Impact Analysis Of Enterprise Environmental Factors On Project Management, Essay.

Government regulations

Question:

Discuss about Tools and Techniques Proposed for Qualitative and Quantitative Impact Analysis Of (EEF).

The “Enterprise Environmental Factors” or EEF is used to achieve the success of any project externally or internally. Moreover, culture, market conditions, government regulations, political situations and weather conditions are considered here that gets out of control.

The management of EEF is crucial for every project team. This is because they put an effect on the success of their projects. This study indents to identify the impact analysis of EEF.

The report evaluates the different external and internal factors and disparate impact on the project management process. The different strategies are developed to impose various appropriate reasons for the actions courses. It has also considered relevant communication over the process and the outcomes of the different stakeholders.

The EEF has always been followed and penned down in a written form. Despite all this, the EEF is still in action and never under team’s control. The process of a project has been getting influenced by EEF and never alters EEF. The only exception present here is development and managing of project team where various skills are created and added to the future ability of organizations. Inputs of EEF have been displaying as the input to different extra processes (Chen et al., 2014). These inputs refer to the various factors external to projects putting a significant effect on the success of the project in every possible way. The environmental factors as per as the PMBOK Guide are discussed hereafter.

These factors have been able to put an impact on ways to manage those projects. However, in some instances, it has also been including project outcomes. For example, teams assigned to the project have been at junior levels and are devoid of any skills, experience and knowledge needed to end tasks of the project. In this case, project managers are responsible for understanding the different factors on the environment of the company (Ibrahim & Mas’ud, 2016). Further, they must take into consideration and account for how they could put an impact on the results and project managements.

The SWOT analysis:

This is helpful to find out what has been happening externally and internally that could affect all companies. This also includes determination of stakeholders and weaknesses and strengths of all competitors. Further, numerous driving forces beyond trends in sales and potential and essential markets are to be determined (Potocan et al., 2016). Lastly, this is helpful to seek ways to be successful in a market by taking the instance of successful companies.

Market conditions

The PESTLE Analysis:

This is helpful in determining the political situation of the country and its effect on the industry. The prior economic factors could be effectively determined by this analysis. The significance of culture in marketplace and determinants could be defined (Shuangyi, Yanan & Jinsong, 2015). Further, it established technological innovations that could be likely to be popped up and impact the structure of the market.  Lastly, environmental concerns for the industry could also be resolved

The analyzing of the environment:

In this part of the strategic management market scenario, tasks or the societal surroundings are considered. The working situation of agencies has been including the governments, local competitors, suppliers and employees and the other specific associations of the groups (Smith, 2013). These forces are directly impacting on an organization and also getting affected by this. It has been influencing societal scenarios influencing operations on long-term effects of various companies. It has been including capital goods and all kinds of infrastructures and scopes (Shuangyi, Yanan & Jinsong, 2015). Multiple influences on the societal scenarios, as per as the long-term operations of the organizations have been including instances of capital good and all kinds of infrastructure and opportunities. The managers are required to generate an assessment of the business and destinations or locations of business areas.

The panning direction:

The planning direction has been engaged the future direction of different companies. It has been indicating that determining of the complete course of companies has been including mission and formulating objectives to achieve the purpose and components of exercises (Shaul & Tauber, 2013).

The planning strategy:

This strategy is dealing with determining of means to gain the aims. The different alternative approaches have been considered very less. Here, for example, tolls to make decisions like linear programming of game theory and statistics, simulation and statistics have been used for choosing the optimal strategy.

The implementation of strategy:

As per as this strategy, every operation such as human resources, manufacturing and marketing is aligned in such a way that it has been able to contribute to a forceful imposition of the strategies (Potocan et al., 2016). The information and control system is set up to monitor the performance and undertake proper activities as necessary.

The managing of varying project communications comprising of methods as demonstrated hereafter. 

Conclusion:

The primary aim of this report above is to put stress on requirements for the organizations to acknowledge the environmental impacts. It has been affecting companies under the limelight of EEFs. The study highlighted that commercial scenario has been mainly characterized by advent in the globalization trends. Further, it is seen that consumers have been getting used to ideas of products that are present for every unbelievable low expenses. EEFs are able to influence both internal and external corners of the project. Moreover, e economic scenario and corporate culture are also involved here. Further it is seen that ethical scenario is been developing. Despite all these the transition states have been seemed to be applicable to the rise in economies. It has been suggesting that the norms have been lagging behind rise of industrialization as per as a foreseeable future is considered.

Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques. New Jersey, USA.

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Jin, J., Wang, L., & Chow, W. S. (2014). IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 326-342.

Fa, L. N. (2017, November). Causes analysis on the serious defect of enterprise environmental responsibility—Based on the perspective of law and economics. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 93, No. 1, p. 012027). IOP Publishing.

Ibrahim, N., & Mas’ud, A. (2016). Moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation on the relationship between entrepreneurial skills, environmental factors and entrepreneurial intention: A PLS approach. Management Science Letters, 6(3), 225-236.

Li, F., Zhu, L. Y., Zhang, J. D., Liu, C. Y., Qu, Z. G., & Xiao, M. S. (2017, January). The application of DEA model in enterprise environmental performance auditing. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 52, No. 1, p. 012075). IOP Publishing.

Liao, X., Li, H., Yan, W., & Liu, L. (2015). Construction of a thermal power enterprise environmental performance evaluation model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks (pp. 55-63). Springer, Cham.

Marmol, T., Feys, B., & Probert, C. (2015). PESTLE analysis. 50Minutes.

Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., Peleckien?, V., & Peleckis, K. (2016). Values, environmental concern and economic concern as predictors of enterprise environmental responsiveness. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(5), 685-700.

Pounder, J. (2017). Enterprise risk management in an aged care organisation. Governance Directions, 69(9), 532.

Rose, K. H. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Fifth Edition. Project management journal, 44(3).

Shaul, L., & Tauber, D. (2013). Critical success factors in enterprise resource planning systems: Review of the last decade. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(4), 55.

Shuangyi, Z., Yanan, J., & Jinsong, Z. (2015). Enterprise Environmental Management Behavior Influencing Factors under the Construction of the “Two-Oriented Society”——Study on Wuhan East Lake High-tech Development District (China Optical Valley). Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 11, 016.

Smith, K. (2013). Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge.

Thompson, C. W. (1963). An Analysis of Environmental and Managerial Factors in the Success or Failure of Small Manufacturing Enterprise. University of Iowa.