On-Chip Photonics And Nanophotonics: Advancements And Applications

Advancements in On-Chip Nanophotonic Technologies

On-chip photonics, also known as integrated photonics, is a discipline of photonics that involves the fabrication of planar dielectric waveguides on a chip. On-chip is a widely emerging sub-class of on-chip photonics whereby the waveguides are classified as either hybrid (i.e., composite waveguides- classical waveguides with nanoscale overlayers of nanoantennas, metamaterial overlayer, or slab film) or nanoscale in size (Fang and Sun 2015). Furthermore, using guided-wave optics principles, on-chip nanophotonics enables the design, production, and incorporation of numerous nanophotonic elements on a single entity. On-chip nanophotonic technologies need the integration of various light-related disciplines, including but not limited to guided-wave optics, nanophotonics, plasmonics, silicon photonics, and waveguide technology (Mock and Lu 2016).

There has been a surging concern in the design of nanophotonics and its economical uses. The need for ergonomic and rapid data processing, sensing, and other functions in a variety of applications such as cyber security, banking, healthcare, communications, military, and non-destructive detection is driving the downsizing of optoelectronic components (Karabchevsky et al. 2020). Quantum and all-optical computers are predicted to be widely deployed due to the scale of shrinking, minimal capital, and durability of microfabrication technologies that have permitted the plethora of phones as well as laptops. Nanophotonics plays a pervasive role in telecommunications, sensing applications, and energy conversion. Generally, nanophotonic frameworks and equipment guarantee dramatic reductions in the operation energies of devices, densely integrated information systems with lesser power dispersion, improved spatial resolution for imaging and geometrics, and control technologies of enhanced sensitivity and specificity over the next ten years (Khanikaev, Wu and Shvets 2013; Mock and Lu 2016; Qi et al. 2019).

Apart from its growing significance in digital technologies, the photon is a crucial source of energy for the living world and is being used in a growing variety of chemical, biology, and medical purposes. In the future decade, new light-trapping trapping technologies for solar cells, photocatalysis for biofuel generation, thermal/thermal management, and other "green" photonics technologies are projected to gain significant traction (Guyot et al. 2011). Miniature integrated optoelectronic sensor devices linked to information networks have the potential to transform biology and healthcare. Because electronics and photonics can be effectively combined on a similar platform, a plethora of modern, low-cost utilization can be achieved, all of which will profit out of the equivalent economies of scale as Si-based electronics (De Leebeeck et al. 2011).

Several key aspects in the current’s rapidly expanding and diverse sector of nanophotonics were generated decades ago, while the present advances in the power to control devices at the microscale in diverse dimensions have enabled affirmation of those aspects and the recognition of even more fascinating and potent photonic properties (Khanikaev, Wu and Shvets 2013). Researchers have been able to illustrate and achieve the capacity of nanophotonics due to the advancements in the optical frameworks manufacture at the microscale/nanoscale as well as increased control of material’s characteristics, resulting in a powerful incentive for robust invention in the domain (Constans et al. 2019). Applications of nanophotonics are envisioned to have significant enabling potential in various day-to-day applications including modern medical treatments, low-power, high-bandwidth, and high-density computation and telecommunications, high-spatial-resolution imaging and sensing with greater precision in spectral and spatial, effective optical sources and detectors, and a slew of deep new advances pertaining the form of interactions of light-matter (Altug et al. 2022; Ashtiani, Risi and Aflatouni 2019).

Applications of On-Chip Photonics and Nanophotonics

The discovery and exploitation of nanophotonics for various applications are affected by the availability of optical nanoscale characterization devices like scanning near-field optical microscopy (SNOM- due to various commercial traders trading this eco-friendly tool), atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopes (SEMs), ion transmission electron microscopes (TEM), and nano-Auger, nano-secondary ion mass spectrometry (nano-SIMS) ( associated with the capability to relate atomic structure, geometry as well as the size of the nanostructures to the obtained optical traits (Khanikaev, Wu and Shvets 2013).  

Initially, transparent glasses, reflective metals, and different optical thin films were used to make optical waveguides, which happen to be the central component of photonic integrated circuits (PIC) (Kaushik et al. 2021). As per Snell's law, Fermat's principle, Fresnel's equations, and Fresnel–diffraction Kirchhoff's formula (Fang and Sun 2015) these particles selectively refract and reflect light. The renewed focus on improving the workability of classical optical waveguides and overcoming underlying difficulties faced a number of major drawbacks, such as overcoming the diffraction threshold and other constraints imposed by classical theories, as well as lessening the costs and complexity of photonic integrated circuits (Fang and Sun 2015).

The manufacturing scale of optical waveguides has been pushed into measurements lower than the wavelength in recent decades, allowing for the use of light scattered by subwavelength structures, where light propagation can be controlled practically arbitrarily (Mock and Lu 2016). Furthermore, full-vectorial electromagnetic computational algorithms have made it easier to build complicated structures with multiscale feature dimensions (De Leebeeck et al. 2011).  In several nanomaterials employed in on-chip photonics, like noble metals, semiconductors (Karabchevsky 2020) phase-change materials (Constans et al. 2019), and 2D materials (Shiue et al. 2017), the interaction of subwavelength light–matter is fused with conventional and quantum effects at the nanoscale dimensions. That the so metamaterials (Khanikaev, Wu and Shvets 2013) offer unimaginable prospects for improving the workability of conventional optical equipment. Artificial materials exhibiting subwavelength properties are known as metamaterials. They act as small anisotropic light scatterers when utilized as a waveguide overlayer. As a consequence, light can be manipulated in terms of phase, amplitude, and polarization to produce the required optical response on a chip.

