Brexit: A Critical Analysis Of The UK’s Essay On EU Exit (70 Characters)

1) Show evidence of core components of academic/ literacy skills.
2) Apply critical thought to a range of tasks and do so with minimal external guidance in particular situations. 
3) To reflect, analyse and discuss strengths, weaknesses and opportunities personally and academically. 
4) Use appropriate technologies to facilitate the completion of self-analysis/reflection.

Historical Backdrop

In the assignment, the subject related topic ‘UK's exit from Europe' is taken into account for academic writing. The topic, ‘UK's exit from Europe' is significant, as far as political, social and economic factors are concerned. According to Alex and Brian (2016), the term ‘Brexit' is popularly used to denote the schism between England and the European Union. It is noted that England is ostensibly isolated from the mainland Europe by the English Channel. Strategically, England is separated from the European Union. Brexit gives an impetus to the radicalized move. Politically, Brexit gains a new dimension and entails the seeds of political dissent. However, the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union is not an over-night phenomenon. It is occasioned by a concatenation of circumstances.

In the ensuing paragraphs, the assignment describes the key term ‘Brexit', as it signifies the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union. The subject-specific topic should be written in a report format. At the same time, clear paragraphs should be maintained that describe the process of separating England from the European Union. The assignment is a part of academic writing. Therefore, the paragraphs should be written in a lucid and academically sound language with a consistent flow.

The term ‘Brexit’ gains a political connotation in the existing epoch. The veritable question is how did the policy of ‘Brexit' receive a firm mould? The general populace of Britain voted for their nation's exit from the European Union in a referendum of historical eminence on June 23^rd in 2015 (Adler 2016). Therefore, ‘Brexit’ has achieved a wider currency in the recent time. In the aftermath, the British pound began to depreciate at a rapid pace and David Cameron resigned from the post of Prime Minister. Theresa May assumed the role of prime minister of Britain after David Cameron (Adler 2016). Subsequently, the situation became stable in England in all domains. The ‘Brexit' is the watershed in the history of Britain and it is greatly dramatic in disposition. The process of the exit of Britain from the United Kingdom is gradual, as it began to leave the single market of European Union (Busch and Matthes 2016).  It aims to monopolize the rules of immigration, which culminates in the end of the supremacy of European Union laws. The new prime minister of the United Kingdom, Theresa May advocates the ‘split of England’ from the United Kingdom. At the same time, she does not endorse the ramification of EU laws that is detrimental to the United Kingdom (Irwin 2015). The new prime minister does not subscribe to the notion of partial break of England from the United Kingdom.

Economic concerns

The triumph of Brexit began to jeopardize the economic domain of England. As a matter of fact, Britain countenances difficulties in the global economic sphere. The moot point is what would be the fate of Britain after she leaves the Union. It is indispensable for England to outline and compose new trade and business agreements with the rest of the world (Counsel 2015.). At another spectrum, the Bank of England lessened the interest rates and adopted other economic measures supporting the prevalent situation of the nation. The recovery of the English economy is a concerning factor in this regard. The vote of Brexit culminated in the accentuation of import costs over export (Dhingra et al. 2016). On the other hand, the exporters do not have to face tough phase for the time being. The significant thing is, England witnessed a break from the European Union. Therefore, England stopped contributing billions and trillions of funds to reinforce the budget of European Union (Dhingra et al. 2016). On the other hand, the anti-EU campaigners advocated certain policies. They maintained that the exit of England from the European Union should accelerate the shop and travel costs abroad (Correia Fernandes 2016). Therefore, the exit of England from the European Union or ‘Brexit’ witnesses a melange of both positive and adverse factors. It gravely affected the political relations of Europe.

