Essay: Maritime Incident Analysis Based On HSSE Management." (60 Characters)

Please read the Case Study of a maritime incident.

Analyse the case study based on HSSE Management and submit an assignment to include the following:
1. Identify and describe various elements of HSSE management of the ships involved in the incident.
2. In your opinion, what policies would have prevented the incident or minimized the chance of happening in this.
3. Provide a brief summary of the analysis.

The Dover Strait is known for the most congested and busiest paths for shipping throughout the world. In acknowledgment of it, the primary globally perceived Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) was constructed in 1967. By far, the Strait has mostly experienced travels in either north-east or south-west direction. In 1972, The Channel Navigation Information Service (CNIS) was established in Dover with the motivation to screen the development of movement inside the Dover Strait TSS, and to broadcast routine traffic data ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003).

The 1009gt engine vessel Ash directed from Odense, Denmark, to the Spanish port with six groups on-board. Established in the Netherlands, 1980 with IMO No. 7922350, this general freight compose vessel had a length of 65.8m, created in unadulterated steel and enlisted in the port of Kingstown (Branch, House and Place 2004). Labrador Shipping is the enrolled owner of the vessel. The vessel holds a service speed of 10knots.Its motor power was Diesel, caterpillar 839Kw. On 9 October 2001, it speeded around 6.25 knots over the ground in the south-west movement path of the Dover Strait TSS toward the south-east of Hastings.

The 4,671gt concoction tanker, Dutch Aquamarine was likewise on entry from Antwerp to Swansea with 12.5 bunches over the ground. Koninklijke Vopak N.V. is the enlisted proprietor of the vessel. Built-in Lemmer, Netherlands, 2000 with IMO No. 9191656, this Chemical tanker compose vessel had a length of 117.6m, created in unadulterated steel and enrolled in the port of Dordrecht ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003).

In spite of the way that the climate was splendid and the vision was great the watchkeeper on Dutch Aquamarine failed to see Ash before the impact until the point that she was close enough and appropriately ahead. At that point, it was late for taking any rapid action towards it.

The Channel Navigation Information Service (CNIS) was set up in 1972 and is situated in Dover. Its motivation is to screen the development of movement inside, the Dover Strait TSS, and to give routine activity data information. In 1973, the framework was expanded and a corresponding administration was set up on the French side at Cap Griz Nez CNIS. Dover is run by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003). The capacity of CNIS to adequately screen activity was enhanced in 1999 with the presentation of a required ship revealing framework (Szlapczynski 2011). The CNIS was outfitted with a complex radar framework which not only empowers the development of activity to be productively observed, in addition, records the data for investigation after a mishap or occurrence. The CNIS radar framework took records of both the tracks of the vessels associated with this crash from the moment of their entry at the zone of radar scope. Every other vessels track having fringe contribution were additionally kept in record.

Elements of HSSE management of the ships involved in the incident

Ash collapsed after the crash and all the important printed materials of the voyage was lost with the vessel. She stayed in the vertical position on the water for a few minutes before vanishing underneath the water surface. Her position was 50° 43.5' N, 000 44.12'E when she was about to sink. On the other hand, Dutch Aquamarine was externally harmed. Dutch Aquamarine was coordinated to continue to stay off the Isle of Wight, where an MCA surveyor boarded her ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003). She was later allowed to proceed with her voyage to Swansea. She had endured just shallow harm in the crash.

Ash was damaged due to the crash; she recorded rapidly to starboard, overturned and drastically sank. The six people on the vessel hopped in the water and five of them were protected by Dutch Aquamarine's quick life-saving craft. The 6th group and the vessel's lord were found skimming face down in the water (Baker and McCafferty 2005). But because of the severe delay by the rescue helicopters to report and take the victims to the healing center nearby, most of them were declared dead.

In November 2001, the MAIB distributed a Safety Bulletin that highlighted the issues related to the collision and accident of ships and vessels travelling from the north of the south-west movement passage ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003). Certain wellbeing proposals were distributed throughout which addresses issues and safety measures for the Maritime and Coastguard Agency.

