You have been tasked to provide the Chair of the SET Indigenisation Committee with further information in relation to the project. The Chair will act as the Project Executive for the project. The assessment content headings for your project submission are listed below. This submission is due in week 9.
You are to develop a project plan that reflects the project described in this document and aligns to PMBoK and Prince2 requirements.
The Project Executive has supplied a template for you to use which has been tailored to suit the organisational context and incorporates elements of both a project plan and a charter.
Include a title page at the beginning of the assessment item with the following information:
- The project title (i.e. ‘The Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project’)
- Student name and student number
- Campus (DST for distance/Flex students)
The project of Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project is deployed for increasing the proficiency of the culture development method. The students and staffs of Central Queensland University would require the understanding of the operations and the development of the culture and heritage of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island. The staff and students would have to understand the language and the culture of the local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island. It would allow to them communicate with the locals and form the improved operational development of the activities. The project is implied for ensuring that the students and staffs of Central Queensland University would be able to form the deployment of the improved service development. The integration of the activities would be helpful for the deployment of the improved services of the organization and the alignment of the profound system development. The project would help them to understand the cultural heritage of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island. It would help in forming the plan successfully and execute it cohesively.
|
The stakeholder analysis is developed for the integration of the improved functional analysis and the formation of the improved functional development. The analysis of the stakeholder is done for ensuring that the project would be aligned successfully for the modification of the activities of employment and development. The stakeholders are of three classes namely Governance, Managerial, and Operational.
Stakeholder |
Category (i.e. Sponsor / Supplier / User) |
Description of Interest |
Description of Influence |
|
1 |
Board Members, Students, and Staffs of Central Queensland University |
User |
The governance level of the stakeholder comprises of the initial requirement provider and the end users of the project. |
They would provide the project manager with their expected outcomes from the project and later on provide the feedback whether the system developed is acceptable or not. |
2 |
Project Manager |
User |
The managerial stakeholders have to manage the activities of the project on operational level. |
The managerial function deployment of the project activities would allow the implication of the improved project management operations. |
3 |
Contractor |
Supplier |
The managerial stakeholders have to manage the activities of the project on operational level. |
The managerial function deployment of the project activities would allow the implication of the improved project management operations. |
4 |
IT Engineer |
Supplier |
These are the actual working department of the project. They form, develop, and execute all the activities of the project. |
Moreover the project implication is aligned successfully for the management of the improved activities. |
5 |
Project team |
Supplier |
These are the actual working department of the project. They form, develop, and execute all the activities of the project. |
Moreover the project implication is aligned successfully for the management of the improved activities. |
6 |
Trainers |
User |
These are the actual working department of the project. They form, develop, and execute all the activities of the project. |
Moreover the project implication is aligned successfully for the management of the improved activities. |
Stakeholders Engagement Assessment Matrix (3 marks)
Stakeholder |
Unaware |
Resistant |
Neutral |
Supportive |
Leading |
1. Board Members, Students, and Staffs of Central Queensland University |
C |
D |
|||
2. Project Manager |
C |
D |
|||
3. Contractor |
C |
D |
|||
4. IT Engineer |
C |
D |
|||
5. Project team |
C |
D |
|||
6. Trainers |
C |
D |
QUESTION: Briefly explain at least two different methods or techniques to obtain this expert judgement from groups and/or individuals?
Questionnaire: The questionnaire would help in forming the analysis of the improved operations by forming the supportive and constructive feedbacks to the training program development. The information processing would allow the users for the making modifications in the training programs developed.
Survey: The survey forms are formed for securing the ideas from the people and get a clear idea of the requirements of the users from the training programs. The survey forms and forums would allow the users for the development of the information system.
QUESTION: State whether it is appropriate to have a single key stakeholder representing the Traditional Owners of the land on which Central Queensland Campuses are located. Provide an explanation for your response.
No, it is not appropriate for having the single key stakeholder representing the Traditional Owners of the land on which Central Queensland Campuses are located.
QUESTION: Which of the two opening statement styles ‘Welcome to Country’ or ‘Acknowledgement of Country’ is appropriate for the Project Executive to use and provide a brief explanation justifying your answer.
The opening statement of ‘Welcome to the Country’ should be used as it is one of the customary traditions of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island place.