Politically speaking, England is free to determine the geographic boundaries that have a political implication. It has the freedom to control the immigration policies and maintain security across the borders (Wadsworth et al. 2016). At the same time, United Kingdom does not have to see the free movement of people, inasmuch as the nation plans to leave the single market of European Union. The nation witnessed many dissident elements like anti-EU campaigners and pro-EU parties. The Pro-EU campaigners opined that the ‘Brexit’ will deal heavy blows to the economy of the nation (Pisani-Ferry et al. 2016). The Pro-EU campaigners depend on the efficient movement of EU migrant staffs like the medical professionals and IT employees. At the same time, many Pro-EU campaigners believe that should there be any terror problems; the European Union will resolve it with ease.  On the other hand, the anti-EU campaigners believe that the institutions of European Union are intrinsically flawed and not democratic (Pisani-Ferry et al. 2016). The undemocratic laws might adversely affect the fabric of British administration. At the same time, the principal advocator of Brexit, Boris Johnson claims that the European Union has debilitated the economic and political structure of England. To his opinion, ‘Brexit’ is a good decision for England (Gimson 2012). Due to this reason, the EU has gravely debased the ability of the general public to nominate political pioneers and adumbrate legal policies.

Political Concerns

Conclusion

Summing up, ‘Brexit’ is a crucial phenomenon that determines the current political trajectory of the nation. In other words, ‘Brexit’ policies pervade the political and economic landscape of England. The eminent politicians of England opine that ‘Brexit’ will help England to establish their own fate outside the jurisdiction of European Union and within its territory.

In the assignment, I intend to reflect on the strength and weaknesses of opportunities academically and personally. In the segment, I have worked on the subject that related to the UK’s exit from the European Union or ‘Brexit’. The assignment is a part of academic writing. I have written the assignment in a report format that includes title, introduction, body and conclusion. It is noted, the report is a part of academic writing and it furnishes important information through systematic break-down of paragraphs. In the assignment, I have gleaned significant facts and information about the degree-specific academic topic: UK’s exit from the European Union or ‘Brexit’. I have conducted a comprehensive research on the topic by browsing through online journals texts and books. At the same time, I have maintained the perspective of research scholars and political practitioners on the topic. In the assignment, I have used analytical research tool. Based on this tool, I can comprehend the profundity of the subject and analyse it with an academic discernment.

The assignment delves deep into the historical and general significance of the topic ‘Brexit’. I have composed the assignment by maintaining varied sections like the historical background, economic aspect, political factor and summary of findings. These sections are inextricably intertwined and reflect on the episode of ‘Brexit’. As I have mentioned earlier, ‘Brexit’ is a path-breaking political event that leaves an indelible mark in the history of England. Like ‘Grexit’, it also signifies the break of England from the European Union. It is a spectacular political event. However, it incessantly influences the economic, social and cultural aspects of England. In the above report, I have explained all the aspects (particularly political and economic) in an elaborate manner. At the same time, I have assembled the opinions of scholars on this topic. The assignment explores the integration of factual theories and analytical perspective in a prosaic way.

References

Adler, K., 2016. EU Brexit referendum: Preparations for UK “divorce” to begin. BBC News, 25.

Busch, B. and Matthes, J., 2016. Brexit–the economic impact. A Meta-Analysis, IW-Report, (10).

Correia Fernandes, M., 2016. How will Brexit impact deposit balances in the UK. A forecast of sight deposits on UK monetary financial institutions’ using Structural Break in the Holt Method, ISCTE–University Institute of Lisbon, Observatório Lusófono de Actividades Económicas.

Counsel, G., 2015. BREXIT: the impact on the UK and the EU.  https://www. global-counsel. co. uk/system/files/publications/Global_Counsel_ Impact_of_Brexit_June_2015. pdf [2016-3-8].

Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T. and Van Reenen, J., 2016. The impact of Brexit on foreign investment in the UK. BREXIT 2016, p.24.

Gimson, A., 2012. Boris: The Adventures of Boris Johnson. Simon and Schuster.

Hunt, A. and Wheeler, B., 2016. Brexit: All you need to know about the UK leaving the EU. BBC News.

Irwin, G., 2015. BREXIT: the impact on the UK and the EU. Global Counsel. Dostupno na: https://www. global-counsel. co. uk/analysis/special-report/brexit-impact-uk-and-eu (29.09. 2016).

Pisani-Ferry, J., Röttgen, N., Sapir, A., Tucker, P. and Wolff, G.B., 2016. Europe after Brexit: A proposal for a continental partnership. Bruegel External Publication, Brussels.

Wadsworth, J., Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G. and Reenen, J.V., 2016. Brexit and the Impact of Immigration on the UK. Centre for Economic Performance. LSE, pp.34-53.