The safety management system is a composed framework arranged and executed by the delivery organizations to guarantee the security of the ship and marine condition (Azadeh et al. 2008). It is an imperative part of the Health, Safety, Security, and Environment (HSSE) and it focuses interest on all the critical arrangements, practices, and strategies that are to be followed with a specific end goal to guarantee safe working of ships at the ocean (Baker and McCafferty 2005). Every business vessel is required to set up safe ship administration methodology. Each security administration arrangement ought to fulfill a portion of the essential utilitarian necessities to guarantee the wellbeing of each ship.

Policies that could have prevented the incident

Method and rules to act in a crisis circumstance: A crisis circumstance on dispatch must be taken care of with certainty and tranquility. Scramble choices and "making a hasty judgment" can aggravate the issues even more. Proficient handling of crisis circumstances can be accomplished by constant preparation and functioning of drills of the local vessels that are available (Lois et al. 2004). In any case, it has been seen that despite satisfactory precautions, individuals get freeze assaults and in the long run don't do what they ought to in a crisis circumstance.

Security, Natural assurance approach, Procedure, rules for revealing mischance or some other type of non-similarities are the essential components of HSSE administrations incorporated into the occurrence of ship crash that is required to be taken care of. Clear data on the level of specialist and lines of correspondence among transport group individuals is imperative and features the ostensible prerequisites in any sea industry (Wang 2002). In addition, Procedures and rules to guarantee safe operations of boats and security of marine condition inconsistency with worldwide state enactments are among the key idea in the administration of an organization (Miloh and Pachter 1989). Systems for inward reviews, administration audits and vessel points of interest can likewise be noted as the components for an effective voyage administration (Akten 2006).

The principal reason for the collision of the ships was negligence of the authority and the sailors who were sailing the ships. However, ideally, both, of the vessels included should have known about the creating circumstance (Chauvin and Lardjane 2008). In this case, the post on the two vessels was insufficient, and neither of the watchkeepers of the two vessels had kept an eye over the sea and the position of the ship. When they actually saw the position it was not possible for them to avoid the crash since it was too late. Some of the general HSSE policies which are suggested and could have possibly prevented the collision are stated below.

Health, Safety and Environment Protection Policy give sound and safe working conditions, advance and improve security as a work culture, anticipate misfortune or human damage and keep away from any antagonistic effect on the earth (marine or something else) including property(Hse.gov.uk 2018).

The fundamental destinations of our H.S.E. Strategy are as per the following:

•    To avert the loss of human life and individual damage.
•    To avoid damage to the ship, her load, and condition.
•    To build up shields against recognized dangers and to work on the ship.
•  To constantly enhance Safety Management abilities of personnel ashore and onboard individuals, including planning for crises identified with the well-being of human life, property, and condition.

The Marine Company needs to record, execute, keep up and consistently enhance the administration framework as per the necessities and decide how it will satisfy these prerequisites.

The Marine Company's best administration should set up, report and keep up updated policy (is) for word related wellbeing, security, insurance of the employees of the ship as per the administration framework. In addition, they ought to guarantee that the strategies are imparted, comprehended, executed and kept up at all levels of the shore-based and shipboard association, and to all people working for or in the interest of the Maritime Company.

The Marine Company need to build up an Occupational Health, Safety and Environmental Protection approach which depicts how guaranteeing security adrift, the counteractive action of human damage or death toll and evasion of harm to the earth (specifically, the marine condition) and to property can be accomplished(Hse.gov.uk 2018). The top administration ought to characterize the Company's approach and guarantee that, inside the characterized extent of its administration framework, it accommodates safe practices in delivery operations and a sheltered workplace. The administration ought to incorporate a dedication for ceaseless change for crises identified with both wellbeing and natural security, and counteractive action of contamination, which can set up shields against every single distinguished hazard, including a pledge to consistently enhance wellbeing administration aptitudes of workforce and locally available ships (Borch and Batalden 2015).

