Auditing And Risk Assessment Of Double Ink Printers Limited

Question 1: As an auditor, you are conducting your preliminary analytical procedures based on the background information for DIPL contained in the case. Apply analytical procedures to the financial report information of DIPL for the last three years. Explain how your results influence your planning decisions for the audit for the year ending 30 June 2015.

Question 2: You are conducting your risk assessment of DIPL, as part of the planning for your audit for the year ended 30 June. Identify two inherent risk factors that arise from the nature of DIPL’s business operations. Explain why it is a risk and how it may affect the risk of material misstatement in the financial report.

Question 3: As part of your audit of DIPL for the year ended 30 June 2015, you are considering the risk that fraud may have occurred (a) Based on the background information for DIPL contained in the case, identify and explain two key fraud risk factors relating to misstatements arising from fraudulent financial reporting to which DIPL may be susceptible. (b) Explain how the risk factors identified in (a) above would affect the conduct of the (a) audit.

Analyzing DIPL's Financial Reports for Preliminary Analytical Procedures

In the method for setting up the review design of Double Ink Printers Limited (DIPL), the investigative procedure related with money related information gives monstrous regard. As a matter of fact, review design passes on the required orientation and principles to the evaluators in the midst of the review operations. Precisely, review design engages the evaluators in keeping up the cost of review in a particular purpose of containment for foreseeing confusion with the review clients (Alam 2014). The legitimate approach related to the monetary information of DIPL shows the system for spreading budgetary information from the distinctive money related declarations of the association. The methodology for separating the budgetary information of the associations could be brought out through a couple of frameworks.

With the help of analytic approach for assessing the money related information, the accounting and monetary examiners of the association s could utilize such information for undertaking particular budgetary and accounting decisions (Baylis et al. 2017). The ordinary size logical approach enables in the system for dissecting the money related introduction of the associations from the normal viewpoints. One of the fundamental favorable circumstances is that it helps in growing help in separating the money related reports from various monetary courses of occasions.

The accounting and monetary specialists could utilize various lines of things from the budgetary reports and they could affirm their base of making arrangements for the associations. For instance, the selection philosophy of different money related and accounting things in the monetary reports, for instance, net liabilities, assets, proprietor's esteem and others could be seen as consolidated with evaluation of straying from the run of the mill circumstance (Brawley et al. 2015).

Benchmarking is the essential analytic system of money related information and this methodology could be utilized for evaluation of the review design of the association. The benchmarking system helps in recognizing the adjustments in the monetary reports of the associations and the honest to goodness clarifications for the occasions of these distinctions could be learned by perceiving the hidden driver of these changes. Other than the method of benchmarking, proportion examination is pronounced as a significant logical strategy for budgetary information of the associations. Proportion examination is hugely profitable in separating the budgetary clarifications of no less than two associations for setting up the course of action of review (Chambers and Odar 2015).

The grasped logical philosophies of the associations in surveying the budgetary information has colossal effect on the change of the technique related to review orchestrating and this is fundamental to spread monetary information among the differing agencies of the associations. The going with proportions have been considered hence:

Particulars 2013 2014 2015

Current ratio 1.42 1.46 1.50

Profit margin 0.068 0.60 0.06

Solvency ratio 0.62 0.44 0.21

The above table implies that the present proportion of DIPL has extended from 1.42 out of 2013 to 1.46 of each 2014 and it has extended further to 1.50 out of 2015. The net income of the association has been fluctuating consistently, which has helped in revealing the measure of net benefit got rather than the net benefits (Cohen and Simnett 2014). Additionally, this productivity examination gives the monetary inspectors and accounting with the view to choose the employments of the association. In addition, it engages the money related evaluators and bookkeeper s to get a framework of the practicality of the definitive spending design nearby the necessity for business upgrade (Decaux and Sarens 2015).

