site for hoisting of commercial sports championships that would attract a large number of audience. The Australian government have planned that in the initial years after the development of the stadiums, many regional level sports competitions would be held which would be attractively packaged. A budget of AUD $2.1 billion have been affixed by the government of Australia (Lawrence and Hobson-Powell, 2016). It have been affixed that not only the sports forms like Cricket and Football, but also Cycling, swimming, basketball and similar sports that are not so popular have would be hoisted.

The Sports development authority and the Australian Sports development ministry is planning to hoist a second Formula One Grand Prix in Sydney within 2022 to 2026. In case if they are able to do so, the Australian government is expecting that the customer market of alterative level sports in regional level of Australia would be enhanced by 40% approximately (Lawrence and Hobson-Powell, 2017). The franchise level sports at the regional level is also required to be promoted and as such franchise sports leagues can be developed which would involve sportsters from the regional level as well as one or two players from the national or the international levels.

Another important factor that the Regional level sports development committees should focus on is the lifestyle of the Australian regional level players. About 30% of the promising sportsters at the regional level are lost due to the fact that they do not maintain a proper dictum and curriculum as well as they do not have a healthy lifestyle (Vella et al. 2015). Many of the sportsters do not get chance in the national level teams owing to the high drug concentration level in their blood. This is particularly the case with the sports personnel who requires high muscle power. As an outcome, they already miss the chance to participate in the international level competition.

The national sports organization of the Australian origin holds a number of sports events in the concerned amount of time to make sure that the country has the level of the sports faculty in the concerned amount of time. The national organization of the sports faculty is to be analysed to make sure that the sports scene of the country including cricket, rugby, football and hockey and all the indigenous sports of the country is to be channelized to make sure that the every spectrum of the sports in the country have the required level of analysis (Côté and Mallett 2012). Cricket being the national sport of Australia is given more importance than the other to make sure that most of people who belong to the country have inclination towards cricket in the concerned amount of time.

The management of the national sports are held to make sure that the participants of the sports belonging to the regional teams and evolved from the state level sports have made ample awareness of the cases. According to the opinions of Côté and Mallett (2012), the future of the sports circuit in the national level is to be seen in the emergence of the various types of sports in the country and the emphasize on the number of sports in the concerned amount of the time. The country is moving forward towards a better sports faculty in which the level of the sports in the said period of time is evolved in the self. The national level of the sports chooses the working of the various clubs and organizations for the betterment of the sports in every sect and field (Taks et al. 2014)

The future of the different clubs as well as the regional sports are to be amalgamated to make sure that the delivery of future of the sports on the national level has a number of idealism into it. The lack of detail is to make sure that the working of the future plan of the national sports council is to have better amendments (Bailey and Talbot 2015). The whole of the Australian Sports Commission has major plans with the lack of detailing in each. The authorities of the organization of the national level of sports council in Australia have to make sure that the future of the national sports association have the required level of the analysis in the sports development model of the national sports organization of the country.

 The elite organization is defined as the type of organization and sports that is there for the international level of association and in the sports complex in which the honourable mention of the sports authority is being done. According to the views stated by Harman and Doherty (2014), the elite organization of the sports is there for all the countries and it is performed on a global basis to make sure that the country gets the international recognition in the due amount of time.

The mass participatory organizations of the international strata of the case is to be maintained as the state based institutes of sports are to be motivated to make them participate in the places that have the level of the honourable mentions in the same span of time. The AIS Elite Athletic sports which is one of the major instances of the sport management industry is to be analysed to be maintained in the whole span of the time (Kelly, Bauman and Baur 2014). The elite organization of the span of time is to be analysed to make sure that the country have the required amount of the sources to participate and deliver the results in the concerned amount of the time.

The management of the organization is to be done both in terms of the government participation as well as the private bodies concerned about the sports level of the work. The sports at elite level is to be evolved from the national as well as the state level mentions and also to the fact that the whole system of the sport fraternity is to be inter connected to make sure that the elite sports fraternity is to be analysed to make sure that the working of the country in the concerned matter of time is to be seen (Bailey and Talbot 2015). The elite organization of the sports industry is to be maintained to have a stable name of the country in the international front and also to crave a name for the sports person in the said amount of time.

The future of the elite sports of Australia is made sure to be delivered with the required amount of planning and also to focus on the aspects of the sports organization in the span of time. According to the views stated by Eagleman (2013), the leaders of the sports organization have to make sure that the future prospects of rugby are bright. In addition, the other sports that have not been in focus should be brought by using all the levels of the sports sector and making sure that each of the sector employs the players for the considerable period of time.

