$20 Bonus + 25% OFF
Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment at The Lowest Price Now!


What this Case Teaches About the Issues Considered?


In the case of Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 [2014] HCA 36 (8 October 2014), a claim of negligence owing to pure economic loss was pursued by Owners Corporation against Brookfield Multiplex Ltd. Through this case, a much awaited decision of the High Court relating to whether or not a duty of care was owed to the subsequent owner by the builder (High Court of Australia, 2014). This case teaches not only about negligence, negligent pure economic loss, but also about the liability or no liability of the builders towards subsequent owners or to the developer of the building (Ellison, 2014).

Negligence is the failure in the discharging the duty of care which an individual owed to another and which results in a loss of injury to the other person (Harvey and Marston, 2009). In order to establish negligence, there has to be presence of certain elements, and these include the duty of care, the breach of this duty, resulting harm or loss, causation, foreseeability and the injury not being remote (Kennedy, 2009). The snail in the bottle or Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100 is the prime case for negligence. In this case, the beer bottle manufacturer was held to owe a duty of care towards the consumer of the bottle, who fell ill due to the dead snail found inside the bottle (British and Irish Legal Information Institute, 2017). Baltic Shipping v Dillon High Court of Australia (1993) 176 CLR 344 presents the example of negligence, which enables the recovery of damages for even mental distress which resulted as the ship sank (Holmes, 2017).

The professional are required to apply professional skill, judgment, and care in the work they undertake. They also have to adhere to the restriction and controls which have been put upon them, as a result of being member of certain organization. Hence, through such professional undertaking, the duty of care is assigned upon the professionals (Holland, 2011).

Negligence pure economic loss is a principle which denotes the economic loss suffered by the individuals, as a result of negligence of some other individual. Though, this loss is not at all related to a physical injury (Palmer and Bussani, 2009). Hence, the loss covered under this principle has to be purely economic in nature. When it comes to negligence pure economic loss, the rule applicable on it is a no-recovery rule. So, this rule dictates that under negligence owing to pure economic loss, the aggrieved party cannot apply for recovery of damages and even if they apply, they would not be successful for the same (Ward, 2010).

This rule was established in the case of Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1. In the quoted case, the water from the reservoir of the defendant spread over the working mine of the plaintiff which resulted in heavy damages to the working mine. The judges gave the verdict stating that the defendant could only be held liable for the wrong use of land and not for the recovery of pure economic loss (Rush and Ottley, 2006). This verdict was further supported in the case of Weller v Foot and Mouth Disease Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569, where the cattle of the plaintiff was infected due to the virus which escaped the premises of the defendant. This rendered the cattle unsellable and the plaintiff sued for loss. But the no recovery rule was applied in this case too (Steele, 2014).

However, since these cases, the no recovery rule has often been discarded and one of such cases is the case of Caltex Oil v The Dredge "Willemstadt" (1976) 136 CLR 529. In this case, the pipeline was damaged while the defendant was dredging. The plaintiff was a user of this pipeline and due to its damage he could not transfer the oil, which was done through the pipeline which was damaged in this case. As a result, he sued for economic loss. However, the judges held that as the defendant was aware about the foreseeability of the loss, he would be liable for the recovery of damages (Sappideen et al. 2009).

Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 also presents the base of circumstances in which builders may or may not responsible to the subsequent owners or to the developers of the building. In proving this point, the court referred to the case of Woolcock Street Investments v CDG Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 16, which acted as a landmark decision of the High Court (Richards, 2014). The decision given in this case relinquished the liability for any defects in the designing or construction of a builder or architect of a commercial building, to a subsequent purchaser. Hence, in case the architects or builders were faced with a legal action by a subsequent buyer, this case proves to be helpful in denying any liability (The Federation Press, 2017).


The court also referred to the case of Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609; [1995] HCA 17. In this case also, the third subsequent owner of the house sued the builder for negligence in exercising the reasonable care needed for discharging his duty of care, as a failed in avoiding the damages which were foreseeable. The court held that it could not be established if the damages were due to normal wear and tear or because of defects in initial construction. However, in this case the duty of care was clearly established due to the proximity between the loss and the negligence of the builder. This was coupled with the foreseeability of economic loss due to inadequately built footings. And so, the builder was held liable for the negligent pure economic loss (Aitken Whyte Lawyers, 2017).