The policy ought to incorporate a promise to agree to appropriate legitimate necessities, obligatory guidelines and controls and different prerequisites to which the Company buys in, and a dedication for enhancing wellbeing and security execution, that is recorded, actualized and kept up (Hetherington, Flin and Mearns 2006).

The approach ought to be proper to the nature, scale and ecological effects of the Company's shore-based and shipboard exercises, and administrations. The OH&S and ecological strategy ought to give a system to setting and assessing natural and OH&S goals and targets. The OH&S and natural strategy ought to be made accessible to the general population and working individuals (Hse.gov.uk 2018).

Top Management ought to guarantee that the Quality strategy is proper to the reason for the association, and is inspected for proceeding with reasonableness (Chauvin et al. 2013). The approach ought to incorporate a pledge to agree to necessities for a consistent change in the viability of the quality administration framework to stay away from encourages mishaps in an ocean.

The reason for the examination is to identify the major causes and conditions of the mischance as a reason for formulating proposals for avoiding comparative mishaps happening later on.

Certain examinations regarding the ecological conditions concluded that the mishap in the sea was caused due to direction of the tidal stream. For balancing this major impact, the vessel was not ready since the vessels' heading was positioned west of the track. The impact of wind and tide has been dismissed in this examination and it is accepted that the two vessels were guiding near 235°. On account of Dutch Aquamarine, it has been conceivable to affirm that she was travelling around 234½° (gyro) ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003).

When the two ships came closer, it became sure from the witness that Dutch Aquamarine was a few meters away from Ash. As the bow of the ship preceded Ash’s stern on her starboard quarter, a sudden hydrodynamic interaction made ashes heading to change (Alyami et al. 2014). The underlying effect caused Dutch Aquamarine's heading to sheer marginally to port in the primary occasion, before returning to starboard affected by, the autopilot and, later, by the second officer. Fiery debris, then again, swung much more quickly to starboard crosswise over the bow of Dutch Aquamarine.

The distance among the two vessels was around 30°, and as Dutch Aquamarine moved ahead along the starboard of Ash, pushing the railings over the bridge deck, the collision happened. The crash happened in light of the fact that the two vessels were on incidental tracks and going at various velocities ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003).

Grouping of activity in the south-west path of the Dover TSS: That the vessels were on correspondent tracks makes much risk in any case, as most by far of vessels in the south-west path remain on the starboard or northern side of the path, the likelihood that vessels will end up on incidental tracks arises (Bradsher 2018). Vessels pick tracks along the northern edge of the active path, since; it is the characteristic inclination of the sailor to remain on the starboard side of the channel. Littler's vessels avoid the profound draft vessels which utilize the course toward the south of Varne Bank.

Keeping up the arranged track: Navigators seem to want to restore the vessel to the first arranged track instead of, say, parallel it until the point when the following adjust course position, as was basic rehearse before the appearance of GPS (Zhang et al. 2013). Most GPS and track control frameworks have capacities which empower another course direct to the following path to be destined and controlled. It is obvious that numerous guides won't be proficient at utilizing every one of the elements of these instruments ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003). By and large, these highlights of current marine route adequately keep vessels clustered on the same or comparative tracks.

Varieties in speed: Though the vessels pick and keep up incidental, or close correspondent tracks at the north of the south-west path, they would not collide until their rates differed (Bradsher 2018). The more prominent the variety in speed among the vessels picking this course, the more every now and again overwhelming circumstances with potential for strife will happen (Pedersen 1995).

The impact happened due to poor post on Dutch Aquamarine: Because of an intermittent fault, the second officer did not utilize the ARPA capacity of the radars. He was uncertain about the fault since he was on the vessel for just a week. His choice not to utilize ARPA is considered to have been judicious in the conditions. Alternate offices on the radars including target trails, EBLs and VRMs were adequate to keep up a decent valuation for the activity circumstance and danger of impact ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003). In this scenario the second officer utilized these factors to note the probability of the collision of the vessels. He eventually noticed the two vessels beforehand and expected them to pass by peacefully. He gained much more confidence in his estimation when one of the vessels in the sea passed with a distance of 0.5 mile from Dutch Aquamarine (Bradsher 2018). Others in the vessel recognized the vessels in these as far away ships. Ash, the ship has been constantly ahead of the Aquamarine for more than couple of hours before the accident took place ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003). Investigations concluded henceforth that the officers in the ship could not recognize the distance of Ash from on board and mistook Ash as far away vessels of the sea, resulting in the collision and the accident.