Conclusion

At the end of the analysis, it can be concluded that the sports authority of Australia is one of the major instances of the country and holds a vital position in the different levels of the sport associations. The analysis of the whole report is made on the basis of the four pyramids in the concerned span of time. The Australian sports pyramid is to be made aware of the heavy implications of the system in the required span of the senses. The report here analysed the four pyramids of Australian sports along with the emerging models of the variations of the Australian sports with the utility models in all the sources. The report also analyses the evolution of the management, organization and delivery of the sports organization into the future with relation to the emerging models of sport creation and delivery with sport clusters with analysis to the four pyramid model.

Reference

Bailey, R. and Talbot, M., 2015. The problem with the pyramid: Why most models of talent development are flawed. In Elite Sport and Sport-for-All (pp. 92-104). Routledge.

Beck, B.R., Daly, R.M., Singh, M.A.F. and Taaffe, D.R., 2017. Exercise and Sports Science Australia (ESSA) position statement on exercise prescription for the prevention and management of osteoporosis. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 20(5), pp.438-445.

Brymer, E. and MacKenzie, S.H., 2015. 11 The Impact of Extreme Sports on Host Communities’ Psychological Growth and Development. Transformational tourism: Host perspectives, p.129.

Carson, V., Hunter, S., Kuzik, N., Wiebe, S.A., Spence, J.C., Friedman, A., Tremblay, M.S., Slater, L. and Hinkley, T., 2016. Systematic review of physical activity and cognitive development in early childhood. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19(7), pp.573-578.

Côté, J. and Mallett, C.J., 2012. Australian Sports Commission.

De Bosscher, V., Sotiriadou, P. and Van Bottenburg, M., 2013. Scrutinizing the sport pyramid metaphor: an examination of the relationship between elite success and mass participation in Flanders. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(3), pp.319-339.

Delaney, J.A., Duthie, G.M., Thornton, H.R. and Pyne, D.B., 2018. Quantifying the relationship between internal and external work in team sports: development of a novel training efficiency index. Science and Medicine in Football, 2(2), pp.149-156.

Desbrow, B., McCormack, J., Burke, L.M., Cox, G.R., Fallon, K., Hislop, M., Logan, R., Marino, N., Sawyer, S.M., Shaw, G. and Star, A., 2014. Sports Dietitians Australia position statement: sports nutrition for the adolescent athlete. International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism, 24(5), pp.570-584.

Eagleman, A.N., 2013. Acceptance, motivations, and usage of social media as a marketing communications tool amongst employees of sport national governing bodies. Sport Management Review, 16(4), pp.488-497.

Ekegren, C.L., Gabbe, B.J. and Finch, C.F., 2015. Injury surveillance in community sport: can we obtain valid data from sports trainers?. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 25(3), pp.315-322.

Espinosa, H.G., Lee, J. and James, D.A., 2015. THE INERTIAL SENSOR: A BASE PLATFORM FOR WIDER ADOPTION IN SPORTS SCIENCE APPLICATIONS. Journal of Fitness Research, 4(1).

Farrow, D., Buszard, T., Reid, M. and Masters, R., 2016. Using modification to generate emergent performance (and Learning?) in sports. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 87(S1), pp.S21.

Gabbett, T.J., 2016. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?. Br J Sports Med, pp.bjsports-2015.

Hajkowicz, S.A., Cook, H., Wilhelmseder, L. and Boughen, N., 2013. The Future of Australian Sport: Megatrends shaping the sports sector over coming decades. A Consultancy Report for the Australian Sports Commission.

Harman, A. and Doherty, A., 2014. The psychological contract of volunteer youth sport coaches. Journal of Sport Management, 28(6), pp.687-699.

Hodgetts, D. and Duncan, M.J., 2015. Quantitative analysis of sport development event legacy: an examination of the Australian Surf Life Saving Championships. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(3), pp.364-380.

Howe, S.T., Aughey, R.J., Hopkins, W.G., Stewart, A.M. and Cavanagh, B.P., 2017, March. Quantifying important differences in athlete movement during collision-based team sports: Accelerometers outperform Global Positioning Systems. In Inertial Sensors and Systems (INERTIAL), 2017 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Joseph, P., 2016. Australian motor sport enthusiasts’ leisure information behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 72(6), pp.1078-1113.

Kelly, B., Bauman, A.E. and Baur, L.A., 2014. Population estimates of Australian children's exposure to food and beverage sponsorship of sports clubs. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 17(4), pp.394-398.

