Cloud Architecture For MetaSoft - Benefits And Implementation Essay. (70 Characters)

1. Architectures Clear and comprehensive description of Cloud architectures needed, benefits and critical points identified & discussed Detailed description of Cloud architectures needed, most benefits and critical points identified & discussed Good description of Cloud architectures needed, many benefits and critical points identified & discussed Adequate description of Cloud architectures needed, some benefits and critical points identified & discussed Inadequate or incomplete description of Cloud architectures needed, few or no benefits or critical points identified & discussed .

2. Risk Assessment Clear, comprehensive description of Risk Management issues, critical points identified & discussed, Detailed description of Risk Management issues, many critical points identified & discussed, Good description of Risk Management issues, many critical points identified & discussed, Adequate description of Risk Management issues, some critical points identified & discussed, Inadequate or incomplete description of Risk Management issues, critical points identified & discussed.

3. Information security Clear, comprehensive assessment of InfoSec issues, critical points identified & discussed, Detailed assessment of InfoSec issues, most critical points identified & discussed, Good assessment of InfoSec issues, many critical points identified & discussed, Adequate assessment of InfoSec issues, some critical points identified & discussed, Inadequate or incomplete assessment of InfoSec issues, few or no critical points identified & discussed.

4. Changes to BCP Clear, comprehensive description of backup and DR plan, critical points identified & discussed, Detailed description of backup and DR plan, critical points identified & discussed, Good description of backup and DR plan, some critical points identified & discussed, Adequate description of backup and DR plan, some critical points identified Inadequate or incomplete description of backup and DR plan, none or few critical points identified.

5. Hybrid Cloud Management Clear, comprehensive assessment of service management, critical points identified & discussed, Detailed assessment of service management, most critical points identified & discussed, Good description of service management, some critical points identified & discussed, Adequate description of service management, some critical points identified Incomplete or inadequate description of service management, none or few critical points identified.

6. Migration Plan Clear and thorough description of the steps required to migrate to a Hybrid Cloud, issues and critical points and issues identified Detailed description of the steps required to migrate to a Hybrid Cloud, most issues and critical points and issues identified Good description of the steps required to migrate to a Hybrid Cloud, many issues and critical points and issues identified Adequate description of the steps required to migrate to a Hybrid Cloud, some issues and critical points and issues identified Inadequate or incomplete description of the steps required to migrate to a Hybrid Cloud, few or no critical points or issues identified.

Forum Interaction Proactively initiates and facilitates discussion, explicitly using appropriate strategies and tools. Initiates and facilitates discussion using appropriate strategies and tools. 

Evidence that there is a planned strategy to engage with peers in the forums. Some evidence of responding to questions or topics on the discussion forum. No evidence of interaction on forums. 

As MetaSoft is a software company and is concerned about shifting its data centre from the Melbourne data centre to the Sydney data centre, there is a high necessity of implementing a cloud architecture (Li et al., 2013). A cloud architecture is required to be implemented in the company because it will allow the company to be more secured and reuse the most of its services. There are several cloud architectures that can be implemented into the current system to enhance the performance and increase the line of business (Zhang et al., 2014). The company is interested upon implementing a hybrid cloud technology that intends to keep a section of the data centre on the premises whereas the other part of the data centre will be residing in the cloud. The different kinds of the cloud architectures that are required for the MetaSoft software company to meet the Board Strategies include the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud architecture and the Azure Functions server less architecture.

These two types of cloud architectures will be able to meet the requirements of the company as the company is relying on the implementing a cloud architecture to enhance the performance (Goyal, 2014). The various types of ways through which both the types of cloud architecture could assist the MetaSoft software company is by enhancing the efficiency of the company, increasing the productivity and by helping to have a significant reduction of the company expenditures.  Moreover, these two cloud infrastructures are destined upon increasing the flexibility for the business. In addition to it, with the implementation of these two type of cloud architectures, MetaSoft will be able to increase the business sustainability since the architectures will be able to increase the availability for some business line applications that are intended to execute on the self infrastructures. The cloud architectures as a whole will not only increase the flexibility of the business system but will also be able to increase the responsiveness of the business especially with the overseas operations. As the board has formulated some strategies to close down its old datacentre, they are being more reliable on the cloud architectures (Alamri et al., 2013). The mentioned cloud architectures intend to provide an overall support to the software company.

