Evaluation Of Digital Archive Databases: Scope And Limitations (Essay).

Evaluation of the scope of archive operations to preserve as well as deliver both current and historical literature

•Evaluate the scope of archive operations to preserve and deliver current and historical literature.

•Share how digital archive databases might pose limits on end-users (e.g., type and quality of literature, skills and knowledge level of end-users, associated costs, and security issues).

In the context of archival sense, Bingham, (2013) commented that appraisal is the techniques that is mainly conducted with the help professional archivist in which all the records are examined to do the determination of the values. Moreover, different considerations at the time of conducting the appraisal discuss about the process to meet the record-granting organizational needs, process to sustain the requirements of the organizational accountabilities and the process to meet the expectations of different record-using communities (De Virgilio, Maccioni & Torlone, 2014).

In this report, the analyst did evaluation of the scope of different archive operations in terms of preserving as well as delivering both the current and historical literatures (Chauhan, 2014). Moreover, it also discusses about the techniques of digital archive databases to pose limits on different end-users.

In article 1, Cormode & Firmani, (2013) commented that archive operations mainly helps to take different preventive measures that mainly used to detect different criteria of malicious attacks. Moreover, all these attacks depending on data-intensive applications become serious types of threats. In order to discuss about the scope of different archive operations it expands the cyber attacks pressure database management to prevent not only the unauthorized accesses and also different tolerate types of  intrusions (De Bruyne & Fischhendler, 2013). Apart from this, this paper mainly focuses on different critical aspects of intrusion database systems that include both damage assessment as well as repairing techniques.

In the context of article 2, analyst discussed about different criteria of heterogeneous as well as homogenous infrastructures, huge type of datasets, and parallel type of algorithms (Cormode & Firmani, 2013). Moreover, two types of concerns of this research paper address both the query execution planning as well as data access & integration type. Apart from this, this article also helps in order to do the evaluation of archive operations scope that mainly helps to preserve and to deliver both historical as well as current literature.

In article 3, it mainly discusses about different management issues that are mainly related with the database quality. However, analyst also discusses about different discovery tools that are mainly used in decision-making process and the impacts of database quality decisions on users (De Bruyne & Fischhendler, 2013). Moreover, this also discusses about different issues, decision, philosophies that remain unaltered

Sharing of the techniques of digital archive databases might poses limits of end-users

In article 4, analyst discusses that depending on the initiation of distributed computing, querying of huge datasets used in data repositories depending on the global platform becomes the challenging question of this particular research paper (De Virgilio, Maccioni & Torlone, 2014). Apart from this, in this paper we expand the blackboard method with the help of multi-stage and hierarchical approaches.

In article 5, Kafalı, Günay & Yolum, (2013) describes about synchronous check pointing mechanism with the help of which it degrades the performance for check pointing operations to get complete. Moreover, in this article it also discussed about different techniques that helps to prevent contention for the criteria of stable storage. Moreover, in this report, it uses the quasi-synchronous check pointing mechanisms to mitigate various problems regarding synchronous as well asynchronous algorithms (De Virgilio, Maccioni & Torlone, 2014).  

In article 1, Kafalı, Günay & Yolum, (2013) discussed that both check pointing as well as roll back recoveries are the two techniques that are mainly used for handling the failures according to the distributed system. Moreover, in this article it also discussed about both necessary as well as sufficient conditions that are mainly used for transaction-consistent global checkpoints in the distributed database system. Apart from this, De Virgilio, Maccioni & Torlone, (2014) discussed about different issues that are mainly related with the designing procedures and the implementation techniques of recovery techniques as well as efficient characteristics of check pointing required for different distributed systems that are mainly understood. However, in this paper, Moore & Evans, (2013) also cited that different analogous questions that are mainly required for distributed database system. Apart from his, it is also used for different audit purposes. Moreover, in this paper, De Bruyne & Fischhendler, (2013) also elaborated the establishment of both necessary as well as sufficient conditions for the check points of different data items become the part of transaction-consistent global check points used for distributed databases. Furthermore, these types of conditions mainly help in order to do designing and the implementation of non-intrusive Check pointing algorithms for the distributed database systems (Lawrence, 2013).