Impact of Analytical Procedures on Audit Planning Decisions

The great and negative changes in the money related execution and proportions of DIPL enable the inspectors to make an information about the current monetary position of the associations. In this novel circumstance, the dissolvability proportion has been considered, which has declined consistently. Such evaluation is valuable in choosing the charming or undesirable example of the various leveled execution over the subsequent years. The intricacy of proportions has its tremendousness in learning whether the present salary of the association is adequate for meeting both without further ado and whole deal responsibilities.

Precisely, it could be communicated that the connection and appraisal of monetary execution and proportions engages the money related agents and accounting for discovering the relative budgetary position of the association over three-year time allotment. It enables in deciding if the current monetary position of the association is appealing or not. In the event that there ought to be an event of the last specified, the organization of the association is required to endeavor healing exercises for reviving its general budgetary execution. Due to each one of these reasons, the orderly technique identifying with money related information has basic regard (Duncan and Whittington 2014).

Certain risk segments could be raised from the business operations of DIPL. According to the logical examination, the organization of an association has failed to enter diverse business trades of the association. This technique has facilitated association with the inconsistencies in the masterminding of different displaying and arrangements activities of the association (Earley et al. 2016). The general budgetary examination did with respect to DIPL states that the association has fail to complete the concentrated on level of advantage from the general arrangements pay. The basic reason is the deficiency and inefficiency of the organization of the association in business operations. In this way, it could be watched that the association has fail to gage the effect of different scaled down scale and full scale money related segments having influence on the business operations of DIPL like political, budgetary and social components. Therefore, it could be communicated that the lower wage and general income of the association has realized basic risks (Graham 2015).

Also, the staffs of DIPL have extended rapidly and in this way, the intrinsic risks has extended as well. The basic risks level of the association ascends in perspective of the nonattendance of cleaned ability and experienced capacity of the staffs. This is because the achievement of a business is reliant, all things considered, on the execution of its staffs (Homb et al. 2014). Due to such guilelessness and inefficiency of the workforce of DIPL, there is more vital probability of natural perils, since the agents will without a doubt lead bungles. In perspective of the given case of DIPL, the issues could be found in the movement strategy of CEO of the association. Along these lines, such process has achieved climb in normal risks of the association. The essential inherent risks could be found in the insufficient system for picking the CEO movement of the association.

Identifying Inherent Risks Arising from DIPL's Business Operations

Other than this, it could be watched that DIPL does not have satisfactory staffs for managing its business operations. This reason has realized climb in trademark threats in the general business working of DIPL. Consequently, from the above appraisal, it could be watched that these are the basic reasons of the rising in regular perils in the business operations of DIPL (Jones and Beattie 2015).

It has been accumulated that there is high measure of workload on the delegates of the association. The extending workload realizes poor accounting of the association and this issue furthermore achieves different issues of pay, inadequate working results unfit dissolvability and liquidity position of the association. Other than this, the peril of bungle could be depicted in the money related verbalizations due to nonattendance of convincing comprehension. In this remarkable circumstance, the organization of DIPL needs to expect a convincing part. It has been watched that the DIPL organization needs obligation and uprightness and as a result of this reason, they are encountering the stress of losing reputation in the business gathering. The more vital propelling power structure related to organization shapes additional weight on organization and it achieves material misrepresents in the money related reports (Levy 2015).

In the present business associations, blackmail chance is articulated as the essential risks with respect to the same. Because of the occasion of such fake risks, the business associations oftentimes gain genuine misfortunes in its business assets (Martin, Sanders and Scalan 2014). In larger piece of the conditions, the fundamental frustration could be seen among the workforce and such dissatisfaction habitually compel them to take an interest in various sorts of fakes in associations. Another fundamental reason of blackmail is the want of various money related authorities of the associations. The associations routinely make ensures for achieving a specific money related execution that adds to more unmistakable deception level (Nalewaik and Mills 2016).