Visual Lookout: The examination reasoned that other officer in charge did not see Ash’s movement, in spite of the way that he was on the extension and effectively occupied with watchkeeping. Be that as it may, Ash won't have given an extremely evident visual picture. Ash’s stern perspective would have been low in the water and, joined with her blue body shading and white superstructure; it might have mixed with the seascape. Also, the sun was very low in the sky (elevation 24°) and around 10° on Dutch Aquamarine's port bow ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003). These elements made the visual identification of Ash more troublesome yet, in spite of this, a productive post ought to have noticed Ash whenever up to an hour prior to the crash.

Diversions: It is conceivable that other officer in charge was diverted from his duties (Qu et al. 2011). They may have got engaged in any kind of conversation which resulted in diversion from their view sight. The second officer on board initially noticed Ash moments before the crash.

It is conceivable that numerous pilots won't be completely skilled in the utilization of GPS and track control frameworks, which make them, use the customized track after hostile to crash moves (Chauvin and Lardjane 2008). This, thusly, has a tendency to keep up the bundling of activity on the prominent pre-customized tracks. Previously, at the point when deviation from the outlined course was imperative for antagonistic to affect purposes, it was a customary practice to smooth the required track until the point of moment that the changed course position was settled.

It is uncommon to have a sailor post on the extension amid sunshine hours on a huge vessel like Ash. Whatever may be circumstances, sailors should have been present at the extension at the hours of darkness when the chances of accidents are high and one of them should have been present to call the higher authority at short notice (Celik and Cebi 2009).The officers in charge during the day time should have paid more attention and should have provided more assistance in training the watchkeepers their duties so that the collision could have been avoided.

Conclusion

The crash was not turned away because of poor lookout on Ash. Due to the lack of proper experience of the watchkeeper in their watchkeeping duties; this mishap was a big question to the entire training team of the maritime industry.

Collision is a consequence of sheer human mistake (Rømer, Petersen and Haastrup 1995). Beginner movement and lack of common sense of the ace, pilot or navigational officer amid the season of moving, is the main driver of any crash. Aside from that, slack or blame in the impetus framework (Cruickshank and Cork 2005). This report features that the eventual outcomes of a ship crash on marine and human life are unlimited. The ship engaged with an impact experiences overwhelming auxiliary and stabilized harm. Aside from the harm to the ship, collision brings about the different impacts like prompting inconvenient ecological impacts. One of the significant impacts of Ship crash is that it renders considerable danger to human life (Wang and Zhang 2000). There have been mischance in past when the ship sunk in the sea within a few minutes, not allowing or giving enough time to the general population on board to get away.

Certain researches have been conducted by The Seafarers International Research Center (SIRC), Cardiff on the topic of collisions and encounters resulted from voyage overtaking in the traffic path of the Dover Strait TSS in one single day ('Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001' 2003). There has been an ongoing research work on the causes and occurrences of encounters of vessels in the Dover Strait path and this research by the SIRC has been just a part of it. On August 2002, The National Institute’s journal Seaways successfully published the various research findings and analysis from the results in the journal. The findings agree to a great extent with the discoveries of this report (BBC News 2018). The investigation affirms the convergence of vessels towards the northern passage of the movement and the recurrence of close passing.

References

Akten, N., 2006. Shipping accidents: a serious threat for marineenvironment. Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, 12(3).

Alyami, H., Lee, P.T.W., Yang, Z., Riahi, R., Bonsall, S. and Wang, J., 2014. An advanced risk analysis approach for container port safety evaluation. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(7), pp.634-650.

Azadeh, A., Fam, I.M., Nouri, J. and Azadeh, M.A., 2008. Integrated health, safety, environment and ergonomics management system (HSEE-MS): An efficient substitution for conventional HSE-MS.