While giving the judgment in Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288, the High Court Justices quoted these two cases for deciding the liability of the defendant based on the vulnerability of the subsequent purchaser, coupled with the reliance placed upon the builder’s actions. The court weighed the salient features of the relationship amongst the involved parties, to drawn upon the vulnerability of the subsequent purchaser. For this, the first thing which had to be established was related to the duty of care, if owed by the builder. If the duty of care is established, the second step relates to establishing the duty of care towards a subsequent purchaser (Wearne, 2014).

This case presented how and when the cases have to be applied to establish a point. So, the case of Bryan v Maloney is used in cases where the parties are unsophisticated and the contractual arrangements are not used in order to modify the risk allocation under the common law. And the case of Woolcock Street Investments v CDG Pty Ltd is used in such cases where the parties are sophisticated and reliance is made on commercial savvy modes, in form of contractual arrangements in order to allocate the risk (Wearne, 2014).

The case of Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 presented that the contractual arrangements between the parties had allocated the risk in a manner through which Owners Corporation was denied the clause of being vulnerable or reliant on the actions of Brookfield Multiplex Ltd. This decision of the High Court presented more clarity to the parties regarding the circumstances which lead to a differentiation between the ratio in Woolcock and the case of Bryan v Maloney. It clarifies the situations in which the court does not impose higher financial liability in comparison to the on which is already present in the contract. This case made it clear the point where there is a need for drawing the line for expanding the liability of the parties when it comes to a drawn commercial agreement between the parties.



Aitken Whyte Lawyers. (2017) Builder Liable for Negligence to Subsequent Owners of Home for Pure Economic Loss. [Online] Aitken Whyte Lawyers. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

British and Irish Legal Information Institute. (2017) Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100 (26 May 1932). [Online] British and Irish Legal Information Institute. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

Ellison, M. (2014) Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 [2014] HCA 36. [Online] Lexology. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

Harvey, B., and Marston, J. (2009) Cases and Commentary on Tort. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, p 251-255.

High Court of Australia. (2014) Brookfield Multiplex Ltd V Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 & Anor [2014] HCA 36. [Online] High Court of Australia. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

Holland, J.K. (2011) Standard of Care for Design Professionals. [Online] Construction Risk Counsel PLLC. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

Holmes, R. (2017) Mental Distress Damages For Breach Of Contract. [Online] Victoria University of Wellington. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

Kennedy, R. (2009) Duty of Care in the Human Services: Mishaps, Misdeeds ad the Law. Victoria: Cambridge University Press, pp 104-107.

Palmer, V.V., and Bussani, M. (2009) Pure Economic Loss: New Horizons in Comparative Law. Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish.

Richards, G. (2014) Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288. [Online] Mills Okley. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

Rush, J., and Ottley, M. (2006) Business Law. London: Thomson Learning. 

Sappideen, C., at al. (2009) Torts, Commentary and Materials. 10th ed. Pyrmont: Lawbook Co, pp. 309-311.

Steele, J. (2014) Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

The Federation Press. (2017). Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 16 (High Court of Australia). [Online] The Federation Press. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

Ward, P. (2010) Tort Law in Ireland. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

Wearne, N. (2014) Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 [2014] HCA 36. [Online] Norton Rose Fulbright. Available from: [Accessed on: 10/04/17]

Download Sample

Get 100% money back after download, simply upload your unique content* of similar no. of pages or more. We verify your content and once successfully verified 100% value credited to your wallet within 7 days.

Upload Unique Document

Document Under Evaluation

Get Credits into Your Wallet

*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as unique.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

My Assignment Help. (2018). Construction & Property Law. Retrieved from

"Construction & Property Law." My Assignment Help, 2018,

My Assignment Help (2018) Construction & Property Law [Online]. Available from:
[Accessed 13 July 2020].

My Assignment Help. 'Construction & Property Law' (My Assignment Help, 2018) <> accessed 13 July 2020.

My Assignment Help. Construction & Property Law [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2018 [cited 13 July 2020]. Available from: is the perfect solution to render quality solution for all sort of academic issues. We have hired professionals from different fields of study to provide assistance with different subjects. We successfully have provided different types of assignment solutions on 100+ subjects. We have hired industry experts to deliver nursing assignment, hr assignment and finance assignment help. To offer quality content with IT assignments, we have hired IT professionals to render programming language assignment help and IT assignment help for other types of IT assignments as well.