By incorporating the metamaterials into on-chip photonic machines, the operation rate of on-chip gargets can be turned to a greater extent, like lowering waveguide facet reflection losses with anti-reflective frameworks engineering the waveguide effective index to transform the promulgating modes (Mock and Lu, 2016), and cloaking an object on a chip with a 'hiding carpet' (Ma, Dong and Lee 2020) This review provided wide information on the various applications of integrated nanophotonics as well the challenges anticipated in the future with immersed adoption of this technology in various disciplines.

Biosensors have proven to be extremely beneficial in a range of contexts, including healthcare, food security, environmental sensing, surveillance, pharmaceutics, and forensics (Hill, 2014). Diagnostic technologies are one of the most important segments in the biosensor business, as they support almost 70% of medical decisions (Karabchevsky et al. 2020). Hospitals and centralized laboratories now frequently gather diagnostic data using analytical procedures like labeled immunoassays, polymerase chain reaction, cell culturing, and light microscopy. To facilitate the detection of target analytes, labeled immunoassays use an enzyme, fluorescent, or chemiluminescent tags. Despite the fact that labeled immunoassays are sensitive and available for a wide range of analytes, they need expensive and large benchtop apparatus and time-consuming stepwise detection processes (Hu, Brongersma and Baca, 2016).

Optical Nanoscale Characterization Devices

Industrial sensor arrays based on nanophotonic frameworks are available, but their use is hampered due to the large apparatus required to read them. Biacore (Dell’Olio and Passaro 2016), which uses surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and Genalyte, which applies ring resonators, are two prominent examples. As a result, while the nanophotonic sensing chips themselves are small, their readout necessitates an experimental setup, making nanophotonic sensors unworkable in ordinary life. The "chip in a lab conundrum" for nanophotonic sensors arises from the necessity for huge laboratory apparatus. This aspect is critical to creating a portable nanophotonic detector module, where not only the sensor chip itself but also the readout platform is convenient and easy to use by every individual, in order to convert nanophotonic detectors from laboratory-based set-ups into practical systems that can be monetized and utilized conveniently in regular activities (Ashtiani, Risi and Aflatouni 2019). Researchers have used a number of methodologies in their works to generate on-chip nanophotonic detectors with tiny readout devices.

Scientists have developed greater-performance sensing devices to facilitate the rapid diagnosis of diseases as part of their quest to enhance healthcare. On-chip nanophotonic sensors are a promising and effective technology because they have the ability to deliver high-performance, small sensors. Integrated nanophotonic optical sensors, in particular, have made a significant advancement toward greater sensitivity and minimum detection limits, with levels as extreme as 1000 nm/refractive index unit (RIU) and pg/mL previously published. Diverse materials, like metals, semiconductors, dielectrics, or polymers, are used to make nanophotonic detectors that are incorporated on a chip, and various device designs, like an array of nanostructures, cavities, waveguides, interferometers, or gratings, are being used (Khanikaev, Wu and Shvets, 2013; Tokel, Inci and Demirci 2014; Armani et al. 2017) The majority of these sensors are based on the refractive index sensing phenomena (Fei et al. 2019). The signal output in these devices is influenced by a shift in refractive index in close vicinity to the biosensor, which is generated by the application of an analyte. The output signal for resonant-based sensors (Brolo et al. 2018) can be a change in the resonance wavelength or a shift in the level of transmission for waveguide (Armani et al. 2017) or interferometric devices (Baehr-Jones et al. 2018). Most of these sensors need additional bulky and expensive apparatus to measure the output signals, like external sensors or spectrum analyzers, limiting their commercial utility, particularly where downsizing would be advantageous (Dell’Olio and Passaro 2016; Fei et al. 2019).

With increased concern in developing sensors for the detection of biochemical molecules, several article methods that incorporate complete merit of modernized and harmonized microfabrication technology, material sciences, and optical assumptions to use biochemical sensors in a laboratory-on-a chip architect have burgeoned over past years. Different types of on-chips nanophotonic sensors have been presented by different authors (Li et al. 2018; Yesilkoy 2019; Shakoor et al. 2019). On-chip optical vortex-based nanophotonic detectors, for example, are sensitive to the approaching spin beam and can give polarization as well as phase singularity data concurrently.

