Perspective To Inform Project Planning For Light Rail Transit Essay In Canberra. (70 Characters)

Discuss About The Perspective To Inform The Project Planning?

In order to solidify the structure of the Canberra city, the Light Rail Transit project is referred to as one of the most important transport system that helps to offer huge number of opportunities to the passengers. The objective of the Light Rail Transit Project is to develop or extend the existing network for minimizing the traffic pressure from the traffic network. In tight and busy traffic schedule it is very much important to structure the traffic in such a manner so that the road could not be blocked (Capital Metro Agency 2014). The purpose of the project is to develop the preliminary design with conceptual design, detailed design and development criteria, system testing, evaluation, validation and optimization as well of Light rail transit project.

It has been found that the existing LRT project network is not at all significant thus, in order to implement this particular transport in the significant places of Canberra city, it is necessary to develop the conceptual design details including its network and route as well. With the implementation of a smoother Light Rail transit project, the ordinary roadway of Canberra will be able to minimize the commotion and the obstruction as well. After analyzing the project details it is determined that, the transportation development committee of Canberra city is willing to cover a length of 12 Kim around the Canberra city. For connecting different commercial district, the Light Rail have is required to be developed.   

Due to heavy traffic congestion in the large city of Canberra, Australia the development of Light Rail Transit (LRT), has become important to the network developers.  From the private investment sector the project developers are willing to develop the Light Rails Project for Canberra city. In order to ensure that the project is successful certain components those have been considered include rapid prototyping, mind mapping and addition of advanced technologies (Catthoor et al. 2013). A life cycle cost of the project is also estimated for implementing the project. The additional components those have been considered for this project include maintenance cost, experiences, collected historical data, and project details for the construction. However, the Canberra project lacks to collect historical information those are helpful for the development of the system and its related decision making approaches. In order to support the feasibility study life cycle costing system is required to be developed by the project manager and the development committee (Chandler 2015). Based on the structure, scale, factors and construction methods the economic evaluations of the systems are also done.

Detailed design and development

Figure 1: Proposed Route of the Light Rail Network

(Source: Hensher 2016, pp-290)

The other factors that influence the entire project structure include bridges, tunnels. Additionally, an algorithm for analyzing the LCC, are also found to be enough efficient from the project improvement approach.  This particular project has been undertaken by a private business authority thus a private company had analyzed the economic details of the project (Hensher 2016). The business success is completely dependent on proper cost estimation and the derived life cycle cost. The preliminary design details associated to the project are bridge LCC, Highway management and development and bridge life cycle cost analysis.  

In order to utilize the data for developing the new network of the Light Rail, it is necessary for the project developers to analyze proper programming details of the project. The National Institute of Science and Technology has undertaken the responsibility of developing the building and fire research laboratory office for the applied economics (Mulley, Tsai and Ma 2015). For this particular project the Bridge Life cycle cost analysis, is done considering the traditional process and method developed by the transportation research centre.

Not only this but also, for evaluating the system a simulation software rather simulation software named as PLM simulation tool. With the help of this particular tool the developers will be able to test the direction and route details of the light rail project. For the highway development and management a financial support has been gained from the private external resources (Ho, Hensher and Mulley 2015). This particular program is referred to as a tool which could analyze the details of the project investment and all other economic perspectives as well. Both the pre design and post design construction details are demonstrated in this paper.

The different factors those have been used to calculate the life cycle cost for the pre design stage include roadbed, civil work, bridge, tunnel and station.  The civil workers are responsible for the developing the general ground and soft ground. On the other hand, the bridge development factors include over bridge, genera ground, soft ground (Martin 2014). In order to extend the light rail network from the exiting connectors mountainous tunnel and metropolitan tunnel are also developed.  In many rural locations also the stations for stoppages are also considered.

Before the final implementation of the project in the primary phase the steps those have been considered for project include the real discount rate, expected period for the construction and the expected period for the maintenance of the new route for the Light Rail Transit (Burke and Currie 2013). For this particular project the identified two different phases are pre design phase and post design phase.

The Light Rail Transit structure specifications

In order to implement the LRT project successfully it is necessary for the system developers to consider each aspect professionally. The two different phases considered for the project development are pre design phase and the post design phase (Mysydney.nsw.gov.au 2016). The deck is consists of both general and urban areas. The parameters associated to the project implementation are construction estimation, line route selection.

The post design approach of the construction project includes both the construction as well as maintenance cost. In case of the bridge development, the detail design of the bridge is needed to be entered to the database system so that on the time of implementation the information could be deployed successfully.

1. Deck
2. Orbit
3. Building
4. Electric power supply
5. Signaling
6. Communication
7. Streetcar lining

• Before the implementation of the Light Rail Transit project in Canberra City, Australia the existing design of the project should be developed ensuring the efficiency and safe movement of the cyclists and that must be completely accommodated as well (Burke and Currie 2013).
• In order to find out the way for the passengers, through determining the type and optimum direction level placements direction signage and maps are developed.
• Before the real world implementation of the project it is necessary for the project developer to use PLM simulation software (Mulley, Tsaiand Ma 2015). With the help of this particular software the newly extended direction of the light rail could be tested properly and even if any addition changes required then those could also be brought into the system.

