Get Instant Help From 5000+ Experts For
question

Writing Get your essay and assignment written from scratch by PhD expert

Rewriting: Paraphrase or rewrite your friend's essay with similar meaning at reduced cost

Editing:Proofread your work by experts and improve grade at Lowest cost

loader
Phone no. Missing!

Enter phone no. to receive critical updates and urgent messages !

Add File

Error goes here

Files Missing!

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

Guaranteed Higher Grade!

Analysis Of ACCC V TPG Case

6 Pages / 1,462 Words Published On: 27-01-2021

You should be aware from the judgment you have read that the following sequence occurred in the courts:

  • The ACCC brought proceedings against TPG
  • At the first hearing (before a single judge, called the “’primary” judge ACCC was largely successful.
  • TPC appealed to (what is called) the Full Court (three judges) and was largely successful in reversing the outcome before the primary judge
  • The ACCC appealed against that decision to the High Court of Australia.  It is the decision of that court which you have  read (although contained within it is a summary of what the earlier courts decided).

Question 1

There were three problems with TPG’s advertising which the ACCC considered to be misleading;  state briefly what those three were [3 marks]

Question 2

The ACCC alleged that TPG’s advertising contravened two STATUTORY provisions; what were those statutory provisions (ie, which sections of which Act) and what did the ACCC say about the advertisements which contravened each of those provisions [4  marks – 1 each  for identifying each of the two statutory provisions and 1 each for stating how the advertisements contravened that provision]

Question 3

What were the findings (conclusions) of the primary judge about each of the following aspects of the advertising?  In your answer, consider the matters suggested in italics [3 marks total 1 for each of the following]

  • bundling (who did the judge believe would be the “target audience” and what was it about the advertising which could mislead that audience?) [1 mark]
  • the set-up fee (in what way was the advertising capable of misleading consumers about this?) [1 mark]
  • single price (in what way was this aspect in breach of the statute?) [1 mark]

Question 4

The Full Court came to two important different conclusions from those of the primary judge when deciding whether the TPG advertising was misleading? What were those two different conclusions [2 marks]

Question 5

The High Court decided that the conclusions of the Full Court were not correct. For what two reasons did the High Court differ from the Full Court’s reasoning? [2 marks]

Question 6

The Full Court, in coming to its conclusions, applied as a precedent the ratio from an earlier case called Parkdale Custom Built Furniture v Puxu (“Puxu”).  The High Court said that the Full Court should not have applied (ie, the Full Court should have “distinguished”) the principle in Puxu and it gave three reasons for this.  Briefly explain any two of the reasons the High Court said made the Puxu case different from the TPG advertising. [2 marks]

Question 7

If you were employed in the marketing section of an internet service provider or a fitness centre which was about to launch an advertising campaign promoting an attractive “plan” for membership in which there were several “parts” (costs and benefits) to be taken into account by potential customers, what advice would you give about the form the advertising should take, based on your understanding of the High Court’s ruling in ACCC v TPG? [2 marks]

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

My Assignment Help (2021) Analysis Of ACCC V TPG Case [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/bus101-introduction-to-business-law/respond-to-predatory-business-models.html
[Accessed 27 September 2023].

My Assignment Help. 'Analysis Of ACCC V TPG Case' (My Assignment Help, 2021) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/bus101-introduction-to-business-law/respond-to-predatory-business-models.html> accessed 27 September 2023.

My Assignment Help. Analysis Of ACCC V TPG Case [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2021 [cited 27 September 2023]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/bus101-introduction-to-business-law/respond-to-predatory-business-models.html.


Stuck on Any Question

Our best expert will help you with the answer of your question with best explanation.

question

Writing: Get your essay and assignment written from scratch by PhD expert

Rewriting: Paraphrase or rewrite your friend's essay with similar meaning at reduced cost

Editing: Proofread your work by experts and improve grade at Lowest cost

question
We will use e-mail only for:

arrow Communication regarding your orders

arrow To send you invoices, and other billing info

arrow To provide you with information of offers and other benefits

Phone no. Missing!

Enter phone no. to receive critical updates and urgent messages !

loader
250 words
Error goes here

Error goes here

Files Missing!

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

Other Samples
icon
5% Cashback

On APP - grab it while it lasts!

Download app now (or) Scan the QR code

*Offer eligible for first 3 orders ordered through app!

screener
ribbon
callback request mobile
Have any Query?
close
Subtraction Payment required!

Only one step away from your solution of order no.