The basic operation principle of nanophotonic biosensors provided by De Leebeeck et al. (2011), Couture, Zhao, and Masson, (2013), and Altug et al. (2022) follows: Metal nanophotonic sensors take advantage of the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) phenomenon. A resonant oscillation of the metal's conduction electrons caused by a light incident on its surface is known as surface plasmon resonance. The permittivity of metal is negative, while that of its cladding, such as air, is positive. At the interface of the negative (metal) and positive (dielectric) permittivity materials, the incident light induces conduction electrons resonance, which forms plasmonic modes that can pass across the interface. The plasmon resonance generates an increase in the electric field at the metal-dielectric contact. The e - field strength at the interface reacts with a biological sample when it is attached to a metal, leading to greater thresholds. Unfortunately, SPR sensors need a prism-coupling technique, which extends to the detecting setup's complexity. When the metal's continuity is interrupted, as in a nanoparticle, the plasmon mode is concentrated at the air-metal interface, resulting in localized surface plasmon resonance (LPSR), which is used to construct high-sensitivity detectors (Raschke et al. 2012; Tam, Moran and Halas, 2013; Raschke et al. 2014).

Manufacturing Scale and Subwavelength Structures

High-performance optical sensors are made via a phenomenon known as exceptional optical transmission (EOT) through an array of metallic holes (Shew, Cheng and Tsai, 2013; Brolo et al., 2018; Girault et al. 2015). Plasmonic sensors with a Fano resonance response based on metallic nanostructures are also described. But, to measure the resonant transmission/reflection response, these systems still require an external spectrometer or detector. Nanophotonic sensors that use propagating (Šípová and Homola 2017) and localized SPR (Tam, Moran and Halas 2013), EOT (Chung-Yen Chao, Fung and Guo, 2019), and Fano resonance (Raschke et al. 2014) have been reported. Plasmonic nanophotonic devices with metamaterial designs can obtain very highly sensitive levels (thousands of nm/RIU). Their reading, on the other hand, necessitates the employment of bulky external material, reducing their application to laboratory settings.

Cai et al. (2012) and the fellows were the first to provide detailed and comprehensive information concerning an on-chip silicon-integrated optical vortex emitter. Monolithically integrating an emitter and a sensor on the very chip would be a crucial stage forward for on-chip optical vortex-based photodetectors. Schwarz et al. (2014) and colleagues created a new on-chip optical detector built on a plasmonic spin-Hall nanograting that permits comprehensive characterization of the polarization and phase singularity. Their detection method differs from that of previous state-of-the-art systems (Qi et al., 2019) since it enables for simultaneous detection of singularities. Surprisingly, the Schwarz et al. (2014) and collaborators' detector does not necessitate complex synchronization.

It is founded on an asymmetric metallic array with varying grating coefficients at the top and bottom of the array. The angle at which the excited surface plasmon polariton (SPP) propagates is determined by the unique surface geometry. The asymmetry permits the sign of the topological charge (phase) to be differentiated, while the spin-Hall slits are sensitive to the entering beam's spin. Nanoslits orientated at pi/2 make up the so-called spin-Hall slits. The detector's chiral output is caused by the nanoslits' arrangement (Qi et al., 2019). The inverted chiral output response is displayed when the slits are swapped. Scientists can differentiate between a left-circularly polarized (LCP) and a right-circularly polarized (RCP) beam thanks to their unique architecture (Karabchevsky, 2020).

In the same line, Li et al. (2018) and the fellows suggested an orbital angular momentum (OAM) emitter founded on a silico-advanced micro-ring, fabricating the grouped whispering gallery modes (WGMs) of the micro-ring resonator to free-space moving OAM modes utilizing another Bragg grating incorporated in the internal wall of the micro-wall. The technology, which could generate vector vortex beams, was extremely small and simple to operate. The majority of the released power, however, seeps to the substrate in the device, resulting in substantial power loss and low emission efficiency. Li et al. (2019) further indicated that the produced beam’s intensity trajectory in the far-field is a sequence of concentric annuli, thus rendering it impossible to effectively gather and use energy emitted.

By using a periodically agitated silicon micro-ring resonator and an aluminum mirror, Cicek et al. (2019) develop a high-efficiency emitter based on earlier work. From the design, Cicek et al. (2019) established that the device’s efficacy is increased because the mirror reflects the power that is emitted down to the substrate back into the air. With an optimal spacing between the resonator and the mirror, the reflecting beam constructively conflicts with the initial upward-emitting beam (Karabchevsky 2020).

Metamaterials in On-Chip Photonics

Shakoor et al. (2019) pointed out that merging nanophotonic structures monolithically with the photodiodes (PDs) of greater responsivity in the point of greater concern would result in the generation or construction of a mobile nanophotonic detector with a compact readout scheme. Mazzotta et al. (2010des) described the first effort in constructing nanophotonic sensors with a small reading method. The bulk silicon photodiode (PD) was monolithically merged with nanoplasmonics frameworks (gold nanodisc array) in this study, as illustrated in Fig 1. The best responses were achieved when the gold nanodiscs' thickness and diameter were 20 nm and 110 nm, correspondingly. The resonance at 650 nm was determined by constructing the gold nanodisc array on a test silicon nitride-coated glass slide with these parameters. The optical sensitivity response was studied using a gold nanodisc array constructed on a silicon nitride-coated glass slide and varied amounts of glycerol as an analyte.

Figure 1: Showing the detector described by Mazzotta et al. (2010).