In light of the given case, it could be watched that the methodology of valuation of the rough materials of the association in perspective of ordinary cost is not reasonable and suitable, since the present paper cost is over the typical cost. The basic risks in the disclosure of beguiling activities of the staffs for executing new game plan of information advancement could be perceived by checking the assignments in various articulations of occupations. Other than this risks, the risks related with the method of money related declaring could be recognized through evaluation of the differing monetary reports and clarifications of the associations regarding the bookkeeper s and budgetary examiners through different control and descriptive instruments. Such system of checking is required to be driven helpfully (Warren 2014).

Reference List

Agrawal, S., Singh, R.K. and Murtaza, Q., 2016. Outsourcing decisions in reverse logistics: sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 108, pp.41-53.

Awino, Z.B. and Mutua, J.M., 2014. Business process outsourcing strategy and performance of Kenyan State Corporations. Journal of emerging trends in economics and management sciences, 5(7), pp.37-43.

Chou, S.W., Techatassanasoontorn, A.A. and Hung, I.H., 2015. Understanding commitment in business process outsourcing relationships. Information & Management, 52(1), pp.30-43.

Creon, M.J., Grover, V. and Teng, J.T., 2017. Theoretical Perspectives on the Outsourcing of Information Systems. In Outsourcing and Offshoring Business Services (pp. 25-52). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Eva, M., Hindle, K., Paul, D., Rollaston, C. and Tudor, D., 2014. Business analysis. BCS.

Gerbl, M., McIvor, R., Loane, S. and Humphreys, P., 2015. A multi-theory approach to understanding the business process outsourcing decision. Journal of World Business, 50(3), pp.505-518.

Gunasekaran, A., Irani, Z., Choy, K.L., Filippi, L. and Papadopoulos, T., 2015. Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: A review for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, pp.153-166.

Ho, H.D. and Lu, R., 2015. Performance implications of marketing exploitation and exploration: Moderating role of supplier collaboration. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), pp.1026-1034.

Kim, Y.J., Lee, J.M., Koo, C. and Nam, K., 2013. The role of governance effectiveness in explaining IT outsourcing performance. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), pp.850-860.

Kitcher, B., McCarthy, I.P., Turner, S. and Ridgway, K., 2013. Understanding the effects of outsourcing: unpacking the total factor productivity variable. Production Planning & Control, 24(4-5), pp.308-317.

König, A. and Spinler, S., 2016. The effect of logistics outsourcing on the supply chain vulnerability of shippers: Development of a conceptual risk management framework. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(1), pp.122-141.

Krush, M.T., Sohi, R.S. and Saini, A., 2015. Dispersion of marketing capabilities: impact on marketing’s influence and business unit outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), pp.32-51.

Marshall, D., Ambrose, E., McIvor, R. and Lamming, R., 2015. Self-interest or the greater good: How political and rational dynamics influence the outsourcing process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(4), pp.547-576.

Raassens, N., Wuyts, S. and Geyskens, I., 2014. The performance implications of outsourcing customer support to service providers in emerging versus established economies. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(3), pp.280-292.

Rambocas, M., Meneses, R., Monteiro, C. and Brito, P.Q., 2015. Direct or indirect channel structures. Evaluating the impact of channel governance structure on export performance. International Business Review, 24(1), pp.124-132.

Schwarz, C., 2014. Toward an understanding of the nature and conceptualization of outsourcing success. Information & Management, 51(1), pp.152-164.

Solli-Sæther, H. and Gottschalk, P., 2015. Stages-of-growth in outsourcing, offshoring and backsourcing: back to the future?. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 55(2), pp.88-94.

Tjader, Y., May, J.H., Shang, J., Vargas, L.G. and Gao, N., 2014. Firm-level outsourcing decision making: A balanced scorecard-based analytic network process model. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, pp.614-623.

White, R., 2017. The outsourcing manual. Taylor & Francis.

Yang, Q. and Zhao, X., 2016. Are logistics outsourcing partners more integrated in a more volatile environment?. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, pp.211-220.