Baker, C.C. and McCafferty, D.B., 2005, February. Accident database review of human element concerns: What do the results mean for classification?. In Proc. IntConf.‘Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation, RINA Feb.

BBC News. 2018. Several dead in Singapore ship collision. [online] Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41250150 [Accessed 2 Feb. 2018].

Borch, O.J. and Batalden, B.M., 2015. Business-process management in high-turbulence environments: the case of the offshore service vessel industry. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(5), pp.481-498.

Bradsher, E. 2018. After Dangerous Collisions, Navy Will Pause for Safety Check. [online] Nytimes.com. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/21/world/asia/navy-ship-mccain-search-sailors.html [Accessed 2 Feb. 2018].

Branch, M.A.I., House, C. and Place, C., 2004. Marine Accident Investigation Branch.

Celik, M. and Cebi, S., 2009. Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(1), pp.66-75.

Chauvin, C. and Lardjane, S., 2008. Decision making and strategies in an interaction situation: Collision avoidance at sea. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(4), pp.259-269.

Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J.P. and Langard, B., 2013. Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, pp.26-37.

Cruickshank, I. and Cork, S., 2005. Construction health and safety in coastal and maritime engineering. Thomas Telford.

Grech, M.R., Horberry, T. and Smith, A., 2002, September. Human error in maritime operations: Analyses of accident reports using the Leximancer tool. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 46, No. 19, pp. 1718-1721). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Hetherington, C., Flin, R. and Mearns, K., 2006. Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of safety research, 37(4), pp.401-411.

Hse.gov.uk. 2018. Write a health and safety policy for your business. [online] Available at: https://www.hse.gov.uk/simple-health-safety/write.htm [Accessed 2 Feb. 2018].

LAI, L. 2018. Two ships collide in Singapore waters; 7 injured, 2 dead, 3 missing. [online] The Straits Times. Available at: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/two-ships-collide-in-singapore-waters-five-crew-members-missing [Accessed 2 Feb. 2018].

Lois, P., Wang, J., Wall, A. and Ruxton, T., 2004. Formal safety assessment of cruise ships. Tourism management, 25(1), pp.93-109.

Miloh, T. and Pachter, M., 1989. Ship collision-avoidance and pursuit-evasion differential games with speed-loss in a turn. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 18(1-3), pp.77-100.

Pedersen, P.T., 1995. Collision and grounding mechanics. Proceedings of WEMT, 95(1995), pp.125-157.

Qu, X., Meng, Q. and Suyi, L., 2011. Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(6), pp.2030-2036.

'Report on the investigation of the collision between mv Ash and mv Dutch Aquamarine in the SW lane of the Dover Strait TSS with the loss of one life 9 October 2001'. 2003. The Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 1999. [online] United Kingdom: Marine Accident Investigation Branch,Report No 7/2003, pp.6-44. Available at: https://1965433_1929888202_ashanddutchaquamarine.pdf [Accessed 2 Feb. 2018].

Rømer, H., Petersen, H.S. and Haastrup, P., 1995. Marine accident frequencies–review and recent empirical results. the Journal of Navigation, 48(3), pp.410-424.

Rothblum, A.M., 2000, October. Human error and marine safety. In National Safety Council Congress and Expo, Orlando, FL (p. 7).

Salomon, J.C., Breton, M. and Guegueniat, P., 1993. Computed residual flow through the Dover Strait. Oceanologica acta, 16(5-6), pp.449-455.

Szlapczynski, R., 2011. Evolutionary sets of safe ship trajectories: A new approach to collision avoidance. The Journal of Navigation, 64(1), pp.169-181.

Wang, J. and Zhang, S.M., 2000. Management of human error in shipping operations. Professional safety, 45(10), p.23.

Wang, J., 2002. Offshore safety case approach and formal safety assessment of ships. Journal of safety research, 33(1), pp.81-115.

Zhang, D., Yan, X.P., Yang, Z.L., Wall, A. and Wang, J., 2013. Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 118, pp.93-105.