Project Charter: The WOWS Project

The project report is based on WOWS project involves the migration of the current paper based clinical documentation system into an advanced digital solutions. With the use of the digital solution, WGCI improves their quality of care with increase in efficiency as well as accuracy. The WOWS should improve over their current clinical system. This project intends to introduce current process to treat the employees. This system consists of the patient’s data to support the history of the patients.

The problem statement is that the existing system of WGCI is paper-based system that makes the communication between the service provider and patients difficult. Due to this, there are lack of centralized data repository and insufficient process to analyze the information of the patients. Therefore, the current system of the organization is back dated and lack of use of technology.

The vision of the project is to implement WOWS in WGCI with development in 6 months with a budget of $700,000. The purpose of this project is to give accurate information on patient’s medical history. The vision of the organization is to target the patients by providing web based database driven prototype system to collect their information accurately.

• To develop a Web-based Oncological Working System for WGCI
• To complete the project plan within 6 months and a budget of $700,000
• To update and maintenance of the patient’s information so that it an easily access

The success factors of this WOWS project are the involvement of the user in the project work, support from the senior level management, and understanding of the hardware as well as software requirements of this project. Proper planning is required to be done before staring the project work such as accurate estimation of budget and schedule (Dalcher, 2015). Due to development of WOWS project, the proposed system can update and maintain the patient’s information. the entire data becomes centralized so that it can transfer from one location to another.

Agile Methodology:

This methodology is used for the project plan as with using this methodology the project plan gives significant flexibility as well as speed to the project plan. This methodology is best suited for the project, as it requires less control as well as real time communication with self-motivated settings of team (Randolph, 2014). This methodology is highly iterative as well as it allows for rapid adjustments through the project.

The scope of this project plan is divided into in scope and out scope and it is categorized as follows:

Out of scope item 1: The study is required for WGCI to change the market strategies as per the requirements of the patients.

Out of scope item 2: Invitation to the targeted participants is required to get the feedback from them.

Out of scope item 3: This study is required to aware WGCI about their current market position and strategies used.

Assumption1: The assumptions are to be taken by the undertaking director is that every one of the deliverables are done such that the framework would track the status of the request given by the clients with hours spent with the end goal of charging (Verzuh, 2015).

Assumption 2: Every one of the deliverables of the undertaking arrangement ought to be conveyed in the given due date and assessed spending plan.

Assumption 3: The undertaking arrangement ought to be planned after the rules of the venture.

Assumption 4: The issues are to be distinguished and the risk officer ought to find a way to maintain a strategic distance from those identified issues (Burke, 2013). Finally, taking into account the above presumptions the task arrangement must meet with the undertaking targets.

Expectation1: The project manager expects that they should complete the project plan within 6 months and within the estimated budget of $700,000.

Expectation 2: The project manager also expects that they require more resources for successfully develop the WOWS for the clinical activities.

Figure 1: Project Governance

(Source: Davis, 2014, pp-200)

Abdel Azeem, S., Hosny, H., & Ibrahim, A. (2014). Forecasting project schedule performance using probabilistic and deterministic models. HBRC Journal, 10(1), 35-42.

Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques.New Jersey, USA.

Dalcher, D. (2015). Introduction to Software Project Management. Proj Mgmt Jrnl, 46(4), e2-e2.

Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189-201.

Elkabets, S., & Shohet, I. (2012). Risk management model for critical infrastructures. Gerontechnology,11(2).

Eric Kirkland, C. (2014). Project Management: A Problem-Based Approach. Project Management Journal, 45(1), e3-e3.

Evans, W., & Pipkin, D. (2012). Risk management for the future of clinical negligence claims. Clinical Risk, 18(1), 25-27.

Hallgren, M. (2012). The construction of research questions in project management. International Journal Of Project Management, 30(7), 804-816.

Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Maier, E., & Branzei, O. (2014). “On time and on budget”: Harnessing creativity in large scale projects.International Journal Of Project Management, 32(7), 1123-1133.

Randolph, S. (2014). Maximizing Project Value: A Project Manager's Guide. Project Management Journal, 45(2), e2-e2.

Verzuh, E. (2015). The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley & Sons.