• Comfortable ride should be offered to the consumers of the Light rail passengers
• A minimum level of noise with proper control over the vibration is required
• The motor used in the light rail helps to minimize the noise and vibration (Burke and Currie 2013)
• PLM simulation software is used by the project managers and project sponsors to manage the dynamic energy and the speed of the Light Rail Transit project

For the validation and optimization of the system the parameters those have been considered are as follows:

• Professional participation of the community group from Canberra city is required for those who will take part in the operational purposes without any kind of dedicated parking facility (Mysydney.nsw.gov.au 2016).
• Each testing domain associated to the project are required to be tested properly by the volunteers
• In the highly demanding parking areas this project extension is required to be done
• The metropolitan parking infrastructure development
• Additionally, quality raw materials are required for the development and implementation of the project (Capital Metro Agency 2014)
• Before the selection of the newly extended network or channel it is necessary for the project developers to consider the pilot programming and street network management framework
• For avoiding the rate of road accidents signal on proper locations are also developed.
• For the development of the project in the real world in certain location tunnels and bridges of proper diameter and width are needed to be developed by the project manager (Chandler 2015)
• The cost estimation should be done by the project sponsors and project managers to validate the project details with economic support and financial stability as well.

Conclusion

From the overall discussion it can be concluded that in order to complete the project successfully with appropriate launch plan, resource plan and long term plan as well it is necessary for the project developers to consider a detail conceptual design of the Light Rail Transit (LRT) project including system testing, evaluation and development as well. Not only this but also the project demonstrated the validation and optimization of the project. The conceptual network designed for the Canberra Light Rail Transit project has successfully integrated the transport of Australia. The busy traffic issues facing by the Australian city has been partly resolved with the implementation of the advanced Light Rail Transit project. It has been defined that many operation level profits are also associated to this system such as the motor used for the system is free of noise and as the rail runs through electricity thus, the transport is eco-friendly and pollution free. The speeds of the Light Rails are around 70 to 80 km/Hour. Though, the communication channel is very much beneficial but still due to higher cost the development committee is facing different financial issues.

References

Burke, M. and Currie, G., 2013. Light rail in Australia-Performance and prospects.

Capital Metro Agency. 2014. 1st ed. [pdf] Canberra: Capital Metro Full Business Case, pp.12-35. Available at: https://www.tccs.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/887680/Light-rail-Capital-Metro-Business-Case-In-Full.pdf [Accessed 21 Aug. 2016].

Catthoor, F., Wuytack, S., de Greef, G.E., Banica, F., Nachtergaele, L. and Vandecappelle, A., 2013. Custom memory management methodology: Exploration of memory organisation for embedded multimedia system design. Springer Science and Business Media.

Chandler, B., 2015. Australia award for urban design presentations in Melbourne. Planning News, 41(9), p.6.

Total estimated cost for the Light Rail Transit project

Currie, G. and Burke, M., 2013, October. Light rail in Australia–performance and prospects. In Australasian Transport Research Forum, Brisbane, Australia.

Dobes, L. and Leung, J., 2015. Wider economic impacts in transport infrastructure cost-benefit analysis-A bridge too far?. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 22(1), p.75.

Douglas, N. and O'Keeffe, B., 2016, November. Wider Economic Benefits–When and if they should be used in evaluation of transport projects. In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 38th, 2016, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Downs, C., Cassels, B. and Ericksen, J., 2014. Case study of rail design on Gold Coast Light Rail. CORE 2014: Rail Transport For A Vital Economy, p.76.

Hensher, D., Mulley, C. and Rose, J., 2016. Preferences for BRT and light rail. Restructuring Public Transport Through Bus Rapid Transit: An International and Interdisciplinary Perspective, p.209.

Hensher, D.A., 2016. Why is Light Rail Starting to Dominate Bus Rapid Transit Yet Again?. Transport Reviews, 36(3), pp.289-292.

Hensher, D.A., Ho, C. and Mulley, C., 2015. Identifying resident preferences for bus-based and rail-based investments as a complementary buy in perspective to inform project planning prioritisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 46, pp.1-9.

Ho, C., Hensher, D.A. and Mulley, C., 2015. Identifying resident preferences for bus-based and rail-based investments as a complementary buy in perspective to inform project planning prioritisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 46, pp.1-9.

Love, P.E., Ahiaga-Dagbui, D., Welde, M. and Odeck, J., 2017. Light rail transit cost performance: Opportunities for future-proofing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, pp.27-39.

MacKenzie, A., Muminovic, M., Williamson, G., Davey, R. and Lernihan, V., 2015, December. Passing the Community Test-A co-benefits approach to evaluating the case for light rail in Canberra, Australia. In State of Australian Cities National Conference, 2015, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

Martin, S., 2014. Moving beyond cost: Evaluating LRT and BRT options for Australian and New Zealand cities. CORE 2014: Rail Transport For A Vital Economy, p.178.

Miller, N., 2014. The impact of a new light rail network upon walkability in a central business district.

Miller, N., 2014. The impact of a new light rail network upon walkability in a central business district.

Mulley, C., Tsai, C.H.P. and Ma, L., 2015, September. Does residential property price benefit from light rail in Sydney?. In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 37th, 2015, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Mysydney.nsw.gov.au. (2012). Sydney’s Light Rail Future: Expanding public transport, revitalising our city. [online] Available at: https://mysydney.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/user-files/uploads/light-rail-future-web.pdf [Accessed 20 Aug. 2016].

Newman, P., Kenworthy, J. and Glazebrook, G., 2013. Peak car use and the rise of global rail: why this is happening and what it means for large and small cities. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 3.