In article 2, Moore & Evans, (2013) discussed that depending on synchronous check pointing, all processes are mainly involved in the process of distributed computation techniques in the simultaneous manner. In the context of distributed computing system, all existing check-pointing algorithms are mainly classified into three algorithms that include asynchronous, synchronous as well as quasi-synchronous. In this particular paper, we proposed staggered quasi-synchronous which mainly used to reduce the conflict of network stable storage (Qin & Rusu, 2013). The objective of this particular paper is the use of staggered quasi-synchronous check pointing algorithm that mainly allows doing the reduction of contention of stable storage. It also evaluated the performance of this algorithm with the help of simulation techniques (De Bruyne & Fischhendler, 2013).

Conclusion

In article 3, Roberts, (2013) focused on efficient criteria of damage assessment as well as repairing of distributed database system. However, this type of complexity is mainly caused with the help of distributed transaction processing, data partition as well as failures that makes intrusion recovery more challenging than centralized database system (Qin & Rusu, 2013). Moreover, this paper also did the identification of all key challenges and use efficient algorithm for both repairing and distributed damage assessment.

In article 4, Sasak & Brzuszek, (2010) commented that it is mainly introduces heuristic framework for doing the optimization techniques of Query Execution Plan (QEP) on the worldwide platform. However, in this research paper, it mainly discusses about multi-staged blackboard mechanism to do the determination of available data, operations and resources to perform the queries in optimal manner (Roberts, 2013). Apart from this, the evaluation scenario discussed about different findings dependent on then changes of selections.

In article 5, Sasak & Brzuszek, (2010) cited that all the management issues are mainly related with the quality of the library’s catalog as well as the source databases also reflects the continual criteria of evolution. Moreover, in the article it also discussed about the persistent shortcomings of decision-making process that needed to be addressed all lack age based on users benefits and needs (De Virgilio, Maccioni & Torlone, 2014). Apart from this, it also discussed about all the actual impacts of users for all database quality decisions.

Conclusion

In this particular research paper, it mainly discussed the evaluation of the scope of archive operations mainly used to preserve as well as to deliver both the current and historical literature. Moreover, with the understanding of different archive operations it is mainly needed all the digital archive operations poses limits on end-users depending on different security issues, different kind of associated costs. Apart from this, in this research paper, analyst discusses all type of assessment as well as different repairing techniques that are mainly used for distributed database systems and different management issues related to the databases qualities. Furthermore, the analyst also discusses about the uses of query optimization framework for distributed database resources. Furthermore, analyst also concludes that in this report it also discusses about better understanding of database administration as well as management.

Reference List

Bingham, A. (2013). The Times Digital Archive, 1785-2006 (Gale Cengage). The English Historical Review, 128(533), 1037-1040.  

Chauhan, A. (2014). Two phase algorithm to establish consistent checkpoints for recovery in multi process environment. IOSR Journal Of Engineering, 4(5), 39-42.  

Cormode, G., & Firmani, D. (2013). A unifying framework for â„“ 0-sampling algorithms. Distrib Parallel Databases, 32(3), 315-335.  

De Bruyne, C., & Fischhendler, I. (2013). Negotiating conflict resolution mechanisms for transboundary water treaties: A transaction cost approach. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1841-1851.  

De Virgilio, R., Maccioni, A., & Torlone, R. (2014). Approximate querying of RDF graphs via path alignment. Distrib Parallel Databases.  

Kafalı, Ö., Günay, A., & Yolum, P. (2013). Detecting and predicting privacy violations in online social networks. Distrib Parallel Databases, 32(1), 161-190.  

Lawrence, M. (2013). Cold War International History Project Digital Archive. Journal Of American History, 100(3), 947-948.  

Moore, R., & Evans, T. (2013). Preserving the Grey Literature Explosion: PDF/A and the Digital Archive. ISQ, 25(3), 20.  

Qin, C., & Rusu, F. (2013). PF-OLA: a high-performance framework for parallel online aggregation.Distrib Parallel Databases, 32(3), 337-375.  

Roberts, M. (2013). Essay in Review: Labouring in the Digital Archive. Labour History Review, 78(1), 113-126.  

Sasak, A., & Brzuszek, M. (2010). Speculative execution plan for multiple query execution systems.Annales UMCS, Informatica, 10(2).  

Singh, R., Sharma, S., Singh, S., & Singh, B. (2014). Reducing Run-time Execution in Query Optimization. International Journal Of Computer Applications, 96(6), 1-6. doi:10.5120/16795-6505

Wu, J., Manivannan, D., & Thuraisingham, B. (2009). Necessary and sufficient conditions for transaction-consistent global checkpoints in a distributed database system. Information Sciences,179(20), 3659-3672.