Building And Construction Industry Security Of Payments Act 1999 (as Amended) - An Essay.

How does this act Work

The government of New South Wales has enacted the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 1999 (the ‘Act’). The purpose for the introduction of this act is to tackle the challenges which are faced by contractors, sub-contractors and suppliers regarding receiving the payments for their products or services. This act governs these parties to ensure that they receive their payments within appropriate time. This report will evaluate the purpose for enactment of this act, and it will also analyse how this act works. This report will evaluate how this act affects the operations of regular courts in Australia. This report will also analyse the recent amendments made in the act regarding the rights of sub-contractors.

The government wanted to govern the operations of contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers and other parties operating in the construction industry by enacting this act. It applies to the parties who offer their services in both public and private sector. The provisions of this act issue different time limits which apply on the parties operating in this field. The working of this act starts with providing the authority to the parties for securing their payments. As per this act, the parties can make a claim for their payments to recover it within appropriate time. These claims did not require any external assistance of professionals such as lawyers, or the court (Macindoe, 2015). Through this act, the parties have different methods to receive their payments in construction based contracts. These rights are given to contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers and other parties operating in the industry of construction (Brand and Uher, 2010). The provisions of this act apply to the parties once a claim is made by a party in order to recover the amount due on a contract. This act considers that the parties have a statutory right to receive the payment under a construction based contract.

This right is available for the parties even when the contract did not contain any provision regarding the payments made by the parties. Section 11 provides that the payment of a party becomes due when the notice for recovery of the payment is served by the party (Legislation, 2018). After receiving the payment for the due amount, the party becomes liable to make the payment to the party who sent the notice. While giving the reply to the notice sent by the party, the payment schedule can be given. The provisions regarding payment schedule are given under section 14 of this act. This section imposes a liability on the party to start the process to make the payment to the party as per the payment schedule. This liability comes with a range of penalties which can be imposed on the parties by the court for violation of provisions given under secion14. The liability of a party arises if it failed to give the response to the notice for the payment of the money within ten days.

As per this liability, the party has to ensure that the payment is made within the prescribed time or the time schedule is given to the claimant to avoid legal penalties. In case the provisions given under section 14 are violated, then the penalty is imposed by the court under section 15 of the act (Austlii, 2018). Under this section, the parties receive three options. The first option is that the party can terminate the contract. The second options for the party are to make an appeal to the court for adjudication. The third option is to recover the unpaid amount. Therefore, various penalties are imposed on the party in order to ensure that they are able to receive the payment within appropriate time. The process for adjudication is also defined in this act which provides that the court evaluates rights and liabilities of parties to give them appropriate remedies. Therefore, the act works to protect the right of contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers and other parties by giving them the right to receive their payment within appropriate time.

Why was it introduced

Before the introduction of this act, the parties involved in contraction related contract finds it difficult to receive payments within appropriate time. They were subject to unfair trading practices because developers and contractors did not make their payments within appropriate time. The purpose of the government by introducing this act was to ensure that the rights of contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers and other parties are protected (Brand and Davenport, 2012). Various rules and regulations are given under this act in order to recognise and protect the right of parties involved in construction-related contracts. These regulations are given to them to secure their payment which is raised in these contracts. The parties find it difficult to recover their payment within appropriate time; therefore, this act was introduced. This is a comprehensive act which is focused on providing statutory rights to contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers and other parties involved in construction-related contracts.

These parties can claim for their due payment and receive it within appropriate time without dealing with complex rules or regulations. In NSW, the developers and contractors did not pay on time the money due to contraction contracts in order to get the benefit of free capital in the early 1990s. This this act was introduced in order to recognise the rights of contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers and other parties to receive the payment within time. This act targeted on eliminating unfair trading practices in the state by making parties liable to pay the due amount within appropriate time (Security of Payments Act, 2018). The government wanted to address these issues by implementing the policies in the act which gives the statutory rights to parties so that they can claim for their due amount and held other parties liable. Thus, it is a significant act which focuses on ensuring that parties are able to secure their payment which raised under a construction based contracts.

There are various provisions given in this act regarding the actions of regular courts for cases raised under this act. The courts have to comply with these provisions while evaluating the facts of the case and providing its judgement. The objective of these regulations is to ensure that parties receive timely payments regarding their products or services which arise under construction based contracts. Before the introduction of this act, it was difficult for the parties to recover their due amount under construction based contracts. However, the act provides that statutory right based on which they can claim the due amount from the party. The disputes filed by the parties for collection of their unpaid amount have reduced after introduction of this act (Minter Ellison, 2014). However, this act did not prohibit the right of parties to file a suit for recovery of their debts. The proceedings in the regular court begin when the party prepares the adjudication application. This application is prepared without any assistance from professionals. After the due amount is recognised by the party, the liability of the party arises to make the payment. The adjudicator is responsible for determining the amount which is due under the contract and issues a certificate to the party. This certificate is referred as a judgement debt which is submitted by the party into the court.