QUESTION: Is the suggestion of using a previously developed cultural awareness training program an appropriate method of requirements gathering? Briefly explain your answer.
Yes, the suggestion of using a previously developed cultural awareness training program is an appropriate method of requirements gathering. It would allow the program developer to take extra precautions for the possibility of the occurrence of the issues and risks.
QUESTION: What document could be used to track or ‘trace’ requirements throughout the project life cycle?
Requirement Traceability can be implied by using the Resource/Requirement Management Plan and following it for the development of the final documents. The project would be completed successfully for ensuring that the training programs would be developed easily.
Stakeholders Engagement Assessment Matrix
QUESTION: What is requirement prioritisation and why would it be important to communicate this process to stakeholders?
The change controlling and the communication of the views would be carried on for ensuring that the project is completed successfully. The requirement prioritization is a crucial factor for the development of the improved project management operation. The project outcome is analysed and specific conformation of the project outcome is formed. The project of Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project comprises of both technological and operational activities.
QUESTION: List the five components of the MoSCoW technique
Must Have: Training Program System and Manuals
Should Have: Information System
Could Have: Cloud Computing System
Won’t Have: Issues in the Engineering Process
The project scope management is implied for the development of the improved functional analysis. The scope management can be formed for the deployment of the specific project activities and formation of the profound system development. The scope management is helpful for carrying out the management of the operations and development of the specific project integration management. The scope of the project is to integrate the management of the project solution. The project scope development and analysis is helpful for forming the support of the users in forming the effective and improved operational development. The scope of the project of Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project at the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island can be divided into two factors namely in scope and out of scope. The in-scope items of the project are project planning, budget, system development, and implementation model. The out of scope items of the project are the transportation cost, communication plan, and change management.
Project Initiating |
|
WBS ID |
1 |
Description of work |
Project Initialization Documentation, Analysis of the requirements, Charter Documentation, Document's Submission, Project Feasibility Analysis, and Approval of the project |
Cost Estimate |
$4,480.00 |
Start and Finish Dates |
1/1/18 and 1/15/18 |
Project Planning |
|
WBS ID |
2 |
Description of work |
Operational requirements of the project are analysed, Activities of the project are aligned, Project Schedule is made, Schedule feasibility is analysed, Risk Management Plan, Communication Plan, and Approval of the plan |
Cost Estimate |
$7,600.00 |
Start and Finish Dates |
1/16/18 and 2/5/18 |
Design Development |
|
WBS ID |
3 |
Description of work |
Platform for the design is selected, Design outline is developed, Design is reviewed, and Design is completed |
Cost Estimate |
$5,280.00 |
Start and Finish Dates |
2/6/18 and 2/20/18 |
Program Development |
|
WBS ID |
4 |
Description of work |
Training method is sorted, Manual is developed, Interface development, Testing and review of the system, Application program is launched, Training Program is developed, and Training Program is executed |
Cost Estimate |
$14,480.00 |
Start and Finish Dates |
2/21/18 and 3/27/18 |
Project Closing |
|
WBS ID |
5 |
Description of work |
Final documentation, Submission of documents, Signing of documents, and Project is Closed |
Cost Estimate |
$3,120.00 |
Start and Finish Dates |
3/28/18 and 4/26/18 |
The project schedule for Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project is developed with the help of Ms-Project Software and the alignment of the improved project management principles. The management of the activities would be implied for implying the development of the specific modification. The schedule for the project is implied for the modification of the activities. The project schedule is developed with the help of aligning system development methodology. The first phase of the planning schedule is project initiating consisting of project initialization documentation, analysis of the requirements, charter documentation, document's submission, project feasibility analysis, and approval of the project. The second phase of the project is project planning that consists of Operational requirements of the project are analysed, activities of the project are aligned, project schedule is made, schedule feasibility is analysed, risk management plan, communication plan, and approval of the plan. The third phase is design development that consists of platform for the design is selected, design outline is developed, design is reviewed, and design is completed. The fourth phase consists of program development that consists of training method is sorted, manual is developed, interface development, testing and review of the system, application program is launched, training program is developed, and training program is executed. The fifth and the last phase is project closing that consists of final documentation, submission of documents, signing of documents, project is closed.