Guyot et al. (2011) took a similar method, monolithically integrating nanoplasmonic structures (array of gold nanoholes) with a p-doped silicon substrate that served as a photodetector in a metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) architecture. As shown in Figure 2a, the array of nanoholes worked as an up contact, while aluminum was placed as a base metal contact. The wavelength shift caused by a shift in the refractive index was registered as the intensity gradient observed by the photodetector, as detailed in the above presentations. In this study, it was discovered that asymmetric nanohole arrays with various periods in orthogonal ends outperform symmetric arrays in terms of sensing capability, as illustrated in Figure 2b. However, Eftekhari et al. (2012) argued that by detecting the signal gradient between orthogonal polarizations and using a self-referencing mechanism to remove experimental noise, higher sensing output for the asymmetric nanohole array can be achieved. The system is difficult to set up, which defeats the utility of the portable readout device (Shakoor et al. 2019).

Figure 2: Depiction of Plasmonic nanostructures incorporated with silicon-photodetectors by Guyot et al. (2011) and Eftekhari et al. (2012).

Patskovsky and Meunier, (2013) used angle-sensitive metallic nano gratings in conjunction with a MOS silicon photosensor to angular scanning of incident beams. The results showed that the integrated detector was in a position to differentiate between  and Ar gases, which have a reflective index variation of . A promising technique was applied by Perino et al. (2014) and Turker et al. (2014) which used an angle-sensitive plasmonic nano grating combined with a heavy silico photonic detector. Perino et al. (2014) examined the sensitivity of the bifunctional and unfunctionalized gratings in relation to variation of intensity of transmission of zero-order diffracted ray and recorded it as 2.94/RIU, while the detection limit of the entire detector was recorded as 2.2 104 RIU. To facilitate plasmonic interaction, Turker et al. (2014) placed a thin silver layer on the upper base of polymer gratings constructed on the upper edge of the silicon photodetector. The gratings integrated silicon photodetector sensor disclosed by Turker et al. (2014) had an electrical sensitivity of 0.6 mA/RIU.

Conclusion

Augel et al. (2018) created plasmonic nanohole arrays by carving nanoholes directly in the topmost Al metal interface of the vertical germanium pin photodiode to build a nanophotonic detector with a compact readout system (PD). Over silicon PDs, Ge was preferred since it has a higher absorption coefficient and a greater value of the generated photocurrent.

Bioengineering-based cancer treatments that may enhance the activity of anti-cancer in tumor cells and especially target resistance mechanisms are the last frontier in the research for feasible and longtime medicinal responses. Nanophotonics are also linked to the controlled and on-demand release of anti-cancer therapeutics such as adriamycin isolated from nanoporous optical antennas to target triple-negative breast tumors, as well as mechanisms for mitigating exocytosis anti-cancer drug resistance, thereby curbing toxicity to normal body tissues and cells. In a recent study, Saha et al. (2021) used discoveries in cancer biology as well anti-cancer treatment to aid construct two different nanotechnology-based therapeutic devices. In this study, they presented a clear description of the exploitation of drug-induced resistance mechanisms through engineered conjugated drugs to distribute cell signaling disruptors that enhance anticancer responses. They also leveraged nanophotonics in controlling the release of payloads and cytotoxic drugs, in a way that bypasses the physical constraints of exocytosis as well as endosomal recycling that invade engineered nanomedicines. From the study findings, it was found that Both cases underscore the necessity of new translational methods that target resistance in order to improve the efficacy of cancer therapies.

Nanomaterials have considerably improved photothermal, photochemical, and photoimmunological interactions for cancer diagnosis and therapy when coupled with photonics. Because of their unique optical features, photoresponsive nanomaterials, for example, have shown promise in cancer theranostics (Zhou et al., 2021). Jain et al. (2021) highlighted the uses of diverse light-activated nanohybrid agents for multimodal imaging and synergistic phototherapy, as well as the current advancements of photo-activated nanomaterials as cancer theranostics agents. Persistent luminescence tools generate light even after excitation has stopped, and they could be utilized to circumvent the constraints of photodynamic treatment (PDT) for deep-seated targets. Bessière, Durand and Noûs, (2021) provided a comprehensive review on the uses of persistent luminescence (PerL) materials in multimodal imaging and therapy. The study findings indicated that PerL-materials are good tools for doing away with tumor cells with the spatio-temporal control that can be provided by light irradiation.

More nanophotonics-related studies have been conducted in relation to cancer therapy. For accurate detection of drug resistance of tumor cells, precise identification of ATP-binding drug transporter ABCB1 expression is crucial. Failure of previously designed procedures to offer the required molecular information concerning the functional state of the starter called for competent research design. To target active human ABCB1, which overexpressed on triple-negative breast cancer cells, Liang et al. (2021) coupled a benzoporphyrin derivative with the conformational-sensitive UIC2 monoclonal antibody. The findings shed light on how hydrophobic photosensitizers are conjugated to conformation-sensitive antibodies that target proteins expressed on cancer cell surfaces.

Surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy are the most common treatments for cancer, with the therapeutic procedure varying depending on the type as well as the location of the disease (Bellavance, Blanchette and Fortin, 2012). Chemoradiotherapy, which blends radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has a negative impact on the normal cells that surround malignancies. Anticancer medications are also known to cause the emergence of cell resistance mechanisms, resulting in the growth of tumors and the ineffectiveness of therapeutic treatment (Rajagopalan et al. 2013). These called for development of alternative therapeutic procedures. Dhaini et al. (2021) provided a review on peptide-conjugated nanoparticles and linked them with photosensitizers for aimed photodynamic therapy procedures. The findings of the studies were quite positive. These Nanoparticles' phototoxicity experiments validated their effectiveness. Furthermore, the in vivo findings revealed impressive tumor regression and growth suppression.

Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) is a novel treatment for cancer that combines a monoclonal antibody with a photoactivatable phthalocyanine-derivative dye, IRDye700DX, to form an antibody-photo-absorber conjugate (APC) (IR700). Wakiyama et al. (2021) investigated medicinal relevancies of near-infrared photoimmunotherapy integrated with monoclonal antibodies and photoactivatable phthalocyanine-derivative dye and found out that NIR-PIT has a rapid effect on the tumor neovasculature, resulting in the SUPR effect, which allows nanodrugs to reach significantly higher concentrations in the treated tumor than would otherwise be possible. It was also found that NIR-PIT activates the immune system in a big way, both locally and systemically in some situations. NIR-PIT destroys cancer cells in a highly precise manner; therefore, it could be utilized to treat a wide range of tumors according to Mitsunaga et al. (2011) studies.

Zhou et al. (2021) presented a comprehensive review of therapies that utilizes an integration of nano-based phototherapy with other approaches.  Immunotherapy has opened up a new treatment option for metastatic malignancies, which account for 90% of cancer-related deaths. Current immunotherapies, like immunological checkpoint treatment (ICT), have had mixed results, owing to tumor intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms that suppress anticancer immune responses. Hoover et al. (2021) discussed the benefits and drawbacks of nano-ablative immunotherapy, particularly when combined with immune checkpoint therapy; they further presented nano-photo-immuno methods to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME).

The combination of photochemotherapy and chemotherapy has a good prospect for creating new immunotherapies for individuals with immunosuppressive malignancies like colon cancer (Galluzzi et al. 2020). Liu et al. (2021) designed a core-structured polydopamine (PDA)-based nanoplatform to insert two FDA-approved cytotoxic drugs, immunostimulatory doxorubicin (Dox) and immunomodulatory curcumin (Cur), so as to realize immunostimulatory photochemotherapy of principal colon tumors using 808 nm near-infrared (NIR) irradiation (1 W/cm2 for 5 min) and successive containment. The study established that at relatively low dosages of treatments (0.25, 5, and 30 mg/kg of Dox, Cur, and PDA, correspondingly), PDA-mediated photothermal therapy (PTT) synergized two therapeutic medicines in triggering colon apoptosis and very successfully reduced principal tumor development (by 92 %). In the context of a tumor rechallenge model, it was found that the combination photochemotherapy induced high adaptive anticancer immune responses and effectively curbed carcinogenesis.

Besides, nanophotonics can be used to design compatible and very efficient drug delivery systems. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have completely revolutionized the paradigm of targeted medication delivery. Their advantages include well-ordered interior mesopores (usually 2–6 nm) with significant pore volume (0.6–1 cm3/g) and surface area (700–1000 m2/g), variable size (50–200 nm) and shape, robustness, and ease of surface modification, and thus making them the most ideal paradigm to develop multifunctional nanosystems (Fernandez-Fernandez, Manchanda and McGoron 2011: Baeza, Colilla and Vallet-Regí 2014: Vallet-Regí, Balas and Arcos 2014). They are promising alternatives for developing enhanced nanotherapeutics because of their drug encapsulation capability and the ability to achieve localized and perhaps even combination therapy (Tang, Li and Chen 2012: Martínez-Carmona, Colilla, and Vallet-Regí 2015). Furthermore, the textural features of MSNs play a significant role in their effectiveness as drug delivery systems (Vallet-Regí, Colilla, and González 2011). As a result, pore diameter acts as a size selection for physiologically active molecules loading into mesoporous cavities. Additionally, this characteristic controls the pace of release, acting as a limiting factor in the diffusion of molecules into the physiological milieu (Tao et al. 2015).

Furthermore, targeted ligands having an affinity for the blood arteries that irrigate the solid tumor can be added to MSNs, disrupting the solid tumor's nutrition and oxygen supply, resulting in tumor death. These two procedures are referred to as active targeting, resulting in a significant increase in particle absorption by tumor cells or tumor blood arteries (Ruoslahti, Bhatia, and Sailor, 2013). On contrary, two targeting agents (dual targeting) can be grafted onto the same nanocarrier to improve selectivity much more (Li et al. 2012: Pan et al., 2013). As a result, targeting molecules that identify distinct cell organelles can be used to modulate nanocarrier trafficking inside the cell (Vallet-Regí et al., 2017).