The AWS cloud architecture is devoted upon using a client infrastructure as the front end infrastructure and a back end architecture that involves the application, management, services, the cloud runtime, storage and the infrastructure (Zou, Deng & 2013). Moreover, this cloud infrastructure is focussed upon the data integration, integrated networking, integrated identity and access, integrated resource and deployment management along with integrated devices and edge systems (Cloud, 2011). The integrated database that is required for this company is the Amazon relational database because it is stress-free in setting up, work and gauge a relational database. In internet networking, the Amazon virtual private cloud can be incorporated in the cloud architecture as complete control of the network can be achievable. A Hardware VPN connection can also be created between the company’s data centre and the virtual proxy cloud to clout the cloud services as a lead of the corporate data centre. Identity of AWS and the access management will enable the company to increase the robustness by granting the management support along with the AWS service access programming interfaces using the remaining identity systems (Koo et al., 2016). The VMware cloud is a manageable VMware environment of the AWS cloud that provides an hourly access. AWS Greengrass is an integrated device that allows the user in calculating, messaging and data retrieving for the linked devices in a secured manner.

Question 2: Risk Assessment

On the other hand, the Azure functions intends to serve the software company with the best of the solutions by running a small snippets of codes or functions in the cloud platforms. Services offered by these cloud architectures are easy to use since the programming codes in cloud can be modified according to the needs of the infrastructure. Since the company is more focussed on closing down the old architectures, the Azure functions will be able to satisfy the needs as new programming codes will be executed while going on with new system (Gong, Yue & Zhou, 2010). In addition to it, Azure functions provide a wide range of coding platforms to choose from such as C#, F# or JavaScript. The features provided by the Azure functions are the selection of the language, pay as per the usage pricing model, fetching the self-dependencies, incorporated security, flexibility in the development  and most importantly the functions of the set up comes from an open source open source. The functions of this cloud architecture will be helpful in handling data, incorporating new set ups, going hand in hand along with the Internet of Things (IoT) and creating simple Access Programming Interfaces along with the microservices (McGrath et al., 2016).

Benefits of the implementation of the AWS hybrid cloud architecture on MetaSoft company are ample. On one side, the data integration and the networking wings will be able to provide the company with the enormous resources available online and will also allow the company to grab a hold on the crucial insights (Dinh et al., 2013). While on the other side the identity access, deployment management and the integrated devices will be able to boost the performance of the company making it more sophisticated and strong. As there will be added security with a virtual platform, the company will get a chance to break free the limitations and work more to meet up the company objectives.

In parallel to the cloud architecture offered by the AWS services, there are several benefits as well that are concerned with the development of the software company. One of the most advantages of the Azure functions are that the entire cloud architecture is server less in nature for which it will be easy to use according to the necessities of the company (Singleton, 2016). The functions are chargeable according to the needs and the number of execution. The mobile backend of the Azure function is server less also. With the implementation of the Azure functions, the company will be able to use its own libraries. Ease of development procedures will also help MetaSoft in getting rid of the old data centres to shift finally to a new data centre (Fox et al., 2017). Azure function saves the from the hassle of managing the virtual machines that is unlikely in other cloud architectures and also helps in processing stream in real time.

References

Alamri, A., Ansari, W. S., Hassan, M. M., Hossain, M. S., Alelaiwi, A., & Hossain, M. A. (2013). A survey on sensor-cloud: architecture, applications, and approaches. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(2), 917923.

Cloud, A. E. C. (2011). Amazon web services. Retrieved November, 9, 2011.

Dinh, H. T., Lee, C., Niyato, D., & Wang, P. (2013). A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 13(18), 1587-1611.

Fox, G. C., Ishakian, V., Muthusamy, V., & Slominski, A. (2017). Status of serverless computing and function-as-a-service (faas) in industry and research. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.08028.

Gong, J., Yue, P., & Zhou, H. (2010, November). Geoprocessing in the Microsoft cloud computing platform-azure. In Proceedings the Joint Symposium of ISPRS Technical Commission IV & AutoCarto (p. 6). Citeseer.

Goyal, S. (2014). Public vs private vs hybrid vs community-cloud computing: a critical review. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 6(3), 20.

Koo, D. D., Lee, J. J., Sebastiani, A., & Kim, J. (2016). An Internet-of-Things (IoT) system development and implementation for bathroom safety enhancement. Procedia Engineering, 145, 396-403.

Li, Q., Wang, Z. Y., Li, W. H., Li, J., Wang, C., & Du, R. Y. (2013). Applications integration in a hybrid cloud computing environment: Modelling and platform. Enterprise Information Systems, 7(3), 237-271.

McGrath, G., Short, J., Ennis, S., Judson, B., & Brenner, P. (2016, June). Cloud event programming paradigms: Applications and analysis. In Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2016 IEEE 9th International Conference on (pp. 400-406). IEEE.

Singleton, A. (2016). The economics of microservices. IEEE Cloud Computing, 3(5), 16-20.

Zhang, H., Jiang, G., Yoshihira, K., & Chen, H. (2014). Proactive workload management in hybrid cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 11(1), 90-100.

Zou, C., Deng, H., & Qiu, Q. (2013, December). Design and implementation of hybrid cloud computing architecture based on cloud bus. In Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks (MSN), 2013 IEEE Ninth International Conference on (pp. 289-293). IEEE.