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
1.1 |
Project Initialization Documentation |
Mon 1/1/18 |
Wed 1/3/18 |
3 days |
1.2 |
Analysis of the requirements |
Thu 1/4/18 |
Tue 1/9/18 |
4 days |
1.3 |
Charter Documentation |
Wed 1/10/18 |
Thu 1/11/18 |
2 days |
1.4 |
Document's Submission |
Fri 1/12/18 |
Fri 1/12/18 |
1 day |
1.5 |
Project Feasibility Analysis |
Wed 1/10/18 |
Fri 1/12/18 |
3 days |
1.6 |
Approval of the project |
Mon 1/15/18 |
Mon 1/15/18 |
1 day |
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
2.1 |
Operational requirements of the project are analyzed |
Tue 1/16/18 |
Thu 1/18/18 |
3 days |
2.2 |
Activities of the project are aligned |
Fri 1/19/18 |
Mon 1/22/18 |
2 days |
2.3 |
Project Schedule is made |
Tue 1/23/18 |
Fri 1/26/18 |
4 days |
2.4 |
Schedule feasibility is analyzed |
Mon 1/29/18 |
Tue 1/30/18 |
2 days |
2.5 |
Risk Management Plan |
Mon 1/29/18 |
Fri 2/2/18 |
5 days |
2.6 |
Communication Plan |
Mon 1/29/18 |
Thu 2/1/18 |
4 days |
2.7 |
Approval of the plan |
Mon 2/5/18 |
Mon 2/5/18 |
1 day |
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
3.1 |
Platform for the design is selected |
Tue 2/6/18 |
Tue 2/6/18 |
1 day |
3.2 |
Design outline is developed |
Wed 2/7/18 |
Fri 2/9/18 |
3 days |
3.3 |
Design is reviewed |
Mon 2/12/18 |
Tue 2/13/18 |
2 days |
3.4 |
Design is completed |
Wed 2/14/18 |
Tue 2/20/18 |
5 days |
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
4.1 |
Training method is sorted |
Wed 2/21/18 |
Thu 2/22/18 |
2 days |
4.2 |
Manual is developed |
Fri 2/23/18 |
Wed 2/28/18 |
4 days |
4.3 |
Interface development |
Thu 3/1/18 |
Wed 3/7/18 |
5 days |
4.4 |
Testing and review of the system |
Thu 3/8/18 |
Mon 3/12/18 |
3 days |
4.5 |
Application program is launched |
Tue 3/13/18 |
Wed 3/14/18 |
2 days |
4.6 |
Training Program is developed |
Thu 3/15/18 |
Thu 3/22/18 |
6 days |
4.7 |
Training Program is executed |
Fri 3/23/18 |
Tue 3/27/18 |
3 days |
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
5.1 |
Final documentation |
Wed 3/28/18 |
Mon 4/2/18 |
4 days |
5.2 |
Submission of documents |
Tue 4/3/18 |
Wed 4/4/18 |
2 days |
5.3 |
Signing of documents |
Thu 4/5/18 |
Thu 4/5/18 |
1 day |
5.4 |
Project is Closed |
Fri 4/6/18 |
Fri 4/6/18 |
1 day |
Expert Judgement Methods
QUESTION: What is the hourly AUD $ rate used in your calculations?