Lawrence, A. and Hobson-Powell, A., 2016. Exercise & Sports Science Australia Submission: Dental and allied health arrangements review. dementia, 1, p.4.

Lloyd, R.S., Oliver, J.L., Faigenbaum, A.D., Howard, R., Croix, M.B.D.S., Williams, C.A., Best, T.M., Alvar, B.A., Micheli, L.J., Thomas, D.P. and Hatfield, D.L., 2015. Long-term athletic development-part 1: a pathway for all youth. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29(5), pp.1439-1450.

Mack, M., Schulenkorf, N., Adair, D. and Bennie, A., 2018. Factors influencing the development of elite-level sports officials in Australia: the AFL, ABA and FFA. Sport in Society, 21(9), pp.1240-1257.

Macniven, R., Kelly, B. and King, L., 2015. Unhealthy product sponsorship of Australian national and state sports organisations. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 26(1), pp.52-56.

Mann, A. and Narula, B., 2017. Positive psychology in sports: An overview. International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), pp.153-158.

O’Boyle, I. and Shilbury, D., 2016. Comparing federal and unitary models of sport governance: a case study investigation. Managing Sport and Leisure, 21(6), pp.353-374.

Phillips, P. and Newland, B., 2014. Emergent models of sport development and delivery: The case of triathlon in Australia and the US. Sport management review, 17(2), pp.107-120.

Piggin, J. and Pollock, A., 2016. World Rugby's erroneous and misleading representation of Australian sports' injury statistics.

Rodríguez, P., Késenne, S. and Koning, R. eds., 2015. The economics of competitive sports. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Sarkar, M., Fletcher, D. and Brown, D.J., 2015. What doesn’t kill me…: adversity-related experiences are vital in the development of superior Olympic performance. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 18(4), pp.475-479.

Singh, H., Fortington, L.V., Thompson, H., Eime, R. and Finch, C., 2016. 975 Geospatial analysis of sports and leisure injury hospitalisations in Victoria, Australia. Injury Prevention, 22, p.A347.

Sotiriadou, P., 2013. Sport development planning: The sunny golf club. Sport Management Review, 16(4), pp.514-523.

Taks, M., Green, B.C., Misener, L. and Chalip, L., 2014. Evaluating sport development outcomes: the case of a medium-sized international sport event. European sport management quarterly, 14(3), pp.213-237.

Vella, S.A., Cliff, D.P., Magee, C.A. and Okely, A.D., 2015. Associations between sports participation and psychological difficulties during childhood: a two-year follow up. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 18(3), pp.304-309.

Andreff, W. and Andreff, M., 2015. 11. Economic prediction of sport performances from the Beijing Olympics to the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa: the notion of surprising sporting outcomes. The Economics of Competitive Sports, p.185.

Arthur-Kelly, M., Farrell, G., De Bortoli, T., Lyons, G., Hinchey, F., Ho, F.C., Opartkiattikul, W., Baker, F. and Fairfax, W., 2017. The Reported Effects of a Systematic Professional Learning Program on the Knowledge, Skills, and Concerns of Australian Early Childhood Educators who Support Young Children Displaying or at Risk of Challenging Behaviours. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64(2), pp.131-149.

Astle, A., Leberman, S. and Watson, G., 2018. Sport Development in Action: Plan, Programme and Practice. Routledge.

Auld, C., 2018. Managing sport in the nonpro?t sector. In Managing Sport Business (pp. 126-146). Routledge.

Barker-Ruchti, N., Schubring, A., Aarresola, O., Kerr, R., Grahn, K. and McMahon, J., 2018. Producing success: A critical analysis of athlete development governance in six countries. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(2), pp.215-234.

Ha, J.P., Lee, K. and Ok, G., 2015. From development of sport to development through sport: A paradigm shift for sport development in South Korea. The international journal of the history of sport, 32(10), pp.1262-1278.

Patatas, J.M., De Bosscher, V. and Legg, D., 2018. Understanding parasport: an analysis of the differences between able-bodied and parasport from a sport policy perspective. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, pp.1-20.

Sotiriadou, P., Brouwers, J. and De Bosscher, V., 2016. High performance development pathways. Managing sport development, pp.63-76.

Weed, M., Coren, E., Fiore, J., Wellard, I., Chatziefstathiou, D., Mansfield, L. and Dowse, S., 2015. The Olympic Games and raising sport participation: a systematic review of evidence and an interrogation of policy for a demonstration effect. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(2), pp.195-226.