Work in relation to the regular court actions

While filing a suit in the regular court for collecting of the due amount, the claimant is required to get an adjudication certificate. This certificate is issued by the adjudicator. The adjudication certificate is submitted to the court along with an affidavit in which the due amount is written. The regular court has given a right to issue a judgement debt to the party without conducting any hearing (Coleman Greig, 2018). The proceeding starts by the court after receiving all the documents by the party. The respondent is not given the right under this act to challenges the pending amount of the party. Section 25 (4) of the act provides that the order for payment of the due amount can be set aside by paying the pending amount as the security money. Moreover, this act determines the authority of regular courts under section 32. Under this section, the authority is given to the regular courts so that they can entertain the cases filed for the disputes raised under construction contracts. Subsection 3 clause (b) of the act provides that the court has the authority to entertain these cases and provide a reasonable judgement as they deemed fit (Legislation, 2018). Thus, this act provides various regulations regarding the working of regular courts in the matters which arise under construction related contracts.

In November 2013, various amendments were introduced in this act in order to recognise the rights of sub-contractors. Firstly, the right of sub-contractors to make a claim for the due payment is recognised under 11 (1B) of the act. In this section, the provisions are introduced to start the progress of payment by the party after the claim for payment is made by the sub-contractor. Thus, this section gives the right to sub-contractors under which they can recover their amount which is not paid under construction related contracts. Section 11 also provides that the progress for making the payment should be started within a period of 30 days after receiving the claim for payment by the sub-contractor (Jade, 2017). While providing this claim, the contractor has to provide a supporting statement for which the claim for payment is made.

In case the contractor failed to comply with these duties, then penalties can be imposed that include three months imprisonment, fine up to $22,000 or both. In case a sub-contractor is not present in a contract, and all the duties are performed by the contractor, then the contractor acquires all the rights of the sub-contractor. Section 12A provides that the party has to set up a trust account in which the money is retained for making the payment to the sub-contractor. The government abolished the provision regarding writing a declaration while claiming for the payment. The parties are no longer required to write “Payment under Building and Constructions Security of Payments Act 1999 (NSW)” when a suit is filed by the sub-contractor for claiming the due amount (Fair Trading, 2018). Thus, various provisions are introduced by the government in order to recognise and protect the right of sub-contractors by making amendments in the act.

Conclusion

From the above observations, it can be concluded that this act is focused on protecting the rights of contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers and other parties to receive the payment for the products and services which they offer in construction contracts. The objective of this act is to recognise their right to claim for the due amount and protect it from violation of parties. The act has made the process of receiving the money easier for these parties. The working of this act is simple as well since parties did not have to get the assistance from professionals while starting proceeding under this act. This act has also introduced various provisions regarding operations which are followed by regular courts when any case related to claim for due payment is made relating to construction contracts. Many amendments are made in this act which recognises and protect the rights of sub-contractors to receive the due payment raised under contraction based contracts.

References

Austlii. (2018) Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 1999. [Online] Available from https://www6.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/bacisopa1999606/ [Accessed 28/09/2018].

Brand, M.C. and Davenport, P. (2012) Adjudication in Australia: An analysis of the amendments introduced by the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Amendment Act 2010 (NSW). International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 4(3), pp.189-202.

Brand, M.C. and Uher, T. (2010) Follow-up empirical study of the performance of the New South Wales construction industry security of payment legislation. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 2(1), pp.7-25.

Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 1999

Coleman Greig. (2018) Plain English Guide to Making a Claim under the Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW). [Online] Available from https://www.colemangreig.com.au/Publication-7-Plain-English-Guide-to-Making-a-Claim-under-the-Building-Construction-Industry-Security-of-Payment-Act-1999-NSW.aspx [Accessed 28/09/2018].

Fair Trading. (2018) Security of Payment. [Online] Available from https://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/trades-and-businesses/construction-and-trade-essentials/security-of-payment [Accessed 28/09/2018].

Jade. (2017) Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW). [Online] Available from https://jade.io/j/?a=outline&id=275093 [Accessed 28/09/2018].

Legislation. (2018) Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 1999 No 46. [Online] Available from https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/act/1999/46/full [Accessed 28/09/2018].

Macindoe, R. (2015) A Seven-Step Guide to using the Security of Payment Act. [Online] Available from https://aca.org.au/article/using-the-security-of-payment-act-a-seven-step-guide [Accessed 28/09/2018].

Minter Ellison. (2014) Security of Payment Legislation New South Wales. [Online] Available from https://www.constructionlawmadeeasy.com/SecurityofPaymentNSW [Accessed 28/09/2018].

Security of Payments Act. (2018) Security of Payments Act NSW. [Online] Available from https://securityofpaymentsact.com.au/security-of-payments-act-new-south-wales/ [Accessed 28/09/2018].