Resource Name |
Initials |
Std. Rate |
Documenter |
Do |
$40.00/hr |
Analyst |
A |
$35.00/hr |
Project Manager |
PM |
$75.00/hr |
Planner |
P |
$50.00/hr |
Risk Analyst |
RA |
$40.00/hr |
Designer |
De |
$60.00/hr |
Trainer |
T |
$60.00/hr |
IT Engineer |
IT |
$75.00/hr |
Activity/Deliverables |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
Project Initialization Documentation |
$960.00 |
|||
Analysis of the requirements |
$1,120.00 |
|||
Charter Documentation |
$640.00 |
|||
Document's Submission |
$320.00 |
|||
Project Feasibility Analysis |
$840.00 |
|||
Approval of the project |
$600.00 |
Activity/Deliverables |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
Operational requirements of the project are analyzed |
$840.00 |
|||
Activities of the project are aligned |
$800.00 |
|||
Project Schedule is made |
$1,600.00 |
|||
Schedule feasibility is analyzed |
$560.00 |
|||
Risk Management Plan |
$960.00 |
$640.00 |
||
Communication Plan |
$1200.00 |
$400.00 |
||
Approval of the plan |
$600.00 |
Activity/Deliverables |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
Platform for the design is selected |
$480.00 |
|||
Design outline is developed |
$1,440.00 |
|||
Design is reviewed |
$960.00 |
|||
Design is completed |
$2,400.00 |
Activity/Deliverables |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
Training method is sorted |
$960.00 |
|||
Manual is developed |
$3,200.00 |
|||
Interface development |
$3,000.00 |
|||
Testing and review of the system |
$1,800.00 |
|||
Application program is launched |
$1,200.00 |
|||
Training Program is developed |
$2,880.00 |
|||
Training Program is executed |
$1,440.00 |
Activity/Deliverables |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
Final documentation |
$320.00 |
$960.00 |
||
Submission of documents |
$640.00 |
|||
Signing of documents |
$600.00 |
|||
Project is Closed |
$600.00 |
The risk management consists of the analysis, evaluation, and mitigation of the various risk factors of the risk. The project of Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project comprises of both technological and operational activities. Hence there are possibilities of a number of risk factors that can impact the project. The risk management is a process of developing the improved functional operations that would form the management of the activities. The steps of risk management are explained below,
Step 1: Risk Analysis- The risk analysis would form the identification of the risk factor and then identify the areas of impact. The risk analysis would be done for ensuring that the activities of the risk are aligned specifically for the management of the operations.
Step 2: Risk Evaluation- The risk evaluation would be done for ensuring that the project is successfully completed. The risk factors are analysed in terms of likelihood and consequences on the project. The probability of the likelihood of the risk is classified into almost certain, likely possible, unlikely, and rare. The consequences are classified into severe, major, moderate, minor, and negligible.
Step 3: Risk Mitigation- The risk mitigation consists of some specific methods and principles for developing specific solution for the risk identified and analysed in the previous step. The risk mitigation would imply the strategies for overcoming the issues and reduce the probability of likelihood of the risk factors.
Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project
Name |
Description |
Likelihood |
Impact |
Response type |
Mitigation strategy |
Failure of training program |
The training program would fail to comply with the system |
Possible |
Severe |
Avoid |
Proper testing and analysis method should be used |
Shortage of resources and required materials |
Resources would not be sufficient for project |
Likely |
Moderate |
Mitigate |
Contingency Planning should be used |
Delay in development |
The project would not work accordingly |
Almost Certain |
Negligible |
Accept |
Project Scheduling should be done cohesively |
Design issues |
Design would be incompatible for the project |
Possible |
Severe |
Transfer |
External Designer would be consulted |
Conflict Among Team members |
The team members would form a rift among the project team members |
Possible |
Minor |
Exploit |
It can be used for forming the competition among them for project benefits |
The project tolerances are the factors of the project that can either be increased a bit of decrease a bit for forming the effective and improved project operations. The project tolerances are the factors that form the deployment of the effective and improved operational development. The alignment of the activities would be formed for either increment or decrement of the operations. The Prince2 offers 6 tolerances namely Time, Scope, Cost, Quality, Risk, and Benefits that can be considered for analysis.
Tolerance |
Specific Tolerance allowed |
Tolerance specified for time |
Time is the most common factor for tolerance that can be considered for the project of Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project. The alignment of the activities would help in forming the smart system development that might of might be finished in 70 days of expected time duration. |
Tolerance specified for cost |
The cost is another crucial factor that can be altered for the improved performance for the project of Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project. The project budget is estimated to be around $34,960.00 |
Tolerance specified for quality |
The quality is another major factor for the development of the activities by aligning the specific project activities. The quality can be modified and easily managed by the formation of the improved activities. |
Tolerance specified for Risk |
Risk is another major factor that can be altered depending upon the activities and implication method. The analysis would align the formation of the improved successful development method. |
Tolerance specified for Benefits |
Benefits of the organization can be altered due to analysis of the activities of Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project. |
Previous lessons learned |
Proposed action to address (in current project) |
Lesson 1 The first lesson involved an ‘off-the-shelf’ online training program which failed to properly interface with the universities learning system. |
The study of the project management had helped in developing an understanding for the process of organizing and executing a project. The alignment of the improved project management factors would also provide an ease in the development of the successive project integration management. It would also allow the analysis of the improved functional development for the organization. |
Lesson 2: The second lesson involved the use of a generic cross cultural training package which failed to properly address the nuances which exists between different indigenous groups located in various geographical areas. |
The deployment of the successful completion of the project would help in forming the management of the operations and cohesive development of the improved functional analysis. The deployment of the actions of the project management from Prince2 and PMBOK would allow the users for the integration of the project activities along with the technological development for forming the modification method. |
The undersigned acknowledge that they have reviewed the <Project Name> Assessment Task 2 and agree with the information presented within this document.