Latest Business Law Samples

LAW00150 Introduction To Business Law For Internal Agreements Assumption

Download : 0 | Pages : 9
  • Course Code: LAW00150
  • University: Southern Cross University
  • Country: Australia

Answer: Relevant Issue  This issue is correlated among Charlie together with his sister if the intention of being legally bound is present among them or not present.  Rule  Intention is in the same manner is lawfully bounded with several more components of the contract, which are crucial for its formation. If any such component is not present among the parties, therefore they are not lawfully bound by the terms which were signe...

Read More arrow

LAW101 Fundamentals Of Law

Download : 0 | Pages : 4

Answer: Negligence Issue:The issue that gave rise to this particular discussion is whether Stan has any rights to file a suit against Wendy for his own physical injury? Rule: Negligence is an act on part of an individual who tries to neglect his/ her duty of care that causes injury to another be it in physical form, mental or even economic. Negligence is deemed to be an act of carelessness on part of an individual that causes harm to an...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia 8 Fundamentals of Law Sttots College 

U50032 Coursework Assessment Information

Download : 0 | Pages : 7
  • Course Code: U50032
  • University: University Of Technology Sydney
  • Country: Australia

Answer: Introduction The company Carillon has been in news  because of its corporate failings. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the situation of Carillion which has been subjected to corporate failing in the light of directors’ duties and insolvency law in UK. The paper also provides the steps which stakeholders and shareholders of Carillion may have taken against the directors for their actions under company law. ...

Read More arrow

AB444A12 Programme: BTEC Higher National Diploma

Download : 0 | Pages : 20
  • Course Code: BUSN20016
  • University: CQ University
  • Country: Australia

Answer: Introduction: In the following report, an effort has been made to chalk out the tax environment of the UK. In pursuance of that the roles and responsibilities of the tax practitioners, the details of the documents required for the purpose of calculation and other matters like the capital gain tax and calculation of adjusted taxable profit have been properly discussed. TASK 1: The responsibility of the tax collection has been vested ...

Read More arrow

HI6027 Business And Corporate Law 5

Download : 0 | Pages : 6

Answers: 1 A sole trader is considered as an individual or any entity who practices a business alone. It is measured as the easiest method of occupation and the inexpensive procedure of the commerce where other than the sole trader no other person or entity shall be obligated for the profits incurred and the losses in the business. A Company is mentioned  as any body or organization that is devouring a separate individuality separately f...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Rozelle 8 business and corporations law Holmes Institute 

Save Time & improve Grade

Just share Requriment and get customize Solution.

We will use e-mail only for:

arrow Communication regarding your orders

arrow To send you invoices, and other billing info

arrow To provide you with information of offers and other benefits




Overall Rating



Our Amazing Features


On Time Delivery

Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.


Plagiarism Free Work

Using reliable plagiarism detection software, only provide customized 100 percent original papers.


24 X 7 Live Help

Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.


Services For All Subjects

Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.


Best Price Guarantee

Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.

Our Experts

Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

93 Order Completed

100% Response Time

Jackson Mitchell

MiM (Masters in Management) in Supply Chain Management

New Jersey, United States

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

184 Order Completed

96% Response Time

Arapera Billing

Masters in Management, MMgt

Wellington, New Zealand

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

134 Order Completed

95% Response Time

Thomas Nelson

MS in Information Systems Technology with Specialization in Database Administration

New Jersey, United States

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

752 Order Completed

100% Response Time

Hugh Cleave

Masters in Human Resource Management (MMgt, HRM)

Wellington, New Zealand

Hire Me

FREE Tools


Plagiarism Checker

Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.


Essay Typer

Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.


GPA Calculator

Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.


Chemical Equation Balancer

Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.


Word Counter & Page Calculator

Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.

Refer Just 5 Friends to Earn More than $2000

Check your estimated earning as per your ability




Your Approx Earning

Live Review

Our Mission Client Satisfaction

The paper was well written, although there some changes needed to be made , overall im satisfied.


User Id: 438520 - 13 Jul 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

It was a perfect work. Nice analysis and organized. I also appreciate that they were very fast.


User Id: 341163 - 13 Jul 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating



User Id: 234292 - 12 Jul 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

Always fast and efficient. They seem to care about delivering good work to the students. My powerpoint was nice and well put. I will continue to use your services.


User Id: 451381 - 12 Jul 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating
callback request mobile
Have any Query?