One of the most rapid transformations in information technology (IT) is the massive reorganization of network infrastructure. The exponential increase in shared and stored data, as well as a rising desire to efficiently understand the enormous amounts of information being generated, are driving the urge to re-architect the data center (Kachris and Tomkos 2012). The infrastructure enabling the Internet of Everything (IoE) will emphasize instantaneous response across people and/or objects, in conjunction with the massive increase in the data flow. The ability to enable cloud computing, cognitive computing, and ubiquitous data processing, as well as the requisite rate and ability to offer a fast response, will be required in the next wave of data processing and data traffic control (Biberman and Bergman 2012).

As light can convey far more information content (bits) at greater rates, optics has often been used to transport data over vast distances. When the transmission length and bandwidth are increased, optical transmission becomes more energy-intensive than electronic equivalents. With the demand for faster data transfer speeds at higher baud rates and lesser power ratings grows, optics are moving closer to the device. To enable switching, transceiver, signal conditioning, and multiplexer/demultiplexer (Mux/Demux) applications, optoelectronic interconnect is now being engineered to interface natively to the processor, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or field-programmable gate array (FPGA) (Christoforos Kachris, Bergman and Ioannis Tomkos 2013).

Figure 3: Representing significant growth rates being experienced in data center traffic and bit rates (Tsuda, 2020).

The goal is to bring the conversion of optoelectronic near the chip and microelectronic packaging base as possible since optics can convey more data at a reduced power than electronic transmission. Until the data enters the package and interfaces with the silicon photonics die, it still assumes an optical form, taking advantage of greater densities of optical. The data is then translated from photonic to electronic format and processed by standard logic ICs for computation, storage, redirection, and other functions. The ultimate goal is to run electrical and optical routes side by side on a micrometer scale (Vlasov and McNab, 2012).

Pre-packaged transceivers as well as other optical modules in today's data centers encompass discrete, conspicuous-pitch substituents. Conventional "gold boxes" and off-the-shelf modules are prohibitively expensive for downstream data center expansion; although, silicon photonics implementation has the potential to fulfill stringent target prices. Silicon photonics as well as its encapsulation will need to use the expertise, best technical standards, and massive scalability produced by high-volume CMOS fabrication and microelectronic assembly, according to Lei, Kumar, and Yalamanchili, (2012) and Jalali and Fathpour (2014). This will lower costs sufficiently to support greater-volume assembly, which will help to lower costs in conjunction with conventional semiconductor development and cost trends (Gunn, 2014).

Processors, ASICs, FPGAs, memory, passive components, and other components, as well as the PIC, can be found in optoelectronic multi-chip modules (MCMs). Some operations will be incorporated in-package (MCM/SiP), while others may be integrated on the photonic chip (Heck et al. 2015). Transmitters, receivers, multiplexers/demultiplexers, modulators, splitters, photodetectors, resonators, optical isolators, and polarization controllers are examples of logic and optical operations. The module may additionally contain nonoptical CMOS amplifiers, drivers, or serializer/deserializer (SerDes) functionalities (Gringeri et al. 2015).

Integrated photonics provides appealing possibilities for harnessing light to perform computing works on a chip, and phase-change semiconductors are gaining popularity as nanomaterials for photonic platforms. Nonvolatile memories on-chip that can be recorded, erased, and read optically are quickly closing the gap toward all-photonic chip-scale data processing (Ríos et al. 2015). Breaking the processor-memory barrier, on the other hand, would drastically alter the computer environment by enabling processing to take place directly on memory elements—a process known as in-memory computing. Electronic versions of such systems are increasingly appearing, capable of performing sophisticated operations like scalar multiplication, bulk-bitwise operations, correlation detection, and compressed sensing recuperation (Bergman, Shalf and Hausken, 2016). Using both inherent wavelengths division multiplexing functionalities and the technological breakthroughs of the Si photonics "revolution," photonic implementations of in-memory computing on an integrated photonic chip have the potential to further transform the computing environment by offering, eventually, enhanced speeds and bandwidths that can come from directly operating in the optical domain (Ríos et al. 2019).

The hardware of silicon microelectronics has overtaken modern computing in the same way that the von Neumann architecture has. It's possible that the optimum hardware platform for the next generation of computer systems will be somewhat different as well (Shainline et al. 2017). The direct integration of optical communication circuits into high-performance microprocessor chips allows for tremendously powerful computer systems (Chen et al. 2015). A monolithically integrated germanium photodetector with silicon transistor technology (Vivien et al. 2012) is seen as a critical component in connecting chip components with infrared optical data. A device like this should be able to detect very minimal-power optical signals at a rapid rate. Despite the fact that Ge-avalanche photodetectors (Assefa et al. 2010) (APD) with charge amplification near avalanche breakdown can reach high gain and so detect low-power photons, they are commonly regarded as having an unbearably high amplification noise typical of germanium (Tsybeskov and Lockwood 2013). By using a Ge layer just for optical signal detection and amplification in a distinct silicon layer, high gain with low excess noise has been investigated (Grote et al. 2016). However, due to the relatively thick semiconductor layers necessary in such devices, APD speeds are limited to roughly 10 GHz and bias voltages of approximately 25 V are required (Wilson et al. 2019). 

Conclusion:

From the above-mentioned literature works, it is clear that on-chip nanophotonics has enormous industrial applications, and with their integration and implementation in different aspects, more promising and impressive results are obtained. Their implementation is associated with fewer negative impacts as compared with other conventional metamaterials.

Reference list

Assefa, S., Xia, F., Bedell, S.W., Zhang, Y., Topuria, T., Rice, P.M. and Vlasov, Y.A. (2010). CMOS-integrated high-speed MSM germanium waveguide photodetector. Optics Express, 18(5), p.4986.

Baeza, A., Colilla, M. and Vallet-Regí, M. (2014). Advances in mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted stimuli-responsive drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 12(2), pp.319–337.

Bellavance, M.-A., Blanchette, M. and Fortin, D. (2012). Recent Advances in Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption as a CNS Delivery Strategy. The AAPS Journal, 10(1), pp.166–177.

Bergman, K., Shalf, J. and Hausken, T. (2016). Optical Interconnects and Extreme Computing. Optics and Photonics News, 27(4), p.32.

Bessière, A., Durand, J.-O. and Noûs, C. (2021). Persistent luminescence materials for deep photodynamic therapy. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.2999–3029.

Biberman, A. and Bergman, K. (2012). Optical interconnection networks for high-performance computing systems. Reports on Progress in Physics, 75(4), p.046402.

Chen, H.T., Verbist, J., Verheyen, P., De Heyn, P., Lepage, G., De Coster, J., Absil, P., Yin, X., Bauwelinck, J., Van Campenhout, J. and Roelkens, G. (2015). High sensitivity 10Gb/s Si photonic receiver based on a low-voltage waveguide-coupled Ge avalanche photodetector. Optics Express, 23(2), p.815.

Christoforos Kachris, Bergman, K. and Ioannis Tomkos (2013). Optical Interconnects for Future Data Center Networks. New York, Ny Springer New York.

Dhaini, B., Kenzhebayeva, B., Ben-Mihoub, A., Gries, M., Acherar, S., Baros, F., Thomas, N., Daouk, J., Schohn, H., Hamieh, T. and Frochot, C. (2021). Peptide-conjugated nanoparticles for targeted photodynamic therapy. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.3089–3134.

Fernandez-Fernandez, A., Manchanda, R. and McGoron, A.J. (2011). Theranostic Applications of Nanomaterials in Cancer: Drug Delivery, Image-Guided Therapy, and Multifunctional Platforms. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 165(7-8), pp.1628–1651.

Galluzzi, L., Humeau, J., Buqué, A., Zitvogel, L. and Kroemer, G. (2020). Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, [online] 17(12), pp.725–741. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-020-0413-z [Accessed 3 Mar. 2021].

Gringeri, S., Basch, B., Shukla, V., Egorov, R. and Xia, T.J. (2015). Flexible architectures for optical transport nodes and networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, [online] 48(7), pp.40–50. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1840464 [Accessed 28 Mar. 2022].

Grote, R.R., Padmaraju, K., Souhan, B., Driscoll, J.B., Bergman, K. and Osgood, R.M. (2016). 10 Gb/s Error-Free Operation of All-Silicon Ion-Implanted-Waveguide Photodiodes. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 25(1), pp.67–70.

Gunn, C. (2014). CMOS Photonics for High-Speed Interconnects. IEEE Micro, 26(2), pp.58–66.

Heck, M.J.R., Bauters, J.F., Davenport, M.L., Doylend, J.K., Jain, S., Kurczveil, G., Srinivasan, S., Tang, Y. and Bowers, J.E. (2015). Hybrid Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuit Technology. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 19(4), pp.6100117–6100117.

Hoover, A.R., Liu, K., Valerio, T.I., Li, M., Mukherjee, P. and Chen, W.R. (2021). Nano-ablative immunotherapy for cancer treatment. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.3247–3266.

Jain, N.K., Chathoth, B.M., Bhaskar, V.S., Meena, H., Prasad, R. and Srivastava, R. (2021). Nanoengineered photoactive theranostic agents for cancer. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.2973–2997.

Jalali, B. and Fathpour, S. (2014). Silicon Photonics. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 24(12), pp.4600–4615.

Kachris, C. and Tomkos, I. (2012). A Survey on Optical Interconnects for Data Centers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, [online] 14(4), pp.1021–1036. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6129370 [Accessed 8 Dec. 2019].

Lei, W.-S., Kumar, A. and Yalamanchili, R. (2012). Die singulation technologies for advanced packaging: A critical review. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena, 30(4), p.040801.

Li, Y., He, H., Jia, X., Lu, W.-L., Lou, J. and Wei, Y. (2012). A dual-targeting nanocarrier based on poly(amidoamine) dendrimers conjugated with transferrin and tamoxifen for treating brain gliomas. Biomaterials, 33(15), pp.3899–3908.

Liang, B.J., Lusvarghi, S., Ambudkar, S.V. and Huang, H.-C. (2021). Use of photoimmunoconjugates to characterize ABCB1 in cancer cells. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.3049–3061.

Liu, J., Movahedi, F., Sun, B., Sun, L., Zhang, B., Wang, J., Li, L. and Xu, Z.P. (2021). Immunostimulatory photochemotherapeutic nanocapsule for enhanced colon cancer treatment. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.3321–3337.

Martínez-Carmona, M., Colilla, M. and Vallet-Regí, M. (2015). Smart Mesoporous Nanomaterials for Antitumor Therapy. Nanomaterials, 5(4), pp.1906–1937.

Mitsunaga, M., Ogawa, M., Kosaka, N., Rosenblum, L.T., Choyke, P.L. and Kobayashi, H. (2011). Cancer cell–selective in vivo near infrared photoimmunotherapy targeting specific membrane molecules. Nature Medicine, [online] 17(12), pp.1685–1691. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3233641/ [Accessed 21 Nov. 2019].

Pan, W., Yang, H., Zhang, T., Li, Y., Li, N. and Tang, B. (2013). Dual-Targeted Nanocarrier Based on Cell Surface Receptor and Intracellular mRNA: An Effective Strategy for Cancer Cell Imaging and Therapy. Analytical Chemistry, 85(14), pp.6930–6935.

Rajagopalan, M.S., Heron, D.E., Wegner, R.E., Zeh, H.J., Bahary, N., Krasinskas, A.M., Lembersky, B., Brand, R., Moser, A., Quinn, A.E. and Burton, S.A. (2013). Pathologic response with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for borderline resectable and locally-advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiation Oncology, 8(1), p.254.

Ríos, C., Stegmaier, M., Hosseini, P., Wang, D., Scherer, T., Wright, C.D., Bhaskaran, H. and Pernice, W.H.P. (2015). Integrated all-photonic non-volatile multi-level memory. Nature Photonics, 9(11), pp.725–732.

Ríos, C., Youngblood, N., Cheng, Z., Le Gallo, M., Pernice, W.H.P., Wright, C.D., Sebastian, A. and Bhaskaran, H. (2019). In-memory computing on a photonic platform. Science Advances, 5(2), p.eaau5759.

Ruoslahti, E., Bhatia, S.N. and Sailor, M.J. (2013). Targeting of drugs and nanoparticles to tumors. Journal of Cell Biology, 188(6), pp.759–768.

Saha, T., Mondal, J., Khiste, S., Lusic, H., Hu, Z.-W., Jayabalan, R., Hodgetts, K.J., Jang, H., Sengupta, S., Lee, S.E., Park, Y., Lee, L.P. and Goldman, A. (2021). Nanotherapeutic approaches to overcome distinct drug resistance barriers in models of breast cancer. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.3063–3073.

Shainline, J.M., Buckley, S.M., Mirin, R.P. and Nam, S.W. (2017). Superconducting Optoelectronic Circuits for Neuromorphic Computing. Physical Review Applied, 7(3).

Tang, F., Li, L. and Chen, D. (2012). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Biocompatibility and Drug Delivery. Advanced Materials, 24(12), pp.1504–1534.

Tao, Z., Morrow, M.P., Asefa, T., Sharma, K.K., Duncan, C., Anan, A., Penefsky, H.S., Goodisman, J. and Souid, A.-K. (2015). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles inhibit cellular respiration. Nano Letters, [online] 8(5), pp.1517–1526. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18376867/ [Accessed 28 Dec. 2021].

Tsuda, H. (2020). Silicon photonics platforms for optical communication systems, outlook on future developments. IEICE Electronics Express, 17(22), pp.20202002–20202002.

Tsybeskov, L. and Lockwood, D.J. (2013). Silicon-Germanium Nanostructures for Light Emitters and On-Chip Optical Interconnects. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(7), pp.1284–1303.

Vallet-Regí, M., Balas, F. and Arcos, D. (2014). Mesoporous Materials for Drug Delivery. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 46(40), pp.7548–7558.

Vallet-Regí, M., Colilla, M. and González, B. (2011). Medical applications of organic–inorganic hybrid materials within the field of silica-based bioceramics. Chem. Soc. Rev., [online] 40(2), pp.596–607. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21049136/ [Accessed 28 Dec. 2021].

Vallet-Regí, M., Colilla, M., Izquierdo-Barba, I. and Manzano, M. (2017). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery: Current Insights. Molecules, 23(1), p.47.

Vivien, L., Osmond, J., Fédéli, J.-M., Marris-Morini, D., Crozat, P., Damlencourt, J.-F., Cassan, E., Lecunff, Y. and Laval, S. (2012). 42 GHz pin Germanium photodetector integrated in a silicon-on-insulator waveguide. Optics Express, 17(8), p.6252.

Vlasov, Y.A. and McNab, S.J. (2012). Losses in single-mode silicon-on-insulator strip waveguides and bends. Optics Express, 12(8), p.1622.

Wakiyama, H., Kato, T., Furusawa, A., Choyke, P.L. and Kobayashi, H. (2021). Near infrared photoimmunotherapy of cancer; possible clinical applications. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.3135–3151.

Wilson, D.J., Schneider, K., Hönl, S., Anderson, M., Baumgartner, Y., Czornomaz, L., Kippenberg, T.J. and Seidler, P. (2019). Integrated gallium phosphide nonlinear photonics. Nature Photonics, 14(1), pp.57–62.

Zhou, F., Hasan, T., Frochot, C. and Chen, W.R. (2021). Nanotechnology, photonics, and immunotherapy for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Nanophotonics, 10(12), pp.2969–2971.