Signature: |
Date: |
||
Print Name: |
|||
Title: |
|||
Organisation: |
[Consider who would have the authority to approve the start of this project?] |
References
Bailey, D. (2015). Business continuity management into operational risk management: Assimilation is imminent… resistance is futile!. Journal of business continuity & emergency planning, 8(4), 290-294.
Caruana, A. (2016). A business continuity plan maturity index: a comparative study of Maltese licensed financial services firms (Bachelor's thesis, University of Malta).
Cook, J. (2015). A six-stage business continuity and disaster recovery planning cycle. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 80(3), 23.
Gozman, D., Wilcocks, L., Kovacevic, M., & Craig, A. (2017). Preparing for the wolf: sustainability through business continuity management. Intelligent Sourcing, (3), 50-63.
Henderson, C., Klimas, J., Dunne, C., Leddin, D., Meagher, D., O'Toole, T., & Cullen, W. (2014). Key performance indicators for mental health and substance use disorders: a literature review and discussion paper. Mental Health and Substance Use, 7(4), 407-419.
Hills, M. (2016). Being resilient: business continuity principles for vetinary practice. In Practice, 38(10), 484-486.
Hà â¢ebíÃÂek, J., Soukopová, J., Štencl, M., & Trenz, O. (2014). Corporate key performance indicators for environmental management and reporting. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(2), 99-108.
Olson, A., & Anderson, J. (2016). Resiliency scoring for business continuity plans. Journal of business continuity & emergency planning, 10(1), 31-43.
Parker, E., & Fox, A. (2016). Changing Perceptions About Business Continuity Planning (BCP) in Communities Around Mounts Bay in Cornwall, UK.
Parmenter, D. (2015). Key performance indicators: developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. John Wiley & Sons.
Peltier, T. R. (2013). Information security fundamentals. CRC Press.
Podgórski, D. (2015). Measuring operational performance of OSH management system–A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety Science, 73, 146-166.
Rodger, J. A., Bhatt, G., Chaudhary, P., Kline, G., & McCloy, W. (2015). The Impact of Business Expertise on Information System Data and Analytics Resilience (ISDAR) for Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity: An Exploratory Study. Intelligent Information Management, 7(04), 223.
Sahebjamnia, N., Torabi, S. A., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Integrated business continuity and disaster recovery planning: Towards organizational resilience. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 261-273.
Snedaker, S. (2013). Business continuity and disaster recovery planning for IT professionals. Newnes.
Stark, C. G., & Willemse, A. (2016, April). Maintaining Business Continuity During the Ebola Crisis. In SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Security, Environment, and Social Responsibility. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Torabi, S. A., Soufi, H. R., & Sahebjamnia, N. (2014). A new framework for business impact analysis in business continuity management (with a case study). Safety Science, 68, 309-323.
Wallace, M., & Webber, L. (2017). The disaster recovery handbook: A step-by-step plan to ensure business continuity and protect vital operations, facilities, and assets. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Xing, J., & Zio, E. (2016, September). An integrated framework for business continuity management of critical infrastructures. In ESREL 2016.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2020). Developing A Project Plan For Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/ppmp20008-initiating-and-planning-projects11.
"Developing A Project Plan For Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project." My Assignment Help, 2020, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/ppmp20008-initiating-and-planning-projects11.
My Assignment Help (2020) Developing A Project Plan For Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/ppmp20008-initiating-and-planning-projects11
[Accessed 22 November 2024].
My Assignment Help. 'Developing A Project Plan For Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project' (My Assignment Help, 2020) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/ppmp20008-initiating-and-planning-projects11> accessed 22 November 2024.
My Assignment Help. Developing A Project Plan For Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2020 [cited 22 November 2024]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/ppmp20008-initiating